Is DA a reliable domain metric?
-
I use DA and PA every day for reporting, researching and most of the time it's a pretty good metric to compare domains and pages but recently I did an experiment and I was surprised when I saw the results.
Two months ago I "link bombed" one of my old, unused websites with thousands of spammy blog comment links. Before the attack, its DA was 21 with a few hundred links.
In August, after the recent OSE update I checked the website again and I was quite surprised to see DA 61 as a results of 8340 links.
A DA value over 60 is considered pretty strong and it's interesting to see that spammy blog comment links could change it so significantly. Someone who doesn't know the history of the domain might get interested in advertising on such websites because the mozbar shows a high DA value.
I know it's difficult to algorithmically differentiate between spammy and valuable blogs but a future OSE update could focus on this issue.
Let me know what you think.
-
Do you guys know the Bad Neighborhood tool? It's a pretty simple tool and I use it to quickly check websites for links, dodgy anchor texts and anything suspicious. I would implement a similar method in the DA calculation.
-
The validity of PA and DA is something which must be of great interest to us all. I have recently looked at a spammy page with PR3 but PA of 72? Another aspect of Link Quality is relevancy, which cant be incorporated in to a metric, as relevancy only exists when the backlink has been built.. That would be interesting if a tool could look at a back link and incorporate relevancy in to an Authority metric. All in all PA/DA has been very useful and I look forward to future refinements.
-
Thanks for explaining Gyorgy.
I agree with you there is definitely room for improvement. I know the present focus is the Linkscape tool. If you have any specific suggestions for improving DA, then you may want to submit them to the help desk so they can be considered. The help desk staff does not regularly read the Q&A.
-
I'm afraid you misunderstood my post.
I know that it's only a link metric but since DA and PA is becoming a standard in the SEO world, future updates should consider more variables in the calculation, because online advertising professionals often use and refer to the mozbar for site comparisons.
"DA is mainly a measure of link counts based on the linking page's DA/PA"
Probably it's more than that. The [DA specification page]( It uses a machine learning model to predicatively find an algorithm that best correlates with rankings across thousands of search results that we predict against.) talks about machine learning and that's exactly where this spammy site analysis could improve the calculation. Algorithmically it should be too complicated to filter spammy sites and lower the value of links coming from those pages.
This post is just a tip for SEOMoz' further improvements, because I do like the team and their tools. A software can be improved by continuos testing and by talking about the weaker parts.
-
DA is a very useful metric, but the tool's limitations must be understood. There are several:
The main thing to recognize when using DA is it's based upon the Linkscape crawl of the web. SEOmoz is working to improve the tool, but there are growing pains. For example take a look at: http://www.micrositez-seo.co.uk/
If I recall correctly, that site had a DA of 8x. Due to issues with the last crawl, the site's records were not captured correctly and it presently shows a DA of 1. Any issue with Linkscape will cause an issue with DA.
Also understand Google crawls every site, but Linkscape only crawls the top 25% of web pages. Google will almost always show more links then reflected in your DA.
Another important note, DA is mainly a measure of link counts based on the linking page's DA/PA. As you pointed out, Google will discount spammy links and eliminate their value. Linkscape has no way of knowing what links Google, Bing, Yahoo, etc have discounted, nor what sites have been penalized. The DA will continue to show link value.
The outcome of your test was predicable. If you add 100 links from JC Penney at the time when the site was under a penalty, the DA would have improved for the site receiving the links. The DA does not use "spamminess" or penalties as ranking factors.
In summary, yes DA is a very valuable tool in analyzing websites. Like most tools, it is important to thoroughly understand how the calculations are performed without the tool, then how the tool itself works. Using DA in combination with that knowledge and experience can make your job a lot easier. If you try to base your SEO decisions blindly on DA without the required understanding, you wont be happy with the results.
-
In the meantime my colleague asked me how I would differentiate between spammy and valuable blogs.
My answer was:
These blogs are easily identified as spammy because there's a dodgy 200 word content and hundreds of comments. Every nick name is a link with "smart" anchor texts. The comments are only a few words long and these pages have roughly 4-500 links. ...so it's pretty easy to algorithmically identify these websites as link farm.
I used a black hat link scraper that uses a list of free-to-comment spammy blogs.
Combine the site analysis with this list and you have a nice negative list of domains.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Why would DA and Home Page PA divurge
I track home page Page Authority and Domain Authority. Normally they move in a similar fashion. However for at least one client I see them moving in markedly opposite directions. One client has seen their Home page PA increase from 29 to 33 ov er the past year or so while their DA is dropped from 22 to 16. Potentially related are odd trends in home page inbound link counts and linking domains. Moz reported 241 inbound link to the home page last December, and 324 now. For the months April through July, however, Moz reported link counts between 1150 and 1350. Linking domains improved from 120 last December to 324 now. I of course recognize that raw counts of links and linking domains need to be tempered with quality considerations. But still, I'm finding is puzzling and wondering if anyone has any thoughts about why the Page Authority and Domain Authority would be diverging.. B8W2wuB
Moz Pro | | btreloar0 -
Does a subdomain hurt/help a domain?
My organization's website currently hosts research databases on a subdomain. We're relatively new to MOZ and when I ran a crawl of my site, it came back with 30K issues.... 98% of which are on this subdomain. I wish I could just remove it and call it a day, however, real and active researchers use it regularly. My question is: Does a subdomain hurt/help a domain? I'm seeing mixed results via Google search and browsing this forum. I'm concerned that I will not be able to fix these 30K issues as I do have access to maintain this database... and just by looking at it you can tell it was built in 2005 and hasn't been updated from an SEO perspective since. Any suggestions?
Moz Pro | | mlothamer0 -
Massive drop in linking domains - please advise!
Hi guys! Our site www.carwow.co.uk appears to have been punched in the face by the latest Moz update. It's claiming our #linking root domains has dropped from 225 to 135 and has subsequently hit our DA from 38 to 35. We haven't disavowed any links and our off-site strategy has been going well the past 2 months. Search performance has increased by around 15% (around 5k sessions) and rankings have improved week on week. Any idea if this is a Moz error? That's almost a 50% drop in linking root domains. Thanks, James
Moz Pro | | Matt.Carwow0 -
Domain Authority
Hi, I've been adding links to my site on directories, article sites and relevant industry blogs. I've also been given and a budget for Google Ads, which has also increased traffic. In the last week my Keyword positions have risen. However, my domain authority has reduced. I know the most important thing is improving traffic and keywords but I'd like to know how I can improve my domain authority. What is causing it to reduce and how can I improve it? Cheers,
Moz Pro | | desktop_nev
Neville0 -
In alt tag of a image can we use #hashtag or domain.com ? Is that good SEO or not allowed ?
Some of the Google Search shows a title has a hashtag of an article, which contain keyword and while tweeting them, the title which has a hashtag automatically very good used for getting traffic to the blog. And other one, can we use the hash tag inside the alt attribute ? Or our domain name with .com in it. Like Google.com or #Google ?
Moz Pro | | Esaky0 -
Competitive Domain Analysis Update
The updates to the Competitive Domain Analysis were occuring every 7 days upto Jan 16. When will the next updates be and how often is the new schedule? R/ John
Moz Pro | | TheNorthernOffice790 -
Can I have multiple domains under the same account>
I own more than one website. Can I have more than one website under this account? thanks Al
Moz Pro | | ayabi0 -
Why isn't my Domain Authority much higher than my competitors'?
Looking at the Competitive Link Analysis report shows my domain outperforming my competitors on Domain MozRank, Domain MozTrust, total links, linking root domains, followed linking root domains, and linking c-blocks. But Domain Authority scores are very similar across all four sites with one competitor actually scoring higher than my domain. How should I unpick this result? I'm assuming that there must a problem with my link profile. Is that a valid assumption? Thanks, Tom fc7Ez.png
Moz Pro | | trbaldwin0