How to place two NADs on site (One website, 2 locations)
-
Hello,
For our site:
nlpca(dot)com
we have 2 locations. One location is based out of a hotel in California, and one location is where we have our offices in Utah.
Our site is about both locations, emphisizing California. Do we need to create a Utah page and put the Utah NAD on that page with separate address and phone number? What do we use as an address since we only have a hotel room in California now? What do we need to do to rank for both in the natural and also Places listings?
Right now we're #1 for NLP California and #4 for NLP Utah
Thanks!
-
Hi Bob,
We're all always learning! A blended result is one that combines information from both the website and 3rd party sources (so, let's say it links to the website from the title but is accompanied by a link to the place/+ page).
A purely organic results has no third party data. This would be your typical old-style result of the title and meta linking to the website.
Most local results are blended these days, but the first page of results typically included both the blended results and some organic results.
Do a search for 'pizza san francisco' in Google. If your results are relatively similar to mine, you will see the page start with a purely organic result from Yelp and another from SeriousEats. This is followed by a set of 7 blended results in which the title element is linking to the websites of various business and is embellished with reviews from Google and Zagat, contact info and links to Google Maps which lead to the Google+ Local pages.
Then, below this, we return to pure organic results (2 for businesses and 1 for Gayot).
I hope that makes what you are seeing in the SERPs really clear to you.
-
How do I tell the difference between a purely organic listing and a blended Places/+/Organic listing?
Is it that if there are no Places results on the page it is purely organic, and if there are both organic and places results on the page then the results without markers next to them are blended and the ones with markers next to them are places?
Thanks for the clarification. I should already know this.
-
Hi Bob,
Pure organic results are governed by a different algo than the blended Places/+/Organic results. So, to the extent that you have any purely organic rankings, these should not be affected by your issues, but at the same time, any results that are blended are a combo of your organic and off-page, so these would have to be seen as intimately involved in your issues. Hope that clarification helps.
Good luck, Bob!
Miriam
-
Miriam,
Before I break the bad news to my coworkers, does our issue in Google Places effect our organic listings. In other words, are our organic results for
NLP Calfornia
NLP San Francisco
NLP Utah
NLP Salt Lake City
at risk or is it just our Places results that are at risk?
-
Hi Bob,
Where you live, are you still seeing a Google Place Page with a 'report a problem' link at the bottom of the page? If so, you'd go through the problem wizard. If not, you might try the troubleshooter:
http://support.google.com/places/?hl=en-US&rd=1
Again, 2 days ago I would have recommended both with confidence, but with the changes, I'm not sure how support has changed. Start with those recommendations and see where you get.
-
It looks like my coworker listed us as 2 different companies in G places with an old address. What a mess.
What would be the best white hat way to clean this up?
-
Hi Bob,
Well, here's a real hold-your-horses moment. As of yesterday, the world of Local has been turned upside down a bit and I am not yet sure of the total implications for multi location businesses. From Greg Sterling's piece, http://searchengineland.com/google-places-is-over-company-makes-google-the-center-of-gravity-for-local-search-122770:"We asked about management of multiple locations from a single page. Google said that there’s no news for the time being but that’s the ultimate goal:
A single page through which businesses can manage their online presence is a top priority, and we’re committed to ensuring business owners have a clear voice in how their business is represented on Google, via Google+."
So, management of businesses like yours is somewhat up in the air, but I believe I can still answer the main questions you've asked with some certainty.
To date, the acquisition of a legit office (no p.o. boxes, no virtual offices) and a dedicated, non-redirecting local area code phone number are essential to legit Places inclusion, and I am assuming these rules will carry over into Google+ Local. People certainly bend and break these rules, renting virtual offices, etc., but it's not something I'd ever recommend to a valued client.
If you don't currently have these things for California, I'm not 'getting' how you are ranking #1 for San Francisco in the local results. What are you using on the Place Page, in terms of NAP, to achieve these rankings. If it doesn't meet the guidelines, the risk is a sudden loss of rankings if Google takes notice. At least, that's how it has been up until yesterday. I believe the algo will carry over into the new Google+ Local, but as you can tell from my reply, I'm working hard right now to understand what has changed and what remains the same. Strongly recommend that you do all of the reading up you can over the next few days on this, Bob, as it will certainly pertain to your business and your future management of your local presence.
Miriam
-
One more thing - don't miss my other post.
Why can't we move up above 5th place organically for "NLP Utah" keywords when we are stronger?
-
Thank you Miriam,
We are first in google organically for "NLP San Francisco"
We are first in google local results for "NLP San Francisco"
Our address is only listed on the contact us page and it is a Salt Lake City Address
Our phone and fax are Utah numbers, and we also have an international number, all on only the contact us page.
We can't lose our rankings for the California keywords, local or organic, since these are our main traffic words.
We want to rank 1st for Utah keywords in both local and organic. Currently we don't rank for local "NLP Salt Lake City" and we're 5th for "NLP Utah" related keywords.
If necessary, we may be able to get a NAP of both utah and california, but I'm not sure on that - any ideas on how to inexpensively acquire a california address and a california phone number would be useful, and can the california phone number forward to the Utah office?
What's the solution?
-
Hi Bob,
I want to begin by clarifying what you mean by NAD. I'm familiar with NAP (name, address, phone number) but I've not encountered the term NAD before. From context, I'm guessing you mean NAP but please let me know if I'm wrong. I'll proceed as though I've guessed correctly.
As you may have reckoned, your California location doesn't qualify as truly local, because of its lack of a dedicated street address. You can't submit a hotel room number to Google Places, so until such time as you've got a standard address for the California branch, what you can do is going to be somewhat limited.
Typically, when dealing with a business model that has just a few locations, like yours, you would put the complete NAP in the footer sitewide, and on the Contact Us page, and you would also likely be creating a landing page for each of the 2 offices. Typically, you would be creating a Google Place Page for each location, creating other local business listings for each location and building out content, citations and links for each location. You can do some of this, but the lack of address for the California business is definitely going to hamper your Places efforts. You may be able to build good rankings organically, but if your core keyword phrases are most heavily used by local searchers and receive local SERPs, then you are likely to be outranked by businesses that can publish an address.
Have I helped to answer your question? If you need to add more info about your scenario, you are welcome to do so.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Google Indexed Site A's Content On Site B, Site C etc
Hi All, I have an issue where the content (pages and images) of Site A (www.ericreynolds.photography) are showing up in Google under different domains Site B (www.fastphonerepair.com), Site C (www.quarryhillvet.com), Site D (www.spacasey.com). I believe this happened because I installed an SSL cert on Site A but didn't have the default SSL domain set on the server. You were able to access Site B and any page from Site A and it would pull up properly. I have since fixed that SSL issue and am now doing a 301 redirect from Sites B, C and D to Site A for anything https since Sites B, C, D are not using an SSL cert. My question is, how can I trigger google to re-index all of the sites to remove the wrong listings in the index. I have a screen shot attached so you can see the issue clearer. I have resubmitted my site map but I'm not seeing much of a change in the index for my site. Any help on what I could do would be great. Thanks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | cwscontent
Eric TeVM49b.png qPtXvME.png1 -
Which one is better?
We are creating a new website and got stuck while deciding the URL structure. Our concern is which url is better in terms of SEO i.e. pune.fabogo.com/spa or fabogo.com/pune/spa and why. Also which one would rank faster if someone searches for spas in pune if both pages are same.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | fabogo_marketing0 -
One Site vs. Many
This is a question that I am not sure has a "right" answer. I am just wondering what everyone's thoughts are on this. I can see benefit of both sides of the coin. In your opinion, is it better to have one large e-commerce site with all of your content on the same domain or is it better to have multiple more targeted domains with your content broken up into smaller chunks? The reason I ask is, I feel like while multiple more targeted sites certainly have the benefit of focus, aren't you taking all your traffic and content, splitting it up and leaving you with several sites that most likely are getting less traffic than one large site would. All opinions welcome.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | unikey0 -
How are these sites ranking!?!
One of our clients is in the insurance industry and over the last 12 months we have seen an increasing number of low quality, newly registered, spammy sites achieving top 5 rankings for major keywords, which in turn is having an adverse effect on the rankings for our client. Does anyone have any idea how the following sites have managed to do this: http://www.multiquotetaxi.co.uk/ - 2nd for taxi insurance http://www.motortradefast.co.uk/ - 1st for motor trade insurance http://www.traders-insurance.com/ - 3rd for motor trade insurance http://www.multiquotefleet.co.uk/ - 1st for fleet insurance We have tried reporting the above sites, tried holding out to see if they get penalised and tried figuring out what they have done ourselves but cannot see how they have managed it. Any ideas at all?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | instinctive0 -
My site is always in the top 4 on google, and sometimes goes to #2\. But the site at #1 is always at #1 .. how can i beat them?
So i'm sure this is a very generic question.. of course everyone wants to be #1. We are an ecommerce web site. We have all sorts of products, user ratings, and are loved by our customers. We sell over 3 million a year. So let me give you some data.. First of all one of the sites that keeps taking the #2 or #3 spot is amazons category for what we sell.. (i'm not sure if I should say who we are here.. as I don't want the #1 spot to realize we are trying to take them over!) Amazon of course has a domain authority of 100. But they never take the #1 spot. The other site that takes the #2 and #3 spot is not even selling anything. Happens to be a technical term's with the same name wikipedia page! (i wish google would figure out people aren't looking for that!) Anyways.. every day we bouce back and forth between #4 and #2.. but #1 never changes.. Here are the stats of us verse #1 from moz: #1: Page Authority: 56.8, Root Domains Linking to page: 158, Domain Authority: 54.6: root domains linking to the root domain 1.42k my site: Page Authority: 60.6, Root domains linking to the page: 562, Domain Authority: 52.8: root domains linking to the root domain: 1.03k So they beat us in domain authority SLIGHTLY and in root domains linking to the root domain. So SEO masters.. what do I do to fix this? Get better backlinks? But how.... I can't just email GQ and ask them to write about us can I? I'm open to all things.. Maybe i'm not using moz data correctly.. We should at least be #2. We get #2 every other day.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | 88mph0 -
Merging two existing company sites into one
Hi Moz community, I have recently started a new job for a Fire & Security company in the UK to help with their non existent SEO efforts. Currently they have two separate websites. One of the websites is for their services and the other website is for their eCommerce store selling fire alarm equipment etc. The eCommerce store is higher up in the SERPs and overall has a lot more links. It also uses a better branded domain name. As I have never attempted such a project I have a few questions. The current eCommerce store is hosted and maintained by another web company which uses their bespoke CMS. What I want to do is take the service website and merge it with the ecommerce domain, however the service site runs on wordpress, which I want to continue for its flexibility. The service page wants to be the new homepage with a link on it to go to the store. I just cant get my head around the whole operation so if anyone could give me some advice to point me in the right direction that would be great. Thanks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | BradNichol0 -
Any problems with two sites by same owner targeting same keyword search?
I have a site, let's call it ExcellentFreeWidgets.com. There is a page on the site that is very popular and we'll call the page title, "Big Blue Widget." That page is currently #1 for the search "big blue widget." This week, I was able to buy the exact match domain for that page, we'll call it BigBlueWidget.com. I want to build a site on BigBlueWidget.com to better capitalize on that search "big blue widget," which is huge. The content would not be the same wording at all, but it would be the same subject. It would probably be a five page or so website, all about Big Blue Widgets: what they are, where to get them, etc. The sites will not reciprocally link to each other. New new site, BigBlueWidgets.com, would link to the existing site, ExcellentFreeWidgets.com. The new site and the current page will compete for position in the SERPs. Here are my questions to you experts: 1. Will Google care at all that the same entity owns both sites, or will just just rank for the term as they normally would. 2. I am not sure I'll run Adsense on the new site or not. I will be pointing a link back my ExcellentWidgets.com site from a button that says, "Get an Excellent Widget." But if I do run Adsense on it, does Google Adsense care that the same entity has a site and another site's page that are competing for the same term that both have Adsense add on them? Note: I do not want to start a new entity for the new site (I'm in CA and LLC's are $800/year) as it's probably not worth all that hassle and money. Thank you so much. I hope the that obfuscating the real domain names did not confuse the issue too much.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | bizzer0 -
How do I get 2 column Google sitelinks instead of one line sitelinks?
Currently, if you search for my site's brand name on Google, we are the top result. However, rather than having 2 columns of sitelinks, there is just one line of 4 sitelinks. When you search for the site's domain (sitename.com), you get the full 2 columns of sitelinks. Are there any strategies for getting the 2 columns on more than just the domain name search? At the very least, I'd like to get 2 columns to appear when you do a brand name search, but it'd be great to get 2 columns of sitelinks for our top search queries as well. Thanks for the advice...
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | BostonWright0