Welcome to the Q&A Forum
Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.
Hi There,
You are correct that the two check marks represent an equivalent value. My instinct is that you are looking at two different parts of the tool. Some of the UI coding is a bit older for some parts of MA than others so while the information is the same it may be displayed differently on different parts of the tool. 
So it looks like everything is a ok but if you have any questions for me please let me know.
For now I wish you a fantastic day and look forward to speaking with you soon!
Hi Robert,
This sounds like something we would need to look into from this end. I have created a ticket asking for a bit more listing information so we should be able to correspond there.
Hopefully once we get a bit more information we can get this all sorted.
For now I wish you a spectacular day and look forward to speaking with you soon!
Hi There,
Hope all is well! I agree with Nitin that we may need to see a screen capture to get to the bottom of this one. if it looks like an issue on our end I would be happy to pass this on to our engineering staff. Also, it may be the case that this is a rendering issue with your browser so I would recommend clearing your cache and cookies to see if that does the trick.
Hopefully though this is just a temporary hiccup and all is well.
For now I wish you a fantastic day and look forward to speaking with you soon.
Hello!
Thanks for reaching out to us and with the blessings of Gondor we should be able to provide a good plan to get back to 100%.
Here is how to interpret your Moz Local listing score, and have a good sense of what Moz Local is doing for and what you can take manual action on.
When you sign into your Moz Local dashboard and click on a business listing there, you are taken to a business details page where you will see your overall listing score. This score is comprised of your status on the direct partner sites in our network + the status of your listings on non indirect partner sites, as well.
The supported partner sites in our network are:
Factual
Foursquare
Neustar/Localeze
Infogroup
Best of the Web
Acxiom
Superpages
Bing
CitySearch (Citygrid/Insider Pages)
Once you’ve uploaded your listing to Moz Local, it’s our job to push your data out to the above direct partner sites. Your overall listing score will begin to rise as each of the above listings achieves updated status. The rise may be gradual rather than instantaneous, but should be noticeable over time. You should be sure you’ve filled out as many details as possible on your listing so that it can achieve a maximum score. If you’ve filled out all of these fields, you’re good to go on this and it’s our job to take it from there, pushing out your data to the direct partners. As each partner achieves updated status, your listing score will gradually begin to rise.
Apart from this, you can contribute to a rise in your listing score manually by improving your listings on the non-partner sites shown on the details page. These non-partner sites are:
Google
Facebook
Yelp
Hotfrog
YP
On the details page, if you discover that we are reporting issues to you under the ‘Inconsistent’ and ‘Incomplete’ tabs on any of the above non-partner sites, you should consider taking manual action to correct these things. This activity on your part will also eventually contribute to a rise in your listing score.
Finally, if our tool also surfaces duplicate listings for you, you’ll want to pay close attention to these. If the duplicates are on any of the partner sites, you can simply click the ‘close’ button. If they are on the non-partner sites, clicking the close button will take you to a page on the associated site where you will need to work manually with the platform to request closure of the duplicate.
Taken all together, the work we are doing to push your data to the our partner sites and the work you do on the non-partner sites will contribute to a rise in your listing score, until hopefully reaching that 100% mark.
I hope this helps you feel fully informed about our service and your opportunities! Please don’t hesitate to let me know if you have any further questions!
Hi There,
Hope all is well and you are having a magical day! It looks like we may need to create a ticket for this issue because it will require the full address of the listing and some additional information. Once we have this we should be able to pass this up to our engineering staff and hopefully get everything shaking like Kevin Bacon!
We should be reaching out shortly so if you have any questions for me in the meantime let me know.
I wish you a fabulous day!
Hi Charles,
Although, we have let our product team know that some users prefer a firm delineation for the moment we are sticking with the breakdown provided above. If you have any questions on this or have some feedback you would like sent up to the powers who rule the keyword difficulty section let me know!
Anyway hope this helps and I wish you an awesome day.
Hi There,
This is a fairly tricky one to answer, though it does seem that I will need to agree with our crawler on this one. 
There seems to be a few questions so if I miss something or you would like some additional clarification let me know.
My instinct is that when it comes to the contact info the .lv is throwing us off. Though we are working hard to include more TLD's my gut instinct is that when we attempt to parse the page the lack of a .net or .com email is throwing us off. One important thing to know when it comes to spam score is that these are just general indicators that we associate with spam. There is always the chance that a non spammy site will have some indicators attributed to it but still not be spam, depending on how the site was set up.
The next two issues are not mutually exlusive because it looks at the site as a whole and not the homepage. So for example if you have a portion of the site that is comprised of a small amount of text without any substantial content both of these triggers could occur. We know this is a lot so I would really recommend reviewing Rands post on spam score here: https://moz.com/blog/understanding-and-applying-mozs-spam-score-metric-whiteboard-friday
I would really recommend reviewing this material and speaking to your web developers. Spam score is a great first step to facilitate a conversation between you and your developers to focus on areas of the site that may be problematic. It may be the case that the portions of the site that have thin content have a very good reason for being there so they should stay.
I know this is a lot so if you have any questions for me let me know!
Hi there! I'm sorry your site isn't showing up in Open Site Explorer yet. This generally indicates that your site has not been included within our index. While we are working hard to continue to expand upon our index some sites may not be included which appears to be the case for meko.lv
For some more in-depth info, here's how we compile our index:
- We grab the most recent index.
- We take the top 10 billion URLs with the highest MozRank (with a fixed limit on some of the larger domains).
- We start crawling from the top down until we've crawled 90,000,000,000 pages (which is about 35% the amount in Google's index).
So, if the site is not linked to by one of these seed URLs (or one of the URLs linked to by them in the next update) then it won't show up in our index.
Other tools, such as Webmaster Tools, Ahrefs, and Majestic will alway show more link data as they target the quantity of links, while OSE focuses more on quality and Domain Authority.
Mozscape focuses on a breadth-first approach. Therefore we almost always have content from the homepage of websites, externally linked-to pages, and pages higher up in a site's information hierarchy. However, deep pages that are buried beneath many layers of navigation are sometimes missed and it may be several index updates before we catch all of these.
We update once a month and you can view the next scheduled update here: http://moz.com/products/api/updates
So there is a chance that we should be able to pick up the site within the next index.
Concerning the spam score we will provide the reasons in our spam score section here: https://moz.com/researchtools/ose/spam-analysis/flags?subdomain=meko.lv
The bolded check marks represent all of the indicators of spam that we were able to find. If you see some indicators that you do not feel apply to your site please feel free to email help@moz.com and we would be happy to take a look.
Hope this helps provide some clarity. Please let me know if you have any questions!
Hi! How exciting! I can send you some resources that can boost your success here, it's a bit of reading but it's really helpful if you are learning
I hope this helps start you off on the right foot! Let me know if you have any questions!
Hi There,
Thanks for writing us! Unfortunately, while it is true that you can export all of your existing keywords from keyword difficulty with the export CSV here:http://screencast.com/t/DSxnAnpJuGm
This will not be able to include the SERPs within the CSV, downloading all of keywords with SERP's is not possible at the moment because it would sadly put a lot of pressure on the system. Though we may be able to expand our capabilities down the line for the moment this is a bit beyond our capability.
Here is an awesome article diving a bit deeper into the tool so if you have any questions for me let me know! https://moz.com/help/guides/research-tools/keyword-difficulty
Hi There,
This is an excellent question! This awesome summary is based on a post back in 2012 by SCL SEO and comes from this link http://moz.com/community/q/keyword-difficulty-score-assesment. So generally it breaks down like this:
Hope this helps and if you have any other questions or concerns please feel free to let us know.
Have a spectacular day and I look forward to hearing from you soon.
Hi There,
Thanks for writing us and this does appear to be a bit strange. I will create a ticket on your behalf and pass this up to our engineers for review. Hopefully they should be able to provide a bit of additional insight moving forward and hopefully with our powers combined we should be able to get this all sorted.
You have been amazingly awesome thus far so if you have any questions or concerns for me let me know.
I wish you a spectacular day and look forward to speaking with you soon!
Hi! How exciting! I can send you some resources that can boost your success here, it's a bit of reading but it's really helpful if you are learning
I hope this helps start you off on the right foot! Let me know if you have any questions!
Hi There,
We are really sorry to hear that you are experiencing this issue and sadly recourse may be a bit limited. In order to update Mozbar we needed to submit the updates to the Mozilla team for review. The Mozilla team has delayed these update by a fairly significant margin, so unless it can be resolved by some cursory trouble shooting such as clearing your cache and cookies, then your best bet may be to switch to chrome.
We know that for many users chrome is not an option though it may be your best recourse at the moment. Hopefully clearing your cache and cookies will be able to resolve the issue though so if you have any questions for me please let me know.
I wish you a fantastic day!
Hi There,
Thanks for writing us and this is a bit tricky. While there is not much in the way of a hard and fast limit, one does exist. After reviewing the campaign in the screen capture the good news is that you are nowhere near the limit. In this case it looks like the these URL/pages were added fairly recently, so they may take about a week to populate. To get all of your wonderful reporting I would check out on-page grade here: https://moz.com/researchtools/on-page-grader
Hope this helps and if you have any questions let me know!
Hi Chris,
This is a really interesting question. In this case I would recommend writing into help@moz.com so we can take a look under the hood to see if there are any issues. If it looks like a bug we will make sure to pass it up to our engineers to take a look.
If you have any other questions please feel free to ask.
Hopefully this helps and I wish you a wonderful day!
Hi Kurt,
Thanks for writing us and I hope this message finds you well! This question can get a bit tricky because there can often be a few facbook or google places pages with information very close to the desired listing can often create some confusion. I would select the facebook and google places partner is the listings that have been verified to see what we are pulling. Here is a screen capture for reference: http://screencast.com/t/m4t4yt7bti5
Also, this help hub article does a pretty good job of breaking down this process here: https://moz.com/help/guides/local/listing
If you can verify the pages that we are pulling from are not the ones associated with your clients business I would be happy to create a ticket with our engineering staff on your behalf.
Let me know what you find and I would be happy to help you with the rest of the process.
Thanks again for being awesome and I look forward to speaking with you soon!
Hi Donna,
I hope that all is well and you are having a super amazing day! You are correct that Keyword Analysis has been added to the Moz Bar to provide all of your keyword analysis needs. Just type the keyword you would like to check out in Google and select the Get Keyword Analysis option. Here is a super cool screen capture for reference: http://screencast.com/t/tD7sIrl3O
The percentage is based off of our existing keyword analysis tool which can be located here: https://moz.com/researchtools/keyword-difficulty.
Although, we would love to be able to expand this feature out in the future for now, it is a bit limited. If you see anything you would like to add or just see some other super cool suggestions feel free to post them at: http://seomoz.zendesk.com/forums/293194-seomoz-pro-feature-requests
Hopefully this helps and if you have any other questions or concerns please let me know.
Have a really awesome day and I look forward to speaking with you soon!
Hello!
Thanks for reaching out to us and with the blessings of Gondor we should be able to provide a good plan to get back to 100%.
Here is how to interpret your Moz Local listing score, and have a good sense of what Moz Local is doing for and what you can take manual action on.
When you sign into your Moz Local dashboard and click on a business listing there, you are taken to a business details page where you will see your overall listing score. This score is comprised of your status on the direct partner sites in our network + the status of your listings on non indirect partner sites, as well.
The supported partner sites in our network are:
Factual
Foursquare
Neustar/Localeze
Infogroup
Best of the Web
Acxiom
Superpages
Bing
CitySearch (Citygrid/Insider Pages)
Once you’ve uploaded your listing to Moz Local, it’s our job to push your data out to the above direct partner sites. Your overall listing score will begin to rise as each of the above listings achieves updated status. The rise may be gradual rather than instantaneous, but should be noticeable over time. You should be sure you’ve filled out as many details as possible on your listing so that it can achieve a maximum score. If you’ve filled out all of these fields, you’re good to go on this and it’s our job to take it from there, pushing out your data to the direct partners. As each partner achieves updated status, your listing score will gradually begin to rise.
Apart from this, you can contribute to a rise in your listing score manually by improving your listings on the non-partner sites shown on the details page. These non-partner sites are:
Google
Facebook
Yelp
Hotfrog
YP
On the details page, if you discover that we are reporting issues to you under the ‘Inconsistent’ and ‘Incomplete’ tabs on any of the above non-partner sites, you should consider taking manual action to correct these things. This activity on your part will also eventually contribute to a rise in your listing score.
Finally, if our tool also surfaces duplicate listings for you, you’ll want to pay close attention to these. If the duplicates are on any of the partner sites, you can simply click the ‘close’ button. If they are on the non-partner sites, clicking the close button will take you to a page on the associated site where you will need to work manually with the platform to request closure of the duplicate.
Taken all together, the work we are doing to push your data to the our partner sites and the work you do on the non-partner sites will contribute to a rise in your listing score, until hopefully reaching that 100% mark.
I hope this helps you feel fully informed about our service and your opportunities! Please don’t hesitate to let me know if you have any further questions!
Hi Tej,
Thanks for writing us on this! So Sheena and Karl are both correct. Although, an REL Canonical may solve the issue with Google it is still technically a duplicate title tag. When designing the tool we found that having the crawler pick up the REL Canonicals can be problematic for a coding and SEO standpoint. It is often possible that an REL Canonical will be directed to an incorrect page and since our crawler is so literal it would have issues recognizing the canonical was bad.
Our product staff is aware of this and they hope to get to a place where we provide an ignore feature, so if you feel that the tag was implemented correctly you can select ignore and we will no longer report that issue for that page.
I know that this is not ideal for many customers, but hopefully our solution will be comprehensive enough to encapsulate many of the solutions SEO's have found for these issues.
Hopefully this helps and if you have any other questions or concerns let me know.
Have a great day!