301 redirects reduce traffic considerably
-
I recently identified an issue with our site whereby we had three different URL types for each article. As an example, we might have something like:
- /articles/my-article-name
- /articles/my-article-name.aspx
- /articles/My-Article-Name
We've since taken action to address this by implement 301 redirects from the second and third formats to the first (so everything is without the .aspx extension and is in lower case). But the results have been disconcerting.
Before the change, one of our articles receives 150 or so hits per day via the .aspx version. The other two existed but had very low traffic (1-3 per day). We decided the non .aspx and lowercase version was the version we wanted. Sure enough, when we introduced the 301 redirects on September 25th the traffic for the .aspx version just stopped (after a day) and the traffic for the non-.aspx version climbed. But not enough.
After the change, the non-.aspx version is receiving about 60-70% of the traffic that we used to have on the .aspx version. So, instead of receiving 150 per day (to the .aspx version) we are receiving around 100 or so to the non-.aspx version.
This pattern has occured across all our articles and, as a result, our site-wide traffic has dropped by about 40% or so.
Since we are using 301 redirects I had assumed that the search engines would just update to reflect the non-.aspx version.
I am sure I am missing something here. Any help would be most appreciated.
Thanks.
Mark
-
Thank you, Ryan (and Malachi). Strangely, I thought I had the redirect for non-www pages in place and I am not sure how that got broken. I do have the preference setting in Google configured. Anyway, I've fixed that and I really appreciate you checking this out.
I will investigate the traffic loss further. It's encouraging to know that my logic is sound here though.
Thanks again.
Mark
-
Ryan has great points.. also you SHOULD change the www. on your backend, but you can also tell google which one you prefer to point to in http://www.google.com/webmasters/
granted, this wont work for yahoo / bing, so def change it on your server as well.
-
After looking at your site and reviewing the issue I can offer the following recommendations:
- Review your Google Analytics to determine the exact source of your traffic loss. If you steadily received 150 hits/day on a page one week, then it dropped to 100 hits/day the next week, examine the source of the hits from each week. Is it Google Organic Search? Bing Search? E-mails? Ads? etc.
Once you determine the source, drill down further. If you determine the loss stems from Google organic search, examine your keywords and determine where you lost traffic. You need to investigate in this manner for at least a couple pages to determine a pattern.
- Your site has a major SEO issue in that it appears in both the www and non-www form.
http://www.wednet.com/wedding-gifts/wedding-articles/engagement-party-ideas
http://wednet.com/wedding-gifts/wedding-articles/engagement-party-ideas
Both of the above URLs work and return the same page. You need to decide which version of URL you want to present to users and then stick to that format 100%. Since you shared a www type of url previously I will assume that is the format you desire. In that case, 301 redirect all non-www traffic to the www equivalent. This should be possible with a single statement. Presently you have links for both URL versions, and this will affect your SEO and rankings.
Your present 301 redirect for your aspx extension and case-sensitive letters appears correct.
-
Thank you Ryan. I believe the 301's are just fine - I have used a utility to verify this and I correctly see them flagged as being redirected through 301. So, assuming that is good....
Can you clarify a little how I would verify if I am losing link juice? I am indeed in a compeitive industry (wedding planning).
Here is an example of an article that gets us a good number of visitors but which has fallen by 40% or so since we implemented the redirect (as compared to the .aspx traffic we received before).
http://www.wednet.com/wedding-gifts/wedding-articles/engagement-party-ideas
Before I implemented the 301's I had three versions of this page. The .aspx version was the "heavy hitter" in terms of visitors, with the non-.aspx and lower-and-uppercase versions very low. However, the .aspx version had a much higher readership than I am now achieving with just the URL above. Having implemenrted the redirect, the other two URLs are now "dormant" as expecetd (no traffic at all being logged, due to the 301's directing to the URL above).
So, pretty confused.
Thanks again.
Mark
-
Hi Mark.
Your reasoning and logic for the 301 redirects is sound. It is a common practice. I have two initial concerns:
-
Were the 301s done properly?
-
How much link juice are you losing with the redirect, and has it affected your rankings? This could happen if you are in an ultra-competitive industry.
Can you share some URL examples for your site?
-
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Increase in Direct Traffic plus Bounce Rate rise for all traffic sources
Hello, I work for an agency and we have seen a big rise in bounce rate for 4 of our clients which happened on the exact same day. This rise on bounce rate is across all traffic sources. We are also seeing a big increase in direct traffic, starting on the same day. Is it possible for bot traffic to affect the bounce rate of all other traffic sources? We have ruled out double reporting in GA but can explain how the bounce rate has increased for all traffic sources. How is this linked to the rise in direct traffic (in some cases as high as 500%)? Thanks
Reporting & Analytics | | jenallen0 -
Slow growth in organic traffic
Hi, Recently our website after 5 months of launch started seeing more organic traffic, thanks to the seo effort being put. However, off late the growth is quite slow and we don't see much increase in organic traffic any more. Any idea on what could have happened to cause this or is it normal. Here is the link to the website to check and if you can recommend anything - https://www.keyhub.com Thanks, Search-Console-Search-Analytics-https-www-keyhub-com-1.png
Reporting & Analytics | | kh-priyam1 -
How do I find out where my "direct traffic" came from?
Last weekend we had a significant rise in traffic to our site. Digging in to Google Analytics, most of it has come from the USA, with some from Canada, Australia and a few other countries. It has all gone to the same article on our website. I have also found that it has mostly come from Safari (in app), on an ipad and iphone. Google Analytics has put this down as Direct traffic. My feeling is that it is not. Could it be from a social media app - perhaps someone with many followers has pinned from our site, or something along these lines. Could it actually be organic search traffic and Google misattributing it as Direct? Bounce rate and time on site is fine, so I don't think it's a bot / spam.
Reporting & Analytics | | TheJewelleryEd
Any ideas / places I could go to help me find out would be appreciated, thank you. Joss0 -
In Google Analytics, what is the correct format for excluding traffic from single IP address?
In the past, when we've setup a filter to exclude a single IP address, we just entered the IP address normally. For example, 64.68.82.164. However, I was researching how to exclude a range of IP addresses and found out that I might be using the wrong format to filter a single IP address. Is it supposed to be 64.68.82.164 or 64.68.82.164? Will it still work if it was entered without the escape characters? Thanks in advance Moz community for your assistance!
Reporting & Analytics | | peteboyd0 -
Alternative domains redirected with 301 to the main domain
Hi everyone I've got a website which gained a Panda penalty back in March 2012 which was because of the implementation of a range of spammy practices (keyword stuffing in titles, indexed category and tag pages, duplicate domains). I've fixed the titles and deindexed any pages that could be seen as thin or duplicate so I'm confident that any onsite Panda issues have been fixed. As mentioned above the client had also created over 40 alternative domains to the website and pointed them to their main website folders (hence duplicating the website and content 40 times over). These domains have now been redirected via 301 redirects to the main website to ensure that any links they have gained are captured. The reason for the redirection is that we initially took the domains down and saw a drop in traffic and this seemed to be the most likely reason. While Moz and Majestic are not showing any significant links to these domains (which is why they where originally taken down), past experience has told me that these tools don't always pick up all referring domains. Primary domain workingvoices.com 5 Example Alternative Domains presentationskillslondon.com workingvoiceslive.biz workingvoices.co.uk livingvoices.co.uk working-voices.net Question 1: At the same time we took down the alternative domains (and experienced the drop in traffic) we removed duplicate instances of Google Analytics code from the webpages. All the guidance that we could find stated that duplicate instances of code shouldn't affect your Analytics numbers, hence we assumed it was the taking down of the alternative domains, but maybe the guidance we found was wrong? Question 2: It is 3 months later and these alternative domains are still indexed by Google, and Panda hasn't run since October 2014 so we haven't experienced a recovery yet. Redirecting the domains will remove any issue of a Panda penalty, but now of course I am worried about Penguin - the last thing I want to do is trigger that can of worms! This whole saga has been pretty complicated and I think I need some fresh sets of eyes. What does everyone think? Could the initial drop have been due to the duplicate Analytics code being removed? Could the redirecting domains trigger Penguin? Should we take the alternative domains down and be done with them? Any other thoughts! Looking forward to hearing your opinions! Damon.
Reporting & Analytics | | Digitator0 -
Traffic by keyword- phenomenon
I have several keywords that seem to bring visitors in but when I look at my rankings it shows that I have no ranking authority at all. Are these just robots or some non human click? Or how do I even get these visitors?
Reporting & Analytics | | Retail_Endeavors0 -
How to devide Google traffic into local google traffic (.com , .uk , .cn etc) in Analytics
Hi, friends In google analytics , we can see search traffic from google, but is it possible to deeply see from which local google? eg: .com , .uk, .hk etc? Thanks alots
Reporting & Analytics | | topchinaseo
Boson0 -
OSE shows URLs redirecting to our custom created error page, is this a problem?.
When I check the link metrics for my product pages in OSE, it shows a message saying that the page redirects to our custom error page. This page was recently created to display when there is an error with the website. Do I need to be concerned that OSE is seeing all product pages as redirecting to this error page? Will it affect page authority etc,? I have attached a screen shot of the message that OSE displays for reference. YWbpM.jpg
Reporting & Analytics | | pugh0