Ose question
-
Hey
why do my websites www.gardeners.scot & www.landscaping.scot not have any links showing in ose?
thanks
-
Hey there!
It's less an issue of a bug in our system and more a factor of how the index was formed this time around. We expect data to normalize and stabilize after our next index update.
-
hi everyone, thanks for the advice, much appreciated
how long do you think it will take for your tech guys to resolve this issue?
-
Another vote for Screaming Frog. Fantastic SEO tool!
-
https://www.screamingfrog.co.uk/seo-spider/ offers a free service (okay for a small site, below 500 links).
That'll cover you as your gardeners.scot site is well below that.
-
Google Search Console is a free one that lists links to your website. I know a lot of people use Ahrefs or Majestic which aren't free to use. Personally I don't have any experience with them.
-
hey
can you recommend another tool for link checking?
ta
-
Another update from the team! This is the most up-to-date list of TLDs that Open Site Explorer currently supports: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/publicsuffix/list/abde055b790f9577d02116da8c819838248a9258/public_suffix_list.dat
It looks like .scot doesn't appear in that list, so my original answer applies here - that TLD just isn't currently supported by our index. Sorry about that!
-
Well, thanks for the update, Tawny; we have clarity at least. There absolutely needs to be a definitive in-house list in place of this nigh-on useless third-party one. This is step two of your 'not showing up on OSE' troubleshooting list; if it had been valid we could have identified it as the problem in minutes, rather than hours.
-
I'm afraid we won't be offering refunds for this issue - Open Site Explorer is one of our free research tools, so there's no cost to get started using this info.
-
well that's disappointing
i guess you'll be offering a refund?
-
I do think that would be helpful especially given that your colleague Samantha said .cc isn't supported here, however, in the list .cc is listed above the line, right under .ca, so according to what you said it should be supported.
-
Back again with a bit more clarity - it turns out that we don't support every TLD in this list, just the ones that appear above the line // List of new gTLDs imported from https://newgtlds.icann.org/newgtlds.csv on 2016-11-29T01:06:51Z
It looks like .scot is actually below that line, so it's not supported by Open Site Explorer. Sorry about that! It appears that this list has been updated since we began using it as a reference. I will check with the team to see if we could put some work into coming up with a Moz-specific list of TLDs that are supported by the tools rather than relying upon a 3rd party resource.
I do apologize for not being able to provide answers that inspire confidence!
-
It doesn't fill you with confidence does it?
Either the list isn't a true reflection of supported TLDs (and they aren't supported - and never have been). or, potentially even more unsettling, they should be/were supported and something is broken within the API.
Neither scenario is good news, however.
I'll contact support and share their reply, here.
Update: See below.
-
You also suggested the same was true for someone recently asking about a .cc TLD - and someone else recently had the same issue with what I believe was a .kitchen TLD - if it is correct that you support all TLDs listed in that link, then all .cc and .kitchen domains should be supported. In fact that list seems to include all sorts of custom TLDs including .landrover, .lidl, .skype, .tkmaxx etc.
Is it possible that this list you reference is simply not correct?
-
hey
does this mean there is a bug in your system?
-
This issue with the .Scot domain appears to cover the whole TLD. I've tested a number of other .Scot domains and They all show No DA/PA and No Established Links. (However, Page Social Metrics do show).
The last one I tested was isleofjura.scot (https://moz.com/researchtools/ose/links?site=isleofjura.scot&filter=&source=external&target=domain&group=0&page=1&sort=page_authority&anchor_id=&anchor_type=&anchor_text=&from_site=)
If this is TLD wide one can't help but wonder if this issue is more widespread?
Could this be part of something bigger, namely the drop in DA/PA after the recent Mozscape API update?
I think this has the potential to be the tip of the iceberg
-
What the deuce?!?!
If .Scot IS supported. you'd expect the Scottish Parliament (http://www.parliament.scot) to show one or two inbound links?! As it stands, it doesn't show any:
Something is amiss, here.
I don't know if you've seen Braveheart, Tawny, but the Scots don't take kindly to being oppressed. If you don't want a lot of hairy, blue-faced fellows showing what is worn beneath their kilts, I'd give someone in the Moz tech department a nudge
-
Shoot - you're totally right - that TLD is supported by OSE.
In that case, it looks like we just don't have much linking information for your site in our index.
Open Site Explorer and the Link Analysis page of campaigns are both tied to our Mozscape index, which tends to update roughly once a month.
Just a few points on how we compile our index:
- We grab the most recent index.
- We take the top 10 billion URLs with the highest MozRank (with a fixed limit on some of the larger domains).
- We start crawling from the top down until we've crawled ~130 billion URLs
The idea here is that we're focusing on the highest-quality links we can find, coming from the most prominent pages of authoritative sites. So, while you may not see every link for a site within our index, we're aiming to report the most valuable ones available!
Most new sites and links will be indexed by our spiders and available in Mozscape and Open Site Explorer within 60 days, but some take even longer for many reasons - including the crawl-ability of sites, the number of inbound links to them, and the depth of pages in subdirectories. This does bias our index slightly in favor of newer links - older links are only cached in the index for about 180 days, so unless the tools are prompted to return to those sites and re-crawl them, they may fall back out of our index after a few months.
You can see our most recently updated schedule here as well as some more technical metrics on our Mozscape API Updates page. You can also see when the last and next updates happened on the Open Site Explorer (OSE) homepage at any time.
Since Moz focuses on quality of links over quantity, we are always focused on the most relevant links to display to our users. It's possible that Moz's index will leave out some of the lower-quality (non-link juice providing) links out of our index because of this. So, that might explain why you may see some discrepancies with what other tools may be showing.
The best thing to do if you want us to find backlinks to your site is to do just what you're already doing - search for those sites in Open Site Explorer. That should prompt our tools to visit your sites and crawl the web looking for links pointing back to them. Depending on where we are with processing the current index, you should start to see more backlink information after one or two index updates.
I know that's a ton of info, so if you've still got questions, feel free to shoot us a note at help@moz.com and we'll do our best to answer them for ya!
-
I'm very confused, Tawny. I checked that list (and referenced it myself, above) as this was one of my concerns. if you search the list for Scot, you'll find:
**// scot : 2014-01-23 Dot Scot Registry Limited scot** Which, unless I'm very much mistaken, would suggest you do (or should) support it - assuming this list gives a true reflection of TLDs you support. I'm quite happy to be mistaken but would be more concerned if the resource you're referencing isn't current or accurate. Perhaps an internally generated list of supported TLDs would be a better resource? **UPDATE:** Having checked this against the Scottish parliament's own: www.parliament.scot/ it appears that you're absolutely correct, Tawny, the .Scot isn't supported. However, there does need to be some clarification about supported TLDs. EDIT (for clarity): I checked www.parliament.scot in OSE and it shows no established links.
-
Hi there! Tawny from Moz's Help Team here.
I'm afraid we don't currently support custom Top Level Domains (TLD) such as .scot - this would explain why there's no data for this site in our Index and why Open Site Explorer isn't returning any data for your site.Unfortunately, I don't know of a good workaround for this - it's a technical limitation of the tool. I'll make a note to bring it up with our product team - I know we plan to expand the list of TLDs we support, but I'm not sure what kind of timeframe we can expect before new TLDs will be supported. You can find the current list of TLDs that we do support here: https://publicsuffix.org/list/effective_tld_names.dat
If you've got any more questions, feel free to shoot us a note at help@moz.com and we'll do our best to answer them for ya!
-
Hi,
Well, there is some good news: A search using: site:www.landscaping.scot and site:www.gardeners.scot shows both are indexing and I can see that there are inbound links to the site.
It could simply be that OSE hasn't crawled the site, yet: "Keep in mind that, while large, our index doesn't cover the entire web. If you have a smaller or new site, it's possible we haven't crawled it yet. When we discover a new link, it’s added to our queue, but it can take 1-2 index updates before we actually crawl the page." However, it does appear to be getting on for a year old, so, unless your inbound links are from sites that Moz hasn't crawled, you'd expect to be showing by now - unless there's another issue...
.Scot is a recognised TLD within Moz:
https://publicsuffix.org/list/effective_tld_names.dat so this shouldn't be a problem.UPDATE: See my reply in response to Tawny, below:
Have you recently changed the robots.txt file, perhaps?
Looking at: http://www.landscaping.scot/robots.txt I note that Sitemaps is showing at the very top of robots.txt when I would expect to see it at the bottom (See 'Sitemap Parameters', here: https://moz.com/learn/seo/robotstxt). I'm not sure if this is enough to trip Roger up, but I'd certainly start my investigations there, as an incorrectly configured robots.txt can cause chaos.
The fact that Google is seeing the site is a good sign, obviously.
Let us know you have you made any other structural changes recently (i.e within the last month or so).
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Change in OSE?
Hi My site http://sassandgrace.co.uk has a 301 direct from the www. version as recommended and, up until last week, OSE showed no results for the www version with a message of some kind saying about the re-direct. This week the message has disappeared and I have half my links (still v small) on www version and half on the non version. Has something changed? Should I be worried? And what, if anything, should I do? Thanks
Link Explorer | | Sassandgrace0 -
Moz cannot crawl domain. Also OSE does not work properly on this specific domain?
Hi all, Moz cannot crawl the domein http://www.hoesjescases.nl.
Link Explorer | | Guapa_zwolle
When I open the crawl report I only see one line: <colgroup><col width="229"><col width="287"><col width="420"><col width="370"><col width="141"></colgroup>
| URL | Time Crawled | Title Tag | Meta Description | HTTP Status Code |
| http://www.hoesjescases.nl | 2015-10-05T12:20:48Z | 404 : Received 404 (Not Found) error response for page. | Error attempting to request page; see title for details. | 404 | Also when running OSE on this domain, Moz only can find 4 root domains while Majestic can find 91 domains. Google seems not to have any problems. What can be the problem for MOZ? Greetings!0 -
Thousands of Missing Links in OSE Report
Hi there, Moz reports 70k+ external links pointing to my site but when I use the Open Site Explorer to export all links, I only see 9,000+ I have tried combining different combinations of fields ('this root domain', 'this subdomain', 'all links' etc) but can never see more than 9,000 links. My website does redirect to www. and have a couple of subdomains, the report for non www. only shows around 120 external links. We also use Ahrefs and the crawl reports here display 40k+ links (on the dashboard and when exported) which makes me believe the problem is not with my website but rather OSE. Any help is much appreciated, Thanks, Jason
Link Explorer | | Xtend-Life0 -
Can't make sense of OSE and MOZ.
I checked this site on my OSE and it shows only 7 inbound links a DA of 14 and no social activity whatsoever yet when I check it on Majestic it shows ExternalBacklinks 71 ReferringDomains 20 Referring IPs 19 Referring Subnets 19 . And.. the page is #1 on google search for hypnotherapy michigan. How can it rate so poorly on MOZ, show so much more on majestic and rank so high on google? I thought MOZ data was supposed to be among the best and that top rated pages on google should also rate high on MOZ. here is the site http://hypnotherapy-detroit.com Additionally, when i look at the site, i notice that most of the backlinks are exchanged links and this site's link exchange page isn't even linked from the home page. Now I thought that kind of link exchange game was now discounted by Google. I don't get it. No social pages at all... low page rank... no new content.. so by MOZ standards there is no justification for this page to be anywhere near page one let alone at position #1. Can someone help me make sense of all this?
Link Explorer | | HypnoPro0 -
Question in regards to Comparing Metrics with MOZ tools
Hi all! After using the "Compare Links Metrics" in the research tools, a few questions popped up. Particularly, in regards to what key metrics to look for when determining if a websites outbound links are trustworthy and may pass Link-juice. Basically, "if my link is put on that website, will search engines trust it"? I've copied an example below and typed a few comments next to particular metrics. Please share some insight them: Page Authority: 48 Page MozRank: 4.94 -Is 4.94 considered OK? Page MozTrust: 4.96 -Is 4.96 considered OK? Internal Equity-Passing Links: 2,819 External Equity-Passing Links: 2,326 -Lower = better? Total Equity-Passing Links: 5,145 Total Internal Links: 2,844 Total External Links: 2,383 - Lower = better? Total Links: 5,227 Followed Linking Root Domains: 88 Total Linking Root Domains: 129 Linking C Blocks: 30 Equity-Passing Links vs
Link Explorer | | 90miLLA
Non-Equity-Passing Links:** I am assuming that the higher the Non-equity passing links VS the Equity passing links is typically better? What would be an idea ratio?** Internal Links vs
External Links: Lower external = better?0 -
OSE results vs. Google
Is OSE still a worthy analyzer of the factors breaking down Google rank of a page or website? More so over the past six months, I've seems to noticed how the page comparison in OSE seems to have less and less correspondence to Google rank. For instance, I'm analyzing sites where the top result has a Page Authority rank of 11, Subdomain MozRank of 3.53, outranking a page coming in in spot #14 with Page Authority of 36, Subdomain MozRank of 3.94. I see this frequently, that by the factors measured in OSE, a certain page with favorable scores is being outranked by a page with poor OSE scores. Of course, I realize how sophisticated Google's algorithm is and the OSE can't reverse engineer the whole thing. Also, there are lots of other factors, such as personalized search results, banklink velocity, and who's in my G+ circles, that isn't taken into account in OSE. Yet, I see this more-and-more, where websites kicking ass in OSE measurements rank poor, and poor websites ranked in OSE come out near the top in Google. So, given this, where OSE is apparently a less effective tool to help analyze the factors building Google rank as Google evolves and values brand, what should a chap do? I already know the predictable answers of do RCS, build your community, and so on. But, I want to know what's driving the juice behind these top ranking websites, and OSE doesn't seem to be cutting it anymore... Your thoughts?
Link Explorer | | ExploreConsulting0 -
What is the difference between a "Just Discovered" link and an "Established" link in OSE?
What is the difference between a "Just Discovered" link and an "Established" link in OSE? How long does it generally take for a just discovered link to migrate in to the established link section? Are there other parameters that need to be met before a link can be referred to as established? Sorry for all the questions in one post, but I've had the same "just discovered" links in OSE for quite some time and have yet to see them migrate over to the "established" link section. I was hoping that when these links become established that it would help improve my site DA. Can anyone shed any light on this issue or have any other comments? Thanks MOZ!
Link Explorer | | GalcoIndustrial1