Backlink Dilemma & Typewriters (Seriously...Typewriters)
-
Hi all. I have a bit of a unique issue.
My company, Smith Corona **used **to be one of the world's premier typewriter manufacturers.
However, we have completely got out of that business roughly a decade ago. Instead, we sell blank thermal shipping labels.
As you might imagine, writing content and getting links about paper labels is not easy. Quite simply, no one cares about labels. They either stick or they don't.
Typewriters is a whole different story. We still get tons of calls and emails everyday about them. There are online communities dedicated to them.
I think if I even tried a little, I could get backlinks from people interested in typewriters. The problem is... that we don't do ANYTHING with them at all anymore. I would really just be pimping out our brand name in hopes of getting some cheap links.
The real question is... do I even want these links? If they are semantically about typewriters and not labels, is it really helping my SEO efforts?
Any advice is welcome. Thanks all!
-
I agree with Paddy here. I'm not suggesting you use typewriter links to link to thermal label content - let me make that clear. You should still go after links specifically to the main thermal labelling business pages.
-
Hi there,
As you may have noticed, you have two answered from Nigel and Chris which conflict a little. So I'll do my best to help!
I think the answer lies somewhere in the middle in that in an ideal world, links that aren't quite 100% on topic would still help you, but the reality is that there is probably at least some thought given by Google as to the relevance of the link. In my experience, it comes down to the overall link profile and the quality/relevance of it rather than individual links. Websites are linked to 24/7 from random websites on all sorts of topics, so I don't think it would necessarily hurt you.
For me, it comes down to three things that you should keep in mind:
- As Nigel said, the topics aren't a million miles away from each other, so it's very unlikely that building links related to this topic are going to hurt you
- Your main focus should be on the quality of the links, if you're worried about the quality and the relevance, then it may be worth staying away from them
- I'd recommend a dual approach whereby you use the great history of the company in this topic to get links, but also start looking at ways you can build links for the new era of the company too.
I hope that helps!
Paddy
-
Hi SmithCarona
I'm quite sure there was a smith corona that bounced between family members in my household when I was young and in my mind, the brand name, and typewriters seem inseparable. The problem, as you're recognizing, is that to Google, they're almost inseparable too.
Those "typewriter" links are not going to help you rank for "label" searches. The authority all those links give you is to die for but the fact that they are off topic means that authority isn't doing much to help you rank for your label-oriented terms.
I'd say you have a long project in front of you of seriously cataloging those existing backlinks and wrapping your arms around creative ways the company and website could make use of some of them and even seriously considering disavowing many of them. Maybe seek out a consultant who developed a lot of experience back in the Penguin algo change days because a lot of what you will need to do will require that skillset and toolset.
-
Hi Smithcorona
I absolutely would. I would have a proper set of pages charting the company's history from the very beginning, showing mages of the early typewriters you used to make bringing the story up to the present day. If that leads to people linking to you and sharing your images with backlinks then I can't see it doing any harm whatsoever.
The extra backlinks will help enhance your overall domain authority so frankly, you have little to lose. There is a relationship between typewriters, ie the transferring of the written word on to paper and thermal labels so at least you are still in the same 'industry'.
I would have no hesitation in promoting this and saying just go ahead. Nothing to lose and lots to gain.
I'd even blog about it - 'Did you know we used to make typewriters...'
I hope that helps - Regards Nigel
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Backlinks to an anchor name URL: How Google sees them
I have been searching for the answer to this question and to my surprise have yet to find anything on the web. This is my situation: I have a form at the bottom of one of my pages and have another website that wants to link to this page, more specifically this form. I have an anchor link on the page to this form already. I was planning on sending the anchor name URL to the Webmaster to link to my page so their users will go straight to my form. My question is: do I lose link juice to my URL from this link because it is an anchor name URL? Does Google see this link that goes to a specific portion of my page to be less valuable than if I just linked to the plain URL? Cheers Sean
Link Building | | Tyler1232 -
How do we identify poor backlink sites
We are often being preached to not get backlinks to dodgy or spammy sites but how do we identify these sites?
Link Building | | dynamyt1000 -
Looking for Resources for Broken backlink Building With My Team
I've been doing some reading on broken backlink building but have not had much success with implementing a fine tuned process with my team. I've already read the moz post about broken backlink building. I've also used the www.<a>brokenlinkbuilding</a><a>.com</a> tool by citation labs but found it to be kind of clunky. Could have just been me though : ). Any helpful resources would be appreciated to automate the process better?
Link Building | | Keith-Eneix0 -
Backlink question
Hi all. Here's the scenario. There is a company who provide financial services to their online clients. On ALL their clients sites they have a "payments-by-us" style logo with backlink to their homepage domain name. This means they have over 3,000 links from a multitude of non-related websites - with just 3 or 4 anchor text keywords in these backlinks. No surprise they have been hit by Penguin My questions What it the best practice for these type of linking LOGO's. Should they link to a dedicated page,and NOT the homepage? Should they have branded + anchor text, no text, or just branded? or a combination of each Should they even be a link at all as they are coming from such a diverse group of sites? I understand how Penguin penalises for overuse of money word keywords as anchor text. This is something that has definitely happened here (by the bucket load) ... Assume the anchor text is "Green Chips Finance" and that phrase is also overused and a bit "stuffy" in their homepage. Here's my question - could simply lowering the prominence / significance of "Green Chips Finance" on the actual home page, help in reducing the impact of the damage caused by the thousands of backlinks with "Green Chips Finance" as the anchor text? I say this as they have a similar number of back links saying "Red Chips Finance", but there is no mention of "Red Chips Finance" on their homepage other than in the keywords and a couple of standard text mentions (no H1, H2, alt text etc) ... interestingly, "Red Chips Finance" (not the real words) is Google No1 whereas "Green Chips Finance" has been demoted from longtime No1 to about 4. Cheers
Link Building | | BinaryTris0 -
Web Designers and SEOs using backlinks from client sites
What are your thoughts on SEOs and web designers putting their own links in the footers of client sites. For the sake of argument, lets assume that the client is happy for the link to be there. I'm referring to the SEO merits of the link being there from an 'irrelevant' website. My belief is that this goes against what Google is looking for and that these are irrelevant links and likely to be picked up and penalised. That's what I believe! However, I see lots of sites offering SEO services that have dofollow links from their client sites, using exact match anchor text and they are all ranking highly. Is it just a matter of time before Google sniffs them out and penalises them for it? Or should I be going through my client sites and adding myself a dofollow link in the footer? (with their permission of course). The highest ranking sites in any UK city do this. If you search SEO Manchester, SEO Leeds etc and find the top ranking sites and check them out on opensite explorer, they are all using a disproportionate amount of dofollow backlinks form client sites.
Link Building | | littlesthobo0 -
Directories for backlinks
Hello, I was wondering whether directories are a good source of creating quality back links? Thanks
Link Building | | PeterAllen910 -
Press Releases as Backlinking
After analyzing one of my competitors I notices they show up in PRweb as one of their top rated back linking sites. My question is using prweb or something similar okay to use for backlinking? Would they help at all? Also, since they distribute content, would I get penalized for duplicate content?
Link Building | | floridaoutdoorsrv0 -
Good/Bad Backlinks - Penalties
Just a quick question from someone that is extremely new to this: If "G" penalizes sites for bad backlinks (low quality, spammy) then why are people not building these types of links towards the competitors that are currently outranking them? Or are they? and if they are, is it beneficial? (are your competitors dropping in rankings?) Seems like a fair question.... Any insight is appreciated
Link Building | | Prime850