What is a really great bounce rate for a product or service site? What does Good look like?
-
I am really curious about a result I have never seen before. Our bounce rate went down a lot on a new site. So, what is good???
Recently, we took on a project with a company that offers a product they install for consumers and who had been in business for 15 plus years. The company is successful, has good customer base of those who have been made very happy, etc. It is not a repeat sale type of product, etc. One and done.
Their site when we began talking was roughly a year old and was not well constructed but not terrible. Most of the issues were around I frames, use of older coding, poor SEO, etc. There was not really a way to "redesign" and we built a new site.
This became a true collaboration in a B2B environment as the owner pushed us like crazy. Not the bad kind of push, the one that makes you say to your team, "Let's find a way!"
The result, IMO, was a gorgeous site. But, as you know, those are a dime a dozen. But, to get to the point, when we took over the account they had a bounce rate of around 45%. I did not see this as either good or bad, but a fact and for this industry probably not bad at all. In all honesty, I was not looking at that as a first metric I wanted to move, but it was obviously at or near the top for all the reasons we know.
So, this site is a local business, not an everyday product and gets about 2500 to 3000 uniques per month. If we compare to May of 2011/2012:
2011 2012
Total Visitors 1852 3,298
Uniques 1609 2,740
Pageviews 5,634 23,203
Pages/visit 3.04 7.04
Avg Duration 2.05 3.20
Yes, I am leaving off what we are getting, yes, I am leaving off the site. Please don't hate me. I am really wanting to see what others see with site changes and bounce rates first and will disclose. So, what's a great bounce rate? How do you know?
-
Actually better! 0.7% WOW. ...if only...
Interesting thought on header/footer though our JS is at bottom so not a 'slow' load.
-
So I'm guessing you had a 1-2% bounce rate? If so that brings up another question. If the code is in twice therefore bounces can't be record properly, then surely bounce rate would be 0% not 1%-2%.
The only thing I can think off is some users are bouncing before the page is fully loaded (eg header but not the footer).... just a thought
-
All,
I have to admit, sometimes you guys are too good. My head of Dev was in this morning and I was speaking with him re Keri's assertion (eunaneunan posit) on two instances of GA code. Well......... He looked and said its here in header and footer. "Good bug catch!" I opened my email and Keri had followed up with screen shots earlier this morning. Well, that's why she is one of my favorites.
Does anyone know how to rebuild an ego that had gone way up with a way low bounce rate and which has now gone way down due to being, uh, well, uh brought to reality??
While the current stats are great anyway, I had allowed those improvements to cloud my judgement on this and therefore did not look closer. (Picture me wiping the rose coloring from my glasses!)
Thanks to each of you as usual. I cannot imagine a world without Mozzzzzzzzzzzers!
Keepin it real.
-
Thanks again Keri,
I wanted to reply and thank all who have responded so far. I do not think the code is in twice and am checking it with three different sources as, frankly, Keri made me nervous.
If you look at May to May, the Total Visitors are up 78% (I see this as attributable to better CTR mostly and to some degree you would have to say it could be attributable to different market or marketing, but for May last year they did PPC all month and this year it started on the 25th with lower daily spend).If you look at average visit duration it is up 56% and pages per visit have more than doubled - up 131%. With total pageviews, well it is 4 times. Now, when you look at percentage of uniques to total it is 87% for 2011 and 83% for 2012 so no real change.
When I add it up, I see: People are engaging the site more and deeper. They are finding something that takes them in and makes them want to look at more. Obviously, if this is true (I am open to it not being) you would assume the bounce rate would go down.
Or am I off here?
-
Hi Robert. I think of bounce rate as my site's pulse. Over time I establish what is a "healthy" pulse, which for us is about 50-55%. Every site will be different based on its content (products) and delivery.
Our site has a lot of products that are not shippable, but only available for store pick up. We also have a lot of products that are only able to be delivered in-state, which affects bounce rate.
After we started our product feed, our bounce rate jumped to 55-60% but our sales jumped significantly also. A 55-60% bounce rate is not great for us, but the sales have been great so it is an acceptable trade-off.
I would say we have a "good" bounce rate for what we do. Its not great, but good. I would suggest great is a rate that is trending down while sales are trending up.
-
It really depends on your business sector. I'm a consumer bankruptcy lawyer. I've got a brief summary of my services on my home page and contact information.
A potential client can get all the info they need on the homepage. So in my case, I have a 80% bounce rate, but get a ton of business from my website.
Interestingly, I have section pages, i.e. Chapter 7, Chapter 13, etc., that have much lower bounce rates. Those pages contain much more detail and link to more in depth articles about those practice areas
-
Yes same thing a happen to me with a site, tracking code was in twice, so bounce dropped to 1% 2%.
Back on topic, under 30% would be good/v.good I would say
-
If you suddenly got a really good bounce rate of 1% or 2%, I'd take a look at your code and make sure that there's not two analytics instances there that are both firing, or some other code that's firing twice. The doubling in pages a visit would make me want to look there. I had the same issue on my site -- had a WP site and put in a custom analytics script in the footer, but still had the regular analytics in there via a WP plugin.
-
Thanks, Adam, Good viewpoint in my estimation. Before I give it all away, I want to see some more responses as I am highly intrigued by what we are seeing over time. When it first occurred I thought the result would diminish but it has not. So,.......
BTW - Crimson Penguin is one I haven't seen before! Have to elucidate some time!
-
It's hard to give a definitive answer to what is a 'really great' bounce rate. I find that bounce rates can vary greatly between industries, website types (blogs, e-commerce etc.) and even between pages.
Brian Clifton gives an indication of bounce rate levels in his book by use of a traffic light system. Less than 25% is considered green (good), 25-50% is amber (average) and above 50% is red (not good). I generally go by this rough guideline. So I guess really great could be considered less than 15% perhaps?
Hope this helps,
Adam.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Are Breadcrumbs Really Necessary?
An SEO provider suggested we add breadcrumbs to the top of each page about 3 years ago, which we did. 3 years later we are going thru the site and find it really busy with lots of redundant and distracting elements. We would like to remove the breadcrumbs from the top of the pages. Is there any real SEO downside to doing so?
Web Design | | Kingalan1
All URLs are listed on our site map so I don't see why Google would not index all pages. Our domain is www.metro-manhattan.com I have uploaded a sample page with a breadcrumb. Thanks,
Alan kbbpS0 -
What is the Estimated Time for SERP Rankings to Replenish after a Site Redesign?
Hello Fellow Moz'ers, My company's website, www.1099pro.com, is currently OLD and not mobile-friendly! However, we rank #1 for out most important keywords and don't want to lose that ranking. I've recently redesigned our site, currently in testing, to use the same standard desktop pages but to also have responsive, mobile friendly, pages for different view ports. My question is if anyone knows an estimated time frame that search engines (mainly Google) takes to re-crawl the site and restore SERP rankings to their previous levels? The reason is because we are HIGHLY seasonal and if we are not back at our top rankings by early December, at latest (November would be better), then we stand the chance to lose a considerable amount of traffic/revenue. -The Unenlightened One
Web Design | | Stew2220 -
Responsive Design vs Mobile For This Site?
They are going to do an entire website redesign for http://gaport.com/ and I think they should adhere to responsive design best practices. However, I'm just saying that because everything I have read says that's the "way of the future" if not the way of the present already. Any reason, they shouldn't do that and keep the desktop/mobile sites? Thanks, Ruben
Web Design | | KempRugeLawGroup0 -
I am looking to build an informational site that consists of a few landing pages. What kind of platform would you recommend?
The site would consist of an initial homepage, about us page, products & services page, sub-category pages that consist of the products and services in greater detail, and a contact us page. What platform would you recommend building this site on? I currently use Miva Merchant for an ecommerce platform, however this new site will not require the customization that Miva provides, and will also not need to have ecommerce capabilities. This will strictly be an informational site for prospective and current clients.
Web Design | | djlittman0 -
Internal linking for small site
I have a site with 13 pages, 6 are product pages, 5 are free tips pages (the other 2 are the home page and contact form). Currently I have the navbar at top of site with a "products" dropdown menu for the 6 product pages and a "Tips" dropdown menu for the 5 tip pages. All categories except the contact page are at the bottom as breadcrumbs, the homepage is "home" and the rest are relevant user friendly keyword anchor text. So I have 2 more pages to ad to "Tips" and am wondering whether to have a new 2nd level tips page that links to a 3rd level of 7 different tips pages, or keep it shallow as it is, with only 2 levels from the homepage to the other (now 13) pages, with a potential of 22 pages in the foreseable few years? (and some graphics work to make it user friendly like how Zappo's has categories to the side on each of its drop down navbar menu's and non-link text categories for its bottom of page breadcrumb links) Can those aforementioned pages linking to each other in the footer dilute link equity? (I think that's one of the primary reasons I'm curious). What do you think of this: http://www.dbswebsite.com/blog/2012/08/08/internal-linking-101-5-best-practices/ (I guess I should no follow my contact page), could it be better to have a 2nd level page for "Tips" to get more equity to that page rather than across all 7 tips pages? I have read around about this on here (hence how I found out about Zappo's) and elsewhere and wanted ask to make sure.
Web Design | | Zoolander0 -
Site Re-Design - Running old XML site map for 301's
Hi all, We are going to launch a new site design for our current e-commerce site. I have taken this opportunity to change some categories due to keyword research and all old categories will be 301ed to best fitting new category. So I have 2 questions about moving stuff over; 1. I read that leaving the old xml site map running for the first week, would help, because this would give crawlers the chance to run through the site and follow the 301s, which would help pass the juice. How true does this sound? 2. I was thinking of re-writing all category and sub category titles, meta descriptions and on page content. The positive of this is loads of fresh content - but doing this all at the same time with the new site launch might see some major dropping in search ranking. I've identified our top traffic keyword terms/pages, would it be more wise to leave these pages, and change the others, or would the total new fresh burst have a better impact? Cheers
Web Design | | ToxicFox0 -
Turning my Design Business site into a site to promote SEO
I need advice on retooling my website for my SEO biz. I have shifted my business model from graphic designer who does websites, to "internet marketing consultant who does graphics too". My main website and domain name is over 10 years old, so I've made the decision to keep it, even though it has no keywords in the name. The name works well for the new business, otherwise. The site has a PR3 and I rank well for small business advertising terms, which gets me graphic design business. I intend to keep doing graphic design, but that is a smaller part of my income. I had considered making 3 satellite sites with keyword domain names to cover my offerings of graphic design SEO, website development, and internet marketing. But am leaning against it for several reasons (that all of us SEO's know) but mainly the fact that I cannot keep up with both working for my clients and blogging on multiple sites and link building for multiple sites. So my question is (you knew there was one coming, right?), what is the best approach to building categories of web development, internet marketing, and SEO into my existing graphic design/advertising oriented website? This is slightly embarrassing to ask as an SEO, but given the multiple approaches possible, and knowing the importance of doing it right the first time, it's best to get an consensus perspective on the BEST approach. My main concerns are the navigation system and the links from the homepage into the site. I have too many pages I've identified as essential to link off of the home page and navigation menus? (Website development, social media marketing, link building, keyword research, pay per click, online advertising, graphic design, brochures, catalogs, Logos, Branding, SEO, keyword research etc.) I've always tried for the ratio of one link off of any page for every 100 words of content. Do I create a home page that is of monster proportions? Do I just have the 4 basic areas linking off the home page then create a "landing zone" of 4 folders and create down from that? I am concerned about URL length as I go deeper with that approach. Or, does it make more sense to have a dozen second-level pages, and not link them all off the home page, and build from beneath (and relying on external juice). Next issue is the nav system. It will be huge. Am I best off just keeping it to 4-6, and creating subnavigation on everypage within the site according to section (PITA)? I've read dozens of blog opinions on how much nav systems do or do not hurt link juice. I've always thought footer links were right next to worthless to pass any juice, but given this situation, does it make sense to make a footer link for each major page (about 20)? Thanks for your opinions.
Web Design | | JCDenver0 -
Ways to decrease the bounce rate
I am under the impression that bounce rate is a good indicator to Google as to whether the site is relevant to the user. I think that it probably has quite a lot of impact on ranking. So I thought I would start a discussion as to good ways to decrease bounce rate?
Web Design | | esendex0