Meta descriptions
-
When writing a meta description is it ok to use keywords that are not on the page or site itself?
-
You should write your description in a way that will make people want to click on your link when they see your description in the search results.
But be aware that Google won't necessarily pick your description to show—it shows what it thinks best matches what the searcher is looking for. If your description is heavy on keywords that are not on the page and does not contain words that reflect the content of the page, it probably won't get shown.
-
Not using the specific keywords which are embedded on a web-page is fine, writing a description which fails to accurately convey the individual (and unique) value of a web page is not fine.
Meta Descriptions no longer have a 'special place' within Google's various ranking algorithms and modules. A lot of people argue that at most, Meta Descriptions were only ever weighted as heavily as descriptive body content - and that in fact they never held any special ranking significance at all.
So why bother writing them at all? If they don't influence rankings, they won't influence your SEO right? WRONG
Meta Descriptions, if well written (if they seem to be thematically related to the specified page's content, if they're not overly promotional and they aren't full of grammatical errors) - are the most likely on-page element to be chosen to act as a SERP (Search Engine Ranking Position) snippet within Google / Bing's search results. Basically, the descriptive text you see under each hyperlink in Google's results.
A Meta Description won't change your page's ranking position for a given keyword (well, maybe under some very niche circumstances - but it's not common). That being said; a Meta Description which is nicely written, may entice Google's users (or the users of another search engine) to click on your search result instead of another one on the same page.
As such, Meta Descriptions can help your existing rankings to work harder for you (without actually shifting rankings around!)
Meta Descriptions should be written with the sole purpose of enticing users to click through from Google's results to your site. Whether that involves using your on-page keywords, or using alternative keywords - or using no keywords at all, only you can know. Write Meta descriptions from a CRO (Conversion Rate Optimisation) perspective and not from an SEO (Search Engine Optimisation) perspective.
You're trying to 'convert' Google's users, into your own SEO traffic. That off-site conversion is the key, not trying to use Meta Descriptions to increase your rankings (they won't alter your ranking positions)
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Meta robots at every page rather than using robots.txt for blocking crawlers? How they'll get indexed if we block crawlers?
Hi all, The suggestion to use meta robots tag rather than robots.txt file is to make sure the pages do not get indexed if their hyperlinks are available anywhere on the internet. I don't understand how the pages will be indexed if the entire site is blocked? Even though there are page links are available, will Google really index those pages? One of our site got blocked from robots file but internal links are available on internet for years which are not been indexed. So technically robots.txt file is quite enough right? Please clarify and guide me if I'm wrong. Thanks
Algorithm Updates | | vtmoz0 -
Many meta descriptions ignored by Google
Hi all, We have recently added the meta descriptions for more than 50 pages of our website. It's been more than a week and all the pages have been indexed. But still I can see most of the pages in Google results didn't show up with recently added meta description, but the content from page like how it used to be. I wonder what's wrong with this scenario. Please guide of someone aware of this. Thanks
Algorithm Updates | | vtmoz0 -
Meta Descriptions - Google ignores what we have
Hi I still write meta descriptions to help with CTR. I am currently looking at a page where the CTR needs improving. I check the meta on Google SERPs & it isn't pulling through the meta description we have - but other info on the page. This isn't ideal - why does this happen? Will Google just make the decision and are descriptions not worth writing?
Algorithm Updates | | BeckyKey0 -
Meta Titles and Descriptions
Is there no use of writing Meta Titles and Descriptions? I have them added to 100's of my articles but Google picks the actual title from the URL and title in the article only... any reason for this? How can i check if my Meta title and Description are being seen by Search engines but it will just take time to index the new metas may be few more months to change in Search results.
Algorithm Updates | | skandlikp90 -
Google is simplifying my meta titles. What does it mean?
Hi Guys. I've noticed that google seems to be simplifying my meta titles in their SERP for some keyword searchs. Should I be worried about this? Perhaps a sign of being a little 'spammy' in my meta titles? Or is Google just aiming to bring up the most relevant looking result? Based on that specific search? Isaac.
Algorithm Updates | | isaac6630 -
Multiple products with legitimate duplicate descriptions
We are redeveloping a website for a card company who have far too many products to write unique descriptions for each. Even if they could I don't think it would be beneficial to the user. However they do have unique descriptions for each range which is useful for users viewing an individual card. Which is better practice: a) Ignore the duplicate content issue and supply the user with info about the range b) Provide clear enticing links to find out more about the range which will leave the individual card page a little void of content. Many thanks
Algorithm Updates | | SoundinTheory0 -
Meta description & Meta keywords
Good morning, One of our HTML experts, just told me that Google is not reading meta keywords or meta description - and they (or one of them) are no longer part of my website SEO ranking Do you know where can i read about it? Are other SE do look at these parameters? Thank you SEOWiseUs
Algorithm Updates | | iivgi1 -
Keyword density and meta tags
Hi, I've just checked the number of keywords appearing on my website's pages. On some of them the keyword density was way too high (7-10%) if you included the meta tags, but all under 3.5% if I didn't include the keywords and description meta tags. So my question is - when looking at number of keywords used per page, do I have to worry about what's in those meta tags? Do the keywords in there count towards keyword density / number of keywords per page? Thanks, Luke
Algorithm Updates | | McTaggart0