Meta descriptions
-
When writing a meta description is it ok to use keywords that are not on the page or site itself?
-
You should write your description in a way that will make people want to click on your link when they see your description in the search results.
But be aware that Google won't necessarily pick your description to show—it shows what it thinks best matches what the searcher is looking for. If your description is heavy on keywords that are not on the page and does not contain words that reflect the content of the page, it probably won't get shown.
-
Not using the specific keywords which are embedded on a web-page is fine, writing a description which fails to accurately convey the individual (and unique) value of a web page is not fine.
Meta Descriptions no longer have a 'special place' within Google's various ranking algorithms and modules. A lot of people argue that at most, Meta Descriptions were only ever weighted as heavily as descriptive body content - and that in fact they never held any special ranking significance at all.
So why bother writing them at all? If they don't influence rankings, they won't influence your SEO right? WRONG
Meta Descriptions, if well written (if they seem to be thematically related to the specified page's content, if they're not overly promotional and they aren't full of grammatical errors) - are the most likely on-page element to be chosen to act as a SERP (Search Engine Ranking Position) snippet within Google / Bing's search results. Basically, the descriptive text you see under each hyperlink in Google's results.
A Meta Description won't change your page's ranking position for a given keyword (well, maybe under some very niche circumstances - but it's not common). That being said; a Meta Description which is nicely written, may entice Google's users (or the users of another search engine) to click on your search result instead of another one on the same page.
As such, Meta Descriptions can help your existing rankings to work harder for you (without actually shifting rankings around!)
Meta Descriptions should be written with the sole purpose of enticing users to click through from Google's results to your site. Whether that involves using your on-page keywords, or using alternative keywords - or using no keywords at all, only you can know. Write Meta descriptions from a CRO (Conversion Rate Optimisation) perspective and not from an SEO (Search Engine Optimisation) perspective.
You're trying to 'convert' Google's users, into your own SEO traffic. That off-site conversion is the key, not trying to use Meta Descriptions to increase your rankings (they won't alter your ranking positions)
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Anything wrong with multiple meta descriptions and multiple title tags? We have 2 by mistake
Hi, As I stated in the we have 2 meta description and title tags. Will this hurts? How Google handles this? Thanks
Algorithm Updates | | vtmoz0 -
Do pages with canonicals need meta data?
Page A has a canonical to Page B. Should Page A have meta data values such as description, keywords, dublin core values, etc.? If yes, should the meta data values be different on Page A and Page B?
Algorithm Updates | | Shirley.Fenlason1 -
How to implement meta descriptions for accelerated mobile pages with WordPress?
Is there a way in which meta descriptions can be altered on AMP pages? The meta description is not pulling from the original page for each post, and current plugins such as Yoast/Glue for Yoast & AMP by Automattic do not appear to offer customisation of titles/meta descriptions. Any suggestions would be much appreciated!
Algorithm Updates | | SamClicks0 -
Meta Keyword Tags
What is the word on Meta Keyword Tags? Are they good to have, or bad? Our biggest competitor seems to have them.
Algorithm Updates | | Essential-Pest0 -
Site titles / descriptions change - Google Algo Change ?
Hello, During the weekend 4 of our sites automatically changed their search titles and descriptions at the same time.
Algorithm Updates | | lordish
They are not picking up the real pages: Title, Description. Our ranks are dropping because of this. can you please tell if it happened to you as well or if you recognize a problem here? sites:
http://www.robinhoodbingo.com
http://www.gossipbingo.com
http://www.moonbingo.com in the attached examples:
for the kws searched - the results show different titles and descriptions. results for these pages:
moon bingo - http://www.moonbingo.com
mobile bingo - http://www.robinhoodbingo.com/skin/mobile.php rhMzURw.png 2tRL5dZ.png0 -
Fetch as Google - removes start words from Meta Title ?? Help!
Hi all, I'm experiencing some strange behaviour with Google Webmaster Tools. I noticed that some of our pages from our ecom site were missing start keywords - I created a template for meta titles that uses Manufacturer - Ref Number - Product Name - Online Shop; all trimmed under 65 chars just in case. To give you an idea, an example meta title looks like:
Algorithm Updates | | bjs2010
Weber 522053 - Electric Barbecue Q 140 Grey - Online Shop The strange behaviour is if I do a "Fetch as Google" in GWT, no problem - I can see it pulls the variables and it's ok. So I click submit to index. Then I do a google site:URL search, to see what it has indexed, and I see the meta description has changed (so I know it's working), but the meta title has been cut so it looks like this:
Electric Barbecue Q 140 Grey - Online Shop So I am confused - why would Google cut off some words at start of meta title? Even after the Fetch as Googlebot looks perfectly ok? I should point out that this method works perfect on our other pages, which are many hundreds - but it's not working on some pages for some weird reason.... Any ideas?0 -
Are internal search meta keywords necessary?
One of my duties is to improve internal search results. From my reading, good site architecture and content is the way to achieve that. However, for example, are internal meta keywords necessary? I know they haven't mattered externally for a long time, but somebody in my department mentioned wanting this functionality in our CMS. I just want to make sure I'm not missing anything.
Algorithm Updates | | SSFCU0 -
HTML Not Validating META Title??!!
This seems pretty odd to me. HTML 5 is not validating lots of the typical META content - including, amongst others, the META title. This is typically seen as a standard 'must-have' for many SEOs, including the check-list on SEOmoz. Has anybody else had this issue? And of course, did you find a solution? Thanks, Mark
Algorithm Updates | | RiceMedia0