Changing my site (dramatically)
-
I am about to do a complete site change. I am going to WordPress. I am ranked #2 on SERPS. Will I lose rank for changing everything on my site? I have 500 pages indexed but I am about to have 30k indexed. It is a real estate site that is switching from a "framed" solution, to a listing indexed solution.
If I make good use of my keywords etc (on site optimization) will I be at risk of losing risk just for changing my site?
-
I have thousands of duplicate content warning.
I am using a hosted server/realtor package that doesn't let me see the source code. I basically have duplicates of every page on my site some how. I've used the company for 8 yrs though. I am in deep trouble. I fear I can't stay with them.
-
Joseph,
In scenarios like these, I put together a site map and review the overall value of the site and what it's providing to it's users.
Once I know what the value that I am currently providing, I put together an action plan (301 redirects, site optimization, site architecture etc...) with the proposed site changes and see if it will benefit the visitor by restructuring the site.
Once you are able to visualize the overall flow of the old site and the new site then you make decisions on whether or not it's worth while to move forward. Keep in mind that whatever you are doing has to give users a reason to use your website and stay on it.
It's possible you should start with some conversion optimization of certain pages to find where your leaks are, try and plug them and keep forging forward.
If you find that it's impossible to plug the leaks in your current structure than you may need to do what you are describing in your post.
-
No, no - if you set up the 301s then the originals don't have to remain. A visiting browser knows right away that the old page is gone and has bene permanently replaced.
However, Egol's advice is spot-on. This is complicated, and you have a LOT of pages involved. Your best bet is to hire an expert to help you with this. It may cost you some $$, but it'll pay off in a hurry.
I'm not pitching myself here - in fact, keep me out of the running so that it's clear I have no axe to grind.
But this is very, very technically complex.
-
This may be harder than I could have imagined. If 90% of the backlinks on my site are my root domain (PensacolaRealEstate.com) then I should not lose any link juice, right? The backlinks will lead to my root domain, period; however, if I change my site and cut off some of the URLs then I lose the backlinks to that page. This could cause my domain authority (a sum of ALL my backlinks to ALL my pages in the domain) but not my page strength (the root domain). Right?
If I were to set up these 301 redirects, it means I have to leave the files for those pages on the server but not actually link my new site to them, right?
-
Don't rush into this. You gotta do it smart.
When you change your site the goal should be to improve it and make it more competitive.
That is done by carefully improving the structure and the optimization... and also preserving your link assets with 301 redirects. Also avoiding problems like changing the URLs without redirecting.
If you don't know how to do these things it is essential to get a competent person to help you or to do it for you. There are lots of good instructions for moving a site on the web.
Now... your 30K pages.... Those could suck a lot of strength from your site. These could produce a duplicate content problem (Panda).
I would not be surprised if your rankings dropped after adding them. To minimize ranking loss you want to have very few links into them from the rest of your site and all of those pages linking out generously to the rest of your site.
To minimize panda problems you might combine some of these listings, placing several on a page. This page count reduction can reduce the rankings loss.
The problem with that is having enough links into those pages to get them indexed and hold them in the index. So if you put all of them up at the same time you will need fifty to sixty really strong links that hit nodes deep in the site. These links will channel spiders deep into the site and force them to chew their way out through those pages, indexing them as they go.
These links must be permanent or be held in place until other links are developed. If you remove them then google spider action will fall on those pages and google will forget them.
If you don't have experience with big sites find someone who has that experience who can help you design the structure of these new pages.
(not recommending myself... I only work on my own sites)
-
Chances are the listings are repeated on other web sites, so those probably won't have much positive impact on your rankings. They shouldn't do much harm, either, except that Google's going to waste a lot of time crawling all those duped pages.
The best way to preserve what you can is to ensure that you redirect all of the old page addresses to their new equivalents. So, if you have a page like:
and it will now be:
Set up a 301 redirect from the first to the second URL. That will ensure that search engines can quickly update their indexes.
Also, be sure to set up a full XML site map and submit it to Google and Bing Webmaster Tools. That'll give you very rapid feedback regarding any problems.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
site speed
i use mid-quality pic and... but my site speed is low
On-Page Optimization | | zlbvasgabc
any suggestion?
my site is:
https://bandolini.ir/0 -
Should I "No Index" Certain Pages On My Site?
I have some pages on my site that don't really have any content other than some iframes that are embedded from another site. I thought it would be best to tag the page with a no-index so that search engines would leave the page alone since it has no content as far as the search engine can tell (but does provide value to my site visitors). Is this the proper approach or does it do more harm than good?
On-Page Optimization | | Kyle Eaves0 -
How Google differentiates web sites like directories?
Hi, I want to ask how google differentiates web sites like directories or company listing websites? How it understands that is a normal thing to have many links in a directory site? Are there some guides links about what to do and avoid and how to make SEO optimization for a directory web site.
On-Page Optimization | | vladokan0 -
Changing domain name
Hello, we have 10 websites in same niche, and plan to build one strong site by making a 301 redirect from all sites to one. We think to do redirect each site to subfolder like this: www.newdomain.com/site1 www.newdomain.com/site2 www.newdomain.com/site3 www.newdomain.com/site4 www.newdomain.com/site5 www.newdomain.com/site6 www.newdomain.com/site7 www.newdomain.com/site8 www.newdomain.com/site9 www.newdomain.com/site10 And in root domain place unique content updated daily. Is this would work? Or this is bad idea? Looking to hear from a qualified technicians advice. Thanks in advance!
On-Page Optimization | | bele0 -
Duplicate content harms individual pages or whole site?
Hi, One section of my site is a selection of Art and Design books. I have about 200 individual posts, each with a book image and a description retrieved from Amazon (using their API). Due to several reasons not worth mentioning I decided to use the Amazon description. I don't mind if those pages rank well or not, but I need them as additional content for my visitors as they browse my site. The value relies in the selection of books. My question is if the duplicate content taken from Amazon harms only each book page or the whole site. The rest of the site has unique content. Thanks! Enrique
On-Page Optimization | | enriquef0 -
Changing the page a term ranks for
Hi all, I hope you can help advise me of the best way to change the page that is ranking for a particular keyword/term. Is it just a case of on-page optimizing the term/keyword on the new-page and getting good links/traffic to that page and leaving the old one as it is, or is some sort of "de-optimization" of the old page a something that could help? Thanks.
On-Page Optimization | | bunac10 -
Changing url in connection with meta title inconsistency
We run a site, which is a directory type one, where visitors can look for local businesses per city as well (at some point similar to the 'Yelp concept'). Now, we use www.example.com as the homepage, and the www.example.com/city1, where city1 is the capital of our country, is 301 redirected to the homepage, so this is your default setting. When you choose e.g city2, your url changes to www.example.com/city2, and the city value is stored in a cookie. Then, when you leave the session, and return to the site later on, you will see the homepage url, but with your previous choice of city (in case you let cookies be stored). My concern is, that the meta title always contains the chosen city name, so when you return to the website, and you previously used city2, you will now see the homepage url (which normally belongs to city1), but with the meta title of city2 or with any other previously chosen city. Does this mean a problem, and should I always use the correct url, which would be www.example.com/cityX, or this could not cause a problem for me? If it does, would you mind sharing me the exact problems as well? Thanks,
On-Page Optimization | | Dilbak0 -
Site wide internal links in footer
What is your take on site wide inernal links in the footer, e.g. for the most competitive keywords? Do you think those links are still useful or are those links of little value from your experience? It is an old school tactic but I still see many sites doing it.
On-Page Optimization | | Florakel0