What is a really great bounce rate for a product or service site? What does Good look like?
-
I am really curious about a result I have never seen before. Our bounce rate went down a lot on a new site. So, what is good???
Recently, we took on a project with a company that offers a product they install for consumers and who had been in business for 15 plus years. The company is successful, has good customer base of those who have been made very happy, etc. It is not a repeat sale type of product, etc. One and done.
Their site when we began talking was roughly a year old and was not well constructed but not terrible. Most of the issues were around I frames, use of older coding, poor SEO, etc. There was not really a way to "redesign" and we built a new site.
This became a true collaboration in a B2B environment as the owner pushed us like crazy. Not the bad kind of push, the one that makes you say to your team, "Let's find a way!"
The result, IMO, was a gorgeous site. But, as you know, those are a dime a dozen. But, to get to the point, when we took over the account they had a bounce rate of around 45%. I did not see this as either good or bad, but a fact and for this industry probably not bad at all. In all honesty, I was not looking at that as a first metric I wanted to move, but it was obviously at or near the top for all the reasons we know.
So, this site is a local business, not an everyday product and gets about 2500 to 3000 uniques per month. If we compare to May of 2011/2012:
2011 2012
Total Visitors 1852 3,298
Uniques 1609 2,740
Pageviews 5,634 23,203
Pages/visit 3.04 7.04
Avg Duration 2.05 3.20
Yes, I am leaving off what we are getting, yes, I am leaving off the site. Please don't hate me. I am really wanting to see what others see with site changes and bounce rates first and will disclose. So, what's a great bounce rate? How do you know?
-
Actually better! 0.7% WOW. ...if only...
Interesting thought on header/footer though our JS is at bottom so not a 'slow' load.
-
So I'm guessing you had a 1-2% bounce rate? If so that brings up another question. If the code is in twice therefore bounces can't be record properly, then surely bounce rate would be 0% not 1%-2%.
The only thing I can think off is some users are bouncing before the page is fully loaded (eg header but not the footer).... just a thought
-
All,
I have to admit, sometimes you guys are too good. My head of Dev was in this morning and I was speaking with him re Keri's assertion (eunaneunan posit) on two instances of GA code. Well......... He looked and said its here in header and footer. "Good bug catch!" I opened my email and Keri had followed up with screen shots earlier this morning. Well, that's why she is one of my favorites.
Does anyone know how to rebuild an ego that had gone way up with a way low bounce rate and which has now gone way down due to being, uh, well, uh brought to reality??
While the current stats are great anyway, I had allowed those improvements to cloud my judgement on this and therefore did not look closer. (Picture me wiping the rose coloring from my glasses!)
Thanks to each of you as usual. I cannot imagine a world without Mozzzzzzzzzzzers!
Keepin it real.
-
Thanks again Keri,
I wanted to reply and thank all who have responded so far. I do not think the code is in twice and am checking it with three different sources as, frankly, Keri made me nervous.
If you look at May to May, the Total Visitors are up 78% (I see this as attributable to better CTR mostly and to some degree you would have to say it could be attributable to different market or marketing, but for May last year they did PPC all month and this year it started on the 25th with lower daily spend).If you look at average visit duration it is up 56% and pages per visit have more than doubled - up 131%. With total pageviews, well it is 4 times. Now, when you look at percentage of uniques to total it is 87% for 2011 and 83% for 2012 so no real change.
When I add it up, I see: People are engaging the site more and deeper. They are finding something that takes them in and makes them want to look at more. Obviously, if this is true (I am open to it not being) you would assume the bounce rate would go down.
Or am I off here?
-
Hi Robert. I think of bounce rate as my site's pulse. Over time I establish what is a "healthy" pulse, which for us is about 50-55%. Every site will be different based on its content (products) and delivery.
Our site has a lot of products that are not shippable, but only available for store pick up. We also have a lot of products that are only able to be delivered in-state, which affects bounce rate.
After we started our product feed, our bounce rate jumped to 55-60% but our sales jumped significantly also. A 55-60% bounce rate is not great for us, but the sales have been great so it is an acceptable trade-off.
I would say we have a "good" bounce rate for what we do. Its not great, but good. I would suggest great is a rate that is trending down while sales are trending up.
-
It really depends on your business sector. I'm a consumer bankruptcy lawyer. I've got a brief summary of my services on my home page and contact information.
A potential client can get all the info they need on the homepage. So in my case, I have a 80% bounce rate, but get a ton of business from my website.
Interestingly, I have section pages, i.e. Chapter 7, Chapter 13, etc., that have much lower bounce rates. Those pages contain much more detail and link to more in depth articles about those practice areas
-
Yes same thing a happen to me with a site, tracking code was in twice, so bounce dropped to 1% 2%.
Back on topic, under 30% would be good/v.good I would say
-
If you suddenly got a really good bounce rate of 1% or 2%, I'd take a look at your code and make sure that there's not two analytics instances there that are both firing, or some other code that's firing twice. The doubling in pages a visit would make me want to look there. I had the same issue on my site -- had a WP site and put in a custom analytics script in the footer, but still had the regular analytics in there via a WP plugin.
-
Thanks, Adam, Good viewpoint in my estimation. Before I give it all away, I want to see some more responses as I am highly intrigued by what we are seeing over time. When it first occurred I thought the result would diminish but it has not. So,.......
BTW - Crimson Penguin is one I haven't seen before! Have to elucidate some time!
-
It's hard to give a definitive answer to what is a 'really great' bounce rate. I find that bounce rates can vary greatly between industries, website types (blogs, e-commerce etc.) and even between pages.
Brian Clifton gives an indication of bounce rate levels in his book by use of a traffic light system. Less than 25% is considered green (good), 25-50% is amber (average) and above 50% is red (not good). I generally go by this rough guideline. So I guess really great could be considered less than 15% perhaps?
Hope this helps,
Adam.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Is Sitewide Credit Link Good or Bad in 2015?
We are a web design agency thus we get a good number of links (footer) from our client's site. According to Matt Cutt, Google considers all the sitewide links to 1. So is it okay to have those links? Note: Those links are do-follow and most with 2 anchor text. "Web Design" by "Company Name" and "Website Development" by."Company Name". Thanks
Web Design | | Jubaer961 -
Responsive Design vs Mobile For This Site?
They are going to do an entire website redesign for http://gaport.com/ and I think they should adhere to responsive design best practices. However, I'm just saying that because everything I have read says that's the "way of the future" if not the way of the present already. Any reason, they shouldn't do that and keep the desktop/mobile sites? Thanks, Ruben
Web Design | | KempRugeLawGroup0 -
Using a query string for linked, static landing pages - is this good practice?
My company has a page with links for each of our dozen office locations as well as a clickable map. These offices are also linked in the footer of every page along with their phone number. When one of these links is clicked, the visitor is directed to a static page with a picture of the office, contact information, a short description, and some other information. The URL for these pages is displayed as something like http:/example.com/offices.htm?office_id=123456, with seemingly random ID numbers at the end depending on the office that remain static. I know first off that this is probably bad SEO practice, as the URL should be something like htttp://example.com/offices/springfield/ My question is, why is there a question mark in the page URL? I understand that it represents a query string, but I'm not sure why it's there to begin with. A search query should not required if they are just static landing pages, correct?. Is there any reason at all why they would be queries? Is this an issue that needs to be addressed or does it have little to no impact on SEO?
Web Design | | BD690 -
How to make sure category pages rank higher than product pages?
Hi, This question is E-Commerce related. We have product categories dividing products by color. Let's say we have the category 'blue toy cars' and a product called 'blue toy car racer', both of these could rank for the keyword 'blue toy car'. How do we make sure the category 'blue toy cars' ranks above the product 'blue toy car racer'? Or is the category page automatically ranked higher because of the higher page authority of that page? Alex
Web Design | | WebmasterAlex0 -
Does having a Blog link in the top level navigation provide any better SEO value, or would having it in a footer or top navigation work just as good?
Trying to decide on whether placing a link to the blog in our top level navigation would have a better SEO value than just placing it in top or footer navigation. I have an ecommerce site.
Web Design | | RPD0 -
Google Analtyics Conversion Tracking for Wordpress Life Coaching Site
Hello, How do I do conversion tracking for Google Analytics for this site: debidonner(dot)com She has a 'Thank You' page after you return from Paypal Thanks!
Web Design | | BobGW0 -
Setup of three major retail sites.. need advice.
I recently have taken a new position responsible for three large national retail sites which are all owned by one parent organization. Through a series of acquisitions, these three major brands have been brought under one umbrella and a brand consolidation is likely not to happen within the next 2-4 years. I have a number of questions I’m hoping to get some feedback on, but first a little more background is necessary. A year ago (before my time) the three sites were over-hauled, but were designed to use one common custom CMS and all of the navigation and nearly all the content is the same (with some exceptions, such as tags, url, etc.). All of the brands have identical products and services; however, each one services a different demographic in the US. The design was intended for ease of management, but is terrible for seo. Additionally, without the geographic reference, they all compete for the same keywords. They have now begun a very large ecommerce project utilizing an ATG platform. The initial direction is to use one platform for all three brands, but keep them on separate domains and with the use of basic switching, replace nominal content such as logos and references of the brands for each of the domains. I’m concerned with this approach and would like to hear your feedback.. When optimizing a page for one keyword set, are they likely to be filtered due to dup content? The argument that management has is that all three current sites rank very well for one keyword on all three sites. They feel it won’t be an issue due to this. One option, that is currently still available, is to tri-band one ecommerce site, but it would have to be on an entirely new domain. The other three domains are very well established and are PR6s. Management, and even I, is afraid to abandon these other domains, but having a single domain would allow us to have unique content and really leverage all efforts to one domain. Thoughts? Any knowledge or thoughts what kind of impact having three domains on one ATG platform will be? Thanks much! John If you feel it will help, please message me and I can share the urls... Also, how would you handle a company blog in this case?
Web Design | | kavaliauskas0 -
Question about web site structure
Is there an SEO advantage for individual pages to be in sub folders vs not being in a folder? Of course site managemnt is easier with folders if you have 100;s of pages...clearly a shorter URL is easier for humans to naviagte. store.com/gadgets store.com/lasers vs. store.com/gadgets/lasers
Web Design | | johnshearer0