Nope, won't cause any problems. The xml sitemap is what you will submit to G and search engines while the HTML one is for your site visitors who want to see all your pages (although it will be crawled and indexed as well).
Moz Q&A is closed.
After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.

Best posts made by OlegKorneitchouk
-
RE: Can you have a /sitemap.xml and /sitemap.html on the same site?
-
RE: Can I make 301 redirects on a Windows server (without access to IIS)?
Try this. It uses the web.config file which is accessible via FTP.
-
RE: A charset attribute on a meta element found after the first 1024 bytes.
Move charset="UTF-8"> immediately after the opening
-
RE: Same blog, multiple languages. Got SEO concerns.
If you plan on translating a part to another language, I would use the hreflang tag to tell search engines that two pages are identical, just in different languages. Then search engines can serve the correct version of the page to whoever is searching based on their language preferences.
If a nice chunk of your customers prefer English, I would look into creating a English version of your entire website.
-
RE: Do I need to change my country og:locale to en_AE
You should utilize og:locale:alternative and have og:locale set to the country you want to present it to. see details here.
Overall, since its English in both scenarios, I don't think you need to worry about it.