Welcome to the Q&A Forum

Hi  Bongani,

Here are some extra resources that could help you understand better what happens when you do layout / website changes. This is a video by Matt Cutts posted a wile ago, it also includes some other things but it also mentions things related to the layout:

Will changing the code and layout of my pages while moving to new URLs affect their rankings?

Also, besides what EGOL said I would also add another thing:

8. Be very careful about the Wordpress theme you are going to use. It's a good thing you already mentioned that you want it high quality. Just to be sure - I would check for any embeded / hidden links. I had some unpleasent experiences even with "high quality ones".

Hi,

I used Copyscapefor these 2 pages:

http://www.ciaoitalia.nl/product/pizza-originale/mediterranea-halal
http://www.ciaoitalia.nl/product/pizza-originale/gyros-halal

And found that out of 915 and 918 words - 899 were identical in both documents.

But it's hard to say what happened previously - maybe you can give us more details?

Hi Wesley,

It's better if you do it in stages. A more gradual roll out is also recommended by Matt Cutts. His example is for 200K pages, but 65K is not so far away. I think the approach should be the same.

Check his video, it will help you understand what's better:

Should I add an archive of hundreds of thousands of pages all at once?

I hope this helps, good luck!

Yes. If your website has clear and interesting titles, more people will click on them (as compared to same repeating brand stuff). So, as more people engage with your website, the chance that they talk about your website or link to it increases.

So, this is an additional bonus you get besides the bonus you got when Google Bot understood your content better.

Hi Dan,

Yes, for sure. Assuming that the content of the news pages is unique and valuable.

Having same title gives Google Bot mixed signals which has side effects. Check this post by Rand, I think you'll understand everything:

http://moz.com/blog/how-to-solve-keyword-cannibalization

Hi Rachel,

There are some pretty cool articles written right here on Moz.

Domain Migrations: Surviving the "Perfect Storm" of Site Changes

Web Site Migration Guide - Tips For SEOs

Domain Migrations: Lessons from the Moz Transition

Achieving an SEO-Friendly Domain Migration - The Infographic

I hope this helps, good luck!

Hi Taysir,

Domain Authority is Moz's calculated metric for how well a given webpage is likely to rank in Google's search results. It uses a machine learning model to predictively find an algorithm that best correlates with rankings across the thousands of search results that we predict against.

In terms of accuracy (the level of correlation with Pagerank and other signals from Google) it's pretty good. A lot of professional SEM's are using it to get a general idea of how competitive a given site is in Google.com. But, in your case, a difference of 7 points does not say anything. If we compare two different websites which have a 7 point difference we can't say that one is ranking better than the other. One of them could focus on very specific terms and rank better there (even with a lower DA) than the other with more general approach for users.

There are a few other things that cause fluctuations in DA, which are not in your control:

• Moz says: "We constantly update the algorithm used to calculate Page Authority, so you may see your score fluctuate from time to time."

• Some of the websites you got links from might loose some of their powerful links - and even if you constantly add more, if the loss is bigger than what you gain - you will see a drop in DA

And a few more things:

• Don't rely on DA to "explain the ranking loss". It was not meant for this. Instead try to match the Mozcast Google Algorithm Change History with the drop in your rankings.

• Webmaster Tools does not tell you if you were hit by Penguin, Panda, or Hummingbird. It tells you if you have a manual penalty which is a totally different thing. If you see a drop in impressions in GWT you could be hit by any of the above. Try to do the timing check mentioned above.

Hello Chanpreet,

Like Yiannis says, it's probably related to "over optimized anchor text". To get more info you could compare your anchor text link profile with one for a competitor that still ranks well in SERP's.

Hello Eran,

I'm 100% with kadesmith at each point he covers. So we are two now (small community :). I can add a few more things:

-> It's easy to fall in the "over optimized anchor text" pit when working with directories. At least if they do it like most of the people did it in the past. I had at least 1 website penalized because of these. If I were you I would approach them in this way: I would ask for what details do they need to submit to directories and then check if they would use the same anchor text in all directories. If they use the brand name as anchor text they might be aware of last changes. If not they are probably just doing it to get some money and don't really care for what happens.

-> link velocity -> is related to the historical changes in link profiles - and it mentioned by Google in some of their patents. If people submit to directories like they did in the past they will get a lot of links in a short amount of time. Google is able to detect this, and at least in theory is able to do some interesting stuff like: temporarily rank the website lower and wait to see if the owner of the website takes action to remove the links. This is not 100% confirmed, but personally I would take it into account.

So, directories are not necessarily a problem. But if they handle it the "old school" way, then probably it will be.

Hi,

1. Like Ash said, it's probably an algorithmic ranking penalty. Especially if you do not have anything in the Manual Actions section of Webmaster Tools. Just fixing the problems will solve the ranking issues, but it will take a wile. A lot of people have experience with these kind of  issues, and they regained back the rankings. Don't worry, it can be done Just read on Moz or other SEO resources about concrete examples if you need some facts.

2. If it's a penalty caused only by the linking practices then you should not worry about the content. But be careful, because we see a lot of penalties caused by the actual content. If you paid for the content, chances are even higher. If I were you I would check:

• if there are other linking issues besides inter-blog link

• if content is really unique and has high quality.

And start fixing the problems.

Hi Jarrod,

You are in a very complicated situation. I hope you can find a solution.

This video posted by Matt Cutts a wile ago might help you with a few additional tips:

How can I make sure that Google knows my content is original?

- DMCA request: http://www.google.com/dmca.html

- Google News source attribution metatags: link here

- Or even spam report like Matt Cutts suggests.

Hi Simon, from their answer it looks like they did not understood the problem.

My oppinion is that you don't necessarily have to use 301, you could easily use canonicalization.

Here you got everything explained -> http://moz.com/learn/seo/canonicalization

Maybe you should give them this link also.

Essentially all the domains listed are linking to the same index.html page hosted at 1 location

"... when multiple pages have the same content but different URLs, links that are intended to go to the same page get split up among multiple URLs. This means that the popularity of the pages gets split up." and ..."Each of these URLs spreads out the value of inbound links to the homepage. "

So, it does not matter only were all the domains are linking too -> this is just a small part of the problem -> even more, links that are intended to go to the homepage -> they will be split up as a result.

Hi Bob, some ideas for new keywords/content to cover:

weight loss before and after

weight loss attitude change

weight loss motivation quotes and pictures

Hello,

If you are searching for studies about this topic then here is a very good paper you have to read. It's named Impact Of Ranking Of Organic Search Results On The Incrementality Of Search Ads

http://research.google.com/pubs/pub37731.html

I have read it a few times, there are some interesting findings in it. Try to extract the facts and maybe then draw your own conclusion. And just after this read their conclusion!

Hi Yiannis,

I did not say they will be blacklisted. But they will have consequences for sure.

Listen to Matt Cutts video about the disavow tool, starting with min 6.20:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=393nmCYFRtA

Hi Andy,

You do not have to pay the webmasters to remove the links.

Here is a detailed article that could help you:

Google: Don't Pay The Link Mobster For Link Removals, Just Disavow Them

On the long term they will suffer if you use the dissavow tool, so it's in their interest also. The more people will use it against them the worse it will be for them!

Hi Matthew,

If there are so many problems and so obvious, why don't you submit a report to Google. They clearly state this in their quality guidelines for webmasters:

If you believe that another site is abusing Google's quality guidelines, please let us know by filing a spam report. Google prefers developing scalable and automated solutions to problems, so we attempt to minimize hand-to-hand spam fighting. While we may not take manual action in response to every report, spam reports are prioritized based on user impact, and in some cases may lead to complete removal of a spammy site from Google's search results. Not all manual actions result in removal, however. Even in cases where we take action on a reported site, the effects of these actions may not be obvious.

More details here: https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/35769

Why not do it? You got nothing to loose!

Hi,

1. Maybe you should check the exact timing of the drop in organic search with the latest algorithm updates visible on:

http://moz.com/google-algorithm-change

2. Also, you could check to see if other SEO's here had similar problems in August:

http://www.seroundtable.com/google-update-17268.html

3. If they dropped a few positions in SERP's check your competitors backlinks, especially the "Just Discovered" section of open site explorer, maybe they do some shady stuff.

Hi Thomas,

I would ask the question from another angle:

Would a typical user who searched in English be interested in the same version of the page in Korean? Would that page bring extra value for the user? Does he really need it?

Would a typical user who searched in Korean be interested in the same version of the page in English? Would that page bring extra value for the user? Does he really need it?

If yes you should certainly do it - you should link each page together.

There are some cases in which this is useful:

• sometimes people need/want to read official documents in other languages to be sure they were informed correctly

• for some translation purposes when person must verify the text

• when people want to learn the actual language

• and there are other cases with legal documents and so on...

If the answer to above questions is no, then probably it's not a good idea to link every page. Maybe just general link in the footer/header like the typical websites do.

Hi Bob,

Great job you're doing! I'm certain you will be able to help a lot of people.

I have some suggestions that could help you bring it to the next level. They are more like core/concept ideas:

1. Focus more on you - at a personal level

Right now the website looks more like a business - Bob provides... Bob has hundreds of hours... has helped so many thousands of people... Bob has dedicated ... I would make it more personal. I would focus to grab the user's attention with:

I belive in... this is why I do it... and try to gather an audience around me who believes the same.

There's nothing wrong with the current approach. But I think it will be very hard to get a snowballing effect and grow it to the next level. I know that you already mention beliefs there - which is good - but it's done more like the "corporate way". After a quick look over the website there's nothing actually sticking into my mind. There's a bit about NPL, weightloss, and an actual example. I know you have a lot of experience, you just have to rethink how to present it - and make it stick.

If you want to dream big - I think that this 3 books will help you a lot - Made to Stick: Why Some Ideas Survive and Others Die - by Chip Heath, Dan Heath, Start With Why by Simon Sinek and Linchpin by Seth Godin.

2. Use the story

Great stories succeed because they are able to capture the imagination of large or important audiences (I will let you guess who said this - not my quote). With so much experience you must have a lot of stories. Start using them, they will help you a lot!

Hello Joanne,

You should not worry about it, unless it's taken to an extreme.

Here's a video from Matt Cutts that explains this very clearly:

Will multiple internal links with the same anchor text hurt a site's ranking?

So basically you can't be penalized by links similar to breadcrumbs or links used for navigation. Unless their number is amazingly high. And like you said - if the pages are not keyword stuffed and they're well written - this should not be the problem.

Hi Steve,

What Wordpress theme are you using? Some have embedded links that can hurt your rankings. Other have hidden links, did you check everything out and it's clean from this point of view?

Hi Stephanie,

It will mess things up - at least in my experience.

They did not delete the already existing conversions. They were added to that number. In the standard campaign interface you will get the total sum (adwords + analytics). In the Conversion setup window you will see the actual numbers from both sources. Maybe you could see the actual numbers in the campaign window also if you segment the view by conversion type.

I think this causes big problems for accounts running CPA bidding (and maybe eCPC - not sure about this). These bidding types are very sensitive to changes for the number of conversions. If you had 50 USD/lead CPA set up as target and you suddenly double the conversion numbers you might pay up to 2x times the CPC you already pay.

However, if you are not running on CPA bidding I think that this won't be a major problem. It might be complicated to see which keyword had which conversion - but you can get around this in a way or another. But it won't change your CPC, traffic volume and so on...

For now, there is no way to remove imported or existing conversions - at least from what I know. I did some research about it a while ago. However, there is interesting new feature - > Track Offline Conversions - https://support.google.com/adwords/answer/2998031?hl=en which maybe, if set right, might delete conversions (not sure yet, did not test it)

So, this is just from my experience with a similar problem. Hope it helps!

Hello again,

From what I know, If there is no manual action, then you don't have to worry about reconsideration request. You have to clean up the backlink profile by the next Penguin update.

Try to contact each webmaster first. If they don't answer in a decent time span then use the disavow tool. If there are too many links, then disavow the their whole domain. This should simplify your work. Don't worry about nofollow links, they hurt only in some very extreme cases -> watch this video from Matt Cutts about nofollowed links.

Good luck!

Usually nofollow links don't hurt your website. But there are some extreme cases in which they could.

For more info check this video by Matt Cutts from Google -> Can nofollow links hurt my site's ranking?

Hello,

It could be penguin 2.0 update on May 22. This update had more focus on local search results from what I understood. You could do some timing checks using http://moz.com/google-algorithm-change . First look in Analytics when the traffic dropped, then see if there was an algorithmic update in that proximity.

There could also be other reasons like loss of some important links.

Hmm, interesting.

Like Richard mentioned, any particular links to those pages? even nofollowed?

Another few things to analyze:

-> Average time on site for those visits? Is it very low?

-> User agent data - Segment and Filter Robot Traffic?

There are more and more scrappers who crawl search results for particular queries (especially to monitor stuff).

Look at the geographical data and see if they all come from the same place. It might be that somebody is analyzing your URL's!

Hi Jovan,

Very nice that you started working on improving quality of your website. That's a good thing and you should do it with no restrictions in the future.

However, as a SEO it's very important to stop worrying about ranking results on short term. 1 month is certainly to low. Google wants you to focus most energy bringing quality stuff to the users. It discourages over-optimization and even has a patent filed in 2012 (if I'm not mistaken) which de-values websites that do a optimization changes for a wile, just to see how the owner of the website react to lower rankings. If the owner removes the last websites changes after seeing low ranking - google might be facing people who -> optimize for search engines, not for users. We don't actually know if this happens in reality or not, but It certainly encourage us to check for results less - and focus on quality stuff.

So create the best content you cant with all the guidelines in mind and if in 3-6 months you can't see any results, then start worrying and what went wrong.

Hi again Michael,

Yes, strange things with those nofollows. However. In the current setup, if they are nofollowed, they should not have a dirrect effect on your website's ranking, so this is a good thing. But it they were followed and nofollowed at a point in time, you should know that it takes a while until your website recovers the ranking (if only them were the problem).

To identify better what happend you can do the following:

1. Check Webmaster Tools for messages - if you got anything related to manual actions on your website, then you should read more about "reconsideration reqests".

2. If there are no messages in Webmaster Tools section, then it was probably an algorithmic update that affected your website. If it's related to inbound links than there is a big change it's a "Penguin" update. You can search more about Penguin update on Moz or Search Engine Journal. SEJ has a pretty good article about how to identify which update affected your site.

Then use Google Analytics and Mozcast and see exactly what algorithmic change happened when your website lost it's rankings.

3. It could be the case that this was some kind of attack against your website. Then removing those links should be enough to get your website's ranking back. If this happens keep an eye regularly on the link profile. If something bad pops up, write fast to those people and use disavow tool if they don't answer fast.

Hopes this helps, send more questions if you have!

Yes, the new size is better for me also. The older one was more hard to read.

I also think that the right side has to much block of text. Breaking it down into a few headlines would be a good thing for me!

Hello Chris,

You can use more than one remarketing tag on a page. I use them in combination on some pages, for some time now. But just be careful, the more you use the higher the loading time. There are even a few tricks you can do with Dynamic Remarketing and Google Tag Manager

Here you can read more about Dynamic Remarketing

Hello,

Maybe Copyscape? They even have a tool called Copysentry which monitors the web regularly for plagiarism.

Hello,

Yes, it looks like you might be the victim of some kind of attack.

I just have one question, are these links:

• linking to your website

• posted on your website.

If they are just links to your website, then there is an answer to all your following questions:

The Google Disavow Links Tool - https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/disavow-links-main

You can read more about it here: https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/2648487?hl=en

First contact them to remove the links, if it does not work, use this tool.

If the links are posted on your website just clean everything up, then remove backdors and stuff

I used them in PPC and I got pretty good results. For Adwords they are not complicated to set up - I wrote a while ago how to do it - http://moz.com/community/q/yellow-ratings-stars-in-the-google-serps

You get better CTR for ads and certainly better visibility and trust. The only problem is to keep a high average star rating, or else they disappear.

For SEO they might be a bit harder to set up, but I think you get the same benefits. Better CTR and more trust.

I can't think of any good reason to avoid them - if you have very good products!

Cool. Now let's see some concrete stuff that might help.

One of the common mistakes when people start SEO is to crowd to many keywords on one page. Think about what Google Bot sees when he reads the main page. It asks:

What is this page about? It's a bit about many things - car locksmith, Safe car locksmithing, Fast Locksmith, it works in alexandria,virginia,washington DC,Arlington,VA. This is along with the current text on the homepage as seen by Google Bot right now:

24/7 Locksmith Service - Keyless entry | locked out | lost car keys

<cite>fastlocksmithdc.com/</cite>‎

Locksmith Service provides professional keyless entry, locked out and lost car keys services with complete customer satisfaction.

A bit to many things, you will get small credit for all keywords, and will probably rank for many keyword combinations on very low positon as a result.

Now, what do you think Google will rank first when an user searches for "safe locksmith services in Alexandria"?

A page with the following title, description and focused content:

Safe Locksmith Service in Alexandria - Open 24/7

www.asd.com

We provide 24–hour locksmith service across Alexandria. We get there fast and we solve the problem in a safe and professional manner.

or your page with not so much focus on this particular problem?

So, the idea is to get a big subject/purpose for each page. Then write a compelling title, good description, and content about that subject. Then, find the second big subject/purpose, write a title, description and content, and so on... Put it on the second most important page of the website. For example:

Homepage

Safe Locksmith Service -  Open 24/7. The main keyword for this page are "safe locksmith service". You can add a few secondary keywords like fast, secure and so on, but without changing the big picture (you don). You can also add more location, not necessarily one. Just write them in the description or in the content of the page.

2nd page -> Locked out of your car (focus on this) - you already got this part

3rd page -> Locked out of your house (focus on this)

This are just some examples, not necessarily the best, you should choose which are the best.

Remember that enumeration means dilution, and your focus is lost. Right now you have 4 things on your homepage: "Locksmith Service - Keyless entry | locked out | lost car keys".

So, what's the most important keyword for your homepage? Then we'll think about a few variations (maybe with fast, secure, or locations). Then we will create an amazing title for that page, then a very good description, and content! Then we'll move to next. And just after that we will worry about linking and other stuff.

Hello Danny,

First let's see what exact match terms were triggered your broad branding keyword.

Go to that adgroup, select Keywords, select a longer timerange (it does not work for today), then click on Details -> Search Temrs -> All.

Any particular combination that makes up for the high spendings?

Hi Mark, really good questions.

1. How many links would Google count as part of the link juice model?

There are a lot of opinions about this subject and there is no clear answer (it's really hard to test). Some time ago Google removed the effect of "nofollow" attribute for internal links, to cut the advantage SEO's  gained by "pagerank sculpting". I think they did this so that search engine optimizers don't have a big advantage over standard websites. My personal opinion is that in terms of link juice lost Google would count 5, but the page benefiting  won't get double the value. I think Google would only count the advantages of one of those links, whichever the best (probably the one in content. But on the other side, the link juice lost is not so important. The rest of the pages won't necessarily rank for popular terms.

I think that in-content links get way more advantages than just the "juice" and anchor text. The neighboring text is also important, the fact that it's in a block of text it's also important. Also it brings value to the users, who, might want to see all the shoes models when reading about them. I think you should definitely use this approach but just make sure you don't take it to an extreme.

2. 20% to each link, but the shoes page won't get 20x2 from those 2 duplicate, maybe it will get 25 + some other advantages (personal oppinion!)

3. Changing anchor text had some effect in the past, but recently anchor text has less and less importance. It probably still has value. It's still an important ranking factor for 2013, and I would use it if I was you. But I would bring it to a new level. I would also think about the words in the context of the link. Try to link from all the relevant sections of the websites, and as you point to the shoes page from different contexts, naturally, the anchor text will change. For example you could link through our "shoe collection" from an article which compares between your shoes and competitor shoes.

I wrote an article for YouMoz a few years ago, some concepts might be a bit outdated because the ranking factors changed a lot since then. However it might give you some ideas to explore from a new perspective -> An Intelligent Way to Plan Your Internal Linking Structure

Hello,

I understand clearly what you mean, and I can say I was on the other side.

I was among the first ranking in a smaller country for the most popular "blog" related queries. The page was a part of a more general website, was very solid and solved most of the problems for users searching for those particular queries. Most of the people were clicking my search result and they were pretty satisfied by what they got there. The website was old school, layout old scool. I had amazingly attractive title and meta description, I basically nailed it.

Then bigger brand names and huge websites were launched on the same queries. Solving way more problems and dealing with the matter in a new way. But I was still the first. Brands with pagerank 5 to 7 were competing with my page with no/or close to zero pagerank. I did not even have a fraction of their links and authority. I even laughed seeing that year after that I rank 1st above these big guys, they were on 2nd, 3rd and so on. A lot of years passed and I was still the first. It was really funny. And I tried to learn from it.

Then I decided to refresh and modify the layout, because it was old school. I had some problems with internal linking and domain was down for a while. Then somebody hacked my server and I got some stuff injected there. I solved most of the problems, it was not easy. But when I got back I lost the top spot. There were a lot of changes, but the URL and the content of that particular page was exactly the same.

So, from personal experience I can tell you that things can change.

I  had the following:

• I was the first to cover that area

• a lot of users were clicking on my website - CTR from webmaster tools was amazingly high, and bounce rate was low

And I can tell you that one of those ranking factors talked about a lot on seomoz - "User Usage and Traffic/Query Data" weigh way more than people think. At least from my experience. Anyway, try to ask yourself the following questions:

-> Are the differences between your website and the old one significant? Do the users see them in the search listing and do they consider them of significant importance? If not, try to give them a 10th times better reason to click on your website, and also give them what they want (sometimes the bounce rate has something to say about this, but not always).

It may look like Grandfathering, it's really hard to dismiss or confirm it. At first I thought about it the same way you do. However, first it would be very nice to answer honestly and from the user's point of view to the above questions.

Good luck!

Hello Shay,

First don't worry, what you want to do is not very complicated. The Moz community will surely be able to help. Just relax and try to ask each specific question one by one, people will start giving you answers.

Like Oleg said, one of the most important problems for you is localization.

You said you got to the first 2 pages, then dropped to 2nd.

1. For what keyword combination?

2. What are the most relevant keywords for your services?  You should include location.

And then we'll go to next problems.

Hi moregood,

If I were you I would do it the other way around:

I would go over all the existing links asking the following question:

Is this an "editorial" link?

And I would cut out all the rest.

I think It's easier to find out the good ones. There are a lot of reasons for which links could be bad for you, you might not even be aware why they are bad. But the good ones are pretty obvious and way fewer :). I think it's easier to recover from a penalty this way, and the chance to cut something good is pretty low. If you go the way you mentioned and avoid cutting the ones that are in a gray area, you might resubmit the website over and over. It will take a lot of time. Meanwhile you could stick with the good links and invest the rest of time to get more of these

• Check all suggestions for your keyword by using the alphabet:

targeted keyword a

targeted keyword ab

targeted keyword ac

• Extract all the questions about your keywords

• Write articles containing clear and straight to the point answers, especially for the questions that have elements that need to be remembered and start ranking for them.

• At the end of each article write this: "If you found the information here useful please bookmark this article or remember to search on Google for "this suggestion"

And voila, in time you will see more and more people remember how to search and thus raise the popularity of those questions in the Google suggestions. You did not exploit or inflate anything - besides your visitor's mind! Haha.

Yes, a good one. And simple

Hello,

I would like to hear your strange/unusual/funny ideas for link building campaigns for a website targeted in the short term lending industry. It doesn't matter how easy/complicated it is to apply them, but the more realistic the better.

Please don't post anything that was covered in detail somewhere else or something that does not have at least a small/tiny level of realism.

An example:

Extract the funniest/smart quotations related to money. Create an article where you explain that "even if you are in the short term loan industry" you care about your customers and you want them to educate them so in the future they can avoid getting in a situation when they have very few alternatives.

Does the news item appear always in the search results on the same position (like 10th)?

If so you have a few more workarounds:

In Google Webmaster Tools look at the "Search Query" report. Do a localization in the desired country. Click on the desired keyword and look at the details. See if the impressions on different search results positions match the news spot.

There is a filter for Google Analytics that shows you the position in search results for that clicked keyword. Search "google analytics filter keyword position" on Google and if I remember right you'll find it. Maybe you can even adjust the filter to extract info about the news clicks.

Good luck!

Google Adwords Keyword tool can generate related keywords for a specific website.

https://adwords.google.com/select/KeywordToolExternal

Just insert the URL in the second text box titled "Website" and you'll get a list with keywords relevant to that website.

Best luck in your search!

Here is the question you posted:

Just because the link is picked up by OSE does that mean that the search engines value it too?

The answer is very simple: no.

However, there is a relationship between the OSE data and Google data. This relationship is not causation. It's correlation. This doens't mean that if you have a link picked up by OSE it will necessarily be picked up by Google. It means that links that tend to be picked up by OSE also tend to be picked up by Google.

I hope this helps!

Actually, with Google Analytics you can create a filter to see the search queries that users typed to land o a specific page of your website. It's very simple:

When you have the tracked website selected, on the left column in GA you will see "Custom Reports". Click on it, then click on "Create New Report". From the blue Metrix box select "Site Usage", scroll down to "Visits" and drag and drop it in the first empty "Metrix" box on the right. Now click on the green "Dimensions" Box, click on "Content", select "Page" and drag and drop it in the empty Dimension box. Click on "Traffic Sources", scroll down to "Country/Teritory" and drag this in a sub-dimension to also be able to see it by region.

Hope this helps, good luck!