301 redirects reduce traffic considerably
-
I recently identified an issue with our site whereby we had three different URL types for each article. As an example, we might have something like:
- /articles/my-article-name
- /articles/my-article-name.aspx
- /articles/My-Article-Name
We've since taken action to address this by implement 301 redirects from the second and third formats to the first (so everything is without the .aspx extension and is in lower case). But the results have been disconcerting.
Before the change, one of our articles receives 150 or so hits per day via the .aspx version. The other two existed but had very low traffic (1-3 per day). We decided the non .aspx and lowercase version was the version we wanted. Sure enough, when we introduced the 301 redirects on September 25th the traffic for the .aspx version just stopped (after a day) and the traffic for the non-.aspx version climbed. But not enough.
After the change, the non-.aspx version is receiving about 60-70% of the traffic that we used to have on the .aspx version. So, instead of receiving 150 per day (to the .aspx version) we are receiving around 100 or so to the non-.aspx version.
This pattern has occured across all our articles and, as a result, our site-wide traffic has dropped by about 40% or so.
Since we are using 301 redirects I had assumed that the search engines would just update to reflect the non-.aspx version.
I am sure I am missing something here. Any help would be most appreciated.
Thanks.
Mark
-
Thank you, Ryan (and Malachi). Strangely, I thought I had the redirect for non-www pages in place and I am not sure how that got broken. I do have the preference setting in Google configured. Anyway, I've fixed that and I really appreciate you checking this out.
I will investigate the traffic loss further. It's encouraging to know that my logic is sound here though.
Thanks again.
Mark
-
Ryan has great points.. also you SHOULD change the www. on your backend, but you can also tell google which one you prefer to point to in http://www.google.com/webmasters/
granted, this wont work for yahoo / bing, so def change it on your server as well.
-
After looking at your site and reviewing the issue I can offer the following recommendations:
- Review your Google Analytics to determine the exact source of your traffic loss. If you steadily received 150 hits/day on a page one week, then it dropped to 100 hits/day the next week, examine the source of the hits from each week. Is it Google Organic Search? Bing Search? E-mails? Ads? etc.
Once you determine the source, drill down further. If you determine the loss stems from Google organic search, examine your keywords and determine where you lost traffic. You need to investigate in this manner for at least a couple pages to determine a pattern.
- Your site has a major SEO issue in that it appears in both the www and non-www form.
http://www.wednet.com/wedding-gifts/wedding-articles/engagement-party-ideas
http://wednet.com/wedding-gifts/wedding-articles/engagement-party-ideas
Both of the above URLs work and return the same page. You need to decide which version of URL you want to present to users and then stick to that format 100%. Since you shared a www type of url previously I will assume that is the format you desire. In that case, 301 redirect all non-www traffic to the www equivalent. This should be possible with a single statement. Presently you have links for both URL versions, and this will affect your SEO and rankings.
Your present 301 redirect for your aspx extension and case-sensitive letters appears correct.
-
Thank you Ryan. I believe the 301's are just fine - I have used a utility to verify this and I correctly see them flagged as being redirected through 301. So, assuming that is good....
Can you clarify a little how I would verify if I am losing link juice? I am indeed in a compeitive industry (wedding planning).
Here is an example of an article that gets us a good number of visitors but which has fallen by 40% or so since we implemented the redirect (as compared to the .aspx traffic we received before).
http://www.wednet.com/wedding-gifts/wedding-articles/engagement-party-ideas
Before I implemented the 301's I had three versions of this page. The .aspx version was the "heavy hitter" in terms of visitors, with the non-.aspx and lower-and-uppercase versions very low. However, the .aspx version had a much higher readership than I am now achieving with just the URL above. Having implemenrted the redirect, the other two URLs are now "dormant" as expecetd (no traffic at all being logged, due to the 301's directing to the URL above).
So, pretty confused.
Thanks again.
Mark
-
Hi Mark.
Your reasoning and logic for the 301 redirects is sound. It is a common practice. I have two initial concerns:
-
Were the 301s done properly?
-
How much link juice are you losing with the redirect, and has it affected your rankings? This could happen if you are in an ultra-competitive industry.
Can you share some URL examples for your site?
-
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
How to configure multilingual site in google analytic? Currently showing in Referral Traffic why?
Hello All, Currently my Multilingual site is showing in referral traffic is it because I have not added hreflang tag on site? If yes and if I add the hreflang tag on all sites when where it will show in google analytic traffic from international sites? And what type of configuration required in analytic? Thanks!
Reporting & Analytics | | pragnesh96390 -
20% Dip in Traffic. What could be happening?
Hello Dear Community Yesterday I had a sudden drop in visits - screenshot attached. It shows how yesterday Friday 17/10 has had a dip in visits vs Friday 10/10 (1 week ago). I have an authority blog in Italy with over 90k monthly visits. I do now black-hat SEO stuff, and my content is rich. Organic traffic grew 85% y-o-y and I was actually on a nice, slow growth trend, but now, 20% dip. The things I did before all this happened, and which could have had an impact (but I'm not sure about) are: Configured Max CDN and W3 Total Cache (before I was just using SiteGround's Super Cacher plugin and that's it). So now my site is faster by a lot although I'm having issues like I mention in point 2. I had to clear the cache at least a hundred times as I was configuring Optin Monster for lead generation I changed my Google Analytics code from the old version to the new version (universal) Besides this I check my best keywords in RankTracker and it looks like nothing happened to my rankings. Yet a few of my most popular posts which gets roughly the same amount of visits everyday for the past few months, had a dip of 30% more or less. I also added a screenshot of my Webmaster tool dashboard. Everything is ok and there are no messages. Also yesterday was not a national holiday in my country (Italy) so everything should have been normal. Please share with me your thoughts about this. What else should I check to get an idea? What do you think it could be? Thank you! Andrea 2vII81q yXn6zBD
Reporting & Analytics | | Andrew_IT0 -
Exclude brand Traffic
Hello everyone, Whenever any user searches for our website using brand keywords, session count should comes under direct source instead of Google/organic. Or in simple language, We want that all our brand keyword search traffic should be consider as Direct Traffic instead of organic. Is it possible in Google Analytics? If yes then please share the steps of doing it
Reporting & Analytics | | Obbserv0 -
Drop in direct traffic & spike in Adwords, any relation?
So I noticed a significant (around 50%) drop in Direct traffic in analytics to one of my websites (compared to last month). I've also noticed a spike in Adwords for around the same number of sessions. The drop in traffic is pretty much isolated to one specific page, and it is the same page involved in the spike in Adwords. Is it possible that Google was not recognizing a portion of the Adwords traffic? That's the only theory I have, but we haven't changed anything with their tracking or Adwords, so I'm a little hesitant to go with that theory.
Reporting & Analytics | | KiyoW0 -
Why do I have a lot of direct traffic from MSN and Yahoo with 100% bounce rate?
For MSN I have about 8000 hits of one page and a 100% bounce rate. In the last month I have about 400 hits from Yahoo with a 100% bounce rate. Msn is all different pages, while Yahoo is all the home page. What would cause this?
Reporting & Analytics | | EcommerceSite0 -
GA stopped tracking traffic, suddenly, why¿? :-/
2 days ago GA stopped receiving data. It only stopped for one account of all my projects. At this moment there are 5 persons navigating the site and these days there where numerous visitors as they contacted the support team thru the site. GA says that it's receiving the code, hw, I checked it twice. The tracking code is located below the footer, in the body. It was there for few years.... I also checked if there is some js conflict, negative. Is there something that could make the tracking to stop? Does anybody experienced similar problems¿? Should I be worried...¿? (and with SEOmoz server with issues not sure when will see new results.......) EDIT: In Web Master Tools I see results for indexing, with yesterday date, so I assume that the site crawling is ok and must be GA issue.
Reporting & Analytics | | MilosMilcom0 -
Google Webmaster Dropped Traffic
Hi Guys, I've recently implemented a new site design with a new url architecture etc.. I set up Google Webmaster tools in early March and went live with the new site on 2nd April. Since the 6th April (4 days after going live) I've notice a drop in impressions from 15,000 - 28,000 per day to 3,500 - 5,500 per day. Now I'm kind of new to this, so after I cleaned up after my initial panic, I checked impressions vs. clicks. Impression are down 44% and clicks 31%. Not bad I thought but then again what if I dropped so far off the radar I never made an impression. 1. So first question: Are the number of impressions of a keyword independant of ranking. So if I rank #3,445,234th will I still see impressions listed but avg. position reflect #3,445,234? So while I was thinking of asking these questions I checked Google Analytics for which I have just over 3 years of metrics. Compared to the past; overall traffic and organic traffic are the same if not 10-20% better. 2. So second: Am I missing something? Its a resort website so easter just ended and you would expect the traffic to match and drop, but such a sudden and dramitic drop in Webmaster Tools impressions does not match Google Analytics. Infact Organic traffic climbed slightly. Can anyone offer any insight? Thanks, Adam
Reporting & Analytics | | NaescentAdam0 -
URL-structure change - former long-tail traffic gone
Hey people, I'm sure many of you applied changes to the URL structure of a client's or your own website before. So did I for obvious reason: The structure before was like www.domain.com/brand_page/_22-key-word-translatedkeyword.php (ranked 20). This was changed to www.domain.com/key-word.html.
Reporting & Analytics | | dumperama
Edit: Also on-page it was optimized, but only taking out worthless links like "keyword-link to other page" and adding a relevant SEO text (also valuable for the user) Now, for the targeted short-tail keyword, the outcome was great - ranking increased by 17 landing the page on the first SERP. But: Before this page garnered a wide range of long-tail keyword traffic.To be exact: 2600 different keywords generated traffic for that page in a period of 1 month. Now the newly structured site (also on-page optimized) only receives traffic from around 100 keywords. You can imagine that the absolute amount of visits also dropped. So I'd like to know if you observed similar results. Another question that's coming up in this context: How regularly does Google refresh the keywords associated with a page? Like: Is this page really relevant for this one keyword we associated it with 5 years ago? Because it is clear, when I'm looking at the aforementioned 2600 KW in detail, most don't have anything to do with the site, i.e. are not mentioned at all. Still they generated valuable traffic though. All of this is really crucial to this project, because soon the whole website's supposed to be relaunched with optimized URL structure and of course everything else that's need SEO wise... I'd love to hear your experiences. Thanks!!0