Is Anybody Familiar With This SEO Reporting Tool?
-
Just for kicks, I decided to pay 5 bucks for an SEO Report on a website I was working on for a client. Yea FIVERR.
The report was actually not too bad and I was able to clean up a bunch of stuff. Here is a link to other sites on the internet who use this tool. I would like to use it for myself so I'm trying to figure out the source of the report. Here are a few urls to the reports. Remove the two stars in the URL. I don't want to give them a backlink.
http://rapid**purple.com/services/free-seo-analysis/
http://www.doc**stoc.com/docs/93426462/SEO-PlanHas anybody used these or know the source?
-Bob
-
Yea, that's it! A bit pricey. Thanks for the "software review". Maybe I'll sit this one out.
-
Hi,
The name on the bottom right, if I remember correctly, will be the name of the company that has a subscription to the service. I.e. you can brand the report with your own logo and url.
-
Hi Bob,
Yep - I used this, oh must be 8 years ago now! Its a company named IBP (Internet Business Promoter - www.ibusinesspromotor dot com).Its not a great reporting tool TBH, I found it just pointed out a load of things it calculates are incorrect. But a lot of the things it thinks are incorrect are incorrect, if that makes sense.
It tries to get you to do all the things it believes are in-line with the search engines, until your page is "100% optimised".
IMHO, your best getting to grips with excel pivot tables and creating your own measurable reporting technique. Tailor the report to the important metrics - i.e. what is delivering ROI for the client site?
-
I've seen this report in 10 different place in Google and seems like it's private labeled. I tried the URL but I don't think this guy is the owner of the tool.
-
Thanks for the info. I just want to be clear that the links I provided to the reports are just random reports I found on Google. They aren't mine. I'm just trying to find the source of that tool that was used.
I use SEO MoZ, Majestic SEO, Bright Local, SEOFrog and a few others. Seems like you need several tools to look at things in different ways.
This tool was pretty cool because it runs through your site, tells you what's wrong and how to fix it with examples. For 5 bucks, I fixed a bunch of things that the other tools wouldn't have found.
I've been meaning to check out Raven tools. Thanks for the reminder!
-
I found the name on the bottom right of the document and I googled it I did not want to post any of the links I found so I am posting the Google search it was so long I had to shorten it I apologize.
-
Hi Bob,
I just checked out your report. I can't say that's the best software I've ever seen in my life now. It's got the word black in its name and that's never a good sign.
I assume the source of the report is a bunch of APIs from tools similar to this that are free. I know of a way to go and find the source. But you could use a tool called builtwith.com
run the URLs through their it will break down what the site is made of. And you can also do a link profile on the URL find out where it's all coming from.
It that doesn't work Here is some friendly advice.
Are you looking for an all-in-one solution? Have you tried the campaigns here am sorry if it's a dumb question I have to ask?
Raven tools is excellent spider mate is surprisingly good and very low cost.
Majestic SEO for links I could go on but SEM Rush is and all the other tools as well not majestic.
I would not listen to the marquee that is being told and not report. Their really kind of off it's good that you have at least 10% matching anchor text to keywords? I guess they did not hear that's a no-no.
I would honestly run the same thing to the campaign tool here http://www.seomoz.org/campaigns
is very good and I believe Raven tools to be the only other software that has it all as it will give you better metrics on wording using tools like scribe instead of whatever that thing was.
I hope I have been of help,
Tom
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
What is the safest way to redirect for best SEO benefits?
What is the safest way to redirect for best SEO benefits? Example: loodgieter-aanhuis.nl -> loodgieters-ambacht.nl Does someone have any technical information on how to (root) redirect for best SEO practices?
On-Page Optimization | | hans-keeren0 -
Is NitroPack plugin Black Hat SEO for speed optimization
We are getting ready to launch our redesigned WP site and were considering using NitroPack performance optimization plugin, until some of our developers started ringing the alarm. Here is what some in the SEO community are saying about the tool. The rendering of the website made with the NitroPack plugin in the Page Metric Test Tools is based entirely on the inline CSS and JS in the HTML file without taking into account additional numerous CSS or JS files loaded on the page. As a result, the final metric score does not include CSS and JavaScript files evaluation and parsing. So what they are saying is that a lot of websites with the NitroPack plugin never become interactive in the Page Metric Tools because all interactivity is derived from JavaScript and CSS execution. So, their "Time to Interactive" and "Speed Index" should be reported as equal to infinity. Would Google consider this Black Hat SEO and start serving manual actions to sites using NitroPack? We are not ready to lose our hard-earned Google ranking. Please, let me know your thoughts on the plugin. Is it simply JS and CSS "lazy loading" that magically offers the first real-world implementation that works magic and yields fantastic results, or is it truly a Black Hat attempt at cheating Google PageSpeed Insights numbers? Thank you!
On-Page Optimization | | opiates0 -
Duplicate Content Indentification Tools
Does anyone have a recommendation for a good tool that can identify which elements on a page are duplicated content? I use Moz Analytics to determine which pages have the duplicated content on them, but it doesn't say which pieces of text or on-page elements are in fact considered to be duplicate. Thanks Moz Community in advance!
On-Page Optimization | | EmpireToday0 -
Is my megamenu negatively impacting my SEO?
Hello everyone, I have a megamenu with 87 links in total. We offer a ton of products, so when we decided to have this developed, it seemed like a no-brainer because a straight drop-down menu was really hard to digest. But I have been wondering if it is creating too many links on every single page and/or muddling the signals to the search engines. If anyone could take a look and give me their insight, I would really appreciate it. Thanks, www.cleanedison.com
On-Page Optimization | | CleanEdisonInc0 -
Is there a tool that will "grade" content?
Does anybody know of a tool that can "grade" content for Panda compliance. For example, it might look at: • the total number of words on the page • the average number of words in sentences • grammar • spelling • repetitious words and/or phrases • Readability—using algorithms such as: Flesch Kincaid Reading Ease Flesch Kincaid Grade Level Gunning Fog Score Coleman Liau Index Automated Readability Index (ARI) For the last 5 months I've been writing and rewriting literally 100s of catalog descriptions—adhering to the "no duplicate content" and "adding value" rubrics—but in an extremely informal style. I would like to know if I'm at least meeting Google Panda's minimum standards.
On-Page Optimization | | RScime250 -
How much does punctuation affect on-page SEO?
I have a page on a site that is targeted for "men's custom suits." Using the on-page analysis tool from SEOmoz it gives me an F for "mens custom suits" but an A with the apostrophe. Even though the apostrophe is proper English grammar, does it affect rankings either way?
On-Page Optimization | | cgray010 -
Geo-targeted content and SEO?
I am wondering, what effect does geo-targeted "cookie cutter" content have on SEO. For example, one might have a list of "Top US Comedians", which appears as "Top UK Comedians" for users from the United Kingdom. The data would be populated with information from a database in both cases, but would be completely different for each region, with the exception of a few words. Is this essentially giving Google's (US-based) crawler different content to users? I know that plenty of sites do it, but is it legitimate? Would it be better to redirect to a unique page, based on location, rather than change the content of one static page? I know what the logical SEO answer is here, but even some of the big players use the "wrong" tactic. I am very interested to hear your thoughts.
On-Page Optimization | | HalogenDigital0 -
Re-write homepage url for non EMD for SEO
Hi, A lot of talk about EMD's lately not just here but all over SEO and affiliate forums. I've dabbled in emd's but have decided to go against the grain and use a non emd. I think I can optimise hard enough to rank and at the same time build a brand, which is where most emd's fail. But my question is this: If you are targeting lets say the term 'running trainers' and the domain is runyoursocksoff.com would it be more beneficial to rewrite the root domain to this: runyoursocksoff.com/running-trainers/ It does look messy to me and more then likely I would not use this but I have seen it a few times and was wondering if its a work around for non emd's.
On-Page Optimization | | activitysuper0