Purchasing a Google Plus Profile
-
A client of mine has the opportunity to purchase a google plus profile from a now defunct competitor. Essentially the profile is in tens of thousands of circles, so it may be a decent idea just from a marketing standpoint. When it comes to SEO I am wondering about a few things
-
Is this against Googles rules?
-
Has there been any proof of authorship playing a role in SERP rankings? So if there was an article where the author was in 50 circles compared to the same article where the author was in 50,000 circles would it effect the rankings at all?
-
Have there been any studies done that show that the +1 (from Google Plus users) effects SERP rankings?
Sorry for all the questions, but this is an interesting opportunity. Thanks in advance!
-
-
I think that any study would have to be case specific to be worth anything. A circle with two influencers or two popes would be far more valuable than a circle with 5000 drunks. And at the same time who YOU are and what YOU produce is going to make all of the difference. If you are putting out crap nobody is going to pay attention to you and if they do pay attention to you it is really going to be damaging to your brand.
-
That is really the million $ question, right? I have been searching all over to find valuation numbers for Google+ but can;t find them. Have you (or anyone else) seen any studies with this info?
-
It's easy to buy lots of fake circles for your page. I would verify that the 50,000 circles that the page has are indeed real people, and that content that's posted there gets real engagement. By quantifying how much engagement posts on the page get, and coming up with a dollar amount of how much that engagement is worth to your business, you should be able to determine whether the page is a good buy or not.
-
Good question. It is actually a business page not a profile.
-
I had imagined it being a bit more complicated than just switching the name. The page in question (not profile as I mistakenly wrote before) is a enthusiast group. So it would be like a widget company paying to buy a widget enthusiast group's page.
The additional power would come from the fact the widget company could promote their content to the enthusiast group. I would imagine it would also increase the circle count of the author as well.
-
Can't stress enough how much I agree about it being a bad investment and that just because there's people in the circles it doesn't mean any of them will stick around once it changes hands.
-
First of all, is this a personal profile or a business profile? Because right now authorship is only for individuals, not brand pages. For your questions:
-
I have not seen anything explicitly against selling a Google account, but you might want to double check on that.
-
Google has said that authorship does not currently play a role in Google's algorithm, but many people believe it will in the near future. However, the authority of an author will likely be based on more than just circle count (where the writer writes, engagement their content receives, etc)
-
+1 do affect SERP rankings, but only for your connections that are logged into their Google accounts.
-
-
I can tell you that is probably a very bad investment.
Google's rules are very clear about being transparent with your actions on Google +
https://developers.google.com/+/policies
Google pays attention to names very closely. When you're client or friend
changes the name of the business to his and the name of the other gentlemen to his Google will find out and they will ban the site
http://searchengineland.com/will-google-penalize-chromebooks-advertorials-149452
-
yes it's very much against the rules
-
yes there's a lot of proof of authorship playing a large role (primarily on blogs) but as an individual Google dose grade you and authorship tricks like this one will not go over well. You'll most likely be penalized. I do not have any information about 50 circles compared to the same article with the author with 50,000 circles. I'm sure you can Google that however it does make a difference you have to actually be the person that gained the 50,000 Circle users. Plus the users are going to abandon him once he takes over for the person selling it.
-
There have been quite a few studies done on the impact of social media a.k.a. Google + and all the rest collectively playing a large role or small role in your search engine results. You can type better and to search on Moz and find that.
Lastly if you want to help your friend. Prevent them from doing this here is the beginning of what Google has to say about all this and it gets a little bit worse for people trying to buy their way into rankings
Google+ Platform Developer Policies
Guidelines
To help ensure your application's success as well as to promote a healthy community, we require that all Google+ API developers follow these guidelines.
<dl>
<dt>Put the user first</dt>
<dd>Build something that Google+ users will love.</dd>
<dd>Encourage useful sharing and give users meaningful choices about who they share with.</dd>
<dt>Be transparent</dt>
<dd>Be honest about the intention of your application.</dd>
<dd>Show users what you will do on their behalf and get their explicit permission before you do it.</dd>
<dd>Be clear about what is being sold via your application and post your terms of sale.</dd>
<dt>Respect user data</dt>
<dd>Keep users' private information private, in accordance with your privacy policy.</dd>
<dd>Use any data you collect to improve users' experience.</dd>
</dl>
I hope I have been of help,
Thomas
-
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Google SERP shows wrong (and inappropriate) thumbnail for Facebook videos?
Hello I'm running into a strange issue with at least one of my client's video. The video is posted on Facebook. When searching for the video on Google, the SERP shows a completely wrong, and inappropriate, thumbnail image. (And in one case the preview video starts playing within Google SERP.) It also seems that Google is indexing various countries' facebook page for the same video separately (it-it.facebook.com, fr-fr.facebook.com, etc). Note that only the thumbnail and preview video within Google are wrong; if you click on the link, you see the correct video and page. I hesitate to divulge the actual client video, but there are some reports on Google's search community about the same behavior: Here's one that stargs back in March: https://support.google.com/webmasters/thread/33760205?hl=en and a more recent one: https://support.google.com/websearch/thread/71452151?hl=en It looks increasingly like a bug in some google algorithm, but nobody at google seems to acknowledge that. I've unpublished the original video from FB and submitted an 'outdated content' removal to Google, which is pending. In the meantime, my questions for our group of experts here: Has anyone else experienced this and any other suggestionso n how to fix? If we assume that this is not a google bug: how could a malicious actor or black-hat SEO influence Google's algorithms to cause this? Thanks, mickey
Social Media | | infamia0 -
Google Indexed Images: Website Vs Social Media
I use Pinterest, Twitter and Instagram to post images that are already featured on my website. I have been following a routine of uploading the images to these social media platforms only after I can see Google has indexed the image from my original site. My website is ecommerce and the product images drive sales more than any other factor. The thinking behind my method was that when these images are posted on Pinterest, Twitter and the various Instagram crawler sites (I realise Instagram images aren’t indexed directly), Google would recognise that the image was already attributed to my website. The ‘duplicate’ image would not therefore be indexed and the originally uploaded website image would remain in ‘Google Images’. After completing various searches and reviewing other Q&A’s on Moz, it seems as though this is in no way guaranteed and images reposted on social media platforms may still replace the already indexed image from the website. I am assuming this is because Google views these platforms as more authoritative than mine. I usually change the image by adding logos, text, backgrounds, borders etc before posting on Pinterest and this seems to have worked most of the time (both the original and ‘amended for Pinterest’ versions are often indexed) but images posted on other platforms are usually identical. Does it make sense to continue with my method or am I shooting myself in the foot by reposting these images on social media at all? I obviously want customers searching for products, who then click on an image, to be directed to my site rather than one of my social media pages or worse, an image reposting site. Additionally, If I post images on social media before they are uploaded to my website (for example to tease a product launch), would Google likely class these images as the ‘original’ and therefore be less likely to index the website version of the image once it is uploaded? Any thoughts are appreciated.
Social Media | | g3mmab2 -
Best strategy for Multilanguage Google+ Business Page(s) & rel publisher
Hello! I have many troubles defining a clear Google + strategy. Let's say I have one brand, say "reallycoolbarcelona" (because Barcelona is really cool!), 1 google place in Barcelona, and many websites with local ccTLD to promote the brand in different countries: reallycoolbarcelona.fr, reallycoolbarcelona.es, reallycoolbarcelona.co.uk, reallycoolbarcelona.it, reallycoolbarcelona.de. 1/ Now, how to handle that in Google+?
Social Media | | antoine.brunel
==> Shall I create one single page for all languages in Google+? (But then I cannot transfer Google Place to Google Local +?)
Then I would put the rel publisher of this page on all my websites? ==> Or shall I create one Google + page per language?
Then I would put the rel publisher of each language page on the corresponding website based on the language (french Google + page publisher on the french website only)? 2/ Now how did you manage to create a +SEOMoz page in Google+? By that, I mean a page with a clean url plus.google.com/+SEOMoz (that's so cool!) and not the scary url https://plus.google.com/b/1234567890 Thanks for enlighting my blurred mind about Google + multilingual strategies!0 -
Moving from Google place to Google+ - problems, problems
Hi, I'm just moving a business listing from Google Places to Google+ I have a couple of problems. (1) The verification postcard has turned up with the wrong address on it (different to the address on Google Places!) - can I alter this once I've verified Google+ page or would I need to go through postcard verification again? (2) I see the categories in Google+ are far less flexible (and appropriate) for the business I work for, so I'm thinking that may cause problems. Has anybody else experienced this same problem? Thanks in advance for your help 🙂
Social Media | | McTaggart1 -
Setting up Google + Business Pages for Multiple Clients
I am looking at setting up several of my clients with Google Plus pages for their businesses. What's the best practice for doing this? Should I have a separate Google Account for each and set up the Business Page under that account? Are you allowed to have multiple Google Accounts manage a single Business Page - i.e., can I turn it over to the business without having to relinquish my control or give them access to the account I made? Any good tutorials on getting started with this? Thanks! Tom
Social Media | | TomBristol0 -
Search Google Plus Profiles
I need a (or several ways) to search Google Plus Profiles. It would be great to: Identify people by the area in which they live Identify keywords in the profile Any ideas anyone? Justin
Social Media | | GrouchyKids0 -
Anyone use the new "Social Settings" in Google Analytics?
In the past couple of months, Google rolled out a tab called "Social Settings" in the Admin area (see image). It's an optional setting, and Google is rather vague about what it does. GA already tracks social in "Traffic Sources," so what is the advantage of using Social Settings? If you've used these new settings, what have your experiences been? Were the settings helpful? Did they completely screw up your analytics? Thanks, Benjamin Ri5bY Ri5bY.jpg
Social Media | | 1000Bulbs1 -
Does a 301 redirect pass along Google +1's from the old url to the new one?
When I 301 redirect a page that has content that has been +1'ed by our visitors, I would assume that Google would handle a +1 the same as a link and pass this authority along to the new url. Has anyone had any experience or heard directly from Google confirming this behavior?
Social Media | | Eventful0