Google Webmaster Tools - When will the links go away!?
-
About 9 months back we thought having an extremely reputable company build our client some local citations would be a good idea. You definitely know this citation company, but I'll leave names out. Regardless, it's our mistake to cut corners.
Google Webmaster Tools quickly picked up these new citations and added them to the links section.
One of these citation spawned a complete mess of about 60K+ links on their network of sites through ridiculous subdomains of every state in the country and so many other domain variations. We immediately went into remove mode and had the site's webmaster take down the bad links from their site.
This process took about a month for outreach. The bad links (60K+) have not been on the spam site for well over 6 months but GWT still shows them in the "links to your site" section. Majestic, Bing, and OSE only displayed the bad links for a brief time.
Why is webmaster tools still showing these links after 6+ months? We typically see GWT update about every 2 weeks, a month tops. Any ideas? Could a changed robots.txt on the bad site prevent Google from updating the links displayed in GWT?
We have submitted to disavow, but Google replied with "no manual penalty". We even blasted the bad site with Fiverr links, in hopes that Google would re-crawl them. No luck with anything we do. We have patiently waited for way too long.
The rankings for this site got crushed on Google after these citations. How do we fix this? Should we worry about this? Any advice would really help. Thanks so much in advance.
-
Hi Sha,
Thank you for your response. I know Google can take some time to update, but the amount of time we've waited for Google to re-crawl seems a bit extreme. I went ahead and emailed the webmaster of the origin site to see if they would consider re-working their robots.txt file.
I really appreciate your response and helpful direction.
Dario
-
Hi Dana,
Thank you so much for your very helpful response. The Chartelligence app is very interesting, thanks for that nugget too! The rankings drop is right around the Panda 3/14 algo update, according to the app. We did run the entire site through copyscape just about a month ago. Maybe we need to focus some more efforts here? However, I almost positive these citations did the most damage. We will keep digging.
Really enjoyed the side note also
Thank you,
Dario
-
Thanks Shah. Dario, listen to Shah. She knows way more about this topic than I do. Her comments will be helpful I am sure.
-
Hi Dario,
Just one thing to remember - links/domains submitted via the disavow tool will not disappear from your GWMT list as long as they still exist. Google simply discounts them when ranking your site, so you shouldn't spend time checking to see if they have dropped out of the list.
If they have absolutely been removed, then yes it is quite possible that googlebot has been unable to crawl the site of origin (but if there are hundreds of sites then they would all have to have the same roadblock in place) for none to be crawled.
Dana is quite right in saying that Webmaster tools is notorious for updating slowly (and incorrectly at times) and she is absolutely on the money in advising that you need to try to nail down the cause of the rankings drop so you know what you are dealing with.
Hope that helps,
Sha
-
This is one of those situations where it seems like you've done everything right, but you still lose. It's something every SEO can Identify with I am sure.
Here are some things I would think about before deciding what to do next:
- Google Webmaster Tools "Links to Your Site" is notoriously slow, and has, even in recent months, been completely wrong for more than a month at a time. There was a period of about 6 weeks in the past year alone where it was reporting "0" links to many peoples' sites. Remember, it's a free tool, not without its own problems.
- Google let you know there's been no manual penalty....regardless, that doesn't mean of course that an algorithm change or Penguin refresh didn't chew up your site and spit it out. I'm sure you've already considered this.
- Do you know the approximate date that these 60,000 links showed up? I am thinking you can narrow it down pretty accurately. Try uploading that date into Chartelligence (it's a Chrome app) and then overlay that on your Google Analytics data. Does that date correspond with any significant changes in site metrics? Can you reasonably show causation?
My point on the last thought is: you want to be absolutely certain that it's those links that caused your rankings drop. You also want to know if that rankings drop significantly affected your site performance. It's very possible that it could have been something else, or a combination of several things that caused it, not just those links alone. If you can say, after considering all of the above, that you are 95% certain those links were the sole cause of the rankings problem, and the rankings drop is significantly impacting your site performance...then you will know more clearly how to proceed. I'm sorry it's not a better answer in terms of "do x" and you will "achieve y." But this is one of those situations when diagnosis can be difficult.
(Total side note: It's funny, you know, people go to doctors all of the time who have difficulty accurately diagnosing ailments, and they are pretty tolerant of that. They'll even take prescription medication from a doctor who might even say outright they don't know what the problem is, so they are going to try treating the symptoms. Even so, medicine is a highly-respected profession. Conversely, SEOs attempting to make accurate diagnosis and treat the symptoms of a problem are often maligned as being nothing more than "crafty guessers" because no one really knows the Google algorithm. I've had stakeholders refuse to follow my suggestions because I couldn't say with 100% certainty that my diagnosis was correct because, as one continually says: "You don't know Google's algorithm, do you?" He's gone so far as to completely throw out anything an SEO, SEO company or anyone associated with an SEO site like Moz has to say. If it doesn't come from Google directly, he views it all as bunk. This was a bit of a sidebar, but I just wanted to express that it can be very difficult to get a client to accept a diagnosis that's an "educated guess." We have a long way to go in building up our profession to the point where stakeholders value and trust our expertise.)
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Google Analytics
Looking at a client's analytics - one page doesn't seem to record 'average time on page' data (it just displays 0.00 despite it receiving traffic) This isn't an issue for the rest of the website's pages. Any idea? http://www.smilestyledental.co.uk/ppc/general-dentistry-at-smile-style.html thanks for any help!
Reporting & Analytics | | dentaldesign0 -
Cannonical Links?
Hi guys, I recently started using Moz Analytics's for my site and it has told me that the vast majority (perhaps all) of my pages have duplicate content because Google will be indexing the version both with and without www. in front of it as seperate domains. I've done some research and have come across a few suggestions of what to do, but i'm not sure which to go with or how to actually implement it. Any help, advice or suggestions would be greatly appreciated! Thanks
Reporting & Analytics | | Sandicliffe0 -
Bing vs Google Keyword Research
Hi All, I have carried out keyword research based on Google Analytics, Keyword Planner, competitors and various other toolsets.
Reporting & Analytics | | Mark_Ch
My research has been based on performance metrics favored towards Google.
I'm looking to research keyword traffic metrics and suggestions based on Bing Ads Intelligence. My Logic
I have compiled my master list based on Google metrics.
I will carry out Bing search traffic metrics based on my Google master list.
I will carry out Bing keyword suggestions based on my Google master list. My Questions
#1 Will my logic yield me any favorable benefits based on the high number of Google users vs Bing users
#2 Should Bing favor a particular keyword with high search traffic compared to Google, is there a fear that creating a 'seo user friendly website page' could dilute link juice based on the high Google users. Any other useful advice would be welcome. Regards Mark0 -
Localhost:4444 Showing Up in Google Analytics
Hello All, Lately in my Google Analytics account I have noticed a referral source labelled: localhost:4444 The number of visits is really high from this source, but I have no idea (no clue!) what it actually means. Can anyone shed some light on what this is about? Should I be creating some sort of filter to screen out this as a referral source (assuming it is not legitimate)? Many thanks in advance. Cheers!
Reporting & Analytics | | Robert-B0 -
Setting up Webmaster Tools correctly - naked domain DNS error and sub-domains question
I'm trying to get our domain (verdantly.com) set up correctly in Google Webmaster Tools. Currently, I have three "sites" setup: blog.verdantly.com (wordpress.com blog redirected to this subdomain) www.verdantly.com verdantly.com The subdomain blog and www show up without errors. However, the naked domain shows a DNS error. I've checked the DNS settings at the registrar and don't see any issues. So here are my questions: 1. Am I correct in setting up the naked domain AND the subdomains separately in Webmaster tools? 2. How do I track down / resolve the source of the DNS errors at the naked domain? Thanks!
Reporting & Analytics | | letsdothis0 -
301 redirect visible on Google.
Hello, This is a strange one for me. We have 301 redirected our .com domain to the .co.uk domain. The strange thing is that if you gogole the .com domain (theloanengine.com) there is a result with the website description. If you click on the result you are redirected tot he website homepage. One other thing: I've discovered this 301 issue because Google Analytics started to show me a few days ago referrals from the .com domain. I don't know if these things are connected. Cornel
Reporting & Analytics | | Cornel_Ilea0 -
Email campaigns. Should I link to my blog or to my site?
I have a client for who we write and post a daily blog article. The articles are optimized and linked to particular targeted content on his top level site. Now we are going to start e-marketing to his 3000+ website users to announce inventory changes and specials. My question is (from a SE standpoint) are we better off linking the e-mail content to the blog and introducing people to the blog (but adding an additional step for getting to the new inventory. Or are we better off putting a link in the HTML E-mail letter that we send out to both the blog and separately to the inventory section? Just to clarify, we wonder if the search engines would provide some additional authority for the extra blog traffic and thereby build the overall score of the blog & site. We are looking at the e-mail campaigns as a potential opportunity to impact SE scores not just awareness of new inventory. Thanks everyone!
Reporting & Analytics | | webindustry0 -
How to measure number of visits from Google News coming from Google Universal Search (NOT referral coming directly coming from news.google.com) with google analyitcs
I'm running a news site, and I have a problem of accuratly measuring which traffic is REALLY coming from google news. I analyzed a lot of individual articles and I come to the conclusion, that the visits, that come from the google news section in the universal search results are counted as "normal" search engine traffic in google analytics. So if you do a Google search for a topic that includes links from Google news, you don't get an accurate referral count. As an example, if you do a search for "eBay", incorporated into the page 1 search results you may also see Google news results as well.
Reporting & Analytics | | Mulle
If someone clicks on that Google news link that appears in Google search, it shows up in Google analytics as a referral from Google search, when it was actually from a Google news referral. I was already checking google analytics and google news help forums and searched SEO blogs for this. But I wasn't able to find a working solution. Can anybody help me out with this problem? Thanks so much, Matthias0