Advertising and negative impact on SEO
-
On one of my sites, I've been trying to get the word out by contacting blogs and asking them to share my site with their readers. This has resulted in some free publicity for my site, as well as quite a few paid reviews/sponsored posts. Note, however, that I've never paid for links, just reviews of my site...
When I started this about 2 months ago, my site was a PR3 and getting fairly lowsy organic search traffic (i.e. 30-40 visits a day from Google). Then a few days ago, my PR dropped to 1. I didn't worry too much though, because my organic traffic was still around 30-40 visits a day.
Now today, I checked and I only had 1 visitor the entire day from Google. Obviously I've been penalized.
My most important question is, what can I do? Do I have an recourse, or do I need to just shut the domain down and move elsewhere?
Second, wtf is Google penalizing this? I understand the argument against paid links, but should I not be allowed to advertise my site? Apparently I can buy links all day long through Google and they'll happily take my money, but the minute I pay some poor blogger to write an article about my site to their audience, I get penalized?
Please help, I can't believe I just destroyed one of my sites like this!
-
I agree with the thin content assessment. Below is what I wrote before I read your comment a second time.
I'm looking at interior pages on the site, and my question is "if I were Google, what benefit do I get from including this site in the index?". What does this site offer that's not already on the web? I visited a few random pages. Several of the offers were expired, some as much as a couple of years ago. The product information is taken from another site, and is duplicated all across the web. The blog hasn't had a new post since January. There is very little to this site that is not from a data feed, from what I can tell. Why should Google include this site in their results, when other sites can offer more information?
On the technical side, don't include "all" in the robots meta tag, it's not an option (see http://www.robotstxt.org/meta.html). I don't know if it's causing any problems, but it doesn't need to be there.
-
FYI, to add some more to the discussion, I had a long talk with an SEO buddy of mine, and he has a theory on why my google traffic might have dropped. Before, my site was a PR3, had been around for several years, but not getting much traffic, much publicity, etc.
Then I started this advertising campaign in early June. Immediately we started getting a lot of links, so from Google's perspective, it looked like there was suddenly interest in the site. Obviously, some of those links were sponsored posts, which Google possibly took note of.
However, if I look at webmastertools in Google, I noticed that Google is crawling a lot more pages. This was probably because Google said "woah, something is going on here, this site is showing up on a lot of blogs all of the sudden" so it crawled like crazy.
However, on this particular site, I basically aggregate deals on women's products. A lot of the content on each product page is pretty generic, like product titles and descriptions that are duplicate content from other sites.
Therefore, my buddy's theory is that Google took an interest in the site because of the sudden influx of links. As a result, Google crawled deeper into the site (keep in mind we have 50-75k products, each product with its own landing page). As it went deeper, it didn't like what it saw, because the content was "thin" i.e. lots of duplicate content with other sites, etc.
As a result, his theory is that Google decided to penalize the site. So in other words, he doesn't think it's the sponsored posts and the lack of nofollow links, he thinks it's the increased attention on the site that caused Google to look closer.
Any thoughts from anyone else here on this?
-
I haven't made any code changes or robots.txt changes, at least not yet. The URL is:
This is a site that historically has gotten poor SEO, I just started focusing on it in the last month by asking for links/articles/reviews from other sites.
-
Hi Dustin,
Do you know if any code changes have been made? Maybe accidentally something modified the robots.txt and excluded most of your site? Has your organic traffic from Bing and Yahoo had a similar drop? Before getting the tin foil hat on too tight, check the robots.txt file and the code on your page and make sure something didn't go astray there.
Can you share your URL with us?
-
That's what I heard from everyone too, don't rely on page rank when it dropped from 3 to 1. That happened over a week ago, but my organic search results were still healthy. Then last night I noticed the big drop down to only 1 organic search result from the standard 40-50 results I was getting from Google.
If I went back through all of the sponsored posts I've received and asked those site owners to add rel="nofollow" to all of the links to us--or at least the ones that disclosed that the post was sponsored/paid--do you think google would remove the penalty? Do I need to do anything proactive with Google to make them reconsider?
-
The site still shows up in google, but I've lost positioning for the few keywords I spot-checked, which coincides with the results I'm seeing from Google Analytics.
What should I do? One idea I had was to go back to all of the sites that wrote paid reviews for us and disclosed it, and ask them to add rel="nofollow" to all of their links. Assuming this is what penalized us, would Google re-evaluate and eventually remove the penalty if it saw that all of our sponsored posts had rel="nofollow" even if originally they didn't have nofollow attributes?
-
Hi
I would wait another few days before confirming that you have been penalised, as this is unlikely. First check that nothing else has changed, especially your analytics tool? What are your actual organic results positions for your keywords? Do you have an adwords campaign, has that changed? Also, I wouldn't rely on page rank as a metric. Instead, use Seomoz DA and PA.
-
Paid reviews are pretty much the same as paid links, becuase you are paying for the content to be placed on a block with links.
The worst thing is if the person you purchased the paid review is listing the stuff on a public forum or public site. Then Google can easily just see the content and hit it hard.
In regards to making content that is not paid I advise to use Guest posts where you make content for free for a site.
You can try and make sections of the site on sub domains and see if they have any ranking, I would also advise to make sure then content is natural and unique.
Maby it is worth while also too type in site:yoursite.com into google to see if it is also still in the index, worst case senario is if Google has removed the site from the index.
My advice is to try a reconsideration request if that is the case.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Schema for Banks and SEO
I'm researching Schema opportunities for a bank, but besides the shema markup available today (like bankorcreditunion) and developments with FIBO, I can find no answer as to the effect of tagging interest rates and such in terms of SERP/CTR performance or visibility. Does anyone have a case study to share or some insight on the matter?
Technical SEO | | Netsociety0 -
Page speed in relation to SEO
I cannot seem to find any information about this, so I thought I would try to get a few people's opinion. How do you think pagespeed is measured in terms of Google using it as a ranking factor? Do you think they use their internal Pagespeed app? Something during the crawl? Your GA site speed?
Technical SEO | | LesleyPaone0 -
Non-Existent Parent Pages SEO Impact
Hello, I'm working with a client that is creating a new site. They currently are using the following URL structure: http://clientname.com/products/furry-cat-muffins/ But the landing page for the directory /products/ does not actually have any content. They have a similar issue for the /about/ directory where the menu actually sends you to /about/our-story/ instead of /about/. Does it hurt SEO to have the URL structure set up in this way and also does it make sense to create 301 redirects from /about/ to /about/our-story/?
Technical SEO | | Alder0 -
Using RewriteRule - SEO Implications
Hi There, My client has a website (www.activeadventures.com) which they relaunched in April 2013. The company sells inbound tourism trips to New Zealand, South America and the Himalayas. Previously, the websites for these destinations were on their own domains (activenewzealand.com, activehimalayas.com, activesouthamerica.com). With the launch of the new website those domains were all retired (but had 301 redirects put into place to the new site), and moved into sub directories of the activeadventures.com domain (eg: activeadventures.com/new-zealand). There has been no indication that this strategy has improved organic search results (based on analytics) and in my opinion I believe that having this structure has been detrimental to their results. My opinion is based off the following: Visitors to the websites are coming into the site with a specific destination in mind that they want to travel to. Thus... having the destination in the URL I believe provides more immediate relevancy and should result in a higher CTR. I also feel that having the sites on their own URL's will provide a more concentrated theme for the destination based search phrases. The new site is a custom Joomla build and I want to find the easiest way to keep the current Joomla set up AND move the country specific sections of the site back onto their original URL's. It seems on the face of it that the easiest way to get this done is to use the htaccess file and use "RewriteRule" to push all the relevant pages back onto their original domains. Obviously we will ensure we also cover off pointing the existing 301's from the new site and the old sites to this new structure. My question is, are their any potential negative SEO implications of using the RewriteRule in the htaccess file to achieve this? Many thanks in advance. Kind Regards
Technical SEO | | activenz
Conrad Cranfield0 -
Dedicated ip helpful for seo
I read somewhere a while back that having a dedicated ip address was helpful for seo if this true or just another rumor? Also I read you should purchase your domain name for multiple yrs, what do you guys think?
Technical SEO | | TinaGammon0 -
What is best suggested component for joomla seo
my site is running on joomla cms. Iam using jreviews, jomsocial. I want to know what is best componenet for seo and better results
Technical SEO | | jayadeep0 -
.lbi file - SEO friendly or not?
Up until yesterday afternoon i had never heard of a .lbi file. It turns out it is a library file used by Adobe Dreamweaver. From what i can tell it works like a client side included but i am unsure of the technology behind it. The issue:
Technical SEO | | kchandler
When running through a recent SEO audit for a new client i found these .lbi files being used all over there site for site wide callouts and even navigation. When viewing this content through firebug or in the browser you can see the executed HTML content but when viewing the source or the page in seo-browser.com the content is nowhere to be seen. So my thought is this is not SEO friendly and is the same as displaying content in any client-side script like JavaScript or JQuery. Any feedback or thoughts on this subject would be awesome, especially if anyone has used these previously. Unfortunately i cannot share the client site but i would be more than happy to answer any questions if more detail is needed. Thanks in advance - Kyle0 -
What are your best tips for SEO on a shopping cart?
So, I am working on a shopping cart platform (X-Cart) and so far don't like it. Also, the web designer is not someone I've worked with before and he is understandably conservative about access--which limits what I can and cannot do from the back end. One of the things I like to do is include text for the search engines. However, based on conversion, etc., I think the product images on a landing page (main brand info with specific products that show up) should show up first to move toward conversion first. I am thinking of adding the text below the product images on the brand pages so the viewer sees the products first while still keeping the content seo. My practice is to use between 300-350 words minimum on a page. Just wondering what best practices you have for a shopping cart. Care to share? Any tips or hints? Thoughts on what I might do that would be most effective? As always, thanks in advance for your sage advice!
Technical SEO | | TheARKlady0