I would use your private message to SEOmoz on this one, or contact their support group, as this seems a bit odd. Are you saying the .com.au site has a bunch of 302 redirects that point to you? If so, there's nothing you can do about it if you don't own the site. But what kind of data is the campaign picking up from them? Is it counting their pages as yours or anything?
Posts made by DanDeceuster
-
RE: My Campaign just picked up the .com.au site and is showing data
-
RE: Javascript
Yeah let me point you to some resources on this:
http://www.seomoz.org/ugc/new-reality-google-follows-links-in-javascript-4930
Your best resource is from Google here:
To your question though, I do believe Google will execute external javascript files. Ajax stuff I'm not as sure about. They have a primer on this here:
<cite>code.google.com/web/ajaxcrawling/docs/learn-more.html</cite>
The 90% thing I recall from SMX advanced last year I believe. Basically people would try to hide internal links in javascript since using nofollow for pagerank sculpting was debunked by Matt Cutts in 2009. Turned out Google could see most links being created in javascript.
You can read up on that second link there in javascript crawling from Google and it goes into a lot of detail about what they can do, hope it helps.
-
RE: Javascript
Google has said they can execute about 90% or so of all javascript at this point, so there is a good chance Google will be able to see these affiliate links, even if they are being done in javascript.
-
RE: Rel=canonical
I'm not sure what the deal is with blue flags and report cards, but if you have duplicate pages, you should either use the 301 redirect or the rel=canonical tag. My guess is that maybe you had a rel=canonical tag on a page that pointed to the same page, so maybe the crawling tool took that to be some kind of error? I don't know, but make sure your duplicate pages are either redirected to the original or that they use a rel=canonical tag to specify the original, and don't worry about any reports that are simply notifying you of the purpose of a canonical tag.
-
RE: Removing Duplicate Pages
Your question does not make any sense. How do you remove a duplicate page? Delete it. If it is being caused by some backend issues, then use the rel=canonical tag to specify the original page or 301 redirect the duplicates to the original if you can do that.
In your example I'm not sure what you are asking. The URL's are cut off in your question as well as on my browser, are these examples of two different URL's showing an identical page? Are you saying there is an internal link somewhere that points to the wrong place, and it is returning a duplicate of the original page or something? Then change the internal link to point to the right place.
-
RE: Most Important Keyword Term
Here's what I would do, make the title tag of your home page "Main Keyword | Website Name" and then make the title tag of your blue-widgets.html page be "Main Keyword | Secondary Keyword | Tertiary Keyword" so that both kind of mention the keyword, but don't specifically target identical phrases. This is not a bad thing to do because it is part of how you would get a double listing anyway.
You also won't get meta duplication info this way or anything.
-
RE: Ranking above PLACE PAGES
Google will do what Google will do. Just as results change when the query deserves freshness (think how search results for osama bin laden changed dramatically within two hours) so do some results deserve local emphasis, in google's mind at least. If the places results show up after the top three, then getting into those top three is the same as any other top three. If the places results are showing up before any others, there's nothing you can do to get yours ahead of the places results, that's just where google puts it.
some searches even spread the places results out. A search for payday loans brings up A from the map as #1, then no places results again until #4. The key is SEO is SEO, so always have good, unique content and get good links and you will move up as high as you can.
-
RE: Does the value of Twitter/FB shares change depending on the url used?
And this is a classic example of how URL structure can be so important. Do you use wordpress? If so, go to your permalinks and try and change them to static, non parameter urls. Then you don't run into that problem. The issue is you cannot redirect one to the other, only rel-canonical it. This should still work the same way and from an SEO perspective you should be fine though. I would still rather have nice urls instead though.
Any link juice to one url that has a rel=canonical tag to another url will not pass link juice I believe. Only a 301 redirect passes link juice from one url to another. the rel=canonical tag has more to do with indexing and avoiding duplicate content than it does redirecting link juice around.
bit.ly links are just 301 redirects. All the link juice that goes to one bit.ly url passes to its destination url for the most part. Like other 301's it loses a bit when it redirects, so always better to get direct links when possible, but sites like twitter might make this impossible for long urls, so take what you can get.
-
RE: Nofollow links & content syndication
Google knows the original by using the rel=canonical tag. These work across domains as well. If you syndicate content, it doesn't even need to link back to you, nofollow or dofollow. All you need to do is have the rel=canonical tag to the original post and you're good.
-
RE: Redirecting root domains to sub domains
Never, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever redirect your home page. You've listed enough reasons already without even needing to add anymore. This is just a bad idea. It's one thing if your specific platform makes your homepage something other than the root domain and that's how it has always been. If you have had a home page at your root domain and now want to redirect it, bad idea. Just put the content of example.com/shop at example.com. Pretty easy fix.
-
RE: Hundreds of 404 Pages, What Should I do?
The Google webmaster blog answered this perfectly the other day, here is their post:
http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2011/05/do-404s-hurt-my-site.html
-
RE: Website moving up and down SERPs alongside others in 'blocks'.
Google made over 500 changes to their algorithm last year. Each change affects different sites in different ways. I would be more concerned if your sites rankings were not fluctuating to be honest. There is nothing weird, unusual or wrong with bouncing around the serps. Just keeping doing tried and tested seo techniques and you will be fine.
-
RE: Do you link out to good content?
I allow links in my blog comments and publish them all the time. I share on facbeook and twitter links to stuff I enjoy as well. If an article has a tweet this button or a share button that makes it all the easier. I also post things I like to my blog from time to time, so yeah, I have no trouble linking to content I enjoy. It's too bad more people don't think that way though, it would make this whole SEO thing a lot easier
-
RE: Are there SEO benefits to Flickr?
The article says it can contribute to the social signals as well as help in image searches. I'm pretty skeptical myself. I don't use Flickr and don't plan to. I would rather have images on my domain in image search results, and I have plenty of them there without using Flickr. I wouldn't bother personally.
-
RE: .ca and international SEO
I actually noticed nordictrack just did this. If you go to nordictrack.com you can find links to their international sites at .ca and .co.uk as well I believe. I think you would want to do something similar. Announce you have a .ca for canadian customers. I would also include a link to the .ca site on each product page. So instead of just a buy now button, put a text link below it saying"Canadian customer? Click here for our Canadian store!" or something like that.
-
RE: Is having a canonical tag for the link that IS the canonical a negative thing?
I don't think ti is bad but actually encouraged. Ever copy of your content should have the same canonical tag. Obviously that includes the original. As I understand it, this is something you should be doing.
-
RE: Best Way to Analyse Linking Structure of My Site
You can go to opensiteexplorer.org and see your backlink profile. If all your links come from one source like social bookmarks or directories, you may have an issue. The best thing to do is get a variety of backlinks. Comment on some blogs with your real name. Save some social bookmarks. Submit to some high quality human edited directories. Write and publish some articles. Create guest blog posts for financial blogs you come across and offer them for free. All of these things are methods you should be employing to get some variety in your links.
-
RE: Partners and Customers logo listing and links
I would probably not include all 100 customers. Maybe a sampling of your customer base?
You could also nofollow the external links to sites that could be questionable. You could also noindex, nofollow that page as well. All are options.
In fact, you could just put 100 links on the page if you want. I highly doubt you will incur any kind of penalty at all. Matt Cutts has dispelled the myth that you can only have 100 links on a page. You can have as many as you want as long as it makes sense and doesn't look like your are spamming search engines with link farms. I probably wouldn't worry too much about it.
-
RE: Video Sitemaps - Clarification Needed
I haven't done a video sitemap, but I remember reading the Google blog post explaining them, so I'm not sure if you have read either of these resources or not, but they would be an excellent place to look for an answer to your question if no one else here knows how to answer them for you:
http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2007/12/introducing-video-sitemaps.html
http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=80472
Sorry I couldn't be more helpful, good luck!
-
RE: Where are the best places online to build powerful profile pages
You can go to seo.com and join their forums. It is obviously all seo related. I believe they follow your forum signature after 100 points or something like that.
Another good place to look are article websites, like ezinearticles.com. After you publish a certain amount they follow the link you put in your profile bio section. You can create lots of profiles this way as there are several article directories you can register with and publish articles to.
-
RE: How to deal with 1 product in 1 country and 3 languages?
Couldn't you just put all the content on one domain in one place and then embed Google Translate? It puts a drop down menu on your site and allows the visitor to select their language and then translates the content of the page into that language. I don't know how reliable the translation is myself, but I would think it is pretty accurate.
It sounds like each of your three domains are in different languages, correct? I would think you won't get hit with any kind of duplicate content issues precisely because they are in different languages. I might have a link on each of your pages to the other two and mention they can read it in that language. Google may make the connection that way.
-
RE: Linking for multiple clients
Oh I see what you mean, like getting links on one blog to all 100 sites? I don't know if that is how I would go about it. I would spend 2 hours browsing around different blogs and leaving comments for one guy, then the next 2 hours doing it for the next guy, etc. I don't know that I would repeat a lot of blogs or posts. It would be pretty tedious but if you only have 2 hours a month and won't do Google Places work, then it beats writing a single article or submitting to spammy free directories or making hundreds of bookmarks.
-
RE: Linking for multiple clients
Well I would hope no one would smell a rat and report spam because I would hope they would leave real comments as real people with real names. I agree, blog comments are pretty insignificant, but in bulk they are quite helpful for local non-competitive phrases. You just have to do it right, which a lot of people can't seem to do for some reason.
-
RE: SEOmoz Toolbar vs. Opensiteexplorer
Depends on what you are looking at. When you look up the URL in OSE, it will show you linking domains to that URL, not to the whole domain. If in OSE you go to the full link metrics tab you can see everything on that url and domain, and all of those numbers should be in the toolbar somewhere.
-
RE: Linking for multiple clients
If all you have is two hours per client then there are two options you could be doing:
1. The most effective thing you could do would be to build citations and listings in local directories. These links will help immensely because they will also push up the dentists site in Google Places as well.
2. If you aren't concerned with Google Places, then in only an hour or two each month I would comment on as many dental/health related blogs as you can with a real name and not spammy comment. This is the fastest way to create a halfway decent link.
Good luck!
-
RE: My attempt to reduce duplicate content got me slapped with a doorway page penalty. Halp!
A doorway page is an old school black hat SEO technique. What webmasters would do is buy domains with high PR or buy expired domains that used to be competitors and then 301 redirect them back to their website. This was in essence buying their links, as the links to the old domains now ended up at their domain.
Are your domains all on the same hosting account or same serer c-block? Are they all registered and verified with Google Webmaster Tools? If not, then Google may seem them as being owned by different people. In that case, it would look to them like you just bought a bunch of domains and redirected them all to your domain.
To you, you were simply finding all the duplicate content out there and consolidating it into one domain the way you think you should. It just didn't look that way to Google. I would recommend claiming and verifying every one of the domains you want to 301 in GWT. Once you have them verified, then redirect them all to your new domain. At that point, file a reconsideration request with Google, explain your situation, show how you have all the domains verified and that they belong to you, and you should end up okay.
My best guess based on what you're saying is that Google thought all of your domains were under separate ownership, and to see them all 301 all at once looks like you just bought a bunch of other domains and redirected them to yours.
-
RE: Has anyone with a high number of home page tiles been effected by the panda/farmer update?
One thing that has appeared to be a factor is the number of ads and links on the home page. If you have tons and tons of internal links, then this could be hurting you. That's at least what I have been seeing as it relates to this. Even if they are not ads, if they look like lots of ads then that could be hurting too. The key is to limit the number of outgoing and internal links on a page and to make sure ads are very clearly labeled and that there are not tons of them.
-
RE: Subdomains
If you have a windows server, you cannot run php on those pages. You need a Linux server for this. This means you cannot put PHP in a subdirectory or folder. They are correct that it would have to be a subdomain, hosted on a linux server. You can redirect a URL from your subdomain to a subdirectory URL, but if the content is in php, you cannot put the same content from the subdomain into a subfolder.
Using a subdomain is not the end of the world. It is not ideal, but it won't kill you. Your best bet would be to try and change your hosting to be on a linux server, then use a subdirectory. If not, you have no choice really.
-
RE: Spam Directories creating misleading Authority ratings
That is an awful directory. None of the entries in the categories I looked at were even close, they were all over the place. Google has figured this out I would guess because of a very high number of reciprocal links. Most spammy directories require a reciprocal link to be included, so they likely have several hundred or even thousands of domains linking to them. Google would naturally penalize this. OSE doesn't seem to have a way to categorize reciprocal links, but that would be very incredible if they could.
Imagine being able to see your followed links, nofollowed links, and right in there with it, your reciprocal links. Then they could reduce the authority of sites with over 90% reciprocal links or something. Would be good for an SEO to know as well especially when taking over a website you haven't done work on before. That's good info.
-
RE: Can a XML sitemap index point to other sitemaps indexes?
You only need to use a sitemap index file if you have over 50,000 URL's. So if your site is that massive, then yes you'll want to do this. Basically all you do is create a bunch of sitemaps. You can then create a sitemap index file that is just a list of links to those sitemaps. You then submit your sitemap index file to google or each sitemap individually. Just glancing at your link it is pretty darn clear, there's not much to it.
-
RE: Buying Facebook Likes
To date there is no detecting "fake" accounts because they go to great length to imitate real people's accounts. Facebook has no interested in outing them because they love to boast the 500 million+ user base they have. If they deleted the millions of fake accounts out there that number would take a hit. So they don't mind. Outside of Facebook, how could any outside source ever detect a fake account?
So as it stands, you would be safe from anything that could be considered black hate by buying facebook fans, friends, shares and likes. Should you? That's up to you. But you definitely can and you definitely won't get penalized for it...at least for now
-
RE: SERP data went away??
I only see this happen when I block a URL in my robots.txt file. That URL still gets put in the index, but it has no cache. Google doesn't store a copy of it. Usually the URL appears as the title though. IF you redirected all of those home page url's to just one, is that one the same one Google had in its index? Surely Google only had one version of your many url's in its index, so if you didn't 301 to that version, it may take a few weeks for things to get straightened out on their end.
-
RE: Will an active forum on our domain help with rankings by fresh content?
Fresh content does little to anything to help your rankings. If you want to show up in news or discussion results, then fresh content can be good. Otherwise, having a forum or blog on your site won't do much to help a random product page in your store rank better.
If you want, and you should, move your blog from your subdomain to a subdirectory of your main domain. Then at least you are consolidating your content and link juice. Copy it and 301 the orld url's to the new ones. It may not do much to boost rankings, but every little bit can help.
-
RE: Duplicate content check picking up weird urls
Duplicate content by definition is having the same content on different URL's. I've never had the tool tell me I have duplicate content on the same URL. You must be missing something. Is it www vs non-www perhaps? I don't know how you can get identical url's showing up in there.
-
RE: Is SEM rush accurate enough to validate it's price?
I used to use SEMrush for PPC proposals. I would use their data to estimate the cost of a decent PPC campaign for clients. Boy was it worthless. I just checked right now on one of my highest searched keywords. It shows a volume that is 75% of what my search volume was in April. It shows an average CPC of $4.63. My average position is 2.4, quality score is a 5 an my average cpc was $0.99 with a CTR of 2.64%. So my data is totally normal, and my cpc was $0.99. I don't know how they get $4.63. Holiday pricing isn't even above $1.00 per click. So I noticed this trend for literally everything. So if you're doing keyword research for PPC purposes, you can pass on SEMrush.
-
RE: Thoughts on 2 directories?
Are they paid directories? If so, probably not worth it. There are very few directories out there worth paying for. So many free ones you can get decent links from, just worry about those. Only pay for a directory if you think it can actually bring you quality traffic. Never pay for perceived link value as it's usually very low anyway.
-
RE: Social or SEO?
Social bookmarking should be part of an SEO package. But its important to remember that digg is not a social bookmarking website, it is a social news site. Social bookmarking in its purest form is just delicious, jumptags and the like. If you have a few dozen employees, have them maintain regular social bookmarking accounts. Have them use these accounts to bookmark all sorts of stuff. Then when you have a new client, they can integrate a few of the client's pages into their bookmarking profils. This way you don't look like a bunch of spammers or unnatural users.
-
RE: Best Dynamic Sitemap Generator
I use xml-sitemaps.com if the website has proper navigation and is less than 500 pages. It works pretty well, you can download the sitemap afterwards in xml, html or txt.
-
RE: Bing Optimisation
Bing tends to reward on page optimization more than Google. I would make sure you have keywords in the title, url, alt tags, h1 tag, strong tags and internal anchor text. Whenever I optimize a website's content I notice bigger gains in Bing than in Google. I think Google is based more on relevance and links than Bing.
-
RE: Anyone have any good strategies for keyword scalability?
Just ask yourself one simple question: why am I adding this page to my site? Problem solved. If the answer is to provide more information on some specific topic, then you have a keyword, the topic. If it is to advertise a new product or service, then you have a keyword, the product or service.
If you don't know the answer to the first question, ask yourself this question: do I already have a page with similar content on my website? Would this add anything new? If you aren't adding anything new, don't add the page. You don't want to cannibalize your keywords with multiple pages targeting the same topic.
As far as keyword selection, there you go. To make sure they are optimized for a keyword, simply make a checklist. Is the keyword in:
title?
alt tag?
h1 tag?
strong tag?
That's about it.
-
RE: Are post tags on blogs still useful?
Tags never were useful for SEO and are not now. They are strictly a usability feature. If you use categories then tags are certainly obsolete. If you use the all in one seo pack you can noindex your tag pages I believe, so I would do this to avoid duplicate issues. Also block the /tag/ directory in your robots.txt file.
-
RE: Which is best blogging platform from SEO POV?
I don't see how wordpress could be best for small companies but not for big companies. A blog is a blog. Wordpress is great and easy to use with lots of features. It is vastly better than blogger. I don't know anything about Telligent. From an SEO perspective though, I don't know what wordpress could improve upon, I think it is the best out there.
-
RE: Mask links with JS that point to noindex'ed paged
First be aware that the "site:" query won't show improvements for a long time. I had a 15 page website I built for someone get indexed in the dev server on accident. I 301'd every page to the new site's real URL. If I site search the dev url's they are still there, in spite of the fact that they 301 and have been for nearly two months. One I did 6 months ago only recently was removed from the site search.
if you link to your own pages that are not indexed for whatever reason, you could try to mask them in javascript but just be aware of the fine line you walk. Google does not like anything that misleads them or users. Hiding a link that is visible to users and not them is not a good idea in my opinion. If you have content that isn't worth indexing, it shouldn't be worth linking to anyway.
-
RE: Too many 301 redirects to home page - is this possible?
I took over a website once and we redid it. The content was old and stale, a review site of products years old. We did a new url structure and new content, but we didn't redo the content of the old reviews. There were hundreds of URLs that got redirected to the home page. I pretty much took the entire old url structure and sent that whole directory to the home page. I only pulled out a few that had new counterparts. Hasn't harmed us, top 5 ranking. I wouldn't worry about it. Google hates it when you get lots of 301s from other domains, as in you bought up a bunch of old expired ones and redirected all their urls to your home page. That would be a bad idea. Internal links I don't think matter at all from an seo perspective.
-
RE: Nolo.com or bbb.org for link building?
That's pretty steep. You have to think about more thank link value too though. People looking for a lawyer may find you in the nolo directory. it may be expensive but it is a pretty fantastic link. Maybe do all the other stuff first, see how well you can do in the rankings, and when you're looking for something to put you over the top, try getting a link then. If you can get to the top without it, then great, you saved yourself some cash.
-
RE: Nolo.com or bbb.org for link building?
If you have a law firm then being listed at nolo.com is pretty valuable. You get two links it looks like, your profile and then your city/category you show up for. I would definitely pursue a link there.
bbb.org is a very authoritative site. getting a link here would be great as well.
Were you considering not getting links from these sites? Or do they charge a fee and you are wondering if the fee is worth it?
-
RE: What's with the new Q&A set up?
Good call, thumbs up for that I will overlook it as well, it would just be nice to not have to remember to do it all the time.
-
RE: What's with the new Q&A set up?
I gave you a thumbs up for reply so that it feels a little less awkward
-
What's with the new Q&A set up?
In the old Q&A set up your response was automatically given a thumbs up by you so that you got a mozpoint for every response you gave. Now you have to manually thumb up your responses. Why was this change made? Can we get it back to the way it was?
-
RE: When the keyword rankings trend south…?
Normal. Don't be surprised if you are 15 tomorrow and in the 60's next week. Think of your rankings as being like the weather. Right now the trend is weather getting warmer, but some days it will be really hot and some days it will storm and get cold. Overall these are just flukes in the general pattern. Your rankings will do the same types of fluctuations. Only get concerned if your rankings drop and they stay there for over a month.