Google Listings EMD Bias
-
I've been looking at 60+ location based searches for the base two months and noticed a big issue I can't explain. I know EMD was hit hard in the general SERPs but it obviously has not effected the location SERPs.
The main way I'm finding these situations is by seeing the 7 pack and it shows a site with only a quarter amount of the citations the other sites have and jumps to the top very quickly. It appears to be working because of the EMD bias in the Local SERPs algorithm.
From what I understand you are not suppose to add a TLD domain into a G+ listing and then 301 redirect it to your real domain but Google doesn't seem to mind at this point. I'm wondering if this tactic is a valid Local tactic at this time or if, from what I understand, it is a shady tactic that will end up hurting brand and have a strong chance of penalizing the real domain.
-
Ben,
If you're not already using it, 51 Blocks Local Competitive Analysis tool is a good one, and it's free:
http://www.51blocks.com/online-marketing-tools/free-local-analysis/
Might be of help to you in your research.
-
I appreciate you taking the time to explain all that. I'm looking at all the usual ranking local ranking factors and need to compile a list of what they have that doesn't "compete" with all the other.
From my initial research it appears that the only thing these listings have in common with each other is an extremely low number of citations, an EMD that redirects to a different URL and they are listed as high as #3 but usually #5 or #6. It's just strange. I haven't looked at a domain ownership timeframe or even if they did possible make a move recently but I will do that.
Thanks again for all your help Jarno and Miriam.
-
Hi Ben,
Very good question. In the Google Places Quality Guidelines, Google states:
-Do not provide phone numbers or URLs that redirect or “refer” users to landing pages or phone numbers other than those of the actual business.
So, from this guideline, we know that Google doesn't want you to list a URL that redirects to something you don't own, but in this case, apparently this business owns TheCarmelDentist.com. They are not redirecting to a domain that doesn't belong to the business.
This scenario brings up questions. Why is this business doing this? One good guess might be that they've bulit this new website at thecarmeldentist.com and have redirected the old fishers site to the new one, but have yet to update their Google+ Local Page to reflect the URL. All attempts to reach the fishers site are redirecting, so the + Local Page is simply redirecting, too. I can't think of any good reason why they wouldn't just simply list the URL, so my best guess is that they just haven't updated the + Page yet.
Looking at this specific scenario, I just doubt that the redirect is being done with an intent to spam. Because the whole old site has apparently been redirected to the new one, I think this business has simply moved to a new domain.
I would also guess that the redirect rule in the guidelines is meant to speak to the practice of either competitive hijacking of listings and redirecting the URLs to competitors' stuff, or, possibly, spammy stuff in which a snake oil marketer might convince a business owner that their URL should be redirecting to some sort of directory page instead of to the company's website. But, it doesn't look like this is what is happening in your example, unless I'm totally overlooking something.
Now, you are quite right that the EMD penalty does not seem to have hit hard in Local. Like you, I see plenty of these rankings just fine. At this point, it is still quite possible to rank well with an EMD, and if the EMD is supported by strong content, it probably won't ever be penalized.
That being said, if asked whether I would personally advise a client to switch from BobJonesDDS.com to carmeldentist.com, just in hopes of a ranking boost, my answer for 2013 would be a resounding 'no'. Every move Google has made over the past 2 years clearly supports, in my eyes, their preference for authentic presentation of brands. If Bob Jones DDS is your brand, then use it, I say. Don't go for the EMD because it doesn't truly represent your brand...it represents an attempt to rank. Google is getting impatient with anything done simply to rank.
Within the scope of Q&A, I can't do a a full competitive analysis of the situation you've highlighted, Ben, but remember, a domain is just a fraction of the local search ranking factors. Don't forget proximity to centroid, business cluster, domain age, links, citations, reviews, etc. All of these things and so much more determine rank. I don't believe an EMD can be seen as THE cause, though it could be part of the cause.
One last note. The dentist in question does have some problems going on. Their +Page is calling them The Fishers Dentist. Their website is calling them The Carmel Dentist and their address listed on their website is Indianapolis. Even if I'm not predicting a swift EMD penalty, the confusion of the signals they are sending to Google about their brand and locale is pretty serious and could lead to all kinds of problems for them. Not good.
Hope these thoughts help. Please, feel free to share more about your study, Ben.
-
Ben,
no, i did not see anyone get kicked out of Google because of something like this. It indeed is theoratical but there is an bigger chance of getting kicked.
I am really trying to imply that you should only use white hat tactics and not black hat. Just advice your client that it is a possibility but that the risks are great and that you're not liable (don't know if this is the right word).. for if the sites does get penalized.
Jarno
-
Thanks for the response Jamo. I'm asking if there is anything that this tactic directly offends in Google's eyes. The reason why I am asking is not so that I can justify it but so that I can speak from more experience than myself.
I've never seen a site get kicked out of the listing because of this so I'm not sure if it is something that I should warn clients about or not.
Have you seen anyone get penalized or is it like me, a theory?
-
Ben,
I would not go there if I were you. Why add a URL and then redirect that URL to another where your site is being set up? Why not include the right domain name then?
I would avoid this tactic. Even if it does work in the short run it could end up with a complete ban from Google. Keep it clear, keep it fair, keep it white hat. Do things you know are honest. This, in no way to my opionon, seems honest.
Regards
Jarno
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Google Keyword Tool Alternatives
Hey All, So ever since Google shut down the Keyword Tool we have used the keyword planner and a few other tools only to find they aren't quite the same, I was wondering what everyone is using now to get there keyword research and average traffic estimates ? We previous used keyword tool for phrase match and now not much offers phrase match or provides us with what seems as accurate results. We have tried Word Tracker after a numerous amount of research to find a alternative to the keyword tool, and found that the results are very different from the Google Keyword Planner, 1 noticeable result would be of "Web Design Melbourne", in Word Tracker it showed the average search of 9,900 (per month or year I'm not sure) and we compared that to the Google Keyword Planner and it showed 3,000. I have looked over a number of tools and found they weren't quite what we are looking for (Word Tracker, SEMRush, Google Keyword Planner) so I have turned to the MOZ Community. So my first question for everyone would be: A) what do you use for Keyword research and average search estimates now (any good tools with phrase match)? B) If you have used Word Tracker have you found accurate results in your keyword research? If you have found any tools that have proved beneficial and useful please let me know 🙂 (paid or free) Thank you
Competitive Research | | KBB_Digital
Jake Crone0 -
Google serps for split keyword searches
A client has come to me with an issue with the marketing of their website. it is mainly focused around the search of their name. the site is an Magento GO hosted e-commerce based site through Magento. it requires a good amount of optimisation and its in a very competitive market - which has high volume of searches. When entering the name of the business it doesn't show on the first page of Google but it does on Bing or Yahoo. The site name is lovehugz and is UK based The issue is when searched for by name lovehugz it appears on the second page, however if the search term is separated love hugz it appears first on the first page. The site is poorly optmised at present with the page title limited to the name lovehugz. Does anybody know of reasons why Google might be behaving in this manner and what steps should be taken to overcome. Optimising for the name is not the only aim here, however it something that should be in place for people searching by name, There is a lot of work to be done to optimise the site for its essential relevant keywords to stand a chance in its market. Any ideas of help would be greatly appreciated thanks
Competitive Research | | Bristolweb0 -
Unjustified ratings and reviews in google SERP?
I was checking Google US for some search term my company is interested for and found a thing I cannot explain well. The site Tradecarview is shown with a rating of 4.4 stars from 4209 reviews. (Please see attached image).The same rating is shown on their homepage, but I could not find much more details. (By the way: Tradecarview is a sort of directory for used car dealers to post their vehicles, something similar to Ebay or Yahoo motors.) The question is simple: is Google trusting the ratings given directly on the website? Maybe just summarizing the ratings shown here? http://www.tradecarview.com/pr/providerlist.aspx?pn=0&st=7 Or are there other sources I couldn't find that Google used to specify the rating? What do you think? Thank you in advance for your answers, Dario Pe1ft.jpg
Competitive Research | | Darioz0 -
How good really is Yahoo Directory Listing is on SEO optimization
I just god the approval from Yahoo Directory Listing today. How should I expect ranking increase just with that on google, yahoo and bing in the next couple of days ?
Competitive Research | | processia0 -
Double Listing posiblities
Hello all . I have my website which is www.eswaran.com ranked @ 6 on 1st page for the keyword Ceylon tea on www.google.lk . I have a another page of the same site ranked on 3rd page as well . What im looking forward to know is if its possible to gain double listing on 1st page on google.lk what should I do at the moment ? Also Im looking forward to know if there are any onpage issues of these both pages as well . Thank you guys .
Competitive Research | | Osanda0 -
Sometime I just don't get Google rankings
We currently rate #10 on google.com.au on Modern Cloth Nappies and the #4 site is a dead link to a page http://www.modernclothnappies.org/ who's total content is: Index of / <address>Apache Server at www.modernclothnappies.org Port 80</address> <address></address> <address>They have been at that rank for a quiet a while and even the cached version is full of broken links.</address> <address></address> <address>It seems Google is quick to jump on low value sites or ones with duplicate content, but what about stale links and sites? Has anyone else had similar experiences of being out ranked by domant or dead sites?</address>
Competitive Research | | oznappies0 -
How does a site get to no 3 in Google with no KW in their links?!!
Hello everyone, my first post - ahhh I'm investigating a niche and there is a site that should have no right being there in my view. It's no. 3 Google UK for 'company formation' with a small site with 65 weak links from only 7 domains and hosted in the US. But more importantly, the Open Site Explorer says there is not 1 link with that term in its anchor text. This I find crazy and makes me suspicious. But before I go back to my client saying "oh they must be black hat" I would like your expert views. I'm not sure whether to tut or congratulate them and for the first time I'm not sure what reasons to give for their amazing performance! What's your views?
Competitive Research | | GOYMedia480 -
Google Places - Top Listing & Strange Analytics
Hello, we have been working with this customer for a few years, doing their PPC, organic marketing, and we had established one google places listing for them as well. I guess the owner got sold on having someone else work with us to do google places for an additional office location they recently set up, and for whatever reason, they bypassed having us do it. This company never gained FTP access to the website. And despite heavy competition (apparantly), they have that new location listed in the #1 - A spot, without making any changes to the website. And, to top it off, when you review the Google places performance, there is a weird result I had never before seen labeled as "* loc:". You can see what I'm talking in both screen shots. Is there any guidance you can offer, first as to what that listing label means, and second, do you have any ideas how to 'reverse engineer' how they were able to get top listing so quickly for our customer like that? local_results.jpg local_analytics.jpg
Competitive Research | | JerDoggMckoy0