You can import some of the GA into your moz pro
Campaign settings > Google analytics
It's not as in-depth but its good for an overall look at things
Welcome to the Q&A Forum
Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.
You can import some of the GA into your moz pro
Campaign settings > Google analytics
It's not as in-depth but its good for an overall look at things
There used to be a thought that you could horde all your link juice internally but in reality its not worth it. You could no follow the link to the duplicate page and hope that the majority of any links go to the correct page but if rel=canonical any link juice will go the correct place.
In short if you've set up rel=canonical make the rest of the site for users and the rest will come. Endorsing may not have been the best descriptive wording. Any questions let me know ill do my best to explain further. (you can also take a look at the "no follow" link above for more info.
So a site is using a photo from your site but giving you credit for the photo by giving you a link?
How are you sure it's a "very bad domain" ?
The disavow will be fine it tells Google you don't want that site linked to your in anyway. If you don't want people stealing your images you could look into water marks.
Hello Cindy,
To stop the duplicate content use the rel=canonical tag it will then tell Google this is the original content and Google will then only index one of the tabs.
No follow is telling Google that you do not want to let "link juice" flow through that link and you're not really endoursing the link.
Rel=canonical is telling Google you have duplicate content but one of them is the original or the single on you want to be indexed.
Good luck.
I did receive the following response :
" So far we are only able to isolate this to a corrupt cookies issue. You will want to try clearing your cache/cookies in your web browser to see if it will work."
I know it's not an intentional error and I'm sure the Moz team are working hard to fix this.
Its a bit of an error unfortunatly. Go to www.moz.com/logout (or simple type /logout) then log back in and it will fix it.
You can also drop help@moz.com an email and they can help worse case more info for them to work on. I believe its an issue with the cookies.
In short: you're logged in even though it doesn't look like it, so log out then log in again!
Hope it helps.
Hi Ash,
It's really a preference. The great thing about signing the blogs (rel=author) is you get the fancy picture in any results which can help you stand out a bit in the SERPs
I suppose you need to ask yourself what you want from Google+ you may find it easier to use the business account for brand announcements but the personal account for e.g blog posts. This may help you build up authority in your niche whilst keeping any +1 on your business page engaged. You can write (well comment) on your business page with your personal page to help reinforce. it's all far too overly complex if you ask me!
If I'm honest I'm not too familiar with duplicate content on social media but lets assume by duplicating it we lessen the value (and the impact). You could look on "sharing" the business post (or visa vesa I suppose) so the value all goes back to the same place.
In short if you work out what you think would benefit your brand you can then fit in the rest around it. I hope some of that helps anyway. Lets not forget Christy and her great suggestions you using your personal account to really contact with your niche.
Good Luck.
Hi Stacey,
Funnily enough I was talking with some one about it just yesterday http://moz.com/community/q/is-it-possible-to-merge-a-google-page-with-google-places-local-page-on-g
In short, Google+ and local are different, you can claim the duplicate and mark it as a duplicate and thus have one. Can't merge I'm afraid. Google generates them for you and it's normal. There should be an option "are you the owner" from there you can do the rest. Any problems let me know .
Good luck!
I saw it, for some reason I always get overly excited about a Google plus update, couldn't find a mention of it, not sure if I like it yet.
Firstly, have you received a manually penalty, I say this because its far too easy to disavow loads of links but are they really doing you any harm?
If you feel it really is a problem you can disavow the whole domain:
domain:article-niche.com
When you disavow it will dissassociate that domain (or links) from your site.
More info - [https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/2648487](https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/2648487?hl=en)
Hope that helps,
Good luck!
Google+ & Google Local are two different things (confusing I know!)
So if you have a Google plus page and a Google local page that's good and normal you have more than that yes I would recommend removing them. Google+ is for social and Google local is to help people find you (locally)
Hope that helps, sorry if its overly confusing.
You can manually do it but its long and pointless as it's not really very usable as you're only getting names.
I'm still getting these errors its due to Moz thinking I'm not logged in when I am and have to log out manually (typing /logout). When logging in its all fine but this log out issue is a pain in the bum.
Why am I still getting these logged out errors?
Unfortunately you can't merge them you can however shut down one page (rather mark it as a duplicate) Google sometimes will make a page for you and thus the duplicate occurs, there should be a "are you the business owner" button some where where you can claim it then edit or mark it as a duplicate. Worse case you can get in touch with Google explain what page you own and which one is wrong and it can be adjusted ( had it a couple of times)
Google Local is a bit different from your Google+ as well so they do not share many of the same things. I recommend you verify the local page as it can help with local ranking and mean you can edit it in the future etc.
Hope some of that helped.
You can also use Majestic SEO's trust and citation flow, you will find many metrics fluctuate as do the search results. You can also use placement in the SERP to help back up DA etc.
Hi Ash,
I did write a lovely long response unfortunately Moz decided that it was going to remove it so here goes attempt two!
Let me start by a comparison to Facebook. On Facebook you have your personal page which you interact with etc. and you have a business page which people "like" etc. and find info. The same is essentially true for Google+
G+ you have your personal account which can be set up to contribute to websites ( rel=author ) telling people you've done stuff on that site. You have your business page (rel=publisher) which people +1 and talk about the business. The publisher page also can interact a bit more with the SERP. Unfortunately publisher is not as easy as author but they do act differently.
Now you don't really want to have a business set as a "personal" page as it doesn't have some of the features and also doesn't look as professional.
In short:
Use your personal account for rel=author on your site telling Google what you've made on the site (E.g a Blog)
Use a business account for people to +1 and recommend your site as well as interact with your customers
I hope that helps anything else you need to know I'll do my best to help.
More info :
They are the most recent Google has found, this doesn't mean they are the most recently made just the most recently Google has crawled.
you can see dates :
Web master tools >
Search Traffic >
Link to your site >
More >
Download latest links
I find Majestic SEO pretty helpful, you can also use Google webmaster tools and recently discovered links. Unfortunately most of the times its hard to find new links, i recommend you keep track of any links you build. It can take around a week for things to be crawled so you have to wait I'm afraid to say.
It's not about importance but more about crawlability, because Facebooks has privacy settings and not everyone's profile is public it can't always crawl all the links where as Twitter Google can see the links.
So twitter is better as Google can read it easier. Bing Uses Facebook more I believe.
If I may add a quick one "build it and they will come" is a great idea but I still recommend you put it out to your network as people can't find your content by magic this is where social media and even if your niche fits it blogs can be so helpful, it helps you target the people you are aiming your content at.
I'll pint out he following post :
http://moz.com/blog/hummingbird-unleashed
and say again Hummingbird has not resulted in the drop of rankings its only optimized the way people search.
Nothing has changed good links have always been hard to find and they have always been valuable.
SEO wise for some time we've had to split our time (now more over more things). Keep writing good content and keep getting good links with it. Keep your brand in the social spotlight and interact with customers. There is no one thing to focus on or one strategy that works better than another. Some sites have one way that may not work on another.
The best way which has always been the good way is to make your site for the user, make the site really helpful for the user make that user want to not only come back to the site but share it with their friends. Everything from this will fall into place, just don't blame hummingbird as it's not hummingbird!
Hope that helps a bit and good luck. There are some really good blog articles here on Moz that you can pick some tips on too!
The reason Google may consider them black hat is because they are, they are not recommended. I would recommend you work on creating a better main site that has what the user are looking for. If they are already landing on your site for the mentioned terms then you should be okay. Google's job is to bring up the most relevant results for a search term - make your site the most relevant for that search term.
Don't try to cheat Google, go with Google!
Having said all that I do know of some people with micro sites that can perform but best practice would mean it's not recommended. Good luck.
It's always my preference sometimes its unavoidable (e.g e-commerce) but most of the time it's not too difficult to rewrite or come up with fresh content. Glad I could help.
I'll just go ahead and copy and paste a response from a q&a from yesterday
In short yes, canonical is great on site as it puts all the juice on one page however over multiple sites I don't think its as efficient. I've given you some helpful info so I'll leave it to you I hope something helps here
"As far as I'm aware and webmaster guide lines are the following is true :
"Can rel="canonical" be used to suggest a canonical URL on a completely different domain?
There are situations where it's not easily possible to set up redirects. This could be the case when you need to migrate to a new domain name using a web server that cannot create server-side redirects. In this case, you can use the rel="canonical" link element to specify the exact URL of the domain preferred for indexing. While the rel="canonical" link element is seen as a hint and not an absolute directive, we do try to follow it where possible."
canonical is for on page more than off site.
Supporting this Matt Cutts mentions that they prefer 301
So bit of truth in it"
Have you looked in webmaster tools as it may tell you in there under crawl errors ?
Hello and welcome!
You will need to log into your moz analytics (top right over there). Then select your campaign from the drop down menu in the top right corner. You should then see the dashboard. There is lots of cool data there but what you want to look at is the Search tab specifically "Keyword rankings" Here you can see your position in the SERP.
There are a few other cool options here too which are :
Overview
Rankings
Performance
Competition
Opportunities
And if you wanted to in the top right you can create a neat report to share the data if you want.
Hope that helps.
As far as I'm aware and webmaster guide lines are the following is true :
There are situations where it's not easily possible to set up redirects. This could be the case when you need to migrate to a new domain name using a web server that cannot create server-side redirects. In this case, you can use the rel="canonical"
link element to specify the exact URL of the domain preferred for indexing. While the rel="canonical"
link element is seen as a hint and not an absolute directive, we do try to follow it where possible."
canonical is for on page more than off site.
Supporting this Matt Cutts mentions that they prefer 301
So bit of truth in it
Bots can't crawl Flash so unless you have an alt for them they won't follow links.
This may change in the future but for now they wont follow links in flash.
Also you may find this helpful it will tell you a bit more
https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/72746?hl=en
"Note that while Google can index the content of Flash files, other search engines may not be able to. Therefore, we recommend that you use rich-media technologies like Flash primarily for decorative purposes, and instead use HTML for content and navigation. This makes your site more crawler-friendly, and also makes it accessible to a larger audience including, for example, readers with visual impairments that require the use of screen readers, users of old or non-standard browsers, and users with limited or low-bandwidth connections such as a cellphone or mobile device. An added bonus? Using HTML for navigation will allow users to bookmark content and send direct links in email."
Hi,
You may want to read the following :
https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/66359?hl=en
Technically you should be fine though I never recommend duplicate content across sites It reduced the quality across both sites. As long as there is a link back to original source you should be ok.
Easy fix - don't use duplicate content!
You will still receive a penalty it's better to take the time to rewrite or get fresh content.
They can link to your site if they want to use the content as the user would still see the content but just putting a duplicate of the content on their site will result in a drop for the both of you although it may not happen right away it will over time
Hope this help, and good luck!
Hi Nick,
Would be happy to take a look at your site see if there is anything we can do for you.
Good thing about the digital age you can always bounce back!
Glad it helped, if you're finding openers are not working out you could look into your subject lines or the content or the emails, unfortunately it can happen. It's like SEO just keep playing with it until you find that sweet spot.
Hi Jeff,
I'll take a snippit from the webmaster tools
"In addition to returning a 404 code in response to a request for a page that doesn’t exist, the server will also display a 404 page. This may be a standard "File Not Found" message, or it could be a custom page designed to provide the user with additional information. The content of the page is entirely unrelated to the HTTP response returned by the server. Just because a page displays a 404 File Not Found message doesn’t mean that it’s a 404 page. It's like a giraffe wearing a name tag that says "dog." Just because it says it's a dog, doesn't mean it's actually a dog. Similarly, just because a page says 404, doesn't mean it's returning a 404. You can use Fetch as Google (or other tools available on the web) to verify whether the URL is actually returning the correct code."
and to help here is another link
http://forums.seochat.com/search-engine-optimization-28/diff-between-404-soft-404-error-467526.html
"The error 404 "page not found" means that the page you are finding server can't find he page.
Soft 404 means page not found and user will move to either home page or custom page."
Hope it helps.
So many blog posts about on Moz, there are a couple of helpful places to get you started :
http://moz.com/ugc/5-reasons-why-im-loving-the-new-google-keyword-planner
http://moz.com/blog/keyword-volume-tools
http://www.iacquire.com/blog/the-best-free-premium-keyword-research-tools/
Don't forget you can have a "sign up for news letter option" and then you can even start to build up some email lists of people who are engaged in your brand. you can use the likes of mail chimps to send for nearly no cost.
It can be a great way to announce new articles or new items on sale or for sale etc. There are some really great tips above though so this is just another helpful bit of advice.
Couldn't you export a .csv from both then create a graph in excel ? All though its more manual I'd said you get a bit more control.
Moz does some nice reports that export too what about those reports?
Is any one else getting a 503 error (I'll copy it below) whilst trying to get on Moz, I can get to the home page but going to internal links I get the error, I managed to get onto Q&A via an external link.
I've been having some troubles the last few weeks with logging on etc. Most importantly Is Roger ok ?
Service Unavailable
XID: 1257248781
Varnish cache server
I know you can submit your site in webmaster tools to be re-crawl if you need it to be re-crawled.
I can only think it must re-crawl it to find the new location its pointed to.
Sorry I couldn't give you a definitive answer, good luck though.
Matt Cutts touches on it here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Filv4pP-1nw
A 301 is telling Google that the new home of that link is there.
I've seen whole sites 301 then the site has ranked a bit of the keyword that was not relevant to the site (e.g batteries to a site than doesn't sell anything).
I would assume your link would have to be re-crwaled so Google knows the new home once it has been though it shouldn't need to re do it.
in short:Google finds the 301 then knows that is the new home of the link and passes anything that used to go to that link onto the new location.
I hope that helps a bit for you. If not I'm sure some one around here can go far more in depth if you want it more technical
Hi Matt,
Hootsuite you can add a tab called "mentions" and "retweets" and you can then see anyone that's talking to you and reply from there its a bit more manually maybe but would let you communicate.
You can also track your mentions so over time you can keep an eye on it. My only regret I find with using hoot suite is it would be helpful for a bigger notice of a reply (sound or pop up etc.)
Hope that helps.
Mine is fine, i can access more than 4 pages even on your search term. Have you tried a different browser ?
Everything is fine for me, maybe its your niche ?
rel=canonical was made for just such a thing so there is not really an excuse, sure you won't have all of them indexed but at the same time it wont bring your whole site down. As long as the user can find that product (even if its in one instance) via Google then I presume that's good for you,.rel="canonical" wouldn't affect their (user) site navigation.
There is also <cite class="vurls bc">www.reviewcentre.com </cite>
It can be really helpful for giving confidence in your brand when customers are researching you and as well it's also a good way to get in touch with your customers and hear what they have to say about your brand. It can be a good tool.
You can also get some links too, I have to admit it's expensive so I would recommend shopping about, normally what ever you invest in will come up with a brand search over time anyway. You can also always build trust in your site by letting customers review things on your site, the bonus of this is that it can give good social proof for the customer (e.g 100 people have liked this product it must be good).
I hope some of this is helpful.
Good luck what you choose and let us know how it works out.