Purchasing a Google Plus Profile
-
A client of mine has the opportunity to purchase a google plus profile from a now defunct competitor. Essentially the profile is in tens of thousands of circles, so it may be a decent idea just from a marketing standpoint. When it comes to SEO I am wondering about a few things
-
Is this against Googles rules?
-
Has there been any proof of authorship playing a role in SERP rankings? So if there was an article where the author was in 50 circles compared to the same article where the author was in 50,000 circles would it effect the rankings at all?
-
Have there been any studies done that show that the +1 (from Google Plus users) effects SERP rankings?
Sorry for all the questions, but this is an interesting opportunity. Thanks in advance!
-
-
I think that any study would have to be case specific to be worth anything. A circle with two influencers or two popes would be far more valuable than a circle with 5000 drunks. And at the same time who YOU are and what YOU produce is going to make all of the difference. If you are putting out crap nobody is going to pay attention to you and if they do pay attention to you it is really going to be damaging to your brand.
-
That is really the million $ question, right? I have been searching all over to find valuation numbers for Google+ but can;t find them. Have you (or anyone else) seen any studies with this info?
-
It's easy to buy lots of fake circles for your page. I would verify that the 50,000 circles that the page has are indeed real people, and that content that's posted there gets real engagement. By quantifying how much engagement posts on the page get, and coming up with a dollar amount of how much that engagement is worth to your business, you should be able to determine whether the page is a good buy or not.
-
Good question. It is actually a business page not a profile.
-
I had imagined it being a bit more complicated than just switching the name. The page in question (not profile as I mistakenly wrote before) is a enthusiast group. So it would be like a widget company paying to buy a widget enthusiast group's page.
The additional power would come from the fact the widget company could promote their content to the enthusiast group. I would imagine it would also increase the circle count of the author as well.
-
Can't stress enough how much I agree about it being a bad investment and that just because there's people in the circles it doesn't mean any of them will stick around once it changes hands.
-
First of all, is this a personal profile or a business profile? Because right now authorship is only for individuals, not brand pages. For your questions:
-
I have not seen anything explicitly against selling a Google account, but you might want to double check on that.
-
Google has said that authorship does not currently play a role in Google's algorithm, but many people believe it will in the near future. However, the authority of an author will likely be based on more than just circle count (where the writer writes, engagement their content receives, etc)
-
+1 do affect SERP rankings, but only for your connections that are logged into their Google accounts.
-
-
I can tell you that is probably a very bad investment.
Google's rules are very clear about being transparent with your actions on Google +
https://developers.google.com/+/policies
Google pays attention to names very closely. When you're client or friend
changes the name of the business to his and the name of the other gentlemen to his Google will find out and they will ban the site
http://searchengineland.com/will-google-penalize-chromebooks-advertorials-149452
-
yes it's very much against the rules
-
yes there's a lot of proof of authorship playing a large role (primarily on blogs) but as an individual Google dose grade you and authorship tricks like this one will not go over well. You'll most likely be penalized. I do not have any information about 50 circles compared to the same article with the author with 50,000 circles. I'm sure you can Google that however it does make a difference you have to actually be the person that gained the 50,000 Circle users. Plus the users are going to abandon him once he takes over for the person selling it.
-
There have been quite a few studies done on the impact of social media a.k.a. Google + and all the rest collectively playing a large role or small role in your search engine results. You can type better and to search on Moz and find that.
Lastly if you want to help your friend. Prevent them from doing this here is the beginning of what Google has to say about all this and it gets a little bit worse for people trying to buy their way into rankings
Google+ Platform Developer Policies
Guidelines
To help ensure your application's success as well as to promote a healthy community, we require that all Google+ API developers follow these guidelines.
<dl>
<dt>Put the user first</dt>
<dd>Build something that Google+ users will love.</dd>
<dd>Encourage useful sharing and give users meaningful choices about who they share with.</dd>
<dt>Be transparent</dt>
<dd>Be honest about the intention of your application.</dd>
<dd>Show users what you will do on their behalf and get their explicit permission before you do it.</dd>
<dd>Be clear about what is being sold via your application and post your terms of sale.</dd>
<dt>Respect user data</dt>
<dd>Keep users' private information private, in accordance with your privacy policy.</dd>
<dd>Use any data you collect to improve users' experience.</dd>
</dl>
I hope I have been of help,
Thomas
-
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Google + and SEO
Hello, A couple of competitors that I keep an eye on over the last couple of months have been really going for the Google + links and according to Opensite explorer they have over 200 social page metrics for Google +. I was just wondering if there has been an update that I have missed that gives follow links for Google + or does Google + affect Domain authority? And if so can I just use my own Google + account to create these social page metrics or does it depend on someone else sharing my posts? Many thanks
Social Media | | mblsolutions0 -
Claiming Google+ URLs?
I have several brands which I am managing G+ profile pages for. These range from established brands with large followings to just starting out. When I try to claim a custom URL for these on Google+, it says to add some extra characters after the brand names to make them unique. I can't find any example of established big brands who have G+ URLS like "+toyotausa24" "+tacobell3" or anything like that. This does not seem to be well documented anywhere. Can someone tell me what the deal is with this feature? Also what is the best practice for large brands when claiming this? +BrandName1?
Social Media | | IrvCo_Interactive2 -
Why am I seeing so many referalls to my root domain from Facebook in Google Analytics?
When we look at referalls from Facebook in Google Analytics, more than 50% (and sometimes upwards of 80%) of the traffic we're getting is listed as landing on our root domain. The thing is, we don't have any direct links TO our root domain on our Facebook page. So is this legitimate traffic, and how are they getting to our page if we have no links to it? We do post links to stories, videos, etc, but those are to the individual pages, not to our root domain. When I look at those pages that we link to, they do have traffic numbers, but nothing compared to the root domain. Any thoughts would be helpful. Thanks.
Social Media | | TexAgs0 -
Fetch for Google
Hi there! A short question from Holland: My developers made a mistake with a template on a subpage in Wordpress. When Google crawled my site again, Google found an empty page. The same day we loosed our #1 position on the main keyword and now we are on position #6. We restored the page the same day and asked Google to recrawl the page again (fetch for Google). But 48 hours later nothing changed. When I look in the cache date' the page still has the old date, while my competition has a newer cache date. We send some traffic to the page and did some facebook post on this page. Does anybody knows how to kickstart this page again?
Social Media | | remkoallertz0 -
Best strategy for Multilanguage Google+ Business Page(s) & rel publisher
Hello! I have many troubles defining a clear Google + strategy. Let's say I have one brand, say "reallycoolbarcelona" (because Barcelona is really cool!), 1 google place in Barcelona, and many websites with local ccTLD to promote the brand in different countries: reallycoolbarcelona.fr, reallycoolbarcelona.es, reallycoolbarcelona.co.uk, reallycoolbarcelona.it, reallycoolbarcelona.de. 1/ Now, how to handle that in Google+?
Social Media | | antoine.brunel
==> Shall I create one single page for all languages in Google+? (But then I cannot transfer Google Place to Google Local +?)
Then I would put the rel publisher of this page on all my websites? ==> Or shall I create one Google + page per language?
Then I would put the rel publisher of each language page on the corresponding website based on the language (french Google + page publisher on the french website only)? 2/ Now how did you manage to create a +SEOMoz page in Google+? By that, I mean a page with a clean url plus.google.com/+SEOMoz (that's so cool!) and not the scary url https://plus.google.com/b/1234567890 Thanks for enlighting my blurred mind about Google + multilingual strategies!0 -
Social media profiles with same description - Duplicate content or reinforcing business details?
Hi, I am currently doing a Social media review and find myself wondering whether having exactly the same copy - or part thereof, on a businesses' Facebook, LinkedIn, G+, Twitter, profile(s) is likely to be viewed by SE's as a good or bad thing? Is it duplicate content and to be avoided? Or would it be viewed as a case of the business trying to ensure a consistent profile and therefore reinforcing your business details?
Social Media | | Binarynature0 -
Will Google maintain its search engine power?
Reading through the SEOmoz threads, and also other forums, I can't help but notice that the majority of material covered is about SEO & SERP, white hat & black hat linking, social media blogs and articles, etc, etc. Everyone trying to scramble to the top of their market via Google. If Google brought out a release saying that hopping down the street naked & having a neighbour googling that you had, for improved SERP ratings, would produce a weird downtown scenario. What I am asking, is this: Does Google have too much power in determining to the world what is correct and what is not as a corporation. And are they and what they have a passing phase, or will they lose their dominance like Microsoft etc through technical change?
Social Media | | ABCPS0 -
Social Content Posting - Post to Facebook, Google Plus, Twitter and Linked in at the same time
Hi, Is there any means of posting new content for my companies various social profiles in the one go rather than having to log into each one? This would save a lot of time. Thanks
Social Media | | fdep0