Devalued links or negative affect?
-
Hi there,
I'm looking into an issue with a site that was hit after Penguin was introduced.
The site lost 70% of traffic over night.
The site in question seemed to have a large number of backlinks with over optimized anchor text which seems to most likely be the reason for drop in rankings.
But there is also some links from blog networks here too unfortunately, so my question here really is do Google just devalue these links and discount them from consideration in their ranking algorithm or do the links still count but instead of adding positive affects in SERPs add a negative affect?
My reason for this question is I'm trying to determine whether it's worth saving this website or just starting fresh with a new domain.
That does bring me to another question, if I have to start fresh on a new domain is it a possibility to reuse the content from the old site? (providing I remove the URLs from Google via Webmaster tools).
Any help/advice/answers here would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
-
If you have a manual penalty you will have a warning in your Webmaster tools
_Honestly speaking I did not know that thanks for the update .. _
-
If you have a manual penalty you will have a warning in your Webmaster tools.
Now, if a website didn't have webmaster tools, you could set it up and then file a reconsideration request. If there was no manual warning to start with you will get a notice from Google telling you so.
However, when you ask for a reconsideration request you are opening yourself up to potentially have a manual review from Google. So if you're not squeaky clean you could end up attracting yourself a manual penalty on top of the algorithmic issues you have.
As far as diagnosing Penguin, here is some information on how to diagnose Penguin, but it's not always a simple diagnosis.
-
_But how do you know that your website is hit by penguin? I hope there is no way to tell whether a website is hit by penguin or manual penalty. _
-
Hi Marie,
That's a great response and inline with our thinking here. The links are not within our control and we've decided to start a fresh.
The site content ranked really well before Penguin so I am hoping it will recover fast.
Thanks and best regards,
Jason
-
A reconsideration request will not help if there is no manual warning in WMT. Penguin is algorithmic.
-
Ok, Here is the thing.
Did you send a reconsideration request?
_If not, please send reconsideration request after getting rid of some spammy links. Make sure you have listed all the URLs where the link references are still available in a separate Google Spreadsheet File along with the reconsideration request. If you get a response that no manual action is taken, we can be sure of one thing that your website is hit by algo shuffle and this will make things murkier.
Now if your website is hit by manual penalty, you will get a response that the manual penalty is partially removed or not removed at all._
_Now, as some reputed online marketers say if you have not built those links, you would not have to care for them at all but if you have done it themselves, you need to get them down. _
-
I really do think that sites with bad links are penalized as opposed to just losing the link juice from those links. I am working on a site right now that was ranking well for years. Then they hired an SEO to try to rank even better. The SEO built a bunch of anchor texted links and on April 24 (Penguin) their rankings plummeted.
No one knows exactly what is necessary for recovery from Penguin. I think a site can recover if the backlink issue is an easy one to fix. For example, the SEOMoz article on WPMU recovery showed that they were able to remove a pile of footer anchor texted links and regain their rankings with the Penguin refresh on May 25. But for most sites, if you've got anchor texted links in a bunch of places, recovery is pretty much impossible.
In doing unnatural links penalty removal I have found that maybe 15% of webmasters respond to my requests to remove links. For some niches that number is higher. But in order to recover from Penguin I'm guessing you'll need 85-95% of bad links removed and that is probably not going to happen.
I'd start fresh. Definitely don't redirect the old domain to the new.
You can noindex all of the content on the old domain and reuse it on the new domain. It may help to go into webmaster tools for the old domain and ask Google to remove the old urls from the index.
Of course, you'll be starting fresh and have to earn good quality backlinks. Good luck!
-
Hi Alison, thanks for your help with this.
We started contacting webmasters initially however this proved to be a waste of time for the most part as the majority of webmasters didn't respond to requests.
A new site is looking like the way to go, thanks again.
-
Thanks Deb Dulal Dey, unfortunately there are too many links to make this worth while doing. On the other hand the content on the site is very good though.
Thanks again for your thoughts.
-
Thanks Baptiste, you've given me a lot to think about there.
-
Well, @Jason Brooks
Sorry to say but you need get rid of these crappy links otherwise your website will never be able to recover from Penguin update. And in the mean time, you need to make your website awesome by publishing great content that will help you earn some quality links the natural way.
-
Hi Jason,
To answer the first question, low quality links can have a negative effect on rankings, particularly those associated with link networks or if the links look manipulative. That being said, most sites have some sort of spammy sites linking to them for reasons beyond their control, and Google don't seem likely to penalise a small amount of these - they will probably just ignore the links and discount any value that they would have passed.
Have you tried to clean up your link profile by contacting the webmasters of the blog networks and asking them to remove the links?
Starting completely from scratch seems a little extreme, but if you feel that the links are very extensive and hard to rectify, and if the current domain isn't ranking and doesn't have much authority, then it might be the easiest way to "start fresh". Bear in mind that a new domain is likely to be sandboxed and will take a substantial amount of time to gain trust and authority. It would be fine to reuse the content provided that the original content is removed and deindexed.
Good luck.
-
Hi Jason,
With infos from the latest slideshare of Ian Howells, http://slideshare.net/ianhowells/life-after-penguin, I think some of these links are devaluated, and some are penalizing the site. You may remove them and confess to Google, or start on a new domain, or maybe use a new URL for every page, including the homepage.
This is a though question, penguin recovery is still an unknown process and nothing is guaranteed.
About content re-use, Howells did put the same content on another page, without 301 and it worked. Maybe you can put 404 or remove the content and put it on a fresh domain.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Rel Sponsored on Internal Links
Hi all. Should you use rel sponsored on internal links? Here is the scenario: a company accepts money from one of their partners to place a prominent link on their home page. That link goes to an internal page on the company's website that contains information about that partner's service. If this was an external link that the partner was paying for, then you would obviously use rel="sponsored" but since this is a link that goes from awebsite.com to awebsite.com/some-page/, it seems odd to qualify that link in this way. Does this change if the link contains a "sponsored" label in the text (not in the rel qualifier)? Does this change if this link looks more like an ad (i.e. a banner image) vs. regular text (i.e. a link in a paragraph)? Thanks for any and all guidance or examples you can share!
Technical SEO | | Matthew_Edgar0 -
Correct Internal Linking Strategy
Hello. So my website currently has 8 pages in total. (Homepage, 5 Service Pages, Contact, About). I currently have about 80 quality RD and my Homepage already ranks #8 for my main keyword, while all Service Pages (P1, P2, P3, P4, P5) are stuck somewhere at #30-60 positions for their target keywords. My internal linking scheme looks like this https://i.imgur.com/2cA529v.png. The Homepage has a sidebar with links to all Service Pages, and each Service Page has the same sidebar that links to each Service Page, but doesn't link back to my Homepage. Contact and About pages can be accessed only via the links in the menu. I don't have any contextual links on my website, so all pages that are important for SEO are linked only via this same very sidebar. All these Service Pages are equally valuable to me, but they don't seem to grow much in Google. The Onpage Score of these pages is better than those of TOP10 competitors, and my content provides more value (I used the Skyscraper Technique). Taking all that into consideration, can you please tell me what might be wrong? Why Should I build more quality backlinks to these service pages instead of the homepage? Should I add contextual links to all my service pages from the homepage? Does my internal linking strategy look good to you? If not, what should I change? Can I hit top #10 with my internal pages for their target keywords if I mainly build links only to my homepage? All keywords that I'm after have low to medium competition. My website has 90 RD in total, and my website's DA is 27. Thank you. 2cA529v.png
Technical SEO | | NathalieBr3 -
Can you regain any SERPs / link juice of links that have 404'd?
We have a client whose 301 redirects disappeared and have been gone for about 6 months now. We are going to be putting the 301 redirects back in place. Will we be able to regain any of the previous SERPs or link juice from old links or is all lost? Thanks in advance!
Technical SEO | | SavvyPanda0 -
Fake Links indexing in google
Hello everyone, I have an interesting situation occurring here, and hoping maybe someone here has seen something of this nature or be able to offer some sort of advice. So, we recently installed a wordpress to a subdomain for our business and have been blogging through it. We added the google webmaster tools meta tag and I've noticed an increase in 404 links. I brought this up to or server admin, and he verified that there were a lot of ip's pinging our server looking for these links that don't exist. We've combed through our server files and nothing seems to be compromised. Today, we noticed that when you do site:ourdomain.com into google the subdomain with wordpress shows hundreds of these fake links, that when you visit them, return a 404 page. Just curious if anyone has seen anything like this, what it may be, how we can stop it, could it negatively impact us in anyway? Should we even worry about it? Here's the link to the google results. https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Amshowells.com&oq=site%3A&aqs=chrome.0.69i59j69i57j69i58.1905j0j1&sourceid=chrome&es_sm=91&ie=UTF-8 (odd links show up on pages 2-3+)
Technical SEO | | mshowells0 -
Page for Link Building
Hello guys, My question is about link building and reciprocal links. Since many directories request a reciprocal link, makes me wonder if is not better to create a unique page in the website only for this kind of links. What do you guys recommend? Thanks in advance, PP
Technical SEO | | PedroM0 -
How to measure number of links out from a page
Following on from earlier Q, what do you all use to count links out from a page. I believe there is a bing tool which does this, though rather than a list of sites a simple number would be ideal?
Technical SEO | | seanmccauley0 -
Which version of pages should I build links to?
I'm working on the site www.qualityauditor.co.uk which is built in Moonfruit. Moonfruit renders pages in Flash. Not ideal, I know, but it also automatically produces an HTML version of every page for those without Flash, Javascript and search engines. This HTML version is fairly well optimised for search engines, but sits on different URLs. For example, the page you're likely to see if browsing the site is at http://www.qualityauditor.co.uk/#/iso-9001-lead-auditor-course/4528742734 However, if you turn Javascript off you can see the HTML version of the page here <cite>http://www.qualityauditor.co.uk/page/4528742734</cite> Mostly, it's the last version of the URL which appears in the Google search results for a relevant query. But not always. Plus, in Google Webmaster Tools fetching as Googlebot only shows page content for the first version of the URL. For the second version it returns HTTP status code and a 302 redirect to the first version. I have two questions, really: Will these two versions of the page cause my duplicate content issues? I suspect not as the first version renders only in Flash. But will Google think the 302 redirect for people is cloaking? Which version of the URL should I be pointing new links to (bearing in mind the 302 redirect which doesn't pass link juice). The URL's which I see in my browser and which Google likes the look at when I 'fetch as Googlebot'. Or those Google shows in the search results? Thanks folks, much appreciated! Eamon
Technical SEO | | driftnetmedia0