Penguin Recover: Remove links vs Burry Links
-
The best is to do both. However with those with limited resources, would building more links with branded and naked URL anchor links be a better solution than painstakingly asking every webmaster to remove links.
-
.....building more links with branded and naked URL anchor links...
If you control the anchor text then these are phony links.
-
I disagree with creating links over removing links.
If you had a gallon of water with some poison in it would you add fresh water to dilute it before drinking or would you pour out the tainted water first and then add fresh water.
-
The problem with answering this question is that any answer given is pure speculation. We've only had one Penguin refresh and the only credible story I've seen of recovery is the story of WPMU. What that means is that no one really knows what you need to do to beat Penguin.
Many SEO's believe that Penguin is all about the percentage of keyword anchor texted links you have. If this is the case, then diluting the links with more natural looking ones such as "click here" and your url should, in theory, work.
My gut instinct is that the algorithm is more complicated than just looking at the percentage of keyword anchor texted links. If I personally were affected by Penguin I would not build "click here" and url links using the same tactics that originally got me penalized. Those tactics are likely links from low quality article sites, blog comments, etc.
Others may disagree with me but I think that the only links that are going to work to dilute out bad links are ones that are truly naturally earned. And, it is very difficult to earn links on a large enough scale to reliably accomplish this.
With each algo change Google is getting better and better at distinguishing which links are earned and which are self made. I really think that in the future, the only links that are going to be effective (and not penalized) are truly earned links. This is going to make the job of an SEO much more difficult!
-
Depends on your current link profile.
If you already have high quality links, you should remove bad links. If you don't have high quality links, get those first and then focus on removing links if your rankings don't improve.
If you don't have high quality links and you remove all low quality links, your website probably won't rank anyways which is why you should focus on "burying" links.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
What is a natural link?
Hi everyone, I'm trying to better understand what is meant by a natural link and would appreciate any assistance. Doing some competitor link analysis I've noticed a web developer who has created a directory for all its customers. This is not a directory in the traditional sense of being of use to an end user, but to my untrained eyes, it looks like an internal directory used solely for the purpose of link building. For all I know this might be perfectly good practice in the industry, but as a beginner, I'm attempting to get an understanding of things. My question is, what precisely is meant by a natural link? If the above scenario is all ok, whereby there are businesses in the same field of work, but ultimately could be in any given location, on a directory, are they natural links? Do these kind of directories that don't service an end user, exist if the common feature between them is say location only, or an seo agency only? Appreciate I could be completely out of kilter on this, but it seems the benefit on SERPs is pretty significant for something that seems pretty "unnatural" to me? Any guidance would be appreciated...tom
Link Building | | T-J-I1 -
Links Removed from Site but not Google Webmaster Tools
I have a new client who has been fighting to get past an unnatural links penalty. One of the biggest reasons behind it was that they paid to get a followed link/ad on a blog network, well this ad ended up being a site wide link which ended up giving them thousands of back links within a few days. After getting the owner of the blog network to remove the link i manually spot checked a handful of pages and used screaming frog to crawl looking for a link referencing their site. From what i can tell they are all gone. However they are still in Google Webmaster Tools as well as Google's index and it has been a couple months since they have been removed. Does anyone have any advice on getting them removed from Google's entities even though they are already off of the website? Thank you in advance,
Link Building | | kchandler
Kyle0 -
Getting Links Removed From ArticlesFactory.com?
I've tried to contact the staff through the online form at http://www.articlesfactory.com/contact.html but never got any reply. Any idea?
Link Building | | sbrault740 -
No inbound links ?
Hello I just got SeoMoz, started the whole thing and compared myself to my competitor. I'm writing for mayor national newspapers in latin america, been featured a few major sites, and got a whole lot of links directing to muy site. I recently moved domains about a month ago from rxmagaizne.mx to rxmagazine.co. Is this the reason i'm not seeing any links ? ibIPY.png
Link Building | | timi-do0 -
My site has more than 1,341,796 total links but only 500 external links after months of SEO. Please help me ,not sure what went wrong.
My site has more than 1,341,796 total links but only 500 external links after months of SEO. Please help me ,not sure what went wrong.
Link Building | | rsethia1230 -
Remove links after Penguin?
My site did not get hit. I am worried that Google will come back and get me for those anchor-text links I built a while back. They are of low to medium quality guest posts. Should I remove my old low-quality links? What about those on sites and pages that have been deindexed by Google? Any point in removing those? I know we can only speculate at this point, but would really appreciate some opinions on this. Has the trend in the past been a slight rollback after a big algorithm update like this? Or could we expect to see more and more sites being penalized? -Mathias
Link Building | | mathiasppc0 -
Would you advise removing a "links" page?
I'm doing a site audit for someone and they have a links page full of reciprocal links for other similar businesses across the country. My gut instinct is to remove this page. How would you approach this if this was your client?
Link Building | | MarieHaynes0