Should I keep my existing site or start new?
-
I have a website with less than 3K visits a year. Only customers with an Account with me who have login credentials can see my product pricing and make a purchase onsite; therefore, indexing/page ranking is not a concern for me.
My agency suggests that my product catalog be corrected to a parent/child relationship. Currently, each product variation has its own SKU and PDP. As a result, product findability: Site Search, Categorization, and Facets are a mess.
Is there any way I can keep my current URL (branding purposes)? I thought we could delete all pages (PLPs & PDPs) and create all new and enforce 301 redirects.
Thoughts?
-
If your current site has strong SEO, domain authority, and solid traffic, it may be better to optimize and refresh it. However, if the site no longer aligns with your brand, has deep-rooted technical issues, or the content is outdated and aimed at the wrong audience, starting fresh with a new, optimized site could be more effective. Weigh the cost and time for each option, and consider an SEO audit to guide your decision.
-
Deciding whether to keep your existing site or start a new one depends on several factors. If your current site has a significant amount of high-quality content, established backlinks, and a strong brand presence, it may be better to improve and optimize it. However, if your site suffers from severe technical issues, high spam scores, or a poor reputation that can't be easily fixed, starting a new site might be a more effective long-term solution. Assess the overall health and potential of your existing site before making a decision. At some point I was also thinking the same but I have solved many problems for the website and now It up and running.
-
Given that your website has low traffic and you need to improve the organization of your product catalog, it may be beneficial to start over with a revised structure while keeping your current URLs for branding. By removing existing pages and implementing 301 redirects, you can maintain your site's identity while improving product discoverability and user experience. We work closely with agencies to ensure a seamless transition and prioritize user accessibility for optimal results.
-
I think you should keep this website and try your best because To rank new, you'll also have to work hard, site rank is not easy.
I have the same issue with my website, but I'm doing my best to increase its value in the SERP. The best things are three.- UI/UX
- Quality of Content
- Quality of Backlinks (do follow and no follow both)
To see the example Click Here
-
Freecine Apk is an application that allows you to watch movies and TV shows on your phone or tablet. With Freecine Apk, you can enjoy a wide range of content, including the latest Hollywood blockbusters, popular TV series, and classic films. The app is easy to use, with a user-friendly interface that makes it simple to find and stream your favorite movies and shows. Freecine Apk is a great option for anyone who loves movies and wants to watch them on the go.
-
I faced the same issue on one of my Medical Billing service based website. I myself continued on existing website and now all going well. Therefore, I recommend you to keep existing site.
-
The decision to keep your existing site or start a new, including "8171" depends on various factors, including your current site's performance, goals, and required improvements. Evaluate these factors before making a choice.
-
I've been grappling with a dilemma and would greatly appreciate some insights. My website, which receives fewer than 3,000 annual visits, operates on a unique model: only customers with login credentials can access product pricing and make purchases on the site e.g. https://rainguardroofs.com/. This setup essentially eliminates the need for indexing and page ranking. My agency has proposed a restructuring of my product catalog into a parent/child relationship.
-
Yes, you can keep your current URL for branding purposes and still improve your product catalog's organization. It sounds like your agency is recommending that you implement a parent/child relationship for your product catalog to improve the findability of your products. This is a common approach for eCommerce websites that have a large number of variations for each product.
If you choose to implement this approach, you will need to make changes to your website's information architecture, including your site search, categorization, and facets. You may also need to update your product pages to reflect the new structure of your catalog.
Regarding your question about deleting all pages and creating new ones with 301 redirects, this is possible, but it can be risky. If you do not set up the redirects correctly, you could lose traffic and rankings for your website. It's essential to ensure that all of your old URLs redirect to the corresponding new URLs correctly. It's also important to note that it may take some time for search engines to crawl and index your new pages, so you may experience some fluctuations in your traffic and rankings during this period.
Overall, implementing a parent/child relationship for your product catalog is a good approach to improve the findability of your products. However, it's important to proceed with caution when making significant changes to your website's information architecture.
-
I have quite same problem on website and was easily and quickly resolved by web developer.
-
@SEOfreshman I also need the answer
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Understanding Redirects and Canonical Tags in SEO: A Complex Case
Hi everyone, nothing serious here, i'm just playing around doing my experiments 🙂
Technical SEO | | chueneke
but if any1 of you guys understand this chaos and what was the issue here, i'd appreciate if you try to explain it to me. I had a page "Linkaufbau" on my website at https://chriseo.de/linkaufbau. My .htaccess file contains only basic SEO stuff: # removed ".html" using htaccess RewriteCond %{THE_REQUEST} ^GET\ (.*)\.html\ HTTP RewriteRule (.*)\.html$ $1 [R=301,L] # internally added .html if necessary RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME}.html -f RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !/$ RewriteRule (.*) $1\.html [L] # removed "index" from directory index pages RewriteRule (.*)/index$ $1/ [R=301,L] # removed trailing "/" if not a directory RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} /$ RewriteRule (.*)/ $1 [R=301,L] # Here’s the first redirect: RedirectPermanent /index / My first three questions: Why do I need this rule? Why must this rule be at the top? Why isn't this handled by mod_rewrite? Now to the interesting part: I moved the Linkaufbau page to the SEO folder: https://chriseo.de/seo/linkaufbau and set up the redirect accordingly: RedirectPermanent /linkaufbau /seo/linkaufbau.html I deleted the old /linkaufbau page. I requested indexing for /seo/linkaufbau in the Google Search Console. Once the page was indexed, I set a canonical to the old URL: <link rel="canonical" href="https://chriseo.de/linkaufbau"> Then I resubmitted the sitemap and requested indexing for /seo/linkaufbau again, even though it was already indexed. Due to the canonical tag, the page quickly disappeared. I then requested indexing for /linkaufbau and /linkaufbau.html in GSC (the old, deleted page). After two days, both URLs were back in the serps:: https://chriseo.de/linkaufbau https://chriseo.de/linkaufbau.html this is the new page /seo/linkaufbau
b14ee095-5c03-40d5-b7fc-57d47cf66e3b-grafik.png This is the old page /linkaufbau
242d5bfd-af7c-4bed-9887-c12a29837d77-grafik.png Both URLs are now in the search results and all rankings are significantly better than before for keywords like: organic linkbuilding linkaufbau kosten linkaufbau service natürlicher linkaufbau hochwertiger linkaufbau organische backlinks linkaufbau strategie linkaufbau agentur Interestingly, both URLs (with and without .html) redirect to the new URL https://chriseo.de/seo/linkaufbau, which in turn has a canonical pointing to https://chriseo.de/linkaufbau (without .html). In the SERPs, when https://chriseo.de/linkaufbau is shown, my new, updated snippet is displayed. When /linkaufbau.html is shown, it displays the old, deleted page that had already disappeared from the index. I have now removed the canonical tag. I don't fully understand the process of what happened and why. If anyone has any ideas, I would be very grateful. Best regards,
Chris0 -
Unsolved Broken external links
Hi, Does Moz report on broken links to external sites? I've only seen the crawl return broken links relating to internal links. Any info much appreciated. Thanks, Mary
Moz Tools | | rj_dale0 -
Premium domain name redirects
Hi, I run a tree surgery business - woodfeldertreecare.co.uk We're based in Manchester, UK. A few days ago I was called by Premium Domain Names who convinced me that buying treesurgeonsmanchester.com and treesurgerymanchester.com and redirecting them to our main site would be amazing for organic traffic. My designer and an SEO friend both reckon this was a waste of money and reckon I've been scammed. Any thoughts? Please help.
SEO Tactics | | LeoTrees0 -
Old Blogs
We have several blogs on our site for a range of products we no longer stock. Would you set up a redirect for these - and how long would you keep it in place?
Technical SEO | | Caroline_Ardmoor0 -
Best practices for retiring 100s of blog posts?
Hi. I wanted to get best practices for retiring an enterprise blog with hundreds of old posts with subject matter that won't be repurposed. What would be the best course of action to retire and maintain the value of any SEO authority from those old blog pages? Is it enough to move those old posts into an archive subdirectory and Google would deprioritize those posts over time? Or would a mass redirect of old blog posts to the new blog's home page be allowed (even though the old blog post content isn't being specifically replaced)? Or would Google basically say that if there aren't 1:1 replacement URLs, that would be seen as soft-404s and treated like a 404?
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | David_Fisher0 -
Unsolved URL dynamic structure issue for new global site where I will redirect multiple well-working sites.
Dear all, We are working on a new platform called [https://www.piktalent.com](link url), were basically we aim to redirect many smaller sites we have with quite a lot of SEO traffic related to internships. Our previous sites are some like www.spain-internship.com, www.europe-internship.com and other similars we have (around 9). Our idea is to smoothly redirect a bit by a bit many of the sites to this new platform which is a custom made site in python and node, much more scalable and willing to develop app, etc etc etc...to become a bigger platform. For the new site, we decided to create 3 areas for the main content: piktalent.com/opportunities (all the vacancies) , piktalent.com/internships and piktalent.com/jobs so we can categorize the different types of pages and things we have and under opportunities we have all the vacancies. The problem comes with the site when we generate the diferent static landings and dynamic searches. We have static landing pages generated like www.piktalent.com/internships/madrid but dynamically it also generates www.piktalent.com/opportunities?search=madrid. Also, most of the searches will generate that type of urls, not following the structure of Domain name / type of vacancy/ city / name of the vacancy following the dynamic search structure. I have been thinking 2 potential solutions for this, either applying canonicals, or adding the suffix in webmasters as non index.... but... What do you think is the right approach for this? I am worried about potential duplicate content and conflicts between static content dynamic one. My CTO insists that the dynamic has to be like that but.... I am not 100% sure. Someone can provide input on this? Is there a way to block the dynamic urls generated? Someone with a similar experience? Regards,
Technical SEO | | Jose_jimenez0 -
404s on subfolder - how to redirect?
Hi all,
Technical SEO | | MFSMarketing
we have a lot of 404s to subfolders. Eg
www.website.com/blog-post-title/imagename/
www.website.com/blog-post-title/author/ We don't have these subfolders or blog posts anymore.
How do i redirect them? These links (404s) don't seem to have any value or backlinks. Thanks,
Stef0 -
Does changing/shortening a url hurt SEO?
Hi all, I am in the process of making small optimization changes to my site. I noticed Moz identified quite a few URLs that could be shortened. I intend to shorten these URLs and create 301 redirects to ensure website users land on the right page. My question is, will this change in URL damage rankings and engagement(assuming the URL remains content relevant)? I have read in some places that when creating URL redirects for a change in domain, people saw a dip in rankings and engagement. I, however, am not intending to change the main domain of the site, but rather the URL slug. Any thoughts?
On-Page Optimization | | annegretwidmer0