CRAFT Content Management System:

Pros:
Godly fast load times
Lightweight and versatile 
Yoast equivalent plugin : SEOmatic

Cons: Requires a higher end user which will involve more coding
Newer and less popular CMS than something like Wordpress, which means less themes and additions are available.
Utilizes Twigs which is a pain initially to learn the dynamics of the directories and how it's mapped

Conclusion:

If you got time to burn learning a new CMS, go with October CMS, that one is pretty sweet!

I think updating the content is always the best option, especially if any backlinks are pointed at it as Joseph stated. Keywords may be a non important outdated function, but their presence certainly doesn't hurt a pages ranking any, so if you update the pages meta description and page content that would probably be your best bet.

It's coming back with 25 results and quite a few PDF files.

Like Nigel said, pretty much the only reason I would ever aim to try and put something in front of my root domain name, would be because I'm trying to pass the domain off as something it's not. So whether that is affiliate links that nobody wants, or a federal prison sentence for taking Kali linux endeavors a little to far, is not for me to know

I had to make several hundred pages for a video tube at one point. And what I did to expedite the process is use the clone post/page plugin. Then I created a clone with 3 things.

The first thing was the templating for the meta description and title for each video**(naturally I did that with Yoast)**. The second thing I did was create a short code with php to place the page title in several areas using simply [template]. Then for the final automation aspect, I appeased the alt tag necessity with a js script to dynamically add alt tags with the page title on all images.

I don't know what the outcome of the said feature your describing is, however the way you would accomplish your desired end result is by adding a bunch of generic meta title/descriptions with the bulk editor feature of yoast. Naturally skup over the 30 pages, you'll simply need to make a template one time then copy it to clipboard and paste paste paste like a madman! Wont even 5 minutes with 200 pages.

Jeff,

If you have fewer than 10 locations, you’ll have to enter them individually.

Businesses with 10 or more eligible locations can add, verify, and manage them in bulk.

According to the Google partners test, if you end up listing less then 10 and want to differentiate them you use things like the street name or if it was like in a mall the malls name etc. IT indicates not to use store numbers. IF you're going to be doing web design or marketing that involves directory listings for entities like bing and Google, I highly suggest certifying for Google Partners, it's free and it will give you some versatility with the PPC bidding alongside SEO organic.

If there are no errors in the helper tool yer good. I was probably the moron that proposed it not working, but clearly, that's not the case

Some pages I got like 2-3 videos from youtube and the JSON works on that, I guess the confusion I had around your initial inquiry was I was thinking in terms of the organization address or something to that effect.

Not sure if you've played with the article/ blog post schema, but some the similarly categorized objects literally have to have your organization on some approved list of some sort. Otherwise, it fires off a warning in Googles little testing contraption.

On-site is priority number 1. Before you can conduct any off-site, you need to have a solidly built website to direct them to, or they'll simply bounce.

There are niche affiliate marketers such as Income School that rely solely upon on-site SEO for the success of their businesses. While I disagree with their theory of not conducting off-site strategies as a part of my link building efforts, I like the fact they solidify the necessity to focus on your website.

I'm not sure what you mean as far as Technical SEO, I think there are quite a few advanced aspects to both on-site, and off-site SEO, but I haven't seen it categorized separately from the two by itself quite yet, not saying some experts don't, just new outlook to it as of this moment.

I did a bit of Affiliate marketing for Crakrevenue a few months back White, and one thing I advise that affiliates aren't going to tell you proactively is to add rel="nofollow" on your affiliate link.

My adult affiliate site was very easy to drive substantial traffic hitting the right hot spots, and I ranked it pretty quick. In short order, many of the affiliates I was advertising for had less authority than me.  So to avoid passing all that hard work to get authority to someone who was merely paying me for traffic, adding the nofollow tag was a quick fix.

You definitely WILL NOT get a benefit in SEO from an affiliate, that would just be to easy!

As jcnotfound2083 states the ideal is to use a 301 redirect. I am certain it very much will pass authority. Reason being I've seen many black/grey hats check for broken links on NY Times on older articles and should they see a DoFollow to a expired non owned domain, purchase the lease and 301 redirect it to a domain they want authority passed.

When it comes to the NYTimes scenario, I'd Personally make a website and put relevant content on it, giving me the most longevity as to not appear blatantly obvious that I'm manipulating the situation for ranking. In the case of this image, you don't want to just swap it with another one especially if it's annoying and had say for instance the date meshed in with the url extension, which is to much to deal with. This will redirect it to your homepage

Redirect 301 /foldersAnd/ToOldImage/image.jpg /

https://yoast.com/yoast-seo-insights/

It picks the prominent keywords based on density, the frequency the words are being used in the content.

Nigel's right in saying that despite everyone loving to say duplicate content has no negative impact on you it definitely does. I've recently had some creep online stalker clone throw away websites of some of my recent backlinks in an effort to cause me ranking issues. I submitted them all to Google for fishing/credential harvest accounts.

REAL LINK
activerain com
**FAKE LINKS **
activerain net 
activereign net
REAL LINK
seoeffect com
FAKE LINKS
demo-seoeffect nl
REAL LINK
stripperweb com
FAKE LINKS
clarxidad gq
tirtas cf
hascrafot ga

5-10 links in 8-10 hours of work high authority domains? When I'm rich I'm hiring that guy because I've been trying to  hustle a 2000 word blog with 2 custom infographics and a field study and I can't get any biters for a week now

On the business side of things @Kingalan1, I can totally understand looking at SEO from a consumer perspective it should be only reasonable that if you're paying a doctors wage that you could get at least a time estimate. The problem we face is that there are so many factors beyond not only the consumer, but the SEO strategists control.

I think what Chris Menke said, "you should be very, very well educated on the topic of link building before investing your company's money in it." is very crucial in the fact that the more research you put into SEO the better results plus the more money you'll save. In your position what I would probably do if you want VERY HIGH authority links is actually research into each one you want individually.

News Websites seem to be rather heavy hitters for example. So every News website has journalists that write articles which have email addresses to contact them. With some time and money invested you can very much expedite the link building process. I wouldn't go into setting goals of link quantity, but rather target quality. Because as I'm sure you know sometimes 1 link could be worth what 1000 others would provide you.

So if you hire a professional SEO strategist to do these things for you, I would research into the quality of their work, and their results. But I wouldn't go into it with a certain expectation or time frame for any particular result.