Following Penguin, what is the best practice for a web design agency placing a footer link in client sites?
-
For years we have included a 'Web Design by ...' link in the footer of all client websites designed by us.
However, following the Penguin update, it seems that this legitimate practice could now be penalised.
Should we be removing those links from our client's sites? There are tens of thousands, all with similar or identical text!
For future client sites, should we avoid these footer links altogether? Or maybe limit the link to a single page on each site?
-
I know this almost a year after it was asked, but since I was doing a little research, I thought I'd provide a solution I came up with.
When I design a site, I want an attribution link on every page. I can't rely on a visitor saying "I love this site, who designed it?" 3 levels deep, not finding an attribution at the bottom, then thinking that they'd find it on the home page. It doesn't even make good usability sense.
So here's what I set out to do with my sites moving forward:
Still doing Sitewide links, but only the link on the Home Page will be followed. All other links will be NoFollowed.
If you use WordPress, you can use the following conditional statement. (Of course you'll want to replace your own Anchor Text and URL (unless you design pretty websites and want to give me the credit ).
if ( is_front_page() ) { echo "[](;</span><span style=) [ echo "http://flauntyoursite.com";
echo ">Flaunt Your Site](;</span><span style=)";} else {
echo "[
echo "http://flauntyoursite.com";](;</span><span style=)[
echo " rel=";
echo "nofollow";
echo ">Flaunt Your Site](;</span><span style=)";
} ?>It's important to leave the Space between the " and the rel=" otherwise it will collapse the url into something not readable and give you a 404 when you try to click it.
Hope this helps some of you.
-
Since when does SEO = manipulation of the search engines? I take offense to that. This is my career.
Instead of trying to get your link on the client's homepage, you could have your attribution link in the footer lead to a deep deep page on the client's site. On that page link to your company's site. Make the link to your site no-follow and you should be good to go.
-
What I am taking from this thread and associated ones, is that no-one knows for sure what the best practice to avoid possible penalisation is. In this scenario caution is the best approach I guess? Removing links with 'SEO' as part of the anchor text is a no-brainer, this advertises to the search engines that our Clients use these services and are actively trying to manipulate the search engines.
Beyond this the advice seems to be that using our brand name in the anchor text should be fine, the link should open in a new window and we should avoid placing our links in the footer. Placing the link on the Homepage somewhere is preferable.
Thanks to all
-
It would basically end up as reciprocal links though. Not really benefiting any party. Web design agencies use footer links for their own benefit, as a former web designer I used to do this as well, although I only linked on brand and not as many designers do just now on keywords like 'web design by' or 'website designed by' and not their brand.
Many designers do link back to their clients in the form of portfolios and case studies, but generally not in the footer.
-
I take your point regarding the nofollow tag, and those footer links are certainly useful ways for humans to discover your agency through a client's site.
However, if I am completely honest, those links have always been placed there with SEO in mind. More incoming links to our site with our carefully chosen keywords boosted our rankings. That's what we were taught, and it was always encouraged. If a human happened to find us via one of those links, that was just a bonus.
Of course this goes against Google's 'design for humans, not for search engines' thing, but for years it has been a standard, accepted practice to 'optimise' those incoming links. And now it is suddenly dishonest - it turns out we've been manipulating Google's results, cheating our way to better rankings.
To me, those 'web design by [agency]' footer links don't feel wrong. They are truthful words, linking to a genuine agency who did the web design. For those reasons I still feel that we should be entitled to any SEO benefit, not adding nofollow like we are doing something criminal.
I need to get my head around this, and it may take some time. Are all incoming links for SEO purposes now evil?
-
I'm surprised no one has mentioned the nofollow tag here. Technically, regardless of the anchor text used, you are still making a self-made link when you put that attribution link on your client's site. Self-made link = manipulation... well sort of. Just make the link nofollow and you should be good to go.
We've gotten lots of business through attribution links. Our clients don't mind that they're there.
-
We do link back to clients through Case Studies and Our Portfolio pages. I think many agencies do this. Although the footer may not be the best place if you have hundreds of clients!
-
I've always wondered why web design companies are not placing site wide links to their clients in the footers of their own sites. Would that not be helpful to their clients and also be a good thing to do? Certainly more visitors to a web design site would be interested in clicking those links to see samples of web design than would visitors to a car repair site be interested in going to web design?
-
Thank you both.
In summary :
-
Use only your brand name in anchor text when linking from client websites
-
A single link from a clients home page is probably better than linking from every page.
Sounds like good advice
-
-
you should possibly try going down the route of having a single link on your clients websites, on the homepage. You want Google to pass good link-juice back to your site, by having 1000x links pointing from every page on a domain back to your site looks like spam and will probably not even be of any value. Your current site probably has tens of thousands of links coming in from only a handful of unique domains.
-
Yes Lewis, A single link on the home page of each site, sounds a better solutions to avoid too many links.
Thanks,
-
Thank you for your response. We are happy to use our brand name in links, although our brand name is actually 'New Forest Web Design', which could still be seen as spammy because The New Forest is the area we trade and Web Design is a service, so Google could see our brand as '[area] Web Design'. Our actual company name is 'New Forest Web Design Ltd', so I guess we should use that?
Also, is it better to have a single link on a client's site, rather than on every page? Some dynamic sites could end up with thousands of links pointing to us. I was thinking that a single link on the home page of each site may be better?
-
Change them to your brand. Avoid using exact match type competitive keywords like 'web design by..' Google does not penalise exatc brand mentions so much as most commercial websites are expected to receive numerous exact match brand links anyway.
-
Hello Lewis,
I hope i understand you question. and here is what you can do in future.
you can give a link to your site from your company name or domain. Its a fair thing. Avoid getting links from keywords like web designing company, web designing company in city kind of words. you can write that site is designed and developed by company and can give a link to your site from that company name.
If you can remove the link form whole statement and give a link from your brand name I think it will benefit you more. if they are like thousands in numbers start with few good sites and do it gradually as you get time. so it will not harm your link graph and anchor text too.
Thanks
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Is there value of consistently getting a link from a high DA site?
Is there value in consistently getting a link from a high DA sites? For example, consistently posting on a blog monthly rather then only doing it once and getting a link/being done with it. Could you list the pros of consistently getting links on high DA sites?
Link Building | | calf0 -
Can a feeder site link directly to the main site?
I have a client that has several coupons sites. They have about 15 different URLS all of which are [city]deals.com all of the domains have coupons lists that are relevant to that area. Other than the coupons there is not any other content on the sites. There is a Main site however, that has coupons, content, store locations, blogs, news etc... The coupons on the feeder sites are displayed differently than what is displayed on the main site. They are also categorized differently. So the question is on the feeder sites can they have the coupon link directly to the store page on the main site?
Link Building | | Firestarter-SEO0 -
Whats the Best Link Building Strategy for News Sites
Hello, I have a news portal and l am working with 3 editors, they are writing 3-5 daily unique news articles. I would like to know if whats the best link building strategy for news sites that l need to keep getting links from? What sort of sites l should find links for best link building? Please inform me. thanks.
Link Building | | rk19800 -
Networking sites / paid links
A national networking company charges its members, say, a few of hundred pounds to become part of their network, which involves offline networking events and online in forums and a directory. All the links of the directory and forum sigs etc are all do-follow. While it's not just a directory, how beneficial a link is this likely to be? The site itself has a DA of 60 and a PR rank of 4. 1k likes on their cnnected FB page and 21 likes on the G+. At the networking meetings they tell new recruits that being a member gives them a very valuable backlink and everytime they participate in the forums they get another do follow backlink. Ive checked and they are dofollow. Is this likely to be a great value link?
Link Building | | littlesthobo0 -
High PR Web 2.0 sites
Hello, I was wondering if you could provide some advice on which are the best Top 20 high pr web 2.0 properties for content besides wordpress? Whilst i do intend to use them to further improve my SEO campaign I also intend to use readable content, that is to say, content that i have written and i feel is worthy of being read by interested parties. What are the top 20 to look at that would benefit an SEO campaign if used correctly (without abusing or being spammy). I can see lots of crappy ones out there but they all look spammy to me and im not really liking that.
Link Building | | irdeto0 -
Link in the footer
we have a sponsored link in the footer of a website, and since that footer is displayed on each page of that site, it shows that we have thousands of links coming from that site. my question is : does Google consider this as spamming? and does it help us , harm us, or has no effect?
Link Building | | puremobile0 -
Footer Back Links Question "Site by built by"
Hi all I design and develop websites for clients within the UK. With each website I build, I always add a link to the footer of the website which links back to my website. I have always used the link anchor text "Site By Jump" but then decided to try to use the link anchor text to our benefit by changing the links across all of our portfolio of sites to be: "Graphic Design by Jump"
Link Building | | yousayjump
or
"Web Design by Jump" In the hope that this helped us rank better for those keyword phrases. Now something occurred to me the day. Most of the websites I build have no relevance to the content on our website. For example, I could build a website for Baby Food and add a backlink to our homepage which doesn't even mention the words "baby food". In some cases, the websites can have thousands of pages, each with this footer link appearing at the bottom of each page. My question is, could these backlinks potentially be seen as black hat or spam to a search engine? I.e. thousands of backlinks from websites that have no relevance in terms of content all linking back to my homepage? Thank you for reading and any advice would be greatly appreciated.0 -
Observation on Linking to other sites
Hello, I have a blog for one year now and in the overwall is going great. In all this time it was an awesome way to discovery some SEO mysterious and learn with experience wich in my point of view is the best way to do it. Now my observation is about links to other sites and what does that do. At the present I have about 35 keywords in the 3 first places in Google, bing e Yahoo. All good. I notice that the posts that I have links (dofolow) to other sites are performing better then those ones that only have internal-links. And Its curious that this change as starting to surface in Dezember of 2011. Now the confusion is about the SEOmoz observation towards external links. "You should avoid having too many (roughly defined as more than 100) hyperlinks on any given page. When search engine spiders crawl the Internet they are limited by technology resources and are only able to crawl a certain number of links per webpage. In addition, search engine algorithms divide the value of some popularity metrics by the amount of links on a given page." Now hell with this observation I say. Its working for me and for now on I will actually apply this SEO strategy when Im talking about a subject in a post:) What do you guys think? Whats your experince on this? Regards, Pedro M Pereira
Link Building | | PedroM0