Local Listing only Showing out of the Local Market. Have you seen this? What are my options?
-
I have a client (law firm) who has been dominant locally for years. A few months ago he stopped showing locally when you search in his city, but when you search from other cities, he's still dominant. Here are a couple facts:
1. None of the competition is in his building.
2. He does rank dominant locally if you select "top rated" in Google maps.*
*Interestingly enough, his competitors on regular searches have great ratings too so its a bit weird that he shows up in front of them but only when you select top rated.
Have you seen this? Any suggestions?
-
Ah, good to know we've narrowed this down together! For another reporting method, I'd tweet GMB @__GoogleMyBiz__ and link to your GMB forum post. If you do succeed in getting Google to edit the spammed names, I would love to hear what you see happen in the local pack after that. It may/may not affect rankings, so your experience would be educational to our community if you can share it. It's been a pleasure chatting with you about this.
-
You nailed it! I actually know for sure what it is now.
All the SEO items you mentioned are completely on point with this client (thus why dominant everywhere else and why he has been top Google for a long time). Even organic. Dominant.
However, there are two competitive firms that are spamming. I've noticed a few times when the spammers show up even nationally, the client disappears. So I suspected they had something to do with this.
This makes total sense now that since they are keyword spamming, that triggers the filter on my client and is completely gone.
I'm not ok with spamming the name (even if there is currently no penalty) because long-term that will be resolved and when it is, we will be there.
I've always used the map edit listing before, but I've been reporting them for 3 months now with no resolution (it just says pending in my account).
Final Question- Besides map edits and reporting on Google forum is there any other way to effective report a spammer?
You've been a huge help!
-
So glad that helped. So, based on your anecdotal account, if the business is located near other law offices, it was previously ranking well locally but is now only showing up when you filter the results or zoom in, it does sound like Possum is a likely candidate.
Overcoming the Possum filter basically comes down to convincing Google that it is your listing that doesn't deserve to be filtered. How do you do this?
-
Familiarize yourself with the major Local Search Ranking Factors (likely, you're familiar with this annual survey, but if you've not looked at the 2017 version, here's the link: https://moz.com/local-search-ranking-factors). You've got to build both the organic and local strength of the law firm so that Google sees it as the one that deserves to be shown instead of filtered.
-
Do a competitive audit. Look at the businesses that aren't being filtered and analyze what they are getting right that your law firm is missing. The audit has to look at a wide variety of factors, including but not limited to:
-
Age of the listing (is the competitor more established?)
-
Age of the domain (same as above)
-
Domain authority (links, content, etc.)
-
Citation consistency and authority + lack or presence of duplicate GMB listings
-
Google-based reviews (mainly total review count, but with some increasing emphasis on rating/sentiment)
-
Page authority of the URL the listing points to
-
Spam (are any of your competitors violating guidelines to achieve rankings, like stuffing their business title, - if so, report them)
-
etc.
So, basically, what you need to do is evaluate your own marketing to identify weaknesses and improve in those areas, while also evaluating the non-filtered competitors' strengths and weaknesses to see what they're doing better than your client and where they might be vulnerable. This is a major undertaking, with no guarantees that you'll automatically get unfiltered right away if you take the right steps to become the dominant player, but I've covered here your basic options for getting it right. If the business is experiencing a serious loss of traffic due to being filtered, it might be worthwhile for them to invest in some professional consulting with a heavy-hitting Local SEO (think Mike Blumenthal, Phil Rozek, Joy Hawkins) for a complete audit and some strategy sessions that will create a plan for improving the business' chances of becoming dominant again.
The problem with Possum recovery is that it doesn't work like some of Google's previous updates have. It's not like you've done something wrong that resulted in you being filtered out. It's just that you're not authoritative enough for Google to choose you as a top result. Joy Hawkins wrote an interesting article on Streetfight about how one business recovered from Possum (http://streetfightmag.com/2017/04/24/when-breaking-googles-guidelines-is-almost-necessary-with-gmb/) but she is careful to state that she's not advocating violating Google's guidelines in order to achieve recovery, though, like many Local SEOs, she empathizes with the business owner's decision to do so. I'd recommend reading that and considering your next steps, which might need to include high-level consulting. Hope this helps!
-
-
Actually, yes he does show up when when he hits zoom once in the city and there are other firms on his street (not in the actual office).
That was a great article, but I'm still a little stuck on what to do next. Our NAP is perfect. The site isn't spammy (offsite or onsite). We have good quality video (and its marketed well). But what steps to we need to take to overcome this. Any articles you recommend?
Thanks!
-
Hey There!
Was his disappearance from the local packs coeval with the rollout of Possum? If there are other law firms on the same block (or even couple of blocks), he could simply be being filtered by Possum. When you zoom in on the map, does he appear? If so, Possum is a likely culprit, though I can't say for sure without seeing the actual listing.
Obviously, the other thing to check for would be guideline violations/penalties/malware.
I also recommend reading this thread over at the Local Search Forum, which is discussing the phenomenon of proximity to the point of search impacting local rank in a variety of ways: https://www.localsearchforum.com/local-seo-ranking/43925-page-hated-within-100-mile-radius-city-loved-outside.html
From your description, I suspect Possum, but this is a guess without reviewing your client's unique scenario. Hope this helps!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
How can I improve my rank on Google Local?
I am bringing this topic up again. Last year, I suddenly stopped ranking for Google Local search results. I tried backing away and hoping it would correct itself, but it has not. When I do a search for myself, I rarely show up in the results anymore, and this image shows AFTER I've zoomed WAY in just to find myself. I think it has something to do with many fishing charters having the same address. I read the Moz article about which signals are most important, but to be quite honest, I don't think any of these competitors really bother with SEO or even have filled out their Google My Business in its entirety. They all have way less reviews than I do as well. I really try to do everything right, but it doesn't seem to help. Is there something small ad obvious that I am missing. Any ideas on what to do?
Reviews and Ratings | | CalicoKitty20000 -
Schema markup for employees and local business on same page - Possible?
Hello, We have some local business sites where we have user submitted reviews. We then post those reviews on that business' page and use the schema aggregate markup. Works like a charm in getting stars in SERPs on branded searches for these location. We already have information about the persons who work at these locations and are about to work out a process where we can get even better data on these persons. Right now they are marked up as employees on the local business pages. Right now the ratings are for the business as a whole, but we are looking at expanding where you can not only submit a location review, but designate which employee you worked with. We work in the health care industry and so you can see why this would make sense. Right now we mark up a local clinic and employees in the following way Local Business > Employee > Person > Name of Person Person Bio > Person info etc We are going back and forth on if this would be worth marking up reviews at the employee level as well. So, on a page each employee would have an aggregate rating and then the location would have an aggregate rating that consists of all of the reviews for that location - a combination of all employees. As I looked through the schema standard for person https://schema.org/Person there is nothing there that shows a markup for the aggregate rating of a person. Also when I look at other more specific business types https://health-lifesci.schema.org/MedicalBusiness same thing. It looks like schema has rating tied to a business vs a person. Right now - the markup validates. It shows up in the SERPs. People are happy. So, I am inclined to say, if it aint broke ... but we are always looking for better ways to present our data to user and to Google. My gut right now, based on how Google is reading things, to just keep the aggregate rating on the location, but start to track reviews on a per employee basis for potential future use. Lemme know what you all think!
Reviews and Ratings | | HeaHea0 -
Local Business: Chiropractic Services & Massage Services - HOW TO BRAND
Hello! I have a client who has a chiropractic business and has started offering massage services. Client has registered a DBA For the massage component of the business. Client doesn't want to cross contaminate reviews and doesn't know whether or not he should brand the two businesses in one name or separately. Currently client has inconsistent business listings for the business and is unsure of the proper way to brand and optimize for local search. Example would be: Chiropractic AAAA Dr. John B - Chiropractic AAAA Massage BODI Chiropractic AAAA & Massage BODI Background info: Main business is one entity and second is registered as DBA. Right now, Chiropractor is a sole practitioner. in the past has had other chiropractors working in the office. Has only 1 website promoting both services Both operate out of the same location. What is the best way to optimize for local search for both services and what is the best way to brand without cross contaminating reviews online. If recommendation is to target local search separately for the services, should the client has 2 websites since these services target 2 different industries. Your feedback is greatly appreciated.
Reviews and Ratings | | BrentV0 -
Rich snippets are not showing in search
We have a new real estate website. It was launched some 3-4 months back. Search results are not showing rich snippets. Although as per Google testing tool everything is just fine(All Good) As per Google webmaster they deduct 0 pages with structured data. Please suggest. The URL in question is **https://compare-properties.com/project/jaipur/melodia **
Reviews and Ratings | | rakesh10 -
Schema Markup for email with review action for Google places listing - Auto segment.
Hi Guys I have been trying to integrate schema markup with review action into car purchase emails to drive additional reviews for dealership google places listings. I have used the below mark-up but im struggling to get the review action when defining itemtype as AutoDealer. When changing itemtype to FoodEstablishment the review action works perfectly. Has anyone got any suggestions why this may be or have any experience using the review action within emails for google places or itemtype other than FoodEstablishment. I have read the great Moz post on this here but im still struggling. Thanks in advance for any help! See mark-up below... http://schema.org/EmailMessage">http://schema.org/ReviewAction">http://schema.org/Review">https://schema.org/AutoDealer">https://schema.org/Rating">http://schema.org/HttpActionHandler">http://schema.org/Property">http://schema.org/Property"> http://schema.org/HttpRequestMethod/POST"/>
Reviews and Ratings | | MBASydney0 -
Why ratings (no. of reviews & stars) still not showing in search results?
We implemented Schema and submitted the pages (with actual ratings and reviews) to Google Webmaster's Structured Data Markup tool a few weeks ago, but the ratings (stars and no. of reviews) are not showing yet. How long do I need to wait? TIA!
Reviews and Ratings | | zpm20140 -
Duplicate Google Plus Business Listings
Hi everyone, We have a client with duplicate Google Plus pages for two of their locations. The ones that are showing in search results for the most part are the ones we control, but we'd still like to report or delete the duplicates (which we do not control from our existing accounts). I used to notice the option to report a page as duplicate but no longer see that...any advice? Thanks!
Reviews and Ratings | | SUCCESSagency0 -
Google reviews only show up in local results, right?
Two quick questions: 1. google reviews only show up in local results right? 2. If you're 100% e-commerce business with no office location, can you even get a google review? Thanks, Ruben
Reviews and Ratings | | KempRugeLawGroup0