Keyword Cannibalization and Targeting Similar Search Terms
-
My website is a collection of educational games for children. We are currently in the process of doing all the onsite page optimization for the individual game pages (they currently have no title tags, meta descriptions, H1, etc.)
We created several different games to teach each particular skill. For example, there are 4 different games children can play to learn vowels. While offering several different games is good for the user, I am concerned as to how best to target a keyword for each particular game page without creating keyword cannibalization.
Being new to SEO, I am not sure how targeting on each page different variations of related terms would affect SEO. For example, if one page were to target the term "vowel games", and another the term "learning the vowels" are these keywords similar enough to cause keyword cannibalization? If yes, would a proper solution be to use a canonical tag and designate one game as the "primary" game page for vowels?
Ideally, I realize that the best SEO solution would be to have a landing page created just for "vowel games." Yet we created our landing pages based upon school level (preschool, kindergarten, first grade, etc) thinking of the user experience where a child only has to navigate to a single page to find all of the games for their age range.
I greatly appreciate any help in better understanding the best way to avoid any potential problems with cannibalization.
-
Apologies I missed your response for some reason - I normally get an email.
You are right in that there is a fine line between each of the games and that sits at the heart of the problem.
1. If it was me I would have a sub-category below Kindergarten games and write 300 words about the benefits of Vowel Games in the description backed up by Meta, title, compelling call to action description and a highly relevant H1. Then write specific content talking about just the benefits of each type of game on the game pages 1-4
Site>Kindergarten Games>Vowel Games>Vowel game 1 etc
And sit all four games on that.
2. If you can't do that then you could have one page for all four games as I suggested (like the Zappos model)
So:
Site>Kindergarten Games>Vowel Games (Vowel Games being the product name)
Then have the four types of vowel game as attributes as a drop down or separate link on the page.
Site>Kindergarten Games>Vowel Game (attribute 1 = letter sound)
(attribute 2 = identifying the vowels)
(attribute 3 = matching upper and lowercase vowel
(attribute 4 = letter and image match)Then all of the descriptive text could sit on this on page and the drop downs could be by via ajax (which wouldn't change the URL), or after the URL # or ?
e.g http://www.site.com/kindergarten-games/vowel-game#attribute1=letter sound
http://www.site.com/kindergarten-games/vowel-game#attribute2=identifying the vowelsetc
If you do it this way you risk splitting the juice four ways:
Site>Kindergarten Games>Vowel Game1 (attribute= letter sound)
Site>Kindergarten Games>Vowel Game 2 (attribute= identifying the vowels)
Site>Kindergarten Games>Vowel Game 3 (attribute= matching upper and lowercase vowels)
Site>Kindergarten Games>Vowel Game 4 (attribute= letter and image match)It's clear that people are much more likely to type in vowel games so this is not the strongest way when you have 1 or 2 above.
Regards Nigel
-
Hi Nigel,
Thank you so much for the response, I greatly appreciate it. So to be a little more specific, our games are interactive HTML5 games that the child plays on our website. So even though creating a subcategory based off brand does not apply, the same logic still applies for the site structure. So if I am understanding you properly, we are ok keeping the games using the sub category "kindergarten" and then targeting keywords using descriptive content for the games based off their attributes.
Site>Kindergarten Games>Vowel Game1 (attribute= letter sound)
Site>Kindergarten Games>Vowel Game 2 (attribute= identifying the vowels)
Site>Kindergarten Games>Vowel Game 3 (attribute= matching upper and lowercase vowels)
Site>Kindergarten Games>Vowel Game 4 (attribute= letter and image match)My only concern though is whether the attributes (long tailed keywords) in the eyes of the search engines are considered semantic variations and still close enough to cause cannibalization. Also, will they compete against each other for the broader, more heavily searched terms, like "vowel games."
Once again, thank you very much for your help. It is very much appreciated when you are trying to learn a new skill to have experienced people share their knowledge.
-
Hi Bza
This is one of the most common problems I come across. I work with a lot of eCommerce sites that face the same problems. Some of them set up all products separately and others group under core products. It also has a lot to do with site structure. It's all to do with how similar the products are.
Example Structure:
Site>Category>Sub-catergory
Site>Game
Site>Games>Vowel Games
Site>Games>Vowel Games>Product1
Site>Games>Vowel Games>Product2
Site>Games>Vowel Games>Product3
Site>Games>Vowel Games>Product4If you are unwilling to set up the Cat Vowel Games then this would be Kindergarten Games (maybe)
So now you have a category - 'Games' - with all of the generic SEO (Title, description and maybe 300 words of descriptive content.)
You also have a sub category of 'Vowel Games' - but with specific SEO (Title, description and maybe 300 words of descriptive content.) all good so far!
You now have 4 games.
Now - if these games are really similar for example 1+2 come from the same brand and have the same name - and the only difference is the size of the game or number of pieces.
Then set it up as 'Brand - Product Name'
The variants 1 and 2 can be in the form of a drop down on the page. The canonical URL on the singe page would be 'Brand - Product Name' and the variants 1 and 2 could be an attribute so hidden behind a # or ? which can be excluded from Google (in the case of the # it is anyway - with the ? you can do it in parameters)
When someone searches for that product and title - yours would likely come up provided you have written some decent product specific content. Yes its a vowel game but there will be features that will distinguish it from other games.
If the products are ALL the same brand and title apart from a measurable attribute then they could ALL be grouped under one core product with attributes for 1,2,3,4 as a drop down on the page. e.g. size, number of pieces.
If then they are the ONLY vowel games on website and there are no others then you may wish to set them under games and get rid of the sub-category Vowel Games as there will be canonicalization between Vowel Games and the single game with the 4 attributes. (This would not be an issue if you set them under Kindergarten Games)
If the games are not the same brand and title and you canonicalise them then you run the risk of Google ignoring the canonicalisation and showing them anyway. Here you also run the risk of Google not trusting your canonicalization structure.
By teh way I would never set up Product 1 and canonicailze the other products as that one. I would always set up a non-attribute URL and then canonicalze the attributes to that one.
For an example go to Zappos and look how they canonicalise shoes with different colour attributes and sizes under one core URL. http://www.zappos.com/p/dunham-fitsync/product/8651820
I believe that with the right descriptive content for each game or brand-title game then you would still rank if someone typed in vowel games. The individual products would come up. Remember that most people start a search with Brand-Title then the type and these three pieces would be in the Title of the page. i.e. in this form: Brand Title Vowel Games Attribute
I do this every day so if you need any further explanation just ask.
Regards Nigel
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Moz keyword rank checker
The Moz Keyword Ranker does not seem to work - it keeps buffering when I add a keyword, Anyone see the same thing?
Keyword Research | | SmartSimple0 -
I'm finding it difficult to make a decision on keywords to select to target for new site?
Hi, I'm doing keyword research for a small site and followed the standard keyword process of using Ahrefs and Google's keyword planner tools to see what keywords are being searched for my service. There are keywords that have a higher avg monthly search volume but they are aren't as relevant as ones that include the word cheap or affordable for example but those ones are only 300 monthly searches per month which seems very small for the main page of the site. Any advice what I should do in this scenario? Do I choose a more relevant keyword with lower search volume or go for one with much higher avg monthly search volume which is much more competitive?
Keyword Research | | TZ19820 -
Should we target Outsource and Offshore on same page?
While doing keyword research I found out that there are 2 keywords with same search count and difficulty level.
Keyword Research | | harshal.khatavkar
Outsource Engineering Design India
Offshore Engineering Design India My question is, should I create 2 separate pages for these keywords with the addition of their extended related keywords or just keep one long page with both these keywords targeted? Technically, Outsource and Offshore have separate meanings but on SERP it seems like both are searched for the same purpose. Can you please share your views on this? Thanks0 -
Optimizing a Webpage without keywords
Hi all, I’m really running into a challenge internally lately in that we have a lot of teams redesigning or building new pages (specificially one team) that do NOT loop our teams in. When we finally get them to work with us, to drive traffic to the pages, they disagree that there must be other ways of optimizing the pages than focusing on keywords with search volume that are relevant to the page. We usually land that they will choose a keyword or two they think a user will search for, we do keyword research and pick something close (because they don’t want to utilize a term that doesn’t make much sense, as they have written the content without involving us from the beginning, but then our search volume is declining). They keep saying there are other ways than changing the paired down content on their page and adding in keywords to the H1 headers, content on page. they mentioned semantic search at one point. For example, https://www.entrust.com/products/entrust-getaccess/ currently ranks around #10 for "single sign on solution." This keyword was on the previous page quite a few times in headers and body copy. Now it appears on the page 3 times after the redesign and is not in the h1. The team does for example want to optimize for this term, but there’s lots of pushback as they want a page with minimal content and little design. Just wondering your thoughts on this. IS this a common challenge you deal with too and any idea on answers as I've tried many with the teams? Thanks, Laura
Keyword Research | | lauramrobinson321 -
Setting Up a Keyword Matrix
Greetings MOZ community!! My real estate web site contains about 500 pages with perhaps 70 pages targeting low volume, somewhat valuable but not very competitive keywords. Three to four URLs target very competitive terms. The following terms are among the most valuable: New York City office space,
Keyword Research | | Kingalan1
New York office space,
Manhattan office space,
NYC office space Such variants as: Office space in New York City,
Office space in New York,
Office space in Manhattan,
Office space in NYC
ETCETERA convert really well How would I match different terms to different URLs? For example I have just re-written the following two critical URLs: www.nyc-officespace-leader.com (home page)
http://www.nyc-officespace-leader.com/commercial-space/office-space (product page) Would it make sense to use "Manhattan office space" and variants on the home page while excluding "New York City office space" variants? At the same time I would use "New York City office space" variants on the "office-space" product page while excluding all mention of "Manhattan office space". Is this logical and does it conform to SEO best practices? For the "NYC office space" terms I would add them to http://www.nyc-officespace-leader.com/listings. This URL has almost no text but a strong potential to rent because of a high number of incoming internal links. Is this approach sensible? In general what measures should I take to prevent URLs from competing for the same keywords? Also, is there a software package or tools that I can use to come up with keyword variants? As a non SEO professional, can I create my own keyword matrix or is this really in the realm of a professional SEO consultant? Thanks, Alan0 -
How reliable is GWT's keyword data & what is the most accurate way of determining keywords you currently rank for?
I have been monitoring the query data (keywords, average position, CTR, etc.) in GWT, but sometimes the ranking data seems off. I filter the dates for the past week, so it is the most recent. I manually check some of the rankings and they are way off. Does anyone have feedback on this? If you have access to multiple domain data, that would be great. What is the most accurate way of determining keywords you currently rank for? I have also used keywordspy, and that is off too!
Keyword Research | | inhouseseo0 -
Am I Doomed with Low Volume Keywords?
I've been pursuing an internet startup for over a year now. We've figured a lot of things out along the way and even managed to start making some modest revenue ~$3,000/month. We're just now starting to dig into SEO and I'm realizing that most of our keywords aren't very high volume. The best have 1,000 local searches per month (exact match) with most being a couple hundred local searches. I'm worried that I've picked a market that's too small, but I don't have the SEO experience to know if this is normal or not. Most of my keywords are rated 'highly competitive' and also are stacked with CPC ads upon Google search. I'd love to know what others' experience with keyword volume is and if I'm just overreacting on limited knowledge. Thanks!
Keyword Research | | TBiz0 -
Choosing keywords for similar products on an ecommerce site
In the case of an e-commerce website, can you optimize multiple pages using the same keyword ‘root’ but including different long-tail variances of that ‘root’? For example, say I’m optimizing for a site that sells wallpaper. I found search traffic for the keyword “buy wallpaper online,” but no traffic for “Blue Tinted Wallpaper” (or its variants) and no taffic for “Yellow Plaid Wallpaper” (or its variants). Could I effectively optimize both of these pages using the root “Buy wallpaper online”, yet distinguish the pages by using long-tail variants such as “Buy Blue Tinted Wallpaper Online” and “Buy Yellow plaid Wallpaper Online”? Any examples of this you can point to?
Keyword Research | | EricVallee340