Welcome to the Q&A Forum
Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.
Hi
It looks like you don't want to have search engines index internal search results from your website.
You could achieve this a couple of ways:
Hope that's helpful 
Hi
It doesn't sound like rel=canonical is the solution, as each one of your pages might feature multiple pieces of content from various other parts of your website (if I've read your question correctly) - so which would be the canonical version of the page?
You could use Parameter Handling in Webmaster Tools to ensure Google knows what to do with your various parameters. Moz doesn't matter here, as long as Search Engines are aware of how to handle your pages correctly.
There's a good overview here.
I hope that's helpful
Hi
I'm not entirely sure, but I think I can see what you're getting at. You're used to working with sites focussed on a particular niche, but now you have a site to work on that encompasses a variety of categories.
"Does this influence the ranking possibilities?" - it's the same: you can rank each page of a site for its target keywords with relevant content, good site architecture and link authority.
Think about large sites that rank for a huge variety of terms - e.g. Amazon.
There's a good post on Site Architecture here, and another one more specifically about "content hubs" here.
I hope that's helpful and that I've understood your meaning correctly
Hi
Sitemaps - yes, include anything in Sitemaps that you want users to be able to find, so the more ways you can lead a Search Engine to it, the better.
Filename - it would help if you could change the filenames to include keywords, but if that's not an option then there are other things you can do to optimise each PDF.
There's a good overview of optimising PDFs here - How To Optimize PDF Documents For Search
As that post mentions, include links back to your site for maximum value, especially if these documents are shared on other websites. Also, a bit of branding within each PDF (just add a logo) could help you out in some way.
Hope that's helpful
Hi Brien
The X-Robots tag has set many of your pages to noindex,nofollow. X-Robots is delivered as part of the HTTP response header so you won't find it in your HTML code.
In addition to that, your canonical tags are a little confused: the homepage canonical tag is set to
http://barnettcapitaladvisors.com/miami-financial-advisor-south-florida-financial-planner
when it should be barnettcapitaladvisors.com
I found these things by using Screaming Frog site crawler.
In your Robots file you're not allowing Yandex or Baidu to crawl the site - are you aware of this?
Have your developer correct the X-Robots and canonical issues.
Yeah this is the first thing you should do. WMT should give you a more exact number of links than OSE, and those numbers don't tend to fluctuate as much - unless there is an actual loss/gain of a larger number of links/LRDs.
Moz's tools can give a page any score, but it doesn't mean Google will rank it in a lower place than it deserves. If your page has an 'F', maybe all the other pages on that SERP do.
Your page may have good link authority or a good balance of anchor text links which could assist its ranking. Have you considered linking factors?
The report which gave you your score for the page should outline changes you can make in order to comply with SEO best practice.
Final thing - I'm in the UK but couldn't see you on page one for "social media marketing edinburgh" (logged-out, incognito-mode chrome session with personalised search off, location set to Edinburgh).
Thanks,
Rob
Hi
A quick way to track where sales are coming from is to setup a custom report tracking conversion by source/medium which includes referring domains, as long as the GA profile for your payment website records ecommerce transaction information.
Here's one I made earlier...
https://www.google.com/analytics/web/permalink?uid=ATrvKC0LQrWXPcVWHueJTQ
Make sure you're logged into the correct GA account and can apply the report to the correct profile.
Note that GA favours last-click attribution, meaning that they will credit the last place the customer visited before converting as responsible for the sale, which in this case should be your referring sites.
I'm not certain, but is Orderwise along the lines of what you're looking for?
Here's Google's recent mention of how to sort out Pagination issues, which states
"With rel=”next” and rel=”prev” markup, you can provide a strong hint to Google that you would like us to treat these pages as a logical sequence, thus consolidating their linking properties and usually sending searchers to the first page".
I'm assuming you'd like to have 5 star ratings for the product?
Can you go back to those people who gave you a testimonial and get them to give you a rating out of 5? If so then great, but if not perhaps you can judge each review fairly and come up with a star rating.
Once you've done this you can use Schema.org (try the Schema Creator if you're not sure how) or hReview to try and get some rich snippets showing.
Use the Rich Snippets Testing Tool or Bing Webmaster Tools to validate.
It's still worth submitting a site to DMOZ. It's a trustworthy site.
If you're really concerned about getting trustworthy links but don't have much budget then consider whether you want to edit the subcategory you wish your link to appear in.
Sure, you can compete. Do Google Places listings show in the results for these local search queries?
Well if you redirect to the root domain you may still lose your position. Google has pulled out that particular page to show because it's the most relevant page on the website for that particular query. It makes more sense to either add more content to that page or increase the number of links to it.
Is there anything your competitor is doing on their page that you're not? Can you do it better? Can you give more value to readers of that page?
Hi
Yes it would probably turn out to be a mistake if you redirected a page to a subdomain. Subdomains are considered more like separate sites than folders or pages. If you haven't got a subdomain with as-strong a link profile as your current ranking page then you'll likely lose the ranking, either temporarily or permanently.
Are you acquiring links to your current ranking page? That's probably the difference between position 6 and position 2.
Cheers
Rob
Perhaps 302 to the folder (/destination/) until you're ready to use the content on a page. Implementing the canonical tag here probably won't make a difference as there will only be a small number of 'live' pages.
Good luck Paul
Rob
A few questions:
Can you work the brand into the keywords somehow?
Is it necessary to show the brand at the end of the title for Google users?
Do you use the brand in the meta description?
Sounds like a lot of work!
If there's a lot of dupe content are the URLs also quite closely matched in terms of keyword use? Are you going to end up just consolidating a lot of the content on a smaller number of pages? If that's going to be the case then perhaps a 301 to the root domain, or to the best of the current pages, would be better.
Cheers
Rob
302 redirect does indicate a temporary move, but how temporary is the move? If you're going to have this content sorted quite quickly then you might leave the pages as they are for now.
Are you falling short on ranking currently because of dupe issues?
Don't forget about using internal anchor text to inform Google which pages are relevant for certain keywords.
Cheers
Rob
Yeah I'd recommend consolidating the content onto one page, and 301 redirect the old pages to the new version.
If there are clear differences between 2 or more sections of the content then it's not a problem to have those parts of content on separate pages as they're targeting different keywords.
The less "thin" content, the better.
Cheers
Rob
What keywords are you searching with? If you add the brand to the keywords does it show the full Title? Google may be truncating the title depending on your query.
Cheers
Rob
I'd give each product a unique URL and its own content, but for displaying the products some shopping carts offer a Bundle or Grouped Product option.
Also, you could just group products under a Category page to show to non-Google Shopping traffic, and use Related Items links to promote similar products on each individual Product Page
SEO Spider from Screaming Frog is a great crawler and a notable alternative to Xenu
The difference between positions 2 and 8 appear to be combined Organic/Google Places results. Perhaps for stability you should work on your Google Places listing. Google will combine the organic and places results if they see good optimisation of both.
There's a good article on that here - http://www.seomoz.org/blog/how-to-research-local-citations-after-google-removed-them-from-places
When did you implement the 301 redirect?
I've seen it take a couple of months for some sites to regain its PageRank. As long as you follow the correct procedure (which it seems like you have) then you should be okay.
Another thing you might wish to consider is to change the links from pointing to your old site to link to your new site.
Don't forget that internal anchor text can determine which pages Google shows on a given SERP. If you do overuse a keyword in your internal anchor text it does dilute the keyword across the site. It's perhaps better to reduce the number of times a keyword is used in internal anchor text to focus a keyword, and links from that keyword, onto a particular page.
I don't think it's microformats.
For one of my client sites I have Schema.org implemented on Product Pages but not the Category pages.
One of the category pages ranks for a search and does show a list of products on the SERP
Another of the category pages ranks for a search and does not show a list of products in the SERP.
You can see for yourself here:
Without product list:
http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=espresso+cups&pws=0
(position 5, espressodeco.com)
With product list:
http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=espresso+cups+and+saucers&pws=0
(position 4)
It appears Google is just using a list of products from some sites on each SERP.
I currently see you at position 2.
How are you checking your rankings?
Do other sites on the page change positions often?
Ooof there are so many and really it depends if you want news, tips or want to learn more about a particular niche. In lieu of a long list I'd recommend SEO Gadget, State of Search and SEO Theory.
If you are relevant in multiple categories I see no harm in trying to get links from all of them, it's quick and easy to submit your site. The category structure in Dmoz isn't perfect so it can be difficult to know which is the most relevant category for your site especially with some being so similar.
Discovering 404s can be useful.
Is the old page deleted? Why not 301 redirect the URL to an appropriate page elsewhere on your site? Tools such as Screaming Frog's SEO Spider can crawl your website and help you discover 404s. By redirecting the page with a permanent redirect search engines will to pass any link juice the previous page had to the new page. Redirecting will also cleanup your pages in the SERPs and help with any broken internal links on your site (though it'd be better to fix those).
There's no need to having a rel=canonical tag on a 404 page (but if you do, ensure the tag is for the page itself and not actual content on your site).
There's also no need for search engines to index your 404 page, so I suggest adding the meta NOINDEX tag to the page.
If the articles are also featured on individual pages I would recommend NOINDEX for 2 of those pages, and a canonical tag for the correct page.
My experience was that Position Preference never really worked well anyway.
Targeting positions 3-6 for a number of keywords the average position was around 2, which was fine for higher quality score ads with lower cpc but annoying for some of the more competitive phrases with a higher average cpc and less chance of a return due to product pricing and competition.
I found it easier to manage ad positions with bid management rather than Position Preference.
...and what is the SEO benefit of this? This video from Matt Cutts suggests using file extentions, except for a directory.
Google will count links to different pages on your site. This post from David Naylor illustrates the definition of where the First Link counts.
Yeah it's not great and is out of date, has broken links etc, but as with a lot of SEO advice is useful as a guide as to the sort of places you'd benefit from being listed in.
I've a few questions:
Thanks,
Rob
If you have a list of sites you are going to submit to then using an extension like Roboform or AutoFillForms can take a lot of the tedium out of the process and save you a few £/$/etc if you need to do that.
Are there any useful keywords in your site's name? If so then definitely keep it in.
It's important to keep post titles eye-catching, which usually means short with a simple message or idea, which may leave space for your brand. Personally if I can see the brand in the title as it displays on the SERP then I'm probably more likely to click on it.
Oh and Yoast's Wordpress SEO plugin is all you need for WP...
If you're working with Teams then a training area with whiteboard is a must-have. Said area should perhaps be viewable from the normal working environment for added after-effect.
Enough space between you and the person nearest, but enough proximity to feel that you can freely communicate good ideas.
Anyone ever Split-Tested a workspace, or know of anyone who has? Would be very interested to know if this got better results.
Yeah there are risks. But if you go about it in a slightly different way then you're perhaps less likely to be penalised.
For example if you ask each blogger to place a badge on their website as part of the review then it looks a little more legit, with the badge containing an image or logo and an anchor text link.
I've had experience of this. It's good to make clear to the client that you've been hired for a specific purpose and that you can't perform your contracted job properly if a third party won't comply with your instructions.
It's in the client's (and designer's) interest to listen to you. Your reputation depends on your advice or consultation proving successful and if they're aware of that it should help you.
If you have a particularly awkward client who is keen on some useless keywords then it's kind of your job to tell them so (but in the nicest possible way). Compromising and giving them half of what they want, coupled with your own input, can help them move away from their own ideas when they eventually realise that your advice is paying off more than their own thoughts.
Partial SEO can be worthwhile. If by this you mean just on-site SEO then it can go some way, but if there are few valuable links then it's not going to stick around at the top of the SERPs for too long. If it's just on part of the website then it might be worth doing so long as the client is aware that further work should be undertaken later on to make the most of the opportunity.