Another Keyword Driven Domain Question
-
So we have a client that has a ton of great links, solid social profiles, content with good keyword-to-content ratio (7.5-9%), etc. This site has been around for a while and performed well.
Recently a new competitor showed up with a very long keyword driven domain and has been outranking our client (and everyone else) for a large quantity of keywords. We own a keyword driven domain that could be used, but should we switch? I am always for branded domains vs keyword, but in this case it appears to be working and undefeatable. We have waited for 6 months to see if it's a fluke, but it has only gained additional ranking.
The site in question has bad backlinks, many spam items, and stuffed content on the homepage. We will not copy that format obviously, but should we take one more step and beat him at his own game?
Our client has Yext Premium, MOZ local, AdWords, social paid campaigns, location targeting pages, fast load time, etc. Overall a good presence. He seems stuck around the 3-5 position on page one, and is looking to push into the top 3 consistently.
-
Hey David!
I like your thinking on that, but from what I have seen, the top 10 results for most established businesses tend to contain all kinds of different things in the description portion of the SERP entry. For example, one will have part of a user review, another will have hours, another will have part of the owner's description. Take a look at some SERPs and you''ll likely see this.
Again, not trying to discourage anyone from writing unique descriptions - just saying that the ROI on doing so may not be great, given the way that descriptions are going to be duplicated downstream + the fact that you will not control what information ends up in the SERP display description field for most 3rd party mentions of your business.
-
Miriam,
Thank you for your reply.
They are about equal in terms of location. While I can't supply specific details, they are both located well within the "border" of the major target area. Geographically, Google should be able to interpret their business location and apply it to the desired search area.
-
Under normal circumstances, I completely agree. The largest roadblock is the client in this case, and that we are allowed to edit very little in terms of content and focus, and especially visual. At one point we had the site ranking higher with a slightly more aggressive use of keywords, a cleaner visual design, and he had us revert the entire site back.
It is my hope that would could use this method to sidestep the client (although he knows that the domain choice is an option and has approved if we deem it necessary), but also add more location and keyword "targeting" for the business and website.
-
You can bet on a keyword domain or focus on how many times words appear on page.
If this was my site I would, instead, be focusing on the message that appears in the SERPs and how it strikes the potential visitor. Then I would focus on the landing page and on giving the searcher what he is looking for when he clicks in.
These are the things that mean almost nothing and everything in my opinion.
-
Sent you both domains.
-
Some of the titles may have changed recently as the client has access to the site 0_o
I find it hard to believe that a site with that few pages and that small of a backlink profile has been given the green light. Call me crazy, but I think it has to do with the "exact match" of many of his elements.
- Business name matches keyword phrase
- Domain matches keyword phrase
- Business name can be listed on site as name, meaning keyword repeated over and over without penalty.
- City is listed 55 times on home page
- Corporate is listed 33 times on homepage
- When I search for the biggest keyword phrase, the competitor's entire domain name is bolded.
I am wondering if since we have so many of these other items in place for our client if that would catapult him to a higher position? I know the person who built the competitor site, and he is known for the quick "clone, wash, content, repeat" method of launching sites. All using the same EMD method and they do great.
I agree the "I" word is a stupid choice, but the client is very particular in the way he does things. Switching to the new domain name would remove this issue.
-
In my opinion, your competitor has the title tag that I would click. I like it better than any other title tag on the first page. It uses clear common language and gives options.
The message on their site appeals to me. I don't find it a bit spammy. In a previous life, I was a regular customer of this industry. Too regular. I needed a roustabout product instead of an executive product. The competitor's message described what I would buy -- but I my experience is very different from this market.
Overall, I like what the competitor is selling and I like how they are selling it.
I don't like the "I" word in the client's name. Huh? I think that people who are in the position that I was in are going to stumble on the name. If you say their name to the person who helps you arrange your affairs they are going to ask you to spell it. If I owned this business I would change the name for that reason, not because my competitor had a better domain. The client's name would have never occurred to me. The only time I use that word is when I am forced to use that word, it's too highfalutin' and I work at a lower, more common, level.
Bottom line.. I think that these guys are beating you because they are beating you.
-
Sent you a PM with the link and details. If you can offer a response I will share it here minus the client info.
-
EGOL, thanks for deciding to chime in. Please see my responses below:
"When you redirect this site about 10 to 15% of your linkjuice will evaporate in the redirect. When you change this domain you will no longer have people typing your domain into search, typing it into the broswer window, all of your brand mentions will be irrelevant, people will click your old brand links and say WTF when they land on an unfamiliar landscape. This is like sacrificing a lot of SEO, a trusted brand and walking away from your tribe."
We will do a sitewide redirect that states "any traffic to domainA.com/subpage will go to domainB.com/subpage". All pages will go to the new version.
HIS BUSINESS NAME is the keyword. This helps him in maps, search, etc. It's seriously driving me crazy. I'll send you a PM and you will see just how Shi**** this other site is. Its wild that Google is even allowing it, much less promoting it higher.
-
So we have a client that has a ton of great links, solid social profiles, content with good keyword-to-content ratio (7.5-9%), etc. This site has been around for a while and performed well.
We own a keyword driven domain that could be used, but should we switch?
HELL NO !
When you redirect this site about 10 to 15% of your linkjuice will evaporate in the redirect. When you change this domain you will no longer have people typing your domain into search, typing it into the broswer window, all of your brand mentions will be irrelevant, people will click your old brand links and say WTF when they land on an unfamiliar landscape. This is like sacrificing a lot of SEO, a trusted brand and walking away from your tribe.
Don't be seduced into doing this because you fear this new competitor.
in this case it appears to be working and undefeatable.
What ?
My sites are on awesome domains. In my opinion then are the best in their SERPs. And, they are not impossible to beat. The people who beat me got to the top because they beat the quality of my website, or they elicited more clicks, attracted a bigger tribe, created more dedication in their visitors, had more panache, or I was screwing up somewhere. Occasionally a site that I think is a pissant will get above me and that will really make me mad. A couple are making me mad right now. One has such an awesome title tag that it probably getting clicked like mad and I think that is pulling him up the SERPs. Another has content that addresses some topics that are extremely popular for the keyword that I am not willing to put on my site.
I'll create something that beats them.
I will tell you right now that the domain means very little compared to the person in charge of it.
So, every morning before you leave the house, get in front of a mirror, look straight into it and yell, "We are going to kick their asses with excellence"... then when you step across the threshold of the office you need to move and act and think like "IT IS SHOWTIME".
So we have a client that has a ton of great links, solid social profiles, content with good keyword-to-content ratio (7.5-9%), etc. This site has been around for a while and performed well.
You been doing great. Keep at it. Don't allow a guy with a biglongbullshitdomain.com to scare you out of your previous good form. Keep the hammer down. Get a bigger hammer. It's time to step up your game.
-
Yeah, EMD's are a pain, BUT they still work! Crazy.
Yes, they have the service areas listed in their site, and they have a great citation score.
We have already submitted the other site to Google twice for 2 different reasons. They are not responding to any of our requests. Some of the backlinking sites even have a score of 5 and 6 in the Moz link spam indicator. It's maddening that they allow this site to stay in number one and two positions with this type of behavior.
We have recently switched them to https and are now contemplating switching the domain. Everything else we have tried. Editing content, editing settings, compressing load times, fetching and submitting, etc.
The other company's name and domain is LITERALLY the entire keyword phrase. Google is eating it up, and that is hard to beat.
-
Hey David,
Like you, I prefer branded domains, and I totally know the frustration of seeing them outranked by low quality EMDs. Ughh - really frustrating!
Are you talking about local pack or organic rankings? If local pack and you are seeing actual SPAM in the competitor's listing, you can report them to Google for that.
Also, if local pack, have you assessed how your client is doing in terms of geography? Are they within mapped city borders for the city they are hoping to rank for? Is there a clear industry centroid and how close is your client to it vs. their competitor?
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Domain
hello there, I have a 12 years old domain with 35pa and similar domain authority pointed to my hosting which I will call domain A. in December 2020 I will lose the control domain A, as the person controlling the domain died and trying to find a solution but is not possible as it's far more complicated than I anticipated, the domain might be retained by someone else and not me. so I purchased a new domain I will call Domain B. my plan is to serve the info hosted from both domains but B as a principal, I think I can do a 301 in domain A but i wish still be visible in the URL until last minute. but i want to start to pass as soon as possible all the link juice. my problems is how can i serve the content from both domains without creating a 301 but and still be able passing juice link from A to B? is this possible? and from google getting all the indexation for Domain B. bot not for A
Local SEO | | fabguy0 -
2 Websites Targeting Similar Keywords
One of my clients is set on setting up another website targeting some of the keywords/services on the main site. One of the services they offer gets traffic from natural search and also Adwords but doesn't convert well for this service. For other services (which are often utilized at the same time by the customers) the site converts well. My client feels that... "people are not converting on the main site because they click on the page and realise that we are a wider company. From this they probably work out that we don’t actually produce Green Widgets and we just buy them in. Therefore we will be more expensive than a company who does manufacture Green Widgets (although there are only a few in the country who actually make them)." The new site "...will have more of a manufacturer and specialist feel. There will be a small mention of other services. People visiting will think we are specialists and that we make them, whereas at the moment they may feel that they are just being cross sold a product. We have also noticed that we are not being found earlier enough and we are contacted to do other work only to find that another company is providing the Green Widgets." I did something similar back in the day, but here we ran a local website and a national website covering the same products. We tried hard not to duplicate the keywords we targeted minimising this as much as possible. I don't think we cared much about the local site as the national one went crazy busy. In essence, my client wants to do the following: Main Site...
Local SEO | | GrouchyKids
Blue Widgets Bristol
Red Widgets Bristol
Green Widgets Bristol (This would be retained) New Site...
The new site would focus on Green Widgets In time the new site would include content for...
Green Widgets
Green Widgets Bristol (As per the main site)
Green Widgets Cardiff It would also make mention of Blue Widgets and Red Widgets as possible addons. The new site would be at the same address but have its own companies house registration, emails and phone numbers. My feeling is that we should take an above-board, risk-free approach and remove the Green Widgets service from the main site to ensure it doesn't upset Google. In other words go out of our way to minimise targeting of similar/same keywords across the 2 sites. My client strongly disagrees showing evidence of others using similar tactics (we have had the EMD debate as well). I am also concerned about Google Places and how this might be viewed here. Opinions please, also any idea of what if any action Google would take if we push forwards?0 -
Variation on the subdomain/sub-directory question... Descriptive TLDs
Hi there, We have a variation on the subdomain/sub-directory question... Our business has two monetising areas, a clinic and a shop. To market them, we do recipes, blogs and social media, rather than relying primarily on SEO, but we do want to up our SEO game. Our primary site is www.example.co.uk This is Wordpress and where we market the clinic, host the recipes and blogs, and is our main email domain. Our second site is Woocommerce, at www.example.shop Our shop market is primarily in the UK, but we seem to pick up a fair amount of international business, partly because the clinic does virtual consultations to many countries. The shop is online only. We have physical clinics across the UK. Both sites cross link extensively, eg with blogs advertising products in the shop. The branding is intentionally related yet different, because they have very distinct functions, and eg. I don’t want to clutter the interface or distract people with blog or clinic once we have funnelled them to the shop checkout. I would also like to separate the blog and recipe elements from the clinic, using a slightly different theme with different functions. We use a lot of plugins, and the more we aggregate functions on the same Wordpress instance, the more likely something is to go wrong. I like the new TLDs because they are more “human”, and they identify where you are and what you are doing more clearly. We do email footers with links to example.clinic (redirected to www.example.co.uk) and example.shop. They are simple and explain what is going on. Conversely, shop.example.co.uk is not so easy to write or read out. www.example.co.uk/shop looks like an afterthought, rather than a shop in its own right with its own home page. So there would have to be a really good SEO reason for me to merge the shop into the main site with reverse proxy or multisite. Do you think that there is such a good reason? If not, by the same token, would it make sense to separate out example.blog or even naturedoc.recipes from example.clinic and use .co.uk as a single page portal to the three separate sites? My instinct, for what it is worth is that Google is smart enough to have started thinking that domains linked by topic TLDs can be equivalent to subdomains, and to recognise that we are not trying to build links from spammy unrelated sites. My last area is about human behaviour... Are people are as happy to click on or type in a new TLD like .clinic as a local .co.uk one? ...when (a) it is not a discredited TLD like .biz, and (b) it gives them more insight into what they will get when they arrive. And since we have the .uk domain, should we switch to this shorter version at the same time? I already use it for custom shortcodes (eg. example.uk/fte6 for people to type in from printed material or instagram). I can’t help feeling .uk has been unsuccessful, and its use now looks bad, even if it is shorter. Many thanks in advance.
Local SEO | | MizRabble0 -
Is it worth tracking both "keyword" and "keyword near me" for a nation-wide directory?
We're a directory of industry-specific services, so a lot of people find their way to our site by searching something like "tire repair near me." For every keyword we rank for, ("tire repair"), we also rank for the "near me" version, ("tire repair near me"). I'm looking for opinions on if is worth spending ~50% of the keywords included in my plan to track these "near me" keywords, or if we would be better off tracking some of the most important "near me" keywords, and some of those same base keywords on a local basis for major population centres, (for example "tire repair nyc"). What does the forum think?
Local SEO | | 4RS_John0 -
Google's rel=publisher tag question
Hi, i have a question about the use of rel=publisher tag on a large retail website with multiple local stores. There is 1 e-commerce website where i want to put the rel publisher tag from the main Google + businesspage. There are also 60 local google+businesspages, And on the main website every store has his own store-page. Is it good to put on all the 60 storepages their own rel=publishertag connected with the localbusinesspages on google? Or should i Stick at the main rel=publisher tag connected with the main google+page? Thanx, Leonie
Local SEO | | Leonie-Kramer0 -
Lots of [keyword]in[city].com domains - what to do?
A client of mine had purchased a lot of domains. They all start with the same keyword following by "in" following by a cities name. The cities are all the cities around their location. They had the pages set up to all look the same with very small differences in content. A bunch of duplicate content. All of them have a DA of 8 and PA of 19. There are 35 of them total. They get roughly 30-60 hits a month each but it's mostly all spam. The idea was for users to type in [keyword] in [city] in Google and these websites show up. A competitor of my clients had done something similar which was working for them. The main website (separate of these) gets ~1500 visits per month of non spam traffic and gets ~10 referrals from these websites. What should be done with these domains? Chalk it off as a bad idea and have them 301 to the main website until they expire? Or can they be changed into something useful? If so, how? Any ideas would be greatly appreciated. Note: I did search for this similar topic but it was hard to search it out and I did not find an answer. Thanks!
Local SEO | | RedKeyDesigns0 -
Keyword Question - Metro Suburb
My question is about keyword selection for a small divorce law firm located outside of a major city. My firm focuses only on family law matters, such as divorce, child support, child custody, and paternity. Divorce cases generate the most revenue. We are located outside of the Orlando, Florida metro area, in a small town about 15 miles west of Orlando. My keyword research shows a significant amount of traffic for keywords including Orlando, such as Orlando Divorce Lawyer, Divorce Attorney Orlando, and Orlando Divorce Attorney. For my location, Winter Garden, Florida, the search volume is reported as "0" using Moz's Keyword Difficulty tool. When I use other tools, such as Google Keyword Planner, the reported volume for my physical location and surrounding cities, other than Orlando, shows a volume of "0." We do get potential clients contacting us indicating that they found us via a Google search, and I know that we are ranking well in local search results. That's the good news. However, we are trying to increase the volume of potential clients contacting us, and it seems that the way to do that is to rank well for searches including the word "Orlando." I know that ranking in the local results for Orlando is out of the question because my office is not physically located in Orlando. However, it does not seem to make sense to target keywords for organic search including my location and the surrounding cities because the search volume appears to be next to nothing. So my questions are as follows: Even though the search terms with high traffic seem to be quite competitive and my office is not located in Orlando, should I still target keywords including the Orlando location? How should a small business approach this strategy as far as keyword usage and organization of the website? Should I have a city landing page for Orlando or should I target my main pages using keywords including "Orlando" and build city pages for the smaller, surrounding cities? Thanks in advance for the help. My website is located at http://www.thegrossmanlawoffice.com
Local SEO | | ajgrossman0 -
Local Search Question re Bulk Upload Feed
What option is best for a Bulk Upload Feed? A. Should this be done in the same Google account where we run our Adwords campaign or B. Should we use our Google account that has the Google Webmaster access? Thank you
Local SEO | | CeeC-Blogger0