City in title tag hurt Local Search?
-
Big city A is the target optimization for services.
Suburb city B is the location of the business.
Will having big city A in the title tag of pages confuse the NAP consistency and local SEO for the site?
-
It's my pleasure, Jason. Good luck to you with the work ahead!
-
Thank you for the awesomely detailed response Miriam! That helps a ton
-
Hi Jason,
I should have been more clear about this. I'm sorry. Let me provide a little more detail.
In my experience, most local business websites have some basic pages, regardless of whether the business is a dental clinic, or a legal firm or a restaurant. Most feature the following pages;
-
Home
-
About
-
Contact Us
On these pages, I would be adamant about ensuring that the optimization of the titles, tags and text matches the core business NAP (name, address, phone). So, if the business is physically located in Jamestown, then these pages should reflect this in every way possible so that when humans and search engine bots hit these pages, the content there matches the content you are publishing on your various local business listings, in terms of geography.
Beyond these three basic pages, most local businesses will also have a set of service/product description pages. Here, we enter some grey area, because the content and optimization of these pages will be dictated by the needs/goals of the unique business. Some possible choices:
-
If the business does serve clients in its city of location, then it's a no-brainer to optimize the product/service pages for this geo term. In other words, instead of just optimizing for 'teeth whitening', you would be optimizing for 'teeth whitening in jamestown' and such variants.
-
If the business does not serve clients in its city of location, then these pages could be optimized for the neighboring city where it does serve.
-
If the business provides services in multiple cities with equivalent values, then you could either optimize the core service/product pages for the city of location (my first choice) with the plan to build additional content for other cities, or, you could not use geo terms at all in the optimization of these pages (a somewhat iffy choice) and rely on 'cities we serve' pages to stand in for having optimized the actual product/service pages.
There may be other choices, because there are always little nuances to each businesses, but what I've described above are the most common approaches.
Now, in terms of building city landing pages for multiple service cities, I'd like to point you to an article I wrote on this some time back that many people told me really helped them understand their options. Here we go:
The Nitty Gritty of City Landing Pages for Local Businesses
Of course, a local business website will have other pages like testimonials pages, work with us pages, etc., on each one of which you'll be making a nuanced decision in regards to which keyword terms are targeted.
I hope I've provided some further insight here and that the article I've linked to will provide even more.
-
-
Hi Miriam,
Thank you for the response. That is very helpful!
When you say: "Then, build additional content on the website for additional target cities and try to build as much authority surrounding it as possible, in hopes that it will be able to achieve organic visibility." Is this typically landing pages or can it be anywhere on the website outside of basic page?
I guess I am struggling to grasp the concept of what is a "basic page" that should stay consistent with the NAP, vs what page is ok to use to try and gain organic search target city.
-
Hi Jason,
In Google's world, Local Search hinges on physical address, even for SABs (service area businesses). This means that, regardless of your on-page optimization, your business is most likely to achieve local pack rankings for its city of location - not for a different city where you are not physically located. While I'm not sure from your description whether your business is brick-and-mortar (like a dentist located in the suburbs who wishes to gain clients from the neighboring major city) or is an SAB (like a plumber located in the suburbs who travels to the neighboring big city to make house calls), it doesn't really matter. Google's bias toward physical location dictates that most local businesses must go for local rankings for their city of location and organic rankings for any other city.
Because of this, the approach that makes most sense to me is to optimize the basic pages of the website (home, about, contact) for the city of location, because you want these pages to reinforce Google's belief in the validity of the NAP (name, address, phone number) you have included on your Google+ Local page. The goal here is to achieve the highest possible local rankings for the city of location, because this is what Google cares about most.
Then, build additional content on the website for additional target cities and try to build as much authority surrounding it as possible, in hopes that it will be able to achieve organic visibility.
This would be my approach, as I feel it clearly delineates both physical location and target cities.
-
Thanks Eric! Would you suggest putting the larger metro are in the title tag and mentioning it later in the page OR just keeping the nap consistent using the physical address's city and trusting that Google will understand that the suburb serves the metro area?
-
Whenever working on local search engine rankings, I try to be as consistent as possible when it comes to the NAP (Name, Address, Phone Number) data. If you were to put the name of a larger city in the title tag (I am assuming it is in the same metro area), you'll need to mention that larger city in copy on the page. If you just keyword stuff the larger city name in the title tag and don't make it part of a larger strategy (such as getting anchor text links to the site with that city name pointing to your site), then you won't be successful.
Google knows that smaller cities are a part of a larger city or metro area, and usually it isn't a problem with the NAP data being confused. When you set up the Google Plus Local listing, make sure you specify that you serve customers in that same metro area that you're including in the Title Tag.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Local Strategy for Multiple Domain Integration
Hello, We are a locally driven business with two locations. Currently, each location has its own local site and are linked to from our central domain (3 domains total). We are discussing whether we should integrate the local sites into location pages on our core domain. However, we would also prefer to keep the ‘local’ domains live. Is this a viable strategy and what would we need to do to ensure the local sites won’t cannibalize our efforts with the main domain? Also, should we remove the contact information on those local sites to avoid NAP issues? The other option would be to build out the local domains but that could raise concerns over budget and potentially expanding into the future. And we would like the main domain to take presendence. A few additional notes on this: Each location has its own brand name and contact information. Traffic across all 3 sites is about the same. We are also considering using silos with sub-folders to build out local service pages. We understand how to set up location pages but are asking more in terms of overall strategy and ideal way to position all 3 sites. Any help or insight would be very appreciated. Thank you in advance.
Local Website Optimization | | Ben-R
Best,0 -
Local Search ( Automotive Vertical ) One Targeted Landing Page Listed Twice In Navigation
NOT talking about the same page being linked to twice Talking about One (1) (landing) page Being Listed Twice In Navigation. Looking for a definitive answer that there is NO negative SEO ( or negative anything ) to put the same page in your site's Navigation Bar ... twice (or more than once) Can't find anything written that there is anything to consider or be concerned with, but, thought I'd ask. I'm a newERbie, but not a NEWbie...have 2.5 years experience in local, on-page SEO...but only know what I know Maybe I should know this, but, I don't. E.g. Home New Cars Used Cars Special Offers Service Finance About Us PickUps PickUps This is JUST an example, but, we have multiple occurences, let's say, Trade-In-Value ... in two places. One page, two locations in navigation. I have SEEN it being done, 'all the time', but now, when I went to do it with a little bit of a different rationale, I was questioned about ' ... is this okay for SEO ' I THINK yes But, I want to KNOW yes ... it is ok.
Local Website Optimization | | GaryT_SEO0 -
Ranking nationally but not locally
Hi everyone, I'm working with a client that has a strange situation. He's ranking for his target keyword on a national level but when searching locally, he's in the 100s (see attached). Any idea what could be going on here? He did have an old domain that got hacked that is redirecting to his current domain. Thanks, Tim lmSSXdT
Local Website Optimization | | TimKelsey0 -
Is my competitor doing something blackhat? - Cannot only access pages via serps , not from website navigation /search
Hi Mozzers, One of my competitors uses a trick whereby they have a number of different sitemaps containing location specific urls for their most popular categories on their eCommerce store. It's quite obvious that they are trying to rank for keyword <location>and from what I am see, you cant to any of these pages from their website navigation or search , so it's like these pages are separated from the main site in terms of accessing them but you can access the main website pages/navigation the other way round (i.e if you select one of the pages from finding it in serps) </location> I know that google doesn't really like anything you can't access from the main website but would you class this as blackhat ? / cheating etc ... They do tend to rank quite well for these alot of the pages and it hasn't seem to have affected pages on their main website in terms of rankings. I am just wondering , if it's worth us doing similar as google hasn't penalised them by the looks of things.. thanks Pete
Local Website Optimization | | PeteC120 -
Call Tracking, DNI Script & Local SEO
Hi Moz! I've been reading about this a lot more lately - and it doesn't seem like there's exactly a method that Google (or other search engines) would consider to be "best practices". The closest I've come to getting some clarity are these Blumenthals articles - http://blumenthals.com/blog/2013/05/14/a-guide-to-call-tracking-and-local/ & the follow-up piece from CallRail - http://blumenthals.com/blog/2014/11/25/guide-to-using-call-tracking-for-local-search/. Assuming a similar goal of using an existing phone number with a solid foundation in the local search ecosystem, and to create the ability to track how many calls are coming organically (not PPC or other paid platform) to the business directly from the website for an average SMB. For now, let's also assume we're also not interested in screening the calls, or evaluating customer interaction with the staff - I would love to hear from anyone who has implemented the DNI call tracking info for a website. Were there negative effects on Local SEO? Did the value of the information (# of calls/month) outweigh any local search conflicts? If I was deploying this today, it seems like the blueprint for including DNI script, while mitigating risk for losing local search visibility might go something like this: Hire reputable call-tracking service, ensure DNI will match geographic area-code & be "clean" numbers Insert DNI script on key pages on site Maintain original phone number (non-DNI) on footer, within Schema & on Contact page of the site ?? Profit Ok, those last 2 bullet points aren't as important, but I would be curious where other marketers land on this issue, as I think there's not a general consensus at this point. Thanks everyone!
Local Website Optimization | | Etna1 -
URL Keyword stuffing. service-city.com/product-service-city/ vs. service-city.com/product/
For example: tailoring-london.com/suits-tailoring-london/ or tailoring-london.com/suits/ The main keyword being targeted here is "suit tailoring london". The home page's main keyword is "tailoring london". Would love to hear your opinions. Many thanks 🙂
Local Website Optimization | | LondonAli0 -
Localize Homepage, or service pages?
Hi so I am curious if a homepage may carry the most link juice, then if you service an entire state, do you include the state name as a keyword in your homepage title to get noticed, or the company brand, resulting in adding service area pages to cater to unique each city that you service? I am just not sure if Google is smart enough to know you service a state? I have my local page with a service area, but is this all I need? So I would not need to add a state name. Like I build horse barns, pole barns, metal buildings, and indoor riding arenas. So I am curious if you would do a title tag like Colorado Builders - Barns, Buildings, and Arenas Or maybe Colorado at the end? Or not at all Thanks for any tips.
Local Website Optimization | | asbchris0 -
Separate Domains for Different Locations (in Different Cities)
We are in the process of building a new website for a client with locations in Tucson and Phoenix. Currently, they have one website that encompasses all locations, however, we are going to build them location specific websites (as many of the services are different between locations). Now my question is, as far as SEO goes, which one of these options would be the best? Option 1: Have separate domain names for each location. For example, StevesPetTucson.com and StevesPetPhoenix.com. _Pros: Easy to target specific, local keywords. Better looking domains. _ _Cons: Splits backlinks between two domains. _ Option 2: Setup StevesPet.com/Phoenix and StevesPet.com/Tucson. Pros: Keeps all backlinks pointing to one root domain. Note: We are going to use seperate WordPress installs for both websites, regardless of how we setup the domains. As we will be using different templates, menus and so on, we found this to be the best option. Thanks for any advice!
Local Website Optimization | | McFaddenGavender1