Link profile problem? User-generated reviews website suffering after Penguin
-
Hi all,
We run a user-generated reviews website and we link to the websites of businesses with reviews. Many of them also link back to their reviews page (and in fact, we give them a widget to encourage this).
I have a couple of questions about this;
Most of these links are to legitimate, but fairly small and unknown businesses - which means a lot of our inbound (and outbound) links are low quality. Could this be hurting us?
Given that the links are 2-way, could this be viewed as spam?
Some businesses (including a couple with high traffic) have included our widget in their website footer - so there are thousands of (low quality) links from a single domain. Problem?
The reason I'm asking is that our traffic suffered in the Panda update, and is again suffering with Penguin - despite the fact that we have a lot of unique content in the form of user-reviews. We've never engaged in any black-hat techniques.
Any ideas or advice would be much appreciated. SEO novice here!
-
Thanks heaps Charles and lesterj as well.
I've had a look into Google's view on widgets and it looks like you might be right so we've just changed the code on the widget so that the link back to us is nofollow (somewhat counter-intuitive!)
We've also just submitted a disavow on the worst offending links/domains.
.... so fingers crossed! Guess we have to wait for Google to crawl all of these sites to see an impact though.
-
From what you've told us, it sounds like the biggest issue is probably the widget links. Google has specifically stated that they don't consider widget links to be very natural. They are not links that people are editorially deciding to put on their sites. So, sites that have a majority of the links coming back to them as widget links are being hit by Penguin. The simple solution to this is to simply use the nofollow tag for the link in the widget, and that should put you within the guidelines of what Google wants. It also should solve your reciprocal link issue if that's even an issue. It's not going to be a reciprocal link if the link going to you has a nofollow. You could also possibly add nofollow links to the links going out to the companies.
I don't know that reciprocal linking is your real issue here because reciprocal linking itself isn't a huge problem. It's when it's done as a linking scheme and it makes up the majority of your links. So, I would recommend adding a nofollow tag to the widget. Don't remove the widget itself because you want to use your experience, but put a nofollow on the widget and then go from there and try to generate some real links that are not just from the companies that are linking to you to get reviews.
-
The issues you identified can certainly cause problems with your rankings.
1. Links from a lot of low quality sites is what the Penguin update is targeting. You may want to research Google's disavow tool and determine if you need to use it to disavow a lot of low quality links.
2. You don't want to link out to bad neighborhoods because that makes your site appear less trustworthy. You may want to add no-follow to all your outbound links that are user generated. SEOMoz nofollows links in profiles unless you meet certain criteria (200 Mozpoints).
3. A high percentage of reciprocal links may hurt your rankings. I believe that adding no-follow to your outbound links will help with this. If you do not editorially recommend a site, then Google prefers that you no-follow the link.
4. A high percentage of site-wide footer links from the widget can hurt you. Google may consider your ratio of your links that are site-wide and be suspicious if your ratio of site-wide links are unnaturally high. Many people try to buy links in the sidebar of blogs and Google wants to minimize the effectiveness of this. If you do a widget, you may want to no-follow the links to your site and focus on the value you get from free advertising, referral traffic, and increased brand awareness. -
This is what Matt cutt says " If you can't or don't want to vouch for the content of pages you link to from your site — for example, untrusted user comments or guestbook entries — you should nofollow those links. This can discourage spammers from targeting your site, and will help keep your site from inadvertently passing PageRank to bad neighborhoods on the web."
As its a 2 way link - so either Gooogle may take it as reciprocal paid links too.. This is ideal to avoid 'dofollow' links - if the other site links to you too. Why to unnecessarily create confusion to eyes of Google to treat them as unnatural link / spam links
For more see this video:- http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=x4UJS-LFRTU
-
Thanks heaps Gagan,
Any ideas on what we should do? I guess we could remove the links - but then that reduces the user-experience. We could also use no-follows, but I've read elsewhere not to use these.
-
If its a 2 way link - then it comes in definition of reciprocal links.
As per Google :- One of the examples of link schemes which can negatively impact a site's ranking in search results: Excessive link exchanging ("Link to me and I'll link to you")
may be your site falls (unintentionally) in this category
For the other part - If the proportion is 70:30 or even worse, where 70% are low quality sites linking to you - then yes.. PS - This 70% is basis my understanding of Link building field
However, if the number of quality or high DA/PR sites are more - then they may be offsetting the spam links. Have to look at the link quality and start building from good quality sites
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Link Building where link building is dead. Latest tactics in a land of content.
Hello, What is your latest link building techniques considering manual link building is basically dead, and you should really build good content to drive results. Link building has really become less important. It seems to be much more 10X content now. What would you recommend for basic link building considering this besides the 50 first Links video by Rand, which is excellent. Thanks, Bob
Link Building | | BobGW0 -
Tools to visually analyse link profiles?
Hey guys, Looking for tools which can visually look at a websites link profile, specifically from what link profile looks from a macro level. I know there is cognitive seo which can do this, but was wondering if there is anything else? Cheers. Hey guys,
Link Building | | jayoliverwright
Looking for tools which can visually look at a websites link profile, specifically from what link profile looks from a macro level.
I know there is cognitive seo which can do this, but was wondering if there is anything else?
Cheers.0 -
Site review : Should I finish on-page optimization before I start link building ??
Site Review am seeing slight improvement with a few keywords and have revamp site do i need to first on page before link building ? I was wondering do i need to complete all on page seo before i move on to link building & marketing content ?? Kindest regards, Stephen sportingdesires
Link Building | | sportingdesires0 -
Links from sites with iffy link profiles?
So the site http://www.cadenas.de/ appears to have good decent scores from the various Moz ranks, but when I check out the site in OSE there are a lot of really sketchy links that jump out, online pharmacy/drug type links. I should also add that the negative links are seemingly going to a weird blog deep in the site and only appear when I select all links to the root domain in OSE. Everything about the site appears very legitimate except for the link profile which has me nervous. Would you guys pursue a link from this site?
Link Building | | CJ50 -
Website title has domain name in SERPS but not in the website.
We are using the latest version of Wordpress for one of our website. Now every page in SERPS is like this: SEO Services, Link Building and Social Media - Oursite.com But when we look at our website's title tag its like this: <title>SEO Services, Link Building and Social Media</title> It's very strange, why the website's domain name is appended to the title in SERPS?? Any ideas? Thanks!
Link Building | | TheSEOGuy10 -
Finding links online that already exist as link juice based on search results
I'm curious about this, I can't find anything on the net that talks about it. I wrote an article about it on squidoo and have had no responses so I am thinking this is very rare subject. The question is I have done some backlink research with my competitors with linkdetective.com and found many links (even follow ones) related to sites that provide search results. Here are a link about what I am talking about as an example, I have found many more besides this one. http://search.lphant.com/es/webResults.html?q=free%20scrabble%20dictionary&hl=en&page=1&src=hmp_es&ref=1 My site appears in those results. When looking at the source there is no "nofollow". I found this page because linkdetective.com had this link listed pointing to my competitor. Are these valid backlinks? What I have been doing is adding these links to http://www.google.com/addurl so that Google knows about them. Is there something I am missing or are these valid?
Link Building | | cbielich0 -
Advetorial links
How do you scientifically value advertorial links. I have a site who is willing to buy advertorial in large online sites which will contain links. (I would prefer they invested in content on their own site). The DA on these sites is universally extremely strong. the PA of the examples I've seen is pretty low. The site has strong DA matching it's main competition and is performing pretty well in terms of ranking. Question: how do you value this kind of link in terms of the amount of £ the publications want to charge. Anybody have a formula or a logical process which would provide solid advice rather than don't infringe Google's T&C's which I've already mentioned to them. Any thoughts appreciated.
Link Building | | Shivvyt0 -
Which is better - A) links from multiple IP addresses, or B) Links with more associated social signals?
If you had to choose: A) 100 links contained in posts on 100 PR2* blogs, all on separate IP addresses, where none of the posts had associated social signals, or B) 100 links contained in posts within a single PR2* blog (single IP address), where each of the posts had 20 associated social signals, Which would you choose to increase your SERP performance? *I chose PR2 so that PageRank would not be a factor in the decision.
Link Building | | JohnScottDixon0