What is the most effective link building technique?
-
Hi seomoz community!
My question is this: Which is more effective in a) generating traffic and b) increasing authority in the long and short term? Press releases or back-linking through blogs and forums?
Some more detail:
You have $6000 to spend over a 6 month period on which ever technique you choose.
$6000 can buy you 20 press releases, each distributed to over 250 online news outlets (yahoo finance, td waterhouse, ABC, etc), emailed to editors of publications in your industry niche, and tweeted by 10 to-15 influential tweeters. Every release is published by the same news organization plus 5-10 new sources per release. The news organizations all have relatively high domain authorities (60-90) and generate 2500-3000 unique pageviews in total for each article. They also all link back to my site through the articles.
$6000 can buy you 6 months of back-link building - outsourced overseas in India. Based on keywords that our target audience are using to find our competitors (long-tail included), we post links through blog/forum comments that appear in results when those search terms are queried. The blog/forums have varying domain authorities in our industry but none higher than 60.
Again the question: Which technique is more effective in a) generating traffic and b) increasing authority in the long and short term? Press releases or back-linking through blogs and forums? My current website has a domain authority of 66.
Please share your opinions or thoughts.
Thanks
-
its a good investment, but won't be significant change lol
-
I will do the same, choose the option 1
-
Agreed. For $6,000 you can build quite a solid SEO campaign with a reputable company for sure. They'll make sure things are done right, unlike these 3rd-party seo companies that just fire your link up in comments and other questionable websites.
-
thanks for this. its pretty much how i was feeling as well. I am creating an action plan - ordering our options from highest importance and ROI to lowest. Both of these options have been given low priority, but understanding the difference really was important to me.
I have actually seen quite a large increase in domain authority from press releases, and i also am aware of the type of targeted traffic good blog comments can generate. Again neither of these are our first option, but its something we wouldn't mind doing on the cheap.
Just needed to know what i should be careful of, what if any benefit one may have over the other, or if they would do generally the same thing.
I think it is safe to say that no one really thinks that either of these techniques are extremely effective, but for the most part press releases are a safer bet (if the content is newsworthy)?
-
enjoy the seas.
-
For argument's sake? Why? Neither are better. I might as well take that $6K rent a yacht, get some caviar and champagne and have a good old time.
I'll give you that the press releases may have some short term boosting effect. Then nothing. And you're back to where you were. And if you're in a competitive market, those links won't do anything for your actual traffic.
-
My gut tells me that the press release option has a lesser chance of having spammy or rogue links pointed at you. If it were my site and I had only those two choices, I would go for the press releases, presuming they were well-written and met the standards of places like Yahoo and would actually get included. My argument is going to fall back on the content here -- use the method that contains the best content and is the most on-target for your business.
Link building is not a bad idea in and of itself. But six months of having someone halfway around the world post comments in blogs and forums that show up for search queries is NOT where I would spend my money.
edited to add: does the overseas firm chose the search queries? Do they have domain knowledge about the real estate industry in your country? I wouldn't even have someone from a different state or different region of the US write real estate content for me without researching how things are done in my area, I wouldn't want someone who had no concept of the way things are done here to try to decide for themselves what is relevant.
-
I understand the importance of good link worthy content, and can appreciate the advice about spreading the money internally to increase productivity for our content writers.
However, I feel as though my question is still unanswered. The amount of money we spend is of no significance. At the end of the day, which of the two techniques will be better at generating traffic and increasing domain authority?
From what I can tell, it seems as though everyone agrees our money is better spent elsewhere, but just for arguments sake, which is better?
Thanks!
-
Use the money to buy linkworthy content and seed it.
-
I believe Stephen is trying to say spending $6000 to buy art will do about the same for your site as 20 useless press releases. I'm not saying they're useless, though I vote with Egol about investing in content. But I believe that's the point Stephen is trying to make here.
-
what are these things. how do they effect traffic? elaborate would ya?
-
Either take EGOL's advice and spend it on internal resources, or spend $6k contracting with a legitimate SEO services company. They will deliver far better results than shady press release businesses and east asian blackhats.
-
What else can you buy for $6000 that will add more value than 20 useless press releases?
-
Bahahahahaa.....you're so predictable EGOL.
-
Even with a second cup of coffee this answer isn't making sense, and yours normally do Stephen. Was there a copy/paste fail somewhere, or did the editor eat the rest of your reply?
-
this doesn't even make sense.... are you suggesting spending time and money building content to grow organic links or are you just hyping up some stuff you like? either way an explanation of your answer would be appreciated.
Thanks.
-
This is definitely an option, and something i will take into consideration, but i just want to know, for sake of argument, which will be more effective in generating traffic. So that for future clients i can firmly say, this will increase traffic in the long term by this much and in the short term by this much. Or this will increase search visibility and authority by this much as opposed to this much.
Directory submissions are already in place.
-
Thanks John!
The press releases all contain followed links back to my website. And are also distributed to industry specific publications (real estate).
What type of domain authority increase can i expect from press releases versus link building?
-
If I was planning to spend $6000, I would not spend it on press releases or blog/forum spamming.
You asked which would generate more traffic and which would contribute more to domain authority. I think that press releases and blog spamming are wastes of money for both of those purposes.
WIth $6000 to spend I would rather spend $2000 on really comfy chairs for the content writers, $2000 on a new camera/lighting equipment for the photographer, $2000 on licenses to Mindjet or new a graphics program or other productivity software. I'd also chip in for a fancy coffee machine and cold drinks for the refrigerator.
These are "sharpening the ax" at the most basic level.
-
Abe Lincoln is quoted as saying "Give me six hours to chop down a tree and I will spend the first four sharpening the axe."
I think you need to sharpen the axe here, or at least mention more details about your site. Do you have any killer content for the people to come see? Have you made sure that everything works so that people can easily do the desired action/conversion on your site?
What's in it for the users?
[OK, EGOL now you can come in and say to spend all $6000 on content and none on link building, I've done the initial part of adding option C as something to think about ]
-
Both options are weak.
How many of these can you buy?
-
This is one of those questions you can ask ten different SEOs and get ten different answers. But, since you asked...
I'd vote for some diversification. Is there a reason you can't split it up, with 50% of your spend on press releases and 50% on blogs/forums? Or maybe split it three ways: $2k on press releases, $2k on blogs, and $2k on directories?
-
From what you said, the press releases don't contain any back links so you're relying solely on people reading them and then searching for your site. That's not going to help with your SERP results and what traffic it does create will be lost when the releases become dated.
As for the 6-months of backlinks. As long as the sites they're using aren't blacklisted or considered spam sites then that would be the best bet. Proper backlinks boost your Domain Authority(DA) which should move you up through the SERPs and generate more traffic.
Now, if you you could grab some backlinks from the press releases also, I personally would try to find a good mix of both. A good variety of backlinks from various C-blocks and domains is worth more than all links coming from one genre of social sites.
Unfortunately, building DA is a slow process so the results are going to have to be a long term goal. Your traffic should be affected almost immediately with both methods but will last longer with the backlinks.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Will noindex pages still get link equity?
We think we get link equity from some large travel domains to white label versions of our main website. These pages are noindex because they're the same URLs and content as our main B2C website and have canonicals to the pages we want indexed. Question is, is there REALLY link equity to pages on our domain which have "noindex,nofollow" on them? Secondly we're looking to put all these white label pages on a separate structure, to better protect our main indexed pages from duplicate content risks. The best bet would be to put them on a sub folder rather than a subdomain, yes? That way, even though the pages are still noindex, we'd get link equity from these big domains to www.ourdomain.com/subfolder where we wouldn't to subdomain.ourdomain.com? Thank you!
Reporting & Analytics | | HTXSEO0 -
The best way to track internal links in Google Analytics
Hi there, we are a retail business and we have invested in quality editorial content which sits in our Blog at ourwebsite.co.uk/blog/ The Blog links to the main site (an online store) and I want to track the 'value' of the blog by how many clicks the blog content generates back to the main store. At the moment we're using this code on the end of every link in the Blog: ?utm_source=Blog&utm_medium=Widget&utm_campaign=FromBlog Does this affect SEO and is there a better way of doing it? Thanks.
Reporting & Analytics | | Bee1590 -
Best to Leave Toxic Links or Remove/Disovow on Site with Low Number of Linking Domains
Our site has only 87 referring domains (with at least 7,100 incoming links). LinkDetox has identified 29% of our back links as being toxic and 14% as being questionable. Virtually all of these links derive from spammy sites. We never received a manual penalty, but ever since the first Penguin penalty in 2012 our search volume and ranking has dropped with some uneven recover in the last 3 years. By removing/disavowing toxic links are we risking that over optimized link text will be removed and that ranking will suffer as a result? Are we potentially shooting ourselves in the foot? Would we be better to spend a few months building quality links from reputable domains before removing disavowing bad links? Or toxic links (as defined by LinkDetox) so bad that it should be a priority to remove them immediately before taking any other step? Thanks, Alan
Reporting & Analytics | | Kingalan10 -
URL Formatting for Internal Link Tagging
After doing some research on internal campaign link tagging, I have seen conflicting viewpoints from analytics and SEO professionals regarding the most effective and SEO-friendly way to tag internal links for a large ecommerce site. It seems there are several common methods of tagging internal links, which can alter how Google interprets these links and indexes the URLs these links point to. Query Parameter - Using ? or & to separate a parameter like cid that will be appended to all internal-pointing links. Since Google will crawl and index these, I believe this method has the potential of causing duplicate content. Hash - Using # to separate a parameter like cid that will be appended to all internal-pointing links. Javascript - Using an onclick event to pass tracking data to your analytics platform Not Tagging Internal Links - While this method will provide the cleanest possible internal link paths for Google and users navigating the site and prevent duplicate content issues, analytics will be less effective. For those of you that manage SEO or analytics for large (1 million+ visits per month) ecommerce sites, what method do you employ and why? Edit* - For this discussion, I am only concerned with tagging links within the site that point to other pages within the same site - not links that come from outside the site or lead offsite. Thank you
Reporting & Analytics | | RobbieFoglia0 -
Cannonical Links?
Hi guys, I recently started using Moz Analytics's for my site and it has told me that the vast majority (perhaps all) of my pages have duplicate content because Google will be indexing the version both with and without www. in front of it as seperate domains. I've done some research and have come across a few suggestions of what to do, but i'm not sure which to go with or how to actually implement it. Any help, advice or suggestions would be greatly appreciated! Thanks
Reporting & Analytics | | Sandicliffe0 -
Ok. I'm just going to cut loose with my stupid question. What is internal link equity? What distinguishes an internal link with equity from one without equity?
What distinguishes an internal link with equity from one without equity? Is there a limit to how many of these I want? What's the rule-of-thumb? Cheers, Wes
Reporting & Analytics | | wrconard0 -
Is Webmaster Tools Useless as a broken Link Detector?
Buongiorno from yes we still have free parking Wetherby UK!
Reporting & Analytics | | Nightwing
Ok when it comes to detecting broken links I'm getting really frustrated with webmaster tools. Now I'm probably going to end up with egg on my face with this one but here is an example of webmaster tools reporting a broken link which i cant find. http://i216.photobucket.com/albums/cc53/zymurgy_bucket/phantom-broken-links_zpsb74e1246.jpg Having trawled through the code i just cant see the knackered link? Is it a phantom report or is something usefull being detected here? Grazie tanto,
David1 -
Does prevent links from being included in Google Webmaster linking sites report?
My client has clean links in edit from nytimes.com. The links do not have nofollow tags. Google Webmaster stopped including links from nytimes.com in the external linking domains report and we don't know why since the URL is still live. The nytimes.com URL includes this tag in the source code: Are links on pages with NOARCHIVE still counted in Google Webmaster linking domains reports?
Reporting & Analytics | | ebenthurston0