What is a really great bounce rate for a product or service site? What does Good look like?
-
I am really curious about a result I have never seen before. Our bounce rate went down a lot on a new site. So, what is good???
Recently, we took on a project with a company that offers a product they install for consumers and who had been in business for 15 plus years. The company is successful, has good customer base of those who have been made very happy, etc. It is not a repeat sale type of product, etc. One and done.
Their site when we began talking was roughly a year old and was not well constructed but not terrible. Most of the issues were around I frames, use of older coding, poor SEO, etc. There was not really a way to "redesign" and we built a new site.
This became a true collaboration in a B2B environment as the owner pushed us like crazy. Not the bad kind of push, the one that makes you say to your team, "Let's find a way!"
The result, IMO, was a gorgeous site. But, as you know, those are a dime a dozen. But, to get to the point, when we took over the account they had a bounce rate of around 45%. I did not see this as either good or bad, but a fact and for this industry probably not bad at all. In all honesty, I was not looking at that as a first metric I wanted to move, but it was obviously at or near the top for all the reasons we know.
So, this site is a local business, not an everyday product and gets about 2500 to 3000 uniques per month. If we compare to May of 2011/2012:
2011 2012
Total Visitors 1852 3,298
Uniques 1609 2,740
Pageviews 5,634 23,203
Pages/visit 3.04 7.04
Avg Duration 2.05 3.20
Yes, I am leaving off what we are getting, yes, I am leaving off the site. Please don't hate me. I am really wanting to see what others see with site changes and bounce rates first and will disclose. So, what's a great bounce rate? How do you know?
-
Actually better! 0.7% WOW. ...if only...
Interesting thought on header/footer though our JS is at bottom so not a 'slow' load.
-
So I'm guessing you had a 1-2% bounce rate? If so that brings up another question. If the code is in twice therefore bounces can't be record properly, then surely bounce rate would be 0% not 1%-2%.
The only thing I can think off is some users are bouncing before the page is fully loaded (eg header but not the footer).... just a thought
-
All,
I have to admit, sometimes you guys are too good. My head of Dev was in this morning and I was speaking with him re Keri's assertion (eunaneunan posit) on two instances of GA code. Well......... He looked and said its here in header and footer. "Good bug catch!" I opened my email and Keri had followed up with screen shots earlier this morning. Well, that's why she is one of my favorites.
Does anyone know how to rebuild an ego that had gone way up with a way low bounce rate and which has now gone way down due to being, uh, well, uh brought to reality??
While the current stats are great anyway, I had allowed those improvements to cloud my judgement on this and therefore did not look closer. (Picture me wiping the rose coloring from my glasses!)
Thanks to each of you as usual. I cannot imagine a world without Mozzzzzzzzzzzers!
Keepin it real.
-
Thanks again Keri,
I wanted to reply and thank all who have responded so far. I do not think the code is in twice and am checking it with three different sources as, frankly, Keri made me nervous.
If you look at May to May, the Total Visitors are up 78% (I see this as attributable to better CTR mostly and to some degree you would have to say it could be attributable to different market or marketing, but for May last year they did PPC all month and this year it started on the 25th with lower daily spend).If you look at average visit duration it is up 56% and pages per visit have more than doubled - up 131%. With total pageviews, well it is 4 times. Now, when you look at percentage of uniques to total it is 87% for 2011 and 83% for 2012 so no real change.
When I add it up, I see: People are engaging the site more and deeper. They are finding something that takes them in and makes them want to look at more. Obviously, if this is true (I am open to it not being) you would assume the bounce rate would go down.
Or am I off here?
-
Hi Robert. I think of bounce rate as my site's pulse. Over time I establish what is a "healthy" pulse, which for us is about 50-55%. Every site will be different based on its content (products) and delivery.
Our site has a lot of products that are not shippable, but only available for store pick up. We also have a lot of products that are only able to be delivered in-state, which affects bounce rate.
After we started our product feed, our bounce rate jumped to 55-60% but our sales jumped significantly also. A 55-60% bounce rate is not great for us, but the sales have been great so it is an acceptable trade-off.
I would say we have a "good" bounce rate for what we do. Its not great, but good. I would suggest great is a rate that is trending down while sales are trending up.
-
It really depends on your business sector. I'm a consumer bankruptcy lawyer. I've got a brief summary of my services on my home page and contact information.
A potential client can get all the info they need on the homepage. So in my case, I have a 80% bounce rate, but get a ton of business from my website.
Interestingly, I have section pages, i.e. Chapter 7, Chapter 13, etc., that have much lower bounce rates. Those pages contain much more detail and link to more in depth articles about those practice areas
-
Yes same thing a happen to me with a site, tracking code was in twice, so bounce dropped to 1% 2%.
Back on topic, under 30% would be good/v.good I would say
-
If you suddenly got a really good bounce rate of 1% or 2%, I'd take a look at your code and make sure that there's not two analytics instances there that are both firing, or some other code that's firing twice. The doubling in pages a visit would make me want to look there. I had the same issue on my site -- had a WP site and put in a custom analytics script in the footer, but still had the regular analytics in there via a WP plugin.
-
Thanks, Adam, Good viewpoint in my estimation. Before I give it all away, I want to see some more responses as I am highly intrigued by what we are seeing over time. When it first occurred I thought the result would diminish but it has not. So,.......
BTW - Crimson Penguin is one I haven't seen before! Have to elucidate some time!
-
It's hard to give a definitive answer to what is a 'really great' bounce rate. I find that bounce rates can vary greatly between industries, website types (blogs, e-commerce etc.) and even between pages.
Brian Clifton gives an indication of bounce rate levels in his book by use of a traffic light system. Less than 25% is considered green (good), 25-50% is amber (average) and above 50% is red (not good). I generally go by this rough guideline. So I guess really great could be considered less than 15% perhaps?
Hope this helps,
Adam.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Which links to map across in site redesign
Hi there, I'm currently doing a fairly major website redesign for a client. They are moving to my hosting so I am creating the site on my cloud account and have edited my host files to work on it. The site structure will stay largely the same as it is quite a straightforward services site. However I'm moving them onto Wordpress from a different set up and I'm not sure how many of the links that they have, that aren't straight forward pages, I need to create redirects for. I have used Screaming Frog to get a list of all their URLs, of which there are 82. However alongside text/ html links I have: image/jpeg text/css
Web Design | | Frog-Marketing
application/javascript Do I need to create redirects for all of these link types? Or just any of the pages I'm not using? Many thanks, Sarah.0 -
404's and a drop in Rank - Site maps? Data Highlighter?
I managed an old (2006 design) ticket site that was hosted and run by the same company that handled our point of sale. (Think, really crappy, customer had to click through three pages to get to the tickets, etc.) In Mid February, we migrated that old site to a new, more powerful site, built by a company that handles sites exclusively for ticket brokers. (My site: TheTicketKing. - dot - com) Before migration, I set up 301's for all the pages that we had currently ranked for, and had inbound links pointing to, etc. The CMS allowed me to set every one of those landing pages up with fresh content, so I created unique content for all of them, ran them through the Moz grader before launch, etc. We launched the site in Mid February, and it seemed like Google responded well. All the pages that we had 301's set up for stayed up fairly well in rank, and some even reached higher positions, while some took a few weeks to get back up to where they were before. Google was also giving us an average of 8-10K impressions per day, compared to 3000 per day with the old site. I started to notice a slow drop in impressions in mid April (after two months of love from Google,) and we lost rank on all our non branded pages around 4/23. Our branded terms are still fine, we didn't get a message from Google, and I reached out to the company that manages our site, asking if they had any issues with their other clients. They suggested that I resubmit our sitemaps. I did, and saw everything bump back up (impressions and rank) for just one week. Now we're back in the basement with all the non branded terms once again. I realize that Google could have penalized us without giving us a message, but what got me somewhat optimistic was the fact that resubmitting our sitemaps did bring us back up for around a week. One other thing that I was working on with the site just before the drop was Google's data highlighter. I submitted a set of pages that now come back with errors, after Google seemed to be fine with the data set before I submitted it. So now I'm looking at over 300 data highlighter errors when I'm in WMT. I deleted that set, but I still get the error listings in WMT, as if Google is still trying to understand those pages. Would that have an effect on our rank? Finally I do see that our 404's have risen steadily since the migration, to over 1000 now, and the people who manage the CMS tell me that it would have no effect on rank overall. And we're going to continue to get 404's as the nature of a ticket site would dictate? (Not sure on that, but that's what I was told.) Would anyone care to chime in on these thoughts, or any other clues as to my drop?
Web Design | | Ticket_King0 -
Old site to new WordPress site - Client concerned about Yahoo Ranking
Hello, Back Story I have a client (law firm) who has a large .html website. He has been doing his own SEO for years and it shows. I think the only reason he reached out to a professional is because he got a huge penalty from Google last fall and fell very far down in rankings. Although, he still retains a #1 spot in Yahoo for his site for the keyword phrase he wants. I have been creating a new WordPress theme for the client and creating all new pages and updating the formatting/SEO. From the beginning I have told the client that when we delete the old site and install a new WordPress site (same domain name, but different page hierarchy) he will take a bump in the search engines until all the 301 redirects get sorted out. I told him I can't guarantee any time frame of how long the dip in SEO will last. Some sites bounce right back while others take longer. Last week, during a discussion, he tells me that if he loses his #1 ranking on Yahoo for any length of time he thinks he will go out of business. Needless to say I was a little taken back. When it comes to SEO I use best practice techniques, do my research, stay on top of trends but I never guarantee rankings when moving to a new site. I'm thinking of ways I can help elevate any type of huge SEO drop off and help the client. Here is what I was thinking of suggesting to the client and I would love some feedback. Main Question He has another domain he isn't doing anything with. It's pretty much his domain name with pc added. I was thinking about using that domain to create a simple 1-2 page WordPress website with brand new content (no duplicate content) aimed at attracting his keyword phrase. I would do as much SEO as I could with a 1-2 page site and give it a month or so to see if this smaller site can get into the top #10 in Yahoo, or higher. Then, when we move the site he will still have a website on the first page of Yahoo for his keyword phrase. I hope I explained it clearly 🙂 I would be open to any suggestions anyone may have. Thanks
Web Design | | Bill_K0 -
Using a query string for linked, static landing pages - is this good practice?
My company has a page with links for each of our dozen office locations as well as a clickable map. These offices are also linked in the footer of every page along with their phone number. When one of these links is clicked, the visitor is directed to a static page with a picture of the office, contact information, a short description, and some other information. The URL for these pages is displayed as something like http:/example.com/offices.htm?office_id=123456, with seemingly random ID numbers at the end depending on the office that remain static. I know first off that this is probably bad SEO practice, as the URL should be something like htttp://example.com/offices/springfield/ My question is, why is there a question mark in the page URL? I understand that it represents a query string, but I'm not sure why it's there to begin with. A search query should not required if they are just static landing pages, correct?. Is there any reason at all why they would be queries? Is this an issue that needs to be addressed or does it have little to no impact on SEO?
Web Design | | BD690 -
Does having a Blog link in the top level navigation provide any better SEO value, or would having it in a footer or top navigation work just as good?
Trying to decide on whether placing a link to the blog in our top level navigation would have a better SEO value than just placing it in top or footer navigation. I have an ecommerce site.
Web Design | | RPD0 -
Mobile Sitemap for Site with Media Queries
I'm doing SEO for a site. It uses Media Queries and the CSS to automatically resize the site for the screen size in use. I.e. the site detects the screen size of say an iPhone and the CSS knows which elements to hide for that screen size and still make it look good. This is great because it will automatically cut down the content to display nicely on small screens - obviating the need for a separate mobile site. What kind of sitemap should be generated since the urls are for desktop and mobile use? Yoast (sweet SEO) said it should have both regular and mobile style sitemap to get both the regular and mobile bots to visit, but didn't elaborate on how that sitemap should look. Do you have a recommendation for how exactly the sitemap should look? Should the sitemap have the urls all twice, i.e. once regular and once with the mobile indicator?
Web Design | | GregoryHaze1 -
Help choosing an E-Commerce platform for SEO, Product Videos and Usability today?
7 months ago I asked the same question.. I am reaching out to all of you What platforms do you hate? and want to meet the guys or girls that coded it in a dark ally way... and What platforms are good? I keep looking at the code of some sites and its shocking. No GA Async code, No canonical tags.. it goes on and on.. If you want to pitch to me and you are in the UK email me robert@thefurnituremarket.co.uk
Web Design | | robertrRSwalters0 -
The primary search keywords for our news release network have dropped like a rock in Google... we are not sure why.
Hi, On April 11th, a month after the farmer update was released for U.S. users of Google, the primary keywords for ALL our sites significantly dropped in Google. I have some ideas why, but I wanted to get some second opinions also. First off, I did some research if Google did anything on the 11th of April... they did. They implemented the farmer update internationally, but that does not explain why our ranks did not drop in March for U.S. Google users... unless they rolled out their update based on what site the domain is registered in... in our case, Canada. The primary news release site is www.hotelnewsresource.com, but we have many running on the same server. EG. www.restaurantnewsresource.com, www.travelindustrywire.com and many more. We were number 1 or had top ranks for terms like ¨Hotel News¨, ¨Hotel Industry¨, ¨Hotel Financing¨, ¨Hotel Jobs¨, ¨Hotels for Sale¨, etc... and now, for most of these we have dropped in a big way. It seems that Google has issued a penalty for every internal page we link to. Couple obvious issues with the current template we use... too many links, and we intend to change that asap, but it has never been a problem before. The domain hotelnewsresource.com is 10 years old and still holds a page rank of 6. Secondly, the way our news system works, it´s possible to access an article from any domain in the network. E.G. I can read an article that was assigned to www.hotelnewsresource.com on www.restaurantnewsresource.com... we don´t post links to the irrelevant domain, but it does sometimes get indexed. So, we are going to implement the Google source meta tag option. The bottom line is that I think we put too much faith in the maturity of the domain... thinking that may protect us... not the case and it´s now a big mess. Any insight you can offer would be greatly appreciated. Do you think it was farmer or possibly something else? Thanks, Jarrett
Web Design | | jarrett.mackay0