You could install the Google Analytics debugger (https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/google-analytics-debugger/jnkmfdileelhofjcijamephohjechhna). Check the Javascript console in Chrome for Analytics related error messages to be sure that the event tracking is properly setup (when triggering the event)

I didn't check all the references of Patrick - but yes, the way you build your url (folders or "flat") will have no impact on how you are positioned in the SERP's (if they contain the same keywords)- so both of the options you mentioned in your original question are equal if you only see it from SEO perspective.

rgds

Dirk

Hi Theo,

We encountered something similar when we migrated a site. We properly redirected all the old url's to the new one, however, in the weeks after the migration, we saw a huge increase of 404 in the webmastertools.

When we took a closer look to these url's, we noticed that these where using an url structure we had abandoned several years ago. On the "old" site, these were redirected, but we didn't implement these old redirections after migration as we assumed that these very old url's wouldn't be in the index anymore. We proved wrong. We could delete them manually from the index using webmaster tools, because they used folders we are not using any longer, this is not probably not possible in your case.

While it is a bit annoying, I don't think that having these "phantom" url's in the index is doing you any harm in terms of SEO. They will probably never pop-up for normal search queries, only when you do in-depth queries, limiting the results to only your site.

rgds,

Dirk

Missing metadescriptions are on your /tag/ pages - but these are noindex so shouldn't be a problem. Few missing metadescriptions apart from that. Normally Moz bot respects noindex - so a bit strange that it's reporting these errors.

Didn't find exact duplicates but I guess these are generated by pages like http://venture.photo/kristine-chris/ - http://venture.photo/danielle-dave/ - the only difference between these pages is the video, which makes it almost impossible for bots to tell the difference between these pages. You could try to add some text & some images (with alt wedding photo) to make these pages more unique or integrate it with the "article style" content you have on site.

The galleries have a bit the same problem - a lot of images - but almost no text. I also noticed that you use "-" between the words in the alt text of the images -which is not necessary - it's even better to make it a plain descriptive text.

rgds

Dirk

Hugh,

Without the actual url is difficult to judge what's going on. If it's a recent site the difference could be related to the crawl frequency. You could always try to double check with a crawler like Screaming Frog (free is you use an url list or for the first 500 crawls).

rgds,

Dirk

Hi,

First about the city added to the title. Google does this on mobile so that it's easier for the searcher to see if the business is nearby. If I search for "bakery" on my PC - it shows the normal titles, if I do the same thing on my mobile, it's adding the city.

About the wrong location: to be very honest I am not really an expert in local SEO. When I check your site however, it's seems to me that you're not really making it very clear to Google that you have two locations, and what your primary location is. You mention the two addresses on your home page, one with Alberta office, the other one with B.C. (and you assume that Google will know that B.C. stands for British Columbia).

Check this article on local SEO: https://moz.com/blog/everybody-needs-local-seo - it contains a lot of tips & tricks on how to make it very obvious to Google what your location is.

Hope this gets you started & maybe that other Moz members with more "local search" experience could add some additional tips.

rgds,

Dirk