Keyword Volume - as compared to keyword planner and other tools.
-
Hi in the rankings for my keywords, the monthly range is so much lower than other keyword tools I use, including google keyword planner, semrush and longtail pro (which all match and show a number much higher than Moz). Support said it's because those tools may group like keywords or singular/plural versions where Moz truly separates each term as a separate term, hence more specific and precise.
My question is: If google does somewhat group plural/singular and close match keywords, then wouldn’t it not matter anyways - if someone types a close match keyword and my keyword ends up triggering/displaying as if they typed my targeted keyword - then wouldn’t it still fall under the larger number if in the end it works in displaying my website as a result? If google changes search "blue sky" to "sky that is blue", and you get the same ranking for either of those two keywords then in the end does it matter?
I'm thrown for a loop as I spent time optimizing my website based on numbers I received from the other tools and now seeing a much lower number for said keywords and possibly a little higher for a different variation of it, I don't know what to do.
-
yes my brother ! keywords طراحی لوگو is better .
-
I have this problem too
I don't fit in the phrase "طراحی لوگو" but in the word "طراحی لوگو حرفه ای"
In fact, do longer keywords get better results than double keywords?
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Google map listings not shown as a ranking keyword
is there a way to have the google map listings show on my report as a ranked keyword. one of my competitors show their rankings in the organic as well as whether they are listed in the map section.
Moz Bar | | dhanson241 -
Search volume discrepancies between keyword tools
I'm feeling like I'm basing all my research time on tools that I cannot necessarily trust. Between Google keyword planner, Keywords everywhere chrome extension, and Moz keyword explorer, I'm getting wildly different results on 2 simple keywords related to colleges with baking & pastry arts degrees. "baking college", "baking colleges" So Keyword planner won't give me any search volume for those 2 words, I don't even see them in the results. Instead, it decides I really meant "baker college" which has 33,100 global searches. I tried telling it use only closely related terms, but it keeps giving me "baker college" and refuses to show me the terms I asked for. Stubbornly useless. Keywords everywhere says both of these keywords bring in 33,100 searches. It does not tell me those searches were for "baker college." Totally misleading. Moz keyword explorer says baking college as 0-10 volume, baking colleges has 101-200 volume. So at least it's not trying to give me "baker college" numbers. Perhaps I can trust this, but it's not convenient to upload hundreds of various keywords at a time to pull the volume numbers like I do with the other tools. With Keyword planner making assumptions and grouping unrelated terms together, and Keywords everywhere using those numbers without pointing out the assumptions, I feel like I can't trust anything without taking time to dig into the discrepancies, which is impossible with hundreds of keywords. Do you know of any good search volume tools that don't force or hide assumptions? Thanks.
Moz Bar | | JannetteP1 -
Moz on-page grader can't see keyword in H1
Hi, Trying to do grade for whatiswhere.com, keyword 'poi search'. The tool can't see keyword in h1, but It is there. Could you please check what is the problem? Thank you, Andrei.
Moz Bar | | Anazar_20010 -
How to defined the most important keyword for YouTube Video Effects
I make a site https://www.videoeffects.org/. This site is about YouTube Video Effects. I want to know how to defind the most important keyword, such as: youtube, youtube video, youtube effects.
Moz Bar | | micheal90000 -
Keyword explorer and Scandinavia
Hi, congrats on launching keyword explorer! Is the data primarily focused on the US and other larger markets, I see that for the keywords I put in I'm not getting any volume data? When can we expect this to change? Best regards, Anders
Moz Bar | | Anders_Alknes0 -
How does it work Fresh Web Explorer Mention Tool?By given information is right or wrong?
Fresh Web Explorer Mention Tool show two new brand mention urls on my campaign dashboard but i have checked through this urls we don't have any brand and keywords related to my campaign in this urls. So, why it is mentioned that "you have new brand mentions" in this url? Kind for information i have mentioned those urls when show my brand: http://www.slideshare.net/acoleman2/principles-of-micro-economics http://www.scribd.com/doc/237030746/Children-s-Spaces
Moz Bar | | surabhi60 -
Moz keywords tool obsolete?
It looks like Google is going to encrypt all user searches, rendering entire sections of SEO tools useless like portions of Moz. What's Moz's reaction to something like this? http://blog.hubspot.com/google-encrypting-all-searches-nj
Moz Bar | | BlueLinkERP0 -
Can the Moz tool identify variations of a Chinese language branded keyword?
We've recently started a trial of the Moz Pro service and are tracking a selection of keywords. Our primary band / product name is 功夫英语(Kungfu English), so we've set a rule that any keywords containing those four Chinese characters (功夫英语) should be marked as a branded keyword. However, in the "Non-Paid Keywords Sending Search Visits" section of our traffic report, we see a few variations on our brand name that are not being marked as branded keywords. (See attached Images). Based on our rules, shouldn't these variations also be marked as branded keywords without our needing to manually add them as such? Or have I misunderstood the intent of this rule? For the English text, the brand rule about words containing "kungfuenglish" seems to have resulted in all of "www.kungfuenglish.com", "http://www.kungfuenglish.com", and kungfuenglish being labelled as branded keywords. However, I'm not seeing the same sort of result with variations on the Chinese keyword, 功夫英语. KedTi1D.png z5bcUIt.png
Moz Bar | | PaulCoffey0