How can my categories rank for my different branches? Tidied site up but now local rankings are worse
-
Dear Mozzers ,
I am wondering if someone could please help with some advice and assistance on the following for our Tool hire site:
Basically I like to know how we can rank for our categories for our different branch locations ?.
We have a branch finder page and separate branch pages but I do not know if I should have an internal link from all our branch pages to all my different categories or not or is google clever enough to know that I have x locations and x categories and I should rank all the categories in all the locations. I think my site structure is fairly straightforward and on the face of it similar to what others do who have multiple branches .
For example I enclose a link to 2 of our categories - carpet cleaner hire category and a floor sander hire category
carpet cleaner category - http://goo.gl/cMyS4i
floor sander category - http://goo.gl/4ipUyA
Heres a link to our Branch Finder - http://goo.gl/UyTQdK
Heres a link to one of our Branches for example - Bristol Branch - http://goo.gl/9TXHTK
And heres our link to our google plus Bristol page - google plus bristol branch page - https://goo.gl/h0IwAK . We have link from our bristol page going to the bristol google plus page and visa versa.
Currently within our internal linking structure there is No direct link on the branch pages to the categories ?. Is this something we need to do or not necessary ?. - If we do it , then it may mess up or confuse the page as I someone need to get all the category links on the branch pages ?
We have lots of good unique content , lots of citations for our branches and categories etc but we just don't seem to rank at all well for any of our categories in local search.
For example if somene was to search for - Carpet cleaner hire "City Name " or Floor sander hire "City Name" (City name being where our branches are). We dont rank very well for most of our cities. Even without putting the city name in we dont rank to well in local search.
We used to have individual pages for our categories in each of the cities we have branches with unique content on all and these did rank quite well in a few cities but never top 3 in most and we got rid of these last month (start of Oct) as I was told that google may see this as quite spammy or doorway pages if I have a carpet cleaner hire Bristol page or a floor sander hire Bristol page etc ?.. All my location landing pages now just 301 back to the appropriate category.
I am wondering if getting rid of these landing pages was a good idea as by tidying things up , I've seemed to have lost my local rankings for my cities.
Can someone please advise if what I did was right and what else I should look at doing ?> Could it be an internal linking issue I need to sort ?
Any assistance much appreciated.
thanks
Pete -
Good luck, Pete!
-
Hi Miriam,
Many thanks , I will take a look at the local seo audit. Will keep you posted on the limited experiment etc.
Kind Regards
Pete
-
I like and agree with your above conclusions and ideas, Pete. And it won't hurt to do a limited experiment with a few pages, and just see how it goes. Something else to consider - if you don't want to get back to the point where the site is feeling watered down, you might consider video marketing, instead, for some of those keyword combos. How affordable and reasonable that is would be based on your particular resources Wishing you good luck!
P.S. I just noticed my link was funny in the original reply. Meant to link directly to: https://moz.com/blog/ultimate-local-seo-audit. So sorry - I hope that wasn't confusing.
-
Hello Miriam,
Many thanks for your comprehensive and detailed answer. By the 2 approaches you mention, it looks like we did actually originally use approach 2. For a long period until approx 2 years ago, this was very successful until google changed the algorithms . We then went through a process of writing new content of at least 350-500 words for every location/category combo which did improves a little but no way back to where it was. We did however manage to keep probably a larger search visibility footprint than we would have normally had got. On the negative side though, I did think , this could come across as spammy as there is only so many ways one can re-spin similar content without it sounding poor. Also apart from the NAP appearing on the location/category pages, the content wasn't really adding anything unique to that specific location although we did try and localise them by adding in directions , landmarks and major roads etc and other local transport info to get to our depots etc.
Although most, locations/category combos ranked in the top 10-15, most of them were hovering between 6-10 , and only a few top 3. It was def. getting harder and harder to improve on these even with local citations etc and using schema markup.
I posted a couple of questions to John Mueller on a hangout and also to the google webmaster forum and the general feedback I got , was that these could be classed as doorway pages. Whilst John Mueller suggested that branch pages were okay, and he did say you could probably have a few location/category pages if you offered a service in that area, he was very non committal and encouraged against doing this technique for obvious reasons although, i think if done correctly, it could work perfectly well for some time to come.
We therefore re-structured our site recently to follow your approach 1 and setup 301's for our location pages to go back to the relevant category pages. I think this improved the overal internal site structure and we therefore had less link dilution.
We are ranking for our services <city>in serps and in some cases we are ranking exactly the same or slightly better than when we had the combo/location page but the page being returned in serps is the branch page in most cases as opposed to the category page. I do think this going to be best long term although, I think i will experiment a little by possibly adding a few service pages to one or two of my branches and see how that affects things.</city>
I also think that the internal structure in approach 2 diluted everything far to much and weakened many of my landing pages as a whole.
I also looked at that link you sent regarding the local search audit and ordered the book from Amazon. Will keep you posted on the results from my landing page experiment of adding a couple of service pages to a location or two. But I am glad that It looks like I've been on the right track (thereabouts) with regards to both approaches you mention.
Many thanks
Pete
-
Hey Pete,
I can see how this is confusing, and honestly, the amount of time it would take to come up with a totally ideal strategy here is likely more than you will be able to attain in a forum discussion like this one. However, there are 2 typical approaches in your scenario.
Approach 1:
You have a page for each service (which is what I think you are calling 'categories') and a page for each city you serve. This is the simplest method, relying on having a totally awesome page for each service and each city. The site tends to be smaller with this approach, but it can work if the pages are good enough, have enough internal and 3rd party links, age, use, etc.
Approach 2:
In this approach, you build a page for every possible service/city keyword combo. Most of the time, what I see when businesses take this approach is that they end up with a great number of low quality pages, and duplicate content often becomes a part of the scene. The only time I would recommend this approach would be if there is a) truly unique content to offer one each page, b) adequate funding to ensure excellent copywriting, and c) a reason this will be more helpful to the users that Approach 1.
If you're using a location finder for your customers, be sure the links can also be accessed some other way (like in a menu or sitemap). And be sure no steps have been taken to attempt to represent service locations as physical ones. This could include putting up weird or false NAP on website pages, or building citations for non-physical locations.
So, those are the basic approaches, and after you've figured out which strategy you're using, I would recommend doing a formal Local SEO audit to see if you can dig up an explanation for your missing local pack rankings. https://www.google.com/search?q=ultimate+local+seo+audit&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8
I really hope you'll get more feedback from the community, but I do think the complexity of your website and your dilemma is likely going to require a deep dig, which may be beyond the scope of what community members can offer.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Using the Onpage Grader for Local Business websites
Hey Guys, Curious how people use the onpage grader for optimizing pages for local businesses specifically, I'm interested if people use keywords with or without a geo modifier since adding a geo modifier will prevent more natural writing to increase the score. If you don't use a geo modifier do you have some general rules of the city that needs to be in the H1 and first paragraph etc. Any tips for using the page grader for local businesses would be great Thanks!
Local Website Optimization | | solidlocal0 -
Local Site Linking to Corporate Site In Main Menu - Bad for SEO?
Hi, We have 'local' websites for different countries (UK, DE, FR, AP, US etc.) and a corporate website, the local websites are going to be linking back to the corporate website in the main menu (think about us, terms and conditions kind of pages). Any local products will have their own pages on the local website but global products will be linked back to the corporate website. We will be placing an indication the user will be going to another website next to those menu links that go to the corporate website. Is there any drawback to this for SEO? Should we use nofollow in the menu structure of regional websites for these links? Thanks for your help.
Local Website Optimization | | UNIT40 -
What Mystery Local SEO Factors Are At Play Here?
Absolutely perplexed on the ranking factors for Google Maps (hence also the 3-pack in normal search results). Are seeing search queries that return 3-pack and organic result like this and wondering why these sites are getting 3-pack preference?Not that sites 2 and 3 are no closer to the test user's location than Site 4. All 4 sites have a street address showing.3-pack result:#1 - Site 1 - No reviews. Same distance as Site 4 to user. #2 - Site 2 - 1 review for 1 star. Farther from user than site 4. #3 - Site 3 - 2 reviews for 5-star average. Farther from user than site 1, 2, and 4.#4 (not show in 3-pack) - Site 4 - 6 reviews with 6 star rating, closer to user than site 2 and 3.Organic results below 3-pack:#1 - Site 4#2 - Site 4#3 - Other site#4 - Site 1Sites 2 and 3 not in top 10 organic non-map resultsSo what would be the most likely ranking factors keeping making site 1-3 rank above site 4 in the 3-pack/map results?If on-page and backlink factors were at play, you'd expect to see sites 1, 2 and 3 higher than site 4, and in the case of site 2 and 3 at least in the top 10 of the organic results. All sites were similar distance to the user.
Local Website Optimization | | SEO18050 -
Company with different branches: Generic Keywords & Localized Keywords: Best practise?
INITIAL SITUATION: We offer a branded product/service in different cities. We have different contact pages for every city (—> basically just a form and a map, i.e. 100% SHALLOW). GOAL:
Local Website Optimization | | Cesare.Marchetti
We would like to rank for the branded keyword only (—> more generic search intent) but as well as for branded keyword + cities (—> more transactional search intent) combinations. REMARK: It would make little sense in my opinion to develop the individual contact pages (for every city) to „full“ pages with real content as there isn’t really specific content for the differenct cities to add. OPTIONS:
1) HOME page: target for the branded keyword CONTACT pages (one for each city): target for the branded keyword + city name HOME page: target for the branded keyword + all the city names CONTACT pages (one for each city): : NO keyword targeting at all HOME page: target for the branded keyword + different city names CONTACT pages (one for each city): target for the branded keyword + city name Add CANONICAL tag to main page ???!!!??? What is best practise? What would you recommend? Is there another solution? I really would like to know your opinion. Thanks a lot for your hints in advance.
Cheers,
CesareBearbeiten0 -
Local SEO - Multiple stores on same URL
Hello guys, I'm working on a plan of local SEO for a client that is managing over 50 local stores. At the moment all the stores are sharing the same URL address and wanted to ask if it s better to build unique pages for each of the stores or if it's fine to go with all of them on the same URL. What do you think? What's the best way and why? Thank you in advance.
Local Website Optimization | | Noriel0 -
Ranking could be better - wondering why
Hi there, I do SEO for the page conny-ehm.de. I improved the subsite http://www.conny-ehm.de/bewerbungsfotos-freiburg.html to receive an A grade by the on-page grader for the words Bewerbungsfotos Freiburg. However when searching for Bewerbungsfotos Freiburg it is not the subsite that shows up but the main page www.conny-ehm.de. This however get an F in the on-page grader. What should I do to improve the ranking? I do not care which one shows up but I think it should be feasible to get under the top 3. a) Should I improve also the main page for the keywords? I think than I am building an internal concurrence to the subsite which is maybe rather bad. b) Should I place a del canonical on the main site referring to the subsite? c) ??? Thanks for your answers Best regards Marc
Local Website Optimization | | RWW0 -
International SEO - How to rank similar keys for differents countries
Hello MOZ friends.
Local Website Optimization | | NachoRetta
I work in an digital marketing agency in Argentina and since we have a lot of traffic from other Spanish-speaking countries like Mexico and Spain, we want to rank specific keywords for these countries.
We were thinking of putting new versions of the homepage in subfolders, for example /es/ for Spain, /mx/ to Mexico, etc. In these new subfolders we would place a very similar version of the homepage with a few minor modifications to work specific keywords in each country. For example, in Spain it is more searched "marketing online", and "marketing digital" is more used in Mexico and Argentina.
I have understood that to implement this we would be to place a label hrflang on the homepage directing visitors and crawlers to the correct version of each country. Is it ok?
Another concern is, whether they are very similar pages, Google does not take it as duplicate content ..
I read this:
https://moz.com/blog/the-international-seo-checklist
And i am not completely sure about using subfolders for each country, but i dont know how to position diferents keywords for diferent countries.
Regards,
Juan Ignacio Retta0 -
Onsite Optimization for 2 Locations on One Site
Hello, We have multiple client who have 2 office locations n the same state in varying counties and would like to have their site rank for two counties. Is this plausible ? For instance they would like their header tags to read "Lawyer in Middlesex & Monmouth County NJ" Rather than "Middlesex County NJ Lawyer" Would this be an effective strategy or be seen as stuffing by Google?
Local Website Optimization | | Armen-SEO0