Product Subdomain Outranking "Marketing" Domains
-
Hello, Moz community!
I have been puzzling about what to do for a client. Here is the challenge.
The client's "product"/welcome page lives at
this page allows the visitor to select the country/informational site they want OR to login to their subdomain/install of the product.
Google is choosing this www.client.com url as the main result for client brand searches.
In a perfect world, for searchers in the US, we would get served the client's US version of the information/marketing site which lives at https://client.com/us, and so on for other country level content (also living in a directory for that country)
It's a brand new client, we've done geo-targeting within the search console, and I'm kind of scared to rock the boat by de-indexing this www.client.com welcome screen.
Any thoughts, ideas, potential solutions are so appreciated.
THANKS!
Thank you!
-
thanks! Such a great answer.
-
You are very right to be worried about rocking that particular boat. If you de-index a page, it basically nullifies its SEO authority. Since the page which you would nullify, is a homepage-level URL (you gave the example 'www.client.com') then this would basically be SEOicide
Most other pages on your site, probably get most of their SEO authority and ranking power from your homepage (directly or indirectly, e.g: homepage linking to sub-page vs homepage linking to category, which then links to sub-page)
This is because, it's almost certain that your homepage will be the URL which has gained the most links from across the web. People are lazy, they just pick the shortest URL when linking. I'm not saying you don't have good deeplinks, just that 'most' of the good ones are probably hitting the homepage
So if you nullify the homepage's right to hold SEO authority, what happens to everything underneath the homepage? Are you imagining an avalanche right now? That's right, this would be one of the worst possible ideas in the universe. Write it down, print it out and burn it
Search-console level geo-targeting is for whole sites, not pages or (usually, though there can be exceptions) sections - you know that right? What that does is tell Google which country you want the website (the whole property which you have selected) to rank in. It basically stops that property from ranking well globally and gives minor boosts in the location which has been selected. If you just took your homepage level property and told it that it's US now, prepare to kiss most of your other traffic goodbye (hard lesson). If you were semi-smart and added /US/ as a separate property, and only set the geo targeting to US for that property - breathe a sigh of relief. It likely won't solve your issue but it won't be a complete catastrophe either (phew!)
Really the only decent tool you have to direct Google to rank individual web pages for regions and / or languages is the hreflang tag. These tags tell Google: "hey, you landed on me and I'm a valid page. But if you want to see versions of me in other languages - go to these other URLs through my hreflang links". Hreflangs only work if they are mutually agreed (both pages contain mirrored hreflangs to each other, and both pages do NOT give multiple URLs for a single language / location combination - or language / location in isolation)
The problem is, even if you do everything right - Google really has to believe "yes, this other page is another version of exactly the same page I'm looking at right now". Google can do stuff like, take the main content of both URLs, put it into a single string, then check the Boolean string similarity of both content strings to find the 'percentage' of the content's similarity. Well, this is how I check content similarity - Google does something similar, but probably infinitely more elegant and clever. In the case of hreflangs string translation is probably also enacted
If Google's mechanical mind, thinks that the pages are very different - then it will simply ignore the hreflang (just like Google will not pass SEO authority through a 301 redirect, if the contents of the old and new page are highly dissimilar in machine terms)
This is a fail-safe that Google has, to stop people from moving high rankings on 'useful' or 'proven' (via hyperlinks) URLs (content) - onto less useful, or less proven pages (which by Google's logic, if the content is very different, should have to re-prove their worth). Remember, what a human thinks is similar is irrelevant here. You need to focus on what a machine would find similar (can be VERY different things there)
So even if you do it all properly and use hreflangs, since the nature of the pages is very different (one is functional, helps users navigate, log-in and download something - that's very useful; whilst the other is selly, marketing content is usually thin) - it's unlikely that Google will swallow your intended URL serves
You'd be better off making the homepage include some marketing elements and making the marketing URLs include some of the functional elements. If both pages do both things well and are essentially the same, then hreflangs might actually start to work
If you want to keep the marketing URLs pure sell, fine - but they will only be useful as paid traffic landing pages (like from Google Ads, Pinterest Ads or FaceBook ads) where you can connect your ad to the advertorial (marketing) URLs. People expect ads to land on marketing-centric pages. People don't expect (or necessarily want) that for just regular web searches. The channel (SEO) is called 'organic' for a reason!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
'domain:example.com/' is this line with a '/' at the end of the domain valid in a disavow report file ?
Hi everyone Just out of curiosity, what would happen if in my disavow report I have this line : domain:example.com**/** instead of domain:example.com as recommended by google. I was just wondering if adding a / at the end of a domain would automatically render the line invalid and ignored by Google's disavow backlinks tool. Many thanks for your thoughts
Technical SEO | | LabeliumUSA0 -
How to de-index a page with a search string with the structure domain.com/?"spam"
The site in question was hacked years ago. All the security scans come up clean but the seo crawlers like semrush and ahrefs still show it as an indexed page. I can even click through on it and it takes me to the homepage with no 301. Where is the page and how to deindex it? domain/com/?spam There are multiple instances of this. http://www.clipular.com/c/5579083284217856.png?k=Q173VG9pkRrxBl0b5prNqIozPZI
Technical SEO | | Miamirealestatetrendsguy1 -
"Ghost" errors on blog structured data?
Hi, I'm working on a blog which Search Console account advises me about a big bunch of errors on its structured data: Structured data - graphics Structured data - hentry list Structured data - detail But I get to https://developers.google.com/structured-data/testing-tool/ and it tells me "all is ok": Structured data - test Any clue? Thanks in advance, F0NE5lz.png hm7IBtV.png aCRJdJO.jpg 15SRo93.jpg
Technical SEO | | Webicultors0 -
Does using data-href="" work more effectively than href="" rel="nofollow"?
I've been looking at some bigger enterprise sites and noticed some of them used HTML like this: <a <="" span="">data-href="http://www.otherodmain.com/" class="nofollow" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a> <a <="" span="">Instead of a regular href="" Does using data-href and some javascript help with shaping internal links, rather than just using a strict nofollow?</a>
Technical SEO | | JDatSB0 -
Google ignores Meta name="Robots"
Ciao from 24 degrees C wetherby UK, On this page http://www.perspex.co.uk/products/palopaque-cladding/ this line was added to block indexing: But it has not worked, when you google "Palopaque PVC Wall Cladding" the page appears in the SERPS. I'm going to upload a robots txt file in a second attempt to block indexing but my question is please:
Technical SEO | | Nightwing
Why is it being indexed? Grazie,
David0 -
Will Links to one Sub-Domain on a Site hurt a different Sub-Domain on the same site by affecting the Quality of the Root Domain?
Hi, I work for a SaaS company which uses two different subdomains on our site. A public for our main site (which we want to rank in SERPs for), and a secure subdomain, which is the portal for our customers to access our services (which we don't want to rank for) . Recently I realized that by using our product, our customers are creating large amounts of low quality links to our secure subdomain and I'm concerned that this might affect our public subdomain by bringing down the overall Authority of our root domain. Is this a legitimate concern? Has anyone ever worked through a similar situation? any help is appreciated!
Technical SEO | | ifbyphone0 -
Why "title missing or empty" when title tag exists?
Greetings! On Dec 1, 2011 in a SEOMoz campaign, two crawl metrics shot up from zero (Nov 17, Nov 24). "Title missing or empty" was 9,676. "Duplicate page content" was 9,678. Whoa! Content at site has not changed. I checked a sample of web pages and each seems to have a proper TITLE tag. Page content differs as well -- albeit we list electronic part numbers of hard-to-find parts, which look similar. I found a similar post http://www.seomoz.org/q/why-crawl-error-title-missing-or-empty-when-there-is-already-title-and-meta-desciption-in-place . In answer, Sha ran Screaming Frog crawler. I ran Frog crawler on a few hundred pages. Titles were found and hash codes were unique. Hmmm. Site with errors is http://electronics1.usbid.com Small sample of pages with errors: electronics1.usbid.com/catalog_10.html
Technical SEO | | groovykarma
electronics1.usbid.com/catalog_100.html
electronics1.usbid.com/catalog_1000.html I've tried to reproduce errors yet I cannot. What am I missing please? Thanks kindly, Loren0 -
Hyphenated Domain Names - "Spammy" or Not?
Some say hyphenated domain names are "spammy". I have also noticed that Moz's On Page Keyword Tool does NOT recognize keywords in a non-hyphenated domain name. So one would assume neither do the bots. I noticed obviously misleading words like car in carnival or spa in space or spatula, etc embedded in domain names and pondered the effect. I took it a step further with non-hyphenated domain names. I experimented by selecting totally random three or four letter blocks - Example: randomfactgenerator.net - rand omf act gene rator Each one of those clips returns copious results AND the On-Page Report Card does not credit the domain name as containing "random facts" as keywords**,** whereas www.business-sales-sarasota.com does get credit for "business sales sarasota" in the URL. This seems an obvious situation - unhyphenated domains can scramble the keywords and confuse the bots, as they search all possible combinations. YES - I know the content should carry it but - I do not believe domain names are irrelevant, as many say. I don't believe that hyphenated domain names are not more efficient than non hyphenated ones - as long as you don't overdo it. I have also seen where a weak site in an easy market will quickly top the list because the hyphenated domain name matches the search term - I have done it (in my pre Seo Moz days) with ft-myers-auto-air.com. I built the site in a couple of days and in a couple weeks it was on page one. Any thoughts on this?
Technical SEO | | dcmike0