Best way of handling top level domains (with a local twist)
-
Hi There,
We're about to develop a new website for a small company who operates in both New Zealand and Australia. The company has a foot in the door with major Australian distribution so is keen to build their brand there - almost all of the marketing budget will go into Australia this year.
1. Domains and websites:
We're thinking of using separate country domains (.co.nz and .com.au) along with the CMS to create 2 sites that will have:
- Content common to both countries and sites (about, story, product info)
- Country specific content (contacts, tastings, competitions and other promo)
- Headers and footers of each page will contain different content for each site
I guess we're worried about creating a duplicate content issue as both sites will have several pages that are identical (although different info will be in the headers and footers on every page).
Also, using www.brand.com/aus might not be a great option (perception-wise) when the competition will be using .com.au. And creating and maintaining different content for both sites will drain too much budget away from Adwords and marketing.
2. The effect on SEO and Adwords:
If the www.brand.com/aus approach is simply better, are there any implications if all the advertised domains (especially in Adwords) redirect like this?
www.brand.com.au -> www.brand.com/aus
www.brand.co.nz -> www.brand.com/nzHow would everyone recommend approaching this?
As you can tell, we're a bit unsure and want to get this right from the start - any pointers in the right direction would be very much appreciated.
Cheers
Ben
-
Thanks Kate - sorry for the late response.
It looks as if Google doesn't account for the local, feel-good factor when people in certain countries see their TLD.
e.g. New Zealanders feel better if they see .co.nz because the company seems more local and similarly with Australia - but the content could be identical.
And then when you have countries with a healthy rivalry like New Zealand and Australia (or US and Canada) Australians might react differently to seeing NZ's TLD (albeit subtly).
I'm not sure I fully understand the downsides to multiple TLDs and duplicate content as which is the original and which is the duplicate depends greatly on which country you're in - it's perception-based.
I realise Google doesn't see things this way but is that what Nlevi was talking about with Webmaster Tools - you can tell Google to always serve .com.au to Australians?
Anyway, I'm not sure I'm fully understanding the situation as we haven't worked on a site that targets multiple countries specifically before.
It seems like it's safer to go with .com because that's what's best for Google even if that's wrong for the customers - especially New Zealanders who feel a loyal sense of ownership with the brand if that makes sense.
-
1. It sounds like you are actually targeting the different countries. Just be aware that the duplicated page will not perform well. As long as you are aware of that, you should be okay. Duplicate content is not a penalty, just means that the pages won't perform well. Just remember to target geographically in Google and Bing Webmaster Tools.
2. And this question is negated by my answer above, but if you did go with the other option, no you can't have a display domain as .com.au and have the destination URL to another domain. It won't work.
Stick with the TLDs and with trying your best to target each site at it's intended audience.
-
1. Domains
If the page content is identical, then yes, you will probably face duplicated content issues.
You could use rel="canonical" tag to inform Google which version of the page is original. As you probably know rel="canonical" is not bullet proof, it's more like a recommendation for G.BTW. On Google Webmaster tools you can specify which country you are targeting, although this will not erase the duplicated content issues, it might be worth to use.
2. Adwords
It's a bit unclear for me what you meant with redirecting AdWords traffic.
I would do different campaigns for different domains. If the domain changes, just update the URL's to your AdWords campaign.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
I am already ranking top
i saw advice that even if you are already top in the serp you should anyways buy the google ads for it. it doesnt seem to make any sense to me can anyone explain it to me??? thanx
Paid Search Marketing | | Ruchy0 -
Top Ad in Google Adwords
Hello. How much of a difference does it make in click-throughs to be the first listing in Google Adwords versus the second or third (still at the top of the page)? Thank you!
Paid Search Marketing | | nyc-seo0 -
Google Shopping Best Practices
We have a google shopping feed setup for an existing ecommerce website. We now have a new unrelated ecommerce website and want to setup a google shopping feed for that website. Is it best to add that feed to the same adwords account as the previous website or to create an entirely new adwords account login for the new site?
Paid Search Marketing | | JGar-2203710 -
Keyword Domains for PPC
I have a client who wants to buy a lot of long domains with keywords in them, for example, thesandiegopetstore.com (this is fictional) and then set up a PPC landing page for each. They think that when someone types in "san diego pet store" that their domain will be listed high and then they will get a lot of traffic. My concern is that they will own a lot of domains for their company and I thought Google is getting pretty adamant about companies not having a lot of domains, and I thought that keyword domains are not as effective as they used to be -- that branding is more important now. Also, I think the domains they've picked target very competitive keywords and that perhaps they will get a lot unqualified traffic and will still have to pay for the clicks. What do you think? What is the best way to set up PPC landing pages?
Paid Search Marketing | | klkirby0 -
Yahoo Local rejected because of office in residence
I have a client with an office in their home. Yahoo Local has rejected it 3 times for No Physical Location The location is correct, they are listed correctly in just about every reputable local directory available including Google Places. They do see clients at their home office. Any suggestions? Should they pay the $300 for the Yahoo Directory? Should they the $9.95 for the enhanced local listing? Thanks in advance...
Paid Search Marketing | | cozyweb0 -
Best AdWords Training?
We want to give some adwords training to some of our internal staff with no prior SEO / PPC knowledge. We want to find: A good comprehensive Adwords reference book and A good beginner's Adwords online training course Any recommendations on some good options for the above?
Paid Search Marketing | | Czarto0 -
Doing Google Places for customer - best solution?
I work at a media agency in Denmark and I'm trying to open a Google Places-account for one of our retail-customers which is to be linked to the customers AdWords-account. I created a Places account and via bulk upload I submitted the customers 74 locations. I was then asked to verify my bulk upload, which I did. That's two weeks ago, and I've tried to get help from our Google contact but to little avail. Could the problem be that I am doing the places account on behalf of our customer, and thus when I am asked to verify the upload I supply my own information (contact phone and business name) rather than the customers? Have any of you had a similar experience? Is there an alternate path I can take to solve this?
Paid Search Marketing | | Iumreprise0 -
Where are the URLs in Google top ads coming from?
I'm not sure if this new but I noticed it today: Some of the ads that are displayed on top of the SERPs have a title, and then their web address, separated by a vertical bar. For example (see image): Coffee Beans Online | CoffeeBeansDirect.com The same ad, when displayed in the side bar (see 2nd image) doesn't contain the web address. I expected that because if you count the letters in the ad, including the 'coffeebeansdirect.com' it exceeds the amount allowed for a google ad. My question is: How did it get there? There's no room to distinguish between top ads and side ads when you write a new a new ad in adwords so where did it come from? Plus, notice that both CoffeeBeanDirect.com and ROASTe.com use caps that are not used in the green link at the bottom. How did Google know to present the url that way? 549sR 4tAnb
Paid Search Marketing | | 5225Marketing0