Can bad text URLs hurt pages?
-
If you have some pages that contain plain text URLs (not anchored links) that used to be good URLs, but are now bad, either because the website shut down or because it has been acquired by someone else and is now parked (or worse) - are those URLs enough to cause quality problems?
For example:
This information was brought to you by Waymaker http://www.waymaker.net
These aren't the only ones.
And yes, I know I should fix them, but there are probably 10,000 pages like it.
I will fix them, but its not something I can do in a few minutes.
(this one is easy to fix programmatically, but others are a lot more complex)
So my question is: do you have actual experience that these are bad enough to cause ranking problems (making them low quality)
-
Thank you Bryan.
These are links on my site in old stories.
Some aren't links, as in the example above, they are just plain text - no anchor tag.
Some are anchor links, to website are now defunct
Some are anchor links to websites that have now been parked
Some are anchor links to websites that have now been taken over by unrelated people.
So my aim is to clean them all up, but I'll do the most damaging ones first, because there are a lot of pages.
-
Thank you.
I am fixing both types now.
-
If bad anchor tech could hurt your quality then every competitor would be linking to you with bad anchor text. You simply do not get the same quality benefit as good anchor text. Put it this way:
Site A = Vet
Site B = Dog Parlor
Site C = Car SalesSite A ---> Site B with Anchor Text "Wash Your Dog" = 9/10 Quality Link
Site A ---> Site B with Anchor Text "www.dogservice.com" = 7/10 Quality Link
Site A ---> Site C with Anchor Text "Car Sales" = 2/10 Quality Link
Site A ---> Site C with Anchor Text "ww.carsales.com" = 1/10 Quality LinkAs shown above, relevant links are what counts, Anchor text just gives you a added benefit
-
I don't think that bad anchor tags can hurt you unless you're pointing to bad pages on your own site. Linking to a 404 page, for instance, will cause bots to try and spider the bad page instead of a good page. The concept here is called crawl budget and it's not devastating, it just slows down indexation.
I don't think a plain text reference can hurt you at all.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Impact of number of outgoing links on Page Rank of an optimized page?
What is the current best practice on preferred number of outbound links on a page you are trying to rank with: According to online resources form a pure page rank perspective a high number of outbound follow links can have a negative impact not only on child pages but also the page itself
On-Page Optimization | | thomaspro
http://pr.efactory.de/e-outbound-links.shtml Other resources suggest that particularly placing high quality outbound links on a page (nofollow) increases the trust and authority of a page Are there any other elements to keep in mind? Is the best practice to avoid any follow links on a page you want to rank well in Google for? Thanks /T0 -
Page rank check
Hello everyone, How long should I wait to see if page rank for optimized pages have improved? cheers
On-Page Optimization | | PremioOscar0 -
Can rel="canonical" refer to another website page?
I want to republish the post from another website with their permission and want to abide by Google guidelines. Google guidelines is clear when you are using the same content at different parts of the same site however not when using it on another site in a legitimate way. Is there some way to use rel="canonical" refer to another website page of you are reproducing the content from same page?
On-Page Optimization | | h1seo0 -
How to improve On-Page Grades for Top Ranking Pages
please help me - i dont know or understand how to improve on-Page Grades for Top Ranking Pages
On-Page Optimization | | pwwukpw0 -
Can you have more than 1 site on the first page if site look and content is completely different but keywords are the sam.
I have a client that wants to build another completely different site than his main site and optimize it to have 2 websites on the first page for his keywords. The content and look and feel of the website would be completely different. One of his competitors is doing it and getting away with it. What is your advice.
On-Page Optimization | | Roots70 -
On-page keyword usage
SEOMOZ gave me all zeros for keyword usage. Why? The site is www.grass2greens.com and the keywords are "Asheville Landscaping Edible." The site includes these words in the title page and throughout the body text. I am not really sure, but maybe one cause for these low keyword usage ratings might be redirects or some meta tag issues, but I am really not sure. Any ideas?
On-Page Optimization | | dcaudio0 -
Same anchor text
I am using the same anchor text on my homepage to go to two different pages. Is this bad? Thanks
On-Page Optimization | | tylerfraser0 -
Page title structure?
From an SEO and user perspective what structure do you recommend for page titles. For example (given that they shouldn't ideally be more than 70 characters) :- Keywords (maybe two or three) | Company Name | more keywords I understood the best place for the company name was about second place. Is this now the considered view taking into consideration 'branding' which has been flagged up as the way forward. Keywords are separated by the vertical bar | - any thoughts? For 'house keeping' pages such as Privacy Policy - should this be optmised or simply stated as 'privacy policy' Thanks
On-Page Optimization | | PH2920