Why was I hit by the above the fold algo?
-
I cannot find any decent information on this update. Everybody appears to reiterate what Matt Cutts posted. I understand what the update was 'supposed' to combat and achieve. I also understand what those abusing ads above the fold, are supposed to do. But I need to know what to do, when you don't have too many ads above the fold.
One of my websites was hit. Several professionals have tried to convince me it was Panda, that was released on 18th January. But I am now 99.9% certain it wasn't.
I'm in the UK, traffic on the 18th was normal, little better than expected actually. Traffic on the 19th was normal until around 10pm GMT and there as a noticeable dip, compared with previous days and weeks.
January 20th continued this decline and at the end of the day, there was a 25% loss.
I have 1 Google ad, that is above the fold. Most of the pages have no ads at all. No affiliates or anything else. I have always prided myself in keeping my website clean and ad free.
We also have the lowest bounce rates in the niche, by a mile, as far as I can tell, from speaking to other webmasters.
I cannot remove this 1 ad, the servers alone, cost a couple of grand. The advertising supports the website.
Nothing I can find online, gives me any indicators, as to what might be tripping this filter. But I need to figure it out, as traffic has now reached a 50% loss, which equates to about 15,000 visitors per day.
I have tore my pages apart, removed functionality, added functionality and yet traffic has continued to decline.
Can anybody shed light on this? I worry that perhaps Google is seeing the images on my website as ads. The images open a bigger preview in lightbox, but with JS turned off, opens a new page, with nothing but the image on it.
I am at my wits end. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Paul
-
That link is really bothering me. I have never personally used that dirty piece of software, and I've contacted the guy who owns the website several times asking him to remove that link.
It appears other links have been built without my knowledge but nothing OTT. So I don't think that's the issue. The drop on Jan 20th is just too much of a coincidence.
I've lost over $20k. Fortunately Adsense ecpm is a lot higher, after decreasing bounce rate etc.
Despite how it may appear, I've actually got quite a lot of experience fixing Google penalties. This is the first time I've ever been stumped and with it being my own site and getting desperate, I've made some choices against my better judgement.
I've also hired a couple of other SEO's, which is actually how I ended up on a wild goose chase, trying to combat Panda, when I was certain it wasn't the issue.
I did submit a reconsideration request and got the automated response that there was no manual penalties. I may take the loss and remove the ads for a week, at the end of the day, I need to get to the bottom of it.
Thanks a lot for all your input Ryan.
-
Paul,
I agree with you that tearing up your site was likely a mistake. I would suggest restoring your page to represent the page both you and your members loved.
It is my opinion we have reached the limit of what can be done in a Q&A. What you have described is an across-the-board drop in rankings on or about Jan 19th. To diagnose and repair the penalty your options are:
-
hire a professional SEO consultant
-
continue to make guesses and tear up your site
If you were to stay on your current course, I would make the following suggestions:
-submit a Reconsideration Request just to ensure you have not been hit with a manual penalty. If Google responds with the standard message indicating you have not been manually penalized, then take comfort in knowing you are just dealing with the normal algorithm and can focus on it.
-
you are clearly familiar with the ATF update (http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2012/01/page-layout-algorithm-improvement.html). If you are so sure that is the problem, there is a very easy way to test! Remove the ads for a time period and see if your rankings are restored.
-
based on the feedback you have already received from other SEOs, you can try improving your content. Do it in such a way that would truly benefit users, not in a manner to appease the search engines
-
lastly, have you considered other possibilities? For example, your site may have a link penalty. When I checked OSE your first link shows as: http://dbpmarketing.com/senuke/senuke-x-review/
According to the page:
| Name: | SENuke X |
| Creators: | Joe Russell & Areeb Bajwa |
| Focus: | Automated Link Building |Your link profile shows clear signs of manipulation and your links did increase at exactly the time you were penalized.
5+ months of lost traffic = how much revenue? Or asked another way, how much revenue do you need to lose before you consider hiring someone with experience resolving Google penalties?
-
-
Hi Ryan, the site was hitting 30,000 uniques a day. The pages are very image heavy and also serve tens of thousands of downloads a day. We have 2 quad core servers, with 28GB ram. 1 is a dedicated web server and the other dedicated SQL. We also have a dedicated, but much less powerful backup server and finally 20TB traffic allowance.
The blog page in question, wasn't supposed to target any terms. It was to boost morale while traffic is down. I appreciate I could have still targeted terms but I figured I'd just tone things down a little. Most of the other pages are highly targeted. http://www.tehkseven.net/theme/nokia-c3-themes.html for example, is targeting Nokia C3 Themes.
The download page is currently a complete, utter mess. It was previously very similar to this: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.rockstar.gta3&feature=top-paid#?t=W251bGwsMSwxLDIwNiwiY29tLnJvY2tzdGFyLmd0YTMiXQ..
But after losing so much traffic on January 20th, I've ripped it inside out. I removed the large intro banner that members usually spent hours designing, moved text around the page, moved the ad up, down, left and right. It's rather sad and my members aren't pleased that the pages which display their work, have been destroyed, but they are fortunately supportive and understanding of the situation.
I need to start putting it back together and pay extra attention to keeping the ad below the fold, while focusing on my users. As much as I want to fix this issue, destroying my website in the process, isn't what I want to do.
Our bounce rates are 20-30%, which are among the best in the niche, we average 12 page views and 8-9 minutes per visit. Yet none of this seems to matter, all Google cares about is this bloody advert.
I'll checkout the Wikipedia page, thanks.
-
Paul, take a look at this URL for example: http://www.tehkseven.net/blog/1/entry-1164-daily-inspiration-1/
Some positive notes: it appears to be authentic, original content and your community members are responding to it.
Question - what is this page supposed to rank for? Since this page is linked to from an above the fold area of your home page it must be important, right? It does not appear your site is large enough to earn branded searches. For example, SEOmoz "Whiteboard Friday" has been around long enough and attracted enough interest to show signs of a brand. The term earns 1600 Global Monthly Searches.
Try this: look at your various mobile theme pages and ignore the page title. How long does it take to figure out what the page focus is? Ideally the answer should be one second. Instead, the actual focus of the page is often not found in the content, or if it is found it is not in the Description area above the above but rather in the auto-generated text below the large ad.
By the way...opportunity for your site: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phone_theme I would suggest adding HIGH QUALITY, HELPFUL content to the wiki page and providing your site as the source.
On another note...
**the servers alone, cost a couple of grand. **
In re-reading your original Q&A this just hit me. What kind of hosting do you have? The performance of your site is not that of a dedicated server. Based on the performance I would guess you use a VPS but your costs should be under 1k US per year.
-
Hi Ryan, I must ask what you mean by "unfocused" content. Do you mean unfocused in that the subject matter for a theme is unrelated to the next? Or do you have an issue with the architecture of the website? Cheers
-
Hi Ryan, I'm not looking for confirmation, I think it's a given, that ATF is the update that hurt us. Sorry for lack of info, finally at a PC now.
I agree regarding the alt text of the attachments. We are using invision power board and on the attachments system they use terrible alt text. It's likely possible to hack though. In this niche, the top sites all lack textual content an I believe Google is smart enough to understand that.
What I was hoping for, is for somebody to be able to look at the page with the ad and say "oh yes, there's your issue, I've seen this before'. Wishful thinking?
The drop in traffic is site wide and the drop in ranking appears to be across the board too. The drops aren't typical of a normal penalty, we've not been knocked back several pages, just all pages dropped several spots, which has had a devastating effect.
It's not any specific content type, or section of the site. The entire site was hit late Jan 19th, GMT, which would be midday US. If there's any information I can provide, that you feel may assist you in offering help, please ask and I'll provide it.
-
Paul, you are not sharing enough info for anyone to be able to assist you.
Take a step back and look at this Q&A. You have shared:
-
you are 99% sure you have been hit by the ATF algorithm change
-
you are confident you are not affected by Panda
I had to pull even basic info such as the site URL. We have no information about your traffic drop other then the date. What assistance do you desire? Are you really seeking to resolve the root issue? Or do you just want someone to confirm your diagnosis?
Based on what I am seeing, I am highly concerned about your extremely thin and unfocused content. Example page of one of the site's themes: http://www.tehkseven.net/theme/109507/summertime-mobile-theme.html
To make matters worse, the image ALT text is either missing or exceptionally poor. An example of ALT text on the above page "Attached Image: 1.png"
-
-
Hi Ryan, thanks for taking the time to look, once again replying via my iPhone. So please excuse lack of formatting. Ad is on the download page, click any item in the gallery. Prior no major changes other than an update in the cms which did introduce a couple of duplicate content issues that were quickly fixed. But since I have noindexed a lot of content and traffic has spiralled. My gut tells me that this ATF update works on a sliding scale, based on the ratio of pages with the offending ads. My noindexing pages without the ad, has increased that ratio.
-
I viewed your site and did not notice the Google ad you mentioned. Has it been disabled?
I noticed some content issues as you mentioned but did not see anything else which immediately stood out. Further analysis of your analytics is necessary. Exactly HOW has your traffic dropped? Did it drop across the board? Or are there some keywords or pages which experienced a drop while others remain unaffected? Did rankings drop?
What changes were made in the 60 days before the drop?
-
Grr seomoz isn't mobile friendly. It's stripped all the formatting. Sorry for the long sentances.
-
Hi Ryan, I avoided posting the URL, as over on the Google forums, I found people got caught up in details, such as low text content etc. But I'm hoping we won't do that here. URL: http://goo.gl/UDTIw The low text is a problem for the entire niche and we go way beyond what 99% of our competitors do. I'm 99.9% sure the issue is from the ATF update. Since Jan 20th, I have changed a lot. But as I say, this has to be in some way related to ads.
-
Another obvious question is : did you change anything recently?
-
Without the ability to at least look at your web page, we are truly flying blind. I cannot see how any helpful advice can be offered without, at a minimum, examining your site.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Content Below the Fold
Hi I wondered what the view is on content below the fold? We have the H1, product listings & then some written content under the products - will Google just ignore this? I can't hide it under a tab or put a lot of content above products - so I'm not sure what the other option is? Thank you
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | BeckyKey0 -
Penguin 3.0 hit caused by Pinterest?
I've read the FAQs and searched the help center. My URL is: http://www.weplann.comHello there,Since 10/24 we've seen a critical impact in organic results in our site. At first, only taking a look at the date of when it all started made us think about a Penguin 3.0 hit and then we went to take a look at our linking data to find we had more than 14,000 links from Pinterest (significantly more than any other source). Then, another thing that made us think about that dramatic organic drop is the anchor text: an exact match (www.weplann.com) is at #1 in our anchor text ranking but we're not 100% sure if this could affect our organic results because of the Penguin update.So our questions are:- A lot of Pinterest links could affect dramatically our organic results (understanding that Google may find that huge difference between linking sources as a bad practice)?- The anchor text exact match could really affect our ranking? If none of this points could cause that drop, then what would be causing it? We're sure it has to do with the Penguin update.Thank you very much in advance for your help!!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | WePlann0 -
Huge Dip in Traffic Last Week - New Algo Update?
Hi Mozzers, We experienced a huge dip in traffic on Thursday, 8/14, across our entire site. It was not a specific set of pages, it was sitewide. Google Webmaster Tools notes our impressions are down as well. The traffic has not recovered. It appears our pages are still indexed in Google, just not ranking well. Here are some questions I have to help isolate the cause: We recently completed a major redesign of our entire website on 7/26. We did not notice any dip in traffic after the new design launch - in fact, it actually increased a bit. Is it possible that only now Google sees our new site design and this is the reason for our dip? Is there a way to see Google's past cache dates? Did anyone else experience a similar dip in traffic since Thursday? Was there a recent Google update? It would be much appreciated if someone takes a look at our site - www.consumerbase.com for any glaring SEO errors (missing necessary meta tags, etc.). What steps do you guys suggest I take to isolate the cause in this dip in traffic? Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Travis-W0 -
Following Penguin 2.0 hit in May, my site experienced another big drop on August 13th
Hi everyone, my website experienced a 30% drop in organic traffic following the Penguin 2.0 update in May. This was the first significant drop that the site has experienced since 2007, and I was initially concerned that the new website design I released in March was partly to blame. On further investigation, many spammy sites were found to be linking to my website, and I immediately contacted the sites, asked for the removal of the sites, before submitting a disavow file to Google. At the same time, I've had some great content written for my website over the last few months, which has attracted over 100 backlinks from some great websites, as well as lots of social media interaction. So, while I realise my site still needs a lot of work, I do believe I'm trying my best to do things in the correct manner. However, on August 11th, I received a message in Google WMTs : Googlebot found an extremely high number of URLs on your site I studied the table of internal links in WMTs and found that Google has been crawling many URLs throughout my site that I didn't necessarily intend it to find i.e. lots of URLs with filtering and sorting parameters added. As a result, many of my pages are showing in WMTs as having over 300,000 internal links!! I immediately tried to rectify this issue, updating the parameters section in WMTs to tell Google to ignore many of the URLs it comes across that have these filtering parameters attached. In addition, since my access logs were showing that Googlebot was frequently crawling all the URLs with parameters, I also added some Disallow entries to robots.txt to tell Google and the other spiders to ignore many of these URLs. So, I now feel that if Google crawls my site, it will not get bogged down in hundreds of thousands of identical pages and just see those URLs that are important to my business. However, two days later, on August 13th, my site experienced a further huge drop, so its now dropped by about 60-70% of what I would expect at this time of the year! (there is no sign of any manual webspam actions) My question is - do you think the solutions I've put in place over the last week could be to blame for the sudden drop, or do you think I'm taking the correct approach, and that the recent drop is probably due to Google getting bogged down in the crawling process. I'm not aware of any subsequent Penguin updates in recent days, so I'm guessing that this issue is somehow due to the internal structure of my new design. I don't know whether to roll back my recent changes or just sit tight and hope that it sorts itself out over the next few weeks when Google has more time to do a full crawl and observe the changes I've made. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. My website is ConcertHotels.com. Many thanks Mike
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | mjk260 -
Hit By Penguin...Wait for recovery or do i change domains?
Hey Guys Would very much appreciate all opinions on our following situation, we have an .uk based ecommerce sports nutrition site www.cardiffsportsnutrition.co.uk Previously we worked with an SEO, that to put it simply did not follow webmaster guidelines(money anchor heavy, bad links etc), we reached some very good ranks too quickly and subsequently after the first penguin we where hit. We didn't receive any link warning or manual penalties just what i am assuming algorithmic...Rankings and traffic drop significantly, but not business ending. Since the first penguin we have done very little to no SEO, some unique content, re-writing of product pages, lots of social activity and didnt really lose much traffic after that, some small ups and down after refresh s and a slight slow decline on some keywords. Come Penguin 2.0...things that where still ranking for have now dropped even further, impressions in webmasters is now down over 50% and we have a had a wkly but not drastic drop in traffic since then. Over the last couple of months we have obtained some good quality links, have added lots of great unique content that has been shared significantly and generated some great traffic to our blog, added more unique product pages and category pages. But organically things are starting to look pretty grim apart from our brand keywords and everything is still in a slow decline and no increase in impressions in webmasters either jsut small drops We have been working to remove the poor quality and toxic links that the previous SEO built,getting anchor text corrected and collating information on the whole process ready to submit a file of links to disavow tool. which we are planning to do within the next couple of wks. Now i have read some successful stories and some not so successful one, so im starting to think of how to deal with this worse case scenario, If our domain is too damaged by the previous SEO guys We have the same domain name but on the .com that will help us carry over our brand name directly, but my concern is even though we have not had any manual penalty and not 301'd the .com back to the .co.uk or any other form of link will the penalties be carried over to the new domain just on the basis of brand association. We wouldn't plan to redirect any of the .co.uk traffic back to the .com but rather focus on our already strong ablate less converting traffic from the likes of twitter and facebook and run a small PPC campaign for some brand keyword to help buffer the traffic loss. While we focus on building good quality links and putting up plenty of new quality content on the site on the new domain that does not have any poor quality links back to it. What im trying to avoid is carry on spending time money and effort on the .co.uk domain for the next 3/4 months and continue to lose traffic slowly and then have to switch the domain anyway. I plan to wait and see for the next 4-6wks after we run the dissavow to but October time would be time i would have to make a decision and go for it. Any advice or opinions would be appreciated marc
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | CSN0 -
We haven been hit by penguin 2.0 what to do?
Hi, Last week we got hit bij penguin 2.0. Our sites dropped on most keywords on average 10 places. We had a steady place for 2 to 3 years. We have site-wide links in the top of our websites to the other websites ( about 9 e-commerce sites). Today i have put rel= "nofollow " tags in all these links (accept on the hompages). To prevent spammy links. Is there anything else we can do ? Url ww.klokkenpaleis.nl most important keyword = klokken ( previous position, 2nd place) search engine = google netherlands Thanks a lot for your help.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | GTGshops0 -
Above the Fold Content
How important is the placement of unique content "Above the Fold". Will attention grabbing images suffice or must their be a lot of unique text?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | casper4340 -
Google Algo update for over SEO'd sites: Is this a game changer?
This must be on the forum somewhere already but I cant find it. Google are updating there algo to penalise over SEO'd sites, is this a game changer? http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/373630/google-to-demote-seo-heavy-sites Cheers
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | activitysuper0