Searching for Compelling Hard Data on why B2B Websites Should Be Responsive
-
I am being asked to provide hard data in support the migration to a responsive website for a large B2B website. I have searched for any case studies showing before/after comparisons - no luck.
I can easily show:
- Current data on desktop vs mobile visitors, their bounce rate, pages per visit, etc.
- Google Analytics Benchmark data - really compelling stuff there!
- In the past year, 100K visitors have come to the site from mobile devices.
- GWMTs shows the client not receiving mobile impressions for important keywords,
- All the close competitors have gone responsive.
- In APAC regions, mobile is more widely used than in the USA.
BUT, I can’t show that making this expensive and time-consuming transition will result in more revenue. The client is a financial services software company, with a 2-3 year sales cycle.
Has anyone seen data to support this transition?
Thanks everyone! Have a great long weekend.
-
Happy to help!
-
Thank you Kristina: These are awesome examples. It's just what I needed.
Thanks so much for taking the time to submit these.
-
Hi Rosemary,
I work for a company that's very driven by hard data as well, so I totally feel your pain!
I couldn't find many case studies, but here are a number of articles with specific increases in traffic or conversions as a result of making the switch:
- Here are 5 Solid Examples of Responsive Design Improving Conversions
- MTV doubled mobile traffic a year and a half ago with responsive design
- Neil Patel increased mobile traffic from 18% to 56% on Kimberly Snyder's website
- One of my former coworkers increased his organic traffic by 400% when he implemented responsive design (granted, this was waaaay back in 2013)
- This dude found something similar
- So did One Fish Two
Do these help?
Best,
Kristina
-
Hello,
While I don't have any hard data about this, I do have a few points to bring up as I have some experience with B2B company sites.
Key issues are:
Accessibility: While many don't use phones and tablets at work, they do use them on the way to work, on the way back, at home while waiting for this and that, and often it's in relation to their job if only for a small amount of time. That's a lot of missed opportunity to attract someone on their phone or tablet. What about when they voice search and pull up one of your pages on one of those devices, only to see they have to do all this extra work just to view the content, they're gonna press back before they even realize 3 letters in your companies name.
Brand Remembering: Following up from the 1st point, they will think of your site and company name as " that site that doesn't look good on this or that " which can give off the vibe your company isn't as professional as it should be. That's actually a huge trust factor and one they came up with entirely on their own from just the way the site looked.
Conversions: This one is kinda a no brainer but if they can't use your site, they can't or won't want to purchase anything from it, even with someone else's money. Or lets say they used a desktop to view you site, and even have made it as far as adding an item to their cart but forgot something. If they look on their phone or tablet to remember what they were going to get or to add something only, they might just move on to another site when they can't navigate very well.
Not to mention, Google does give a boost to rankings if your site is mobile ready / responsive.
Your site might be ok for the time being, however the future is tomorrow and everyday after that, of which we continue to consume mobile data at a faster rate than desktops and with voice search the events that trigger mobile sites will only grow. Think about automated cars and how users will spend their time commuting to work, maybe using their phone or tablet, if your site isn't set up for them, it won't be positive.
Hope this helps
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Image in Quick Answer from Different Website?
I'm seeing quick answers where the answer and image are from different websites. Does anyone have any insight into what Google is doing? Example search term: "How to tie a knot" Thanks!
Algorithm Updates | | reese52131 -
404s in Google Search Console and javascript
The end of April, we made the switch from http to https and I was prepared for a surge in crawl errors while Google sorted out our site. However, I wasn't prepared for the surge in impossibly incorrect URLs and partial URLs that I've seen since then. I have learned that as Googlebot grows up, he'she's now attempting to read more javascript and will occasionally try to parse out and "read" a URL in a string of javascript code where no URL is actually present. So, I've "marked as fixed" hundreds of bits like /TRo39,
Algorithm Updates | | LizMicik
category/cig
etc., etc.... But they are also returning hundreds of otherwise correct URLs with a .html extension when our CMS system generates URLs with a .uts extension like this: https://www.thompsoncigar.com/thumbnail/CIGARS/90-RATED-CIGARS/FULL-CIGARS/9012/c/9007/pc/8335.html
when it should be:
https://www.thompsoncigar.com/thumbnail/CIGARS/90-RATED-CIGARS/FULL-CIGARS/9012/c/9007/pc/8335.uts Worst of all, when I look at them in GSC and check the "linked from" tab it shows they are linked from themselves, so I can't backtrack and find a common source of the error. Is anyone else experiencing this? Got any suggestions on how to stop it from happening in the future? Last month it was 50 URLs, this month 150, so I can't keep creating redirects and hoping it goes away. Thanks for any and all suggestions!
Liz Micik0 -
With Google's Location Based Searches, Should I Include a City Name with My Keywords?
What I mean is when you search on Google it seems to pull information by your location so would it be helpful including the city name + keyword still for SEO or would it be just as helpful using just the keyword? For example, a client is in Alexandria, VA and has a computer repair shop so would "Alexandria computer repair" be as good or better than "computer repair"? Just a little curious. Thanks!
Algorithm Updates | | CodyOelker-AMICreativeStudio2 -
Our Developer Site randomly drops 10+ places in Google searches for our Company Name. Why?
Hey everyone, At Betable, we have a player-facing site and a developer-facing site. We also have a developer-facing blog. We have this issue where our developer-facing site will randomly drop 10+ places in Google's Search results for the keyword "betable". This problem can be reproduced by others and in incognito mode, so it's not just one person's results. Furthermore, the developer-facing blog and our social media accounts all suddenly rank higher than the developer site. Even stranger, this problem randomly fixes itself after a few days. This has happened twice so far, and on each occasion there were no changes to the website that would have prompted a drop in rank. After the first drop, we did our best to neutralize any SEOMoz "red alerts" but to no avail, the drop happened again last week. Can someone help us understand what's going on? Are there ways to avoid this? Thanks, Tyler
Algorithm Updates | | Betable0 -
New Search Engine.... Vanoogle.com
I'd like to see google start a new search engine. They might call it Vanoogle.com (Vanilla Google). This search engine would not be stinked up with social data, freshness inclusions, crap from my last query, skewed based upon my IP, warped because of my browser, targeted because of my cookies, no personalization, no image results, product results, none of that stuff. Ads are OK if labeled. I just want a plain vanilla search. Something that I know is "clean". Just like the good olde days. Millions of people will start using it right away. 🙂 Would you use Vanoogle.com?
Algorithm Updates | | EGOL2 -
Google showing different pages for same search term in uk and usa
Hi Guys, I have an interesting question and think Google is being a bit strange.. Can anyone tell me why when I input the term design agency in Google.co.uk it shows one page, but when i tyupe in the same search term in Google.com (worldwide search) it shows another page.. Any ideas guys? Is this not bit strange?? Any help here be much appreciated.. Thanks Gareth
Algorithm Updates | | GAZ090 -
Organic Search dropped 50% Wednesday and has not recovered
I've included two charts below. 1. Our organic search results for the last year and, 2. Results for the last 6 weeks. We were up to about 350 visits per day in June 2011. In late june we added affiliate links to our site and took a hit down to about 120 a day. At the end of august we moved the affiliate links behind a login. Only registered users saw them. And we started moving back up. Last week January 8-14 we were averaging about 550 per day. Then this Wednesday we dropped to 287. Thursday 268. And today is under 100. We have not updated our website at all. No changes. Does anyone have any idea what might have caused this plunge. Has anyone else seen their traffic drop in half. Thanks for your help. dash_month.jpg dash_year.jpg
Algorithm Updates | | openspan0 -
Search bots that use referrers?
Can someone point me to a list or just tell me specific search bots that use referrers?
Algorithm Updates | | BostonWright0