How on earth is a site with ONE LINK ranking so well for a competitive keyword?
-
Ok, so I'm sure you get the gist of what I'm asking about in my question.
The query is 'diy kitchens' in Google UK and the website is kitchens4diy[dot]com - which is ranking in third from my viewing.
The thing is, the site has just ONE BACKLINK and has done for a good while. Yet, it's ranking really well.
What gives?
-
Hey Matthew
We have some sites in similar fields ranking highly in local and organic and have done no link building at all. New players, outperforming established players, in organic and local and no links have been built. Times are changing and whilst links (the right kind) are still powerful, there is a multifactorial way of doing things that in many cases is more powerful when going up against folks who have just tried to heavily go after one aspect.
I tend to think and our recent experience shows this that search has several factors and the effectiveness of each factor is amplified to some extent when they all work together. Brand, URL, Local, Citations, Links, Content, On Page etc.
The keyword in the brand / URL is a great example of this where it can still seemingly help as long as it is not abused and forms part of a larger cohesive strategy. A recent client starting out was advised by us to add the location they serve to the company name and it has worked out fabulously for them. This is a local client ranking in organic and local well above the competition with only 8 weeks or so of very light local SEO (and again, whilst it was one of my guys that did the work, I am sure there was no links built as it was just a whole lot easier than that).
Still, there is no better tool than an experiment so try adding some citations and see if you can influence your clients listing as performance for every keyword in every market is different so only through close analysis and tinkering will you know exactly what will move the dial for your client.
Marcus
-
With regards to the co-occurrence of the keyword and brand comment, I'd just like to point out that in this case they are effectively the same thing. From a branding perspective, if you are choosing a name for your business you could not do better than incorporating a relevant keyword you're trying to rank for.
-
I suspect this is the biggest factor in its ranking, you're right. Which shouldn't be the case, of course.
-
Hey Marcus,
First off, great response. I appreciate the time you've taken out to reply with such detail.
Now, to address the points you've raised;
-
I think we can both agree on that.
-
The keyword is probably more competitive than you think. Like I've just mentioned above, there was a great deal of spam EMD sites infiltrating the search over the past few months and they've only just been removed.
-
It's been there for at least two or three months by my reckoning. The competition was spammy. Now, less so.
4, 5) Interesting. Although, I doubt it's intentional. I know people say the future is "linkless" but this is taking it to the extreme.
-
-
Well I would say that their domain name is definitely having something to do with them ranking well
I know EMD (Exact Match Domain) have taken hits from google, but this is not an EMD, but very close.
-
Hey Rikki,
The one link they have comes from here;
http://www.globalknives.org.uk/best-quality-kitchen/
Although, I can't see whereabouts it is on the page.
Our client's site is one of those on the second page with decent DA/PA. Only today have I actually noticed the removal of some spam EMD sites from the search that were infiltrating the results. The keyword is probably a lot more competitive than you may think.
-
I will like to ask
- Has the keyword recently been searched or came into search
We can give you an example of one of the blogs which is :- http://www.highsecurityplates.com
The keywords - high security number plates, high security plates are recently been on search in google.co.in for last 1 yr.. Hardly any link building has been done.. Still we recvd a traffic of over 1000 visitors every day 2 months back which though fallen to 150 visitors - though ranking remains intact. when ever there is a news in media the traffic increases
However, the site is ranking number 1 from the very first month till now despite of many high competition sites
So, this could apply to the site given, if the keyword competition is not much...
-
Hey Matthew
There is really no substitute for tinkering and running some experiments of your own but we can do a bit of digging and see what we can turn up here.
1. The site is weak from a link perspective, no doubt about it
2. The keyword is only returned as moderately competitive (34%) in the Moz keyword tool and there are other sites in the top 10 with only one link.
3. How long as the page been there? How spammy is the competition?
4. They do have some decent UK citations which you can dig into like this:
"Kitchens4DIY" "DY5 1TX" -site:kitchens4diy.com
You can even expand that to look for the keyword in those citations to see if we are seeing more of this co-occurance that is such a hot topic at the moment:
"Kitchens4DIY" "DY5 1TX" -site:kitchens4diy.com "diy kitchens"
5. They also have tons more unstructured citations with the brand + keyword combination.
"Kitchens4DIY" -site:kitchens4diy.com "diy kitchens"
Summary
- The keyword is not terribly competitive in link power terms
- There does not appear to be tons of competing sites for the term
- This is a new site with no negative equity
- Possible spam signals amongst the competition
- Lots of unstructured and a reasonable amount of structured citations
- Frequent co-occurrence of the keyword and brand
- Homepage title is well optimised for this term
Obviously, this is a five minute analysis but really, I see no mystery here. The keyword is not competitive, the site is new, has a clean profile, plenty of citations and good co occurrence of the keyword.
Would be interesting to see your clients site to do a side by side comparison though as that would likely reveal more insights than this general overview.
I wrote about this a little here if it helps:
http://www.bowlerhat.co.uk/blog/types-of-citations-for-seo/
Hope that helps you dig in and build your plan of attack!
Marcus
-
I was expecting to see a page which is very well optimised and with lots of content but it only seems to use that phrase once on the page and doesn't have it in either the H1, Bold tag or an image alt. The page content seems very average too.
I guess its not a massively competitive phrase but the other sites on that page (and a few on the pages below) do have decent DA and PA. What is the one link they have? Is it a strong one with exact anchor text for that phrase?
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Can 'Jump link'/'Anchor tag' urls rank in Google for keywords?
E.g. www.website.com/page/#keyword-anchor-text Where the part after the # is a section of the page you can jump to, and the title of that section is a secondary keyword you want the page to rank for?
Algorithm Updates | | rwat0 -
Are we confusing Google with our internal linking?
Hi all, We decided to give importance to one of our top pages as it has "keyword" in it's slug like website.com/keyword. So we internally linked even from different sub-domain pages more than homepage to rank for that "keyword". But this page didn't show up in Google results for that "keyword"; neither homepage, but our login page is ranking. We wonder why login page is ranking. Has our internal linking plan confused Google to ignore homepage to rank for that primary keyword? And generally do we need to internally link homepage more than anyother page? Thanks
Algorithm Updates | | vtmoz0 -
Recent Algorithm Update Impact on Rankings
I've read that the most recent algorithm update by Google is targeting dodgy links. I have a client's website who within the last few days has been smashed out of of top positions for the most competitive keywords (and many others). I'm worried that the site has been penalised, however I can't understand why it would be. The site only has 11 domains linking to it (65 links total) and a lot of these links are coming from the same websites that link to all of our other web clients and none of them have experienced this sudden and significant drop in rankings. Does anyone know if Google is targeting a specific type of site, or how I can determine if my client's website has been penalised? I've not made any significant changes recently to the site's content or meta data, however rankings have remained steady for months now. It just seemed to happen overnight that they dropped off everything (eg. middle of page 2 to page 8 of search results for some of the better keywords) Thank you in advance for any assistance!
Algorithm Updates | | JuiceBoxOM0 -
Sitemap link in footer?? Is it needed
Hi, I know sitemap is important to have as it tells google the pages to crawl. I have an xml sitemap for google to crawl. However, Do I need a sitemap link in footer. Any thoughts?? Does it have any harm if I dont include a sitemap link in footer
Algorithm Updates | | pejman500 -
What are the most trusted SEO sites?
Other then SEOmoz what sites can you trust for SEO? Is there some type of formula I can use to find out if any site is trustworthy?
Algorithm Updates | | uofmiamiguy0 -
Ranking factors for national and local
What SEO impact factors am I missing if I am ranked 1st on Google for a keyword, but not ranked local search? The keyword being setup like {"company industry" "location" }. Its ranked 4th when searched on google and the location is specific to the location in the keyword. I've tried to varify that all of my citations are correct and identical. When I compare my sites Domain Authority and links to its competitors, I should be dominating that search. If you guys have any incite it would be greatly appreciated. MADD DOGG
Algorithm Updates | | MaddDogg0 -
SEO Ranking & Brand Names
I have several situations where one of my sites rank organically in 4th or 5th place for a specific search term relating to a 'big brand' .. I usually fall in behind the brands main website .. commercially this is very good for me. Let me give you an example .. in google.co.uk type in 'thomas cook exchange rates'. I rank position 4 (comparecurrency.co.uk). Position 1-3 are thomas cook's own pages. Naturally. However, my question is .. could I outrank them and how could I initially measure the effort involved in getting to position 1? I noticed Google recently put me into position 1 for this term and then quickly (within a few days) pulled me back down to position 4. Does anyone have any experience of this type of search positioning and have any information that may help me? My gut feel is that I have maybe maxed out the economically viable potential of these keywords and that I should invest my SEO $s into other phrases? Thanks in advance Olly
Algorithm Updates | | ojkingston0 -
Google said that low-quality pages on your site may affect rankings on other parts
One of my sites got hit pretty hard during the latest Google update. It lost about 30-40% of its US traffic and the future does not look bright considering that Google plans a worldwide roll-out. Problem is, my site is a six year old heavy linked, popular Wordpress blog. I do not know why the article believes that it is low quality. The only reason I came up with is the statement that low-quality pages on a site may affect other pages (think it was in the Wired article). If that is so, would you recommend blocking and de-indexing of Wordpress tag, archive and category pages from the Google index? Or would you suggest to wait a bit more before doing something that drastically. Or do you have another idea what I could to do? I invite you to take a look at the site www.ghacks.net
Algorithm Updates | | badabing0