Should our social network put all of our member profiles in the site map?
-
We're working on some changes to our site and want to add a site map file to give some hints to search engines on our member profiles. Our site has millions of member profiles. I want to ensure that Google indexes them.
Is there a benefit to submitting millions of profiles across multiple site maps?
Is it better to pick a sample of those and submit them? Most member profiles have links to other member profiles.
Is there any benefit to taking a single site map of 50k links and then changing it at some frequency so that all of the member profiles are eventually indexed?
Thanks.
-
This was the approach we were considering. However, what gave me pause was looking at other social networks are doing.
- LinkedIn only has 50k profiles.
- Meez has multiple index files and looks like they are indexing many of their profiles
- Facebook and MySpace don't appear to use Sitemaps (although they do have a crawlable member directory)
- WeeWorld has 500 links
The point is there doesn't seem to be any consistency.
If we end up creating a human readable directory ala Facebook does that achieve the same thing?
-
Totally agree with mike and john.
-
I would definitely do this. Since you have so many profiles, you'll want to have one main sitemaps linking to smaller sitemaps with the profile URLs. One of the sites I work on has several million activities created by users that we put into sitemaps. We automatically generate our sitemaps files frequently and add the new activities created. We include a last modified date for each activity as well so the search bot will know if anything has changed since the last time it's indexed it.
I would create a sitemap system where all of your profiles could be found, and by including the last modified date, you can leave it up to the searchbot as to whether or not a profile has been updated and needs to be re-indexed. There are a couple other properties you could use listed on http://www.sitemaps.org/protocol.php as well.
-
Yes, we have the concept of public / private profiles. Private profiles aren't included in the index.
-
Benefiting or not, make sure users have the ability to turn this off to avoid privacy problems.
It might create a mess though if they link back and forth.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Should Ecommerce Site Give Registration Option to Customers?
Hi All, Should Ecommerce Site Give Registration Option to Customers? What are then advantages and disadvantages? Thanks!
On-Page Optimization | | Arnold31 -
Missing or empty titles >> Site is not part of ARC??
Hello, I have 7 High Priority issues; 3 of them are missing or empty Titles. But when I click on the link I get a blank page with this; **Site is not part of ARC ** Does anyone know what this means, more importantly, how the 'beep' do I fix it ?? 🙂 Mucho Gracias!
On-Page Optimization | | MissThumann0 -
Integrate a blog within an existing site
Hello everyone! I work on a website of a very small company and so far no one has ever implemented (not even thought about) a proper content strategy. The only content on the site are products description. Through Analytics I discovered lots of opportunities and topics to be covered which would massively increase the traffic, increase the engagement and (hopefully) sales. Problem is that I don't really know how to integrate a blog into the existing site; my first thought was wordpress What is the best way to do it?
On-Page Optimization | | PremioOscar0 -
"irrelevant pages of a site"
Hi there! Some pages of my site like "contact" or "registration": Should they have a title and a description tag? They are pages that I don't want them to be shown in the SERPs....Could I be penalized by google If I don't do so? The SEOMOZ crawling tool warms me about this issue (to short titles, no meta-description tags....) Many thanks
On-Page Optimization | | juanmiguelcr0 -
Why is my site not ranking?
Could you please help me understand what is wrong with this site: www.award-certificates.com It simply isn't ranking after about 3 years and I am not so sure what I can do to improve it.
On-Page Optimization | | nicolebd0 -
Site structure suggestions/feedback
I asked this on Reddit and got some some decent answers. I'm curious to see what the pro's of SEOmoz think. I've got a lead generation site for forklift parts--liftxparts.com. You can think of it similar to car parts, where we have sections for specific brands (e.x. Toyota forklift parts) and sections for specific categories (e.x. forklift filters). Right now, the site is structured in two main levels: the top level is a dozen or so brands (separate pages for Toyota forklift parts, Clark forklift parts, etc), and then the second level is the categories (separate pages for a dozen or so different categories like forklift filters, forklift engine parts, etc.).If you check out one of the pages, like Clark forklift parts for example (our top landing page)--liftxparts.com/clark-forklift-parts.html, you'll see that on the brand pages (they're all structured the same), we list all the different categories (with links to the same second level category pages) and "search" buttons. All pages point to the same lead capture form.This has been working pretty well--about 90% of visitors end up on our lead capture form, and a high percentage of those convert. We're working on increasing organic traffic now and I'm thinking our structure could use some improvement.Looking at the analytics, there are a lot more impressions for keywords like "clark forklift" than "clark forklift parts". One gap I've uncovered is while our average position, and by extension CTR and traffic, for phrases like "clark forklift parts" is quite good, it's not so good for broader and higher searched terms like "clark forklift". Should we add another level of hierarchy targeted to just general brands? So now we have content for clark forklift parts, but should we add a page for terms like "clark forklift"? Or should we just add some broader content to the existing brand pages? The pages are quite long already, I'm afraid adding more content to the bottom of the page isn't very functional. Our thinking is that we can increase average position for higher searched terms by adding content targeted to those terms. The question is how exactly to go about it and how to work it into our current site structure? Any feedback related to our site structure or even just related ideas about other ways to approach our goal of increasing organic traffic would be very much appreciated! Thanks!
On-Page Optimization | | wisamabdulla0 -
My site after 3 years has not reached 1500 visitors a day
Hi, I just signed up for Seomoz, but I would like your opinions, please. 🙂 I have a gaming blog for around 3 years. I have a lot of original content, reviews, etc. In these 3 years, however, I have never reached more than 1500 unique visitors a day. Can Seomoz helps me and makes my site goes better? 🙂 Thanks!
On-Page Optimization | | Andarilho0 -
Webmaster tools Site speed?
Google webmaster tools site performance is reading out at 2.8 and still raising (Going further into the slow pale area) this was in the green fast area for a while until now. Is this something to be worried about?
On-Page Optimization | | BobAnderson0