Replacing website, same URL, lose ranking
-
We had to do a rush job for a client and get a website up very quickly.
We had to just replace the existing files on the server, but URL stayed the same.
Now "teeth whitening glasgow" which they were number #1 for isn't coming up. Know there is still some on page work to be done - but the link profile should still remain the same?
Just looking for some advice to get back to where they were - should we do a website change of address or just verify the site in Webmaster and get all the on page done?
Thanks,
Laura
-
Thanks Paul - actually that has worked a treat. Everything is back to where is should be.
I'm getting a error with creating my xml site map which is frustrating as not sure how to fix that as then wanted to submit a new one.
But happy keywords all seem to be as normal!
Laura
-
As Matt Cutts of Google has recently said, Laura, the 301 redirects should send along pretty much all of the ranking influence of their original pages. It can take the search engines a while to index all of these new 301s and get the juice flowing again though.
Let us know how it goes!
Paul
-
Thanks for your answers everyone.
Paul - The domain and URLs of several of the pages are the same. I've redirected all of the old links that weren't the same to point to the new ones via 301s.
I'll leave it a couple of days then do an XML site map.
Should the redirects carry the same SEO benefit?
It's a Wordpress site so going to go through all the pages with Yoast and get them up to date.
I'll also check out Webmaster results.
Thanks,
Laura
-
Just to be clear, Laura - you say "...URL stayed the same".
By this, do you mean that the domain name stayed the same? Or that the actual URL of every single page on the site stayed the same? Meaning that the file names if the new pages are identical to the original ones, including their extensions? This is a critical piece of information.
If the URLs of the actual individual pages have changed, you need to have written 301-redirects for every old page to the new URLs in order to keep the value of your old incoming links. If the actual page URLs have changed and no redirects were done, you will be seeing a massive increase in 404 errors in your Webmaster Tools as well as in your Analytics.
If your individual page URLs have changed, you'll also need to make certain you've created and submitted a new xml sitemap. (But only after you've had the 301-redirects in place for a few days.)
Assuming at least your domain name has stayed the same, as you indicated, there's no way to do a Webmaster Tools change of address as the address hasn't actually changed.
Can you let us know if the actual page URLs all stayed the same?
Paul
-
There are so many things that could have caused this it's impossible to speculate without knowing the URL and looking at the old site which can probably be pulled up in archive.org. But yes, GWMT analysis is a good place to start.
-
Hi Laura,
I would suggest setting up Google webmasters and checking the crawl errors. Google will already be monitoring this so once you have set it up, the errors will already be listed. My feelings are that the urls may have changed in a subtle way eg. Www now non-www or html files now php... Webmasters will give clues. Also while your there I recommend submitting a sitemap.
Best of luck,
Dan
-
Hi Laura,
The link profile should be unchanged, unless you have changed the url structure. So it's important to check if all the url's of the web pages other than the homepage are also unchanged or that you have at least used redirects.
Also have a good look at the on-page optimisation for the page that ranked well for 'teeth whitening glasgow'.
Besides this there are loads of other elements that might have changed in the new site and had an effect on your rankings. (changed internal linking, content etc.)
Good luck!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
What Are other people using in replacement for sliders?
Hello, Moz Community! I am currently trying to replace a slider on our client's site. Sliders, in my opinion, are awful, they slow load times and just don't convey a solid message. I am using Wordpress and the visual composer plugin. Any ideas are really appreciated even they may seem a bit much, if I don't know how to do it I will figure it out. I apologize as well if this isn't the appropriate place for this type of question.
On-Page Optimization | | Striventa0 -
We have new website abexpress.ae. The website is not ranking in the first page when I search with the Domain name itself. Any tips to improve the SEO for a new website?
We have launched a website abexpress.ae. The website is not ranking well even if we search with the Domain name. The Domain authority of the website it 10. How to increase this?
On-Page Optimization | | AlliedTransport0 -
Page/Website Structure
Hello again Mozzers, We have a category, lets call it widgets. Within widgets are about a hundred or so products. For usability my predecessor made the following layout Widgets Main Cateogry - Links off homepage - (no content just links to the 3 sub-categories)
On-Page Optimization | | ATP
- Widgets by Resolution
---- About 20 subcategories
eg. 0.1 Resolution widgets
0.2 resolution widgets
- Widgets by Capacity
---- About 20 subcategories
eg. 1 capacity widgets
2 capacity widgets
- Widgets by Type
---- About 12 subcategories This was a major improvement from a userbility perspective as it made a very complex product range navigatable by the major features or basic type. However, as you can imaging we now have 60+ very similiar pages all displaying very similiar products a nightmare for SEO. It also isnt ideal for user navigation as it take too many clicks to get to the products. I propose the following fix, and i wanted your opinion. Widget Main Category - Link from homepage (Consolidated with Widgets by Type)
-300 Words of content
-Links to the 12 Sub-type Catoregies (These are pages i can fill with content + products. This would give me a more ordinary structure of which I can focus each page to a keyword) The tricky part comes with incorporating the capacity and resolution options. 1 Browse Capacity Page
(20 sub categories all the same except capacity quantity & products)
1 Browse by Resolution Page
(20 sub categories all the same except resolution value & products) The owner want them, I was going to link from the main widgets page to each of these to give the customer the option. What I can't decide is how to deal with them from an SEO point of view. Should they be no-followed? canonicaled? Can there be any advantage to having so many pages covering slightly different variations or as i suspect it is dangerous to the overall health of the site. To complicate things further, Canonical tags may not be an option due to an old magento version running that doesnt support them. Is there an alternative way around? As always many thanks.0 -
Ranking problem.
Hello, Using Moz I can see that my ranks for my site ZenPlugs.com for keywords such as 'ear plugs' and 'molded ear plugs' and several other keywords aren't as high as other sites with similar DAs. I can't see why, am I missing something? Many thanks, Toby
On-Page Optimization | | T0BY0 -
Question about url structure for large real estate website
I've been running a large real estate rental website for the past few years and on May 8, 2013 my Google traffic dropped by about 50%. I'm concerned that my current url structure might be causing thin content pages for certain rental type + location searches. My current directory structure is:
On-Page Optimization | | Amped
domain.com/home-rentals/california/
domain.com/home-rentals/california/beverly-hills/
domain.com/home-rentals/california/beverly-hills/90210/
domain.com/apartment-rentals/california/
domain.com/apartment-rentals/california/beverly-hills/
domain.com/apartment-rentals/california/beverly-hills/90210/
etc.. I was thinking of changing it to the following:
domain.com/rentals/california/
domain.com/rentals/california/beverly-hills/
domain.com/rentals/california/beverly-hills/90210/ ** Note: I'd provide users the ability to filter their results by rental type - by default all types would be displayed. Another question - my listing pages are currently displayed as:
domain.com/123456 And I've been thinking of changing it to:
domain.com/123456-123-Street-City-State-Zip Should I proceed with both changes - one or the one - neither - or something else I'm not thinking of? Thank you in advance!!0 -
Can a page lose ranking because it has too many bold tags?
I run a product search website for the Engineering Sector. Each of the companies listed on the website has a profile page. This page used to rank very well in google. Over the last couple of weeks these pages disappeared for google i.e they fell about 20 to 30 spots in the search results for relevant keywords like the Manufacturer Name. I was trying to analyze the page and found that Each of the Categories that the manufacturer supports was listed in "bold" and linked to the page for that category. A manufacturer can support up to 20 or 30 categories so this results in about 20 or 30 Bold keywords. Is this a bad practice? Could this be a reason for a drop in ranking or do bold keywords on a page not matter? What are your views?
On-Page Optimization | | raghavkapur0 -
Recommendation: Add a canonical URL tag referencing this URL to the header of the page.
Please clarify: In the page optimization tool, seomoz recommends using the canonical url tag on the unique page itself. Is it the same canonical url tag used when want juice to go to the original page? Although the canonical URL tag is generally thought of as a way to solve duplicate content problems, it can be extremely wise to use it on every (unique) page of a site to help prevent any query strings, session IDs, scraped versions, licensing deals or future developments to potentially create a secondary version and pull link juice or other metrics away from the original. We believe the canonical URL tag is a best practice to help prevent future problems, even if nothing is specifically duplicate/problematic today. Please give example.
On-Page Optimization | | AllIsWell0