Keyword stuffing in
-
Having a discussion with my boss over whether the following page is over-saturated (stuffed) with keywords in the element: http://www.godreamvacations.com/BarceloHotels -- We implemented the description and keyword tag text back in 2010 when the boss gave me the text. Anyone have any good responses to the bosses' response (below)?
"These are the ones (pages) that are actually working wonderfully well on Bing. At the time, I researched the optimal number of characters and tried to really follow all that was suggested by SEO experts. As far as the keywords, I would say you could remove the ones without the “s”, for example, take out “Barcelo Hotel” and leave “Barcelo Hotels” I think this is all relevant to what is found on the page. I don’t know what they would expect us to do differently than this. Do you? What is your MOZ currently saying is the optimal number of characters for a Title?"
Any responses would be appreciated. Am I wrong in saying it's "stuffed" and looks spammy? What would you tell your boss?
-
Awesome!
Thank you!
-
Here's a video from Google Webmaster Tools confirming that the meta keywords tag is not used for ranking: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/09/google-does-not-use-keywords-meta-tag.html
The only thing anyone might use a meta keywords tag for these days is your competitors scraping your tags to see which keywords you're targeting on which page!
-
I like your tip about reading it out loud. That has been extremely helpful in eliminating spammy material from my sites.
I've been hearing two opposing views on the meta keywords tag. Some say they are important and some say don't use them at all. I've made a compromise by using them sparingly and not depending on them for anything. Do you have some suggestions on more reliable research I can do on the subject?
Thanks!
-
I would agree that you use the word "Barcelo" more times than is necessary in a title tag. A good rule of thumb for keyword stuffing: read it out loud. If it sounds crazy, you're probably using the keyword too much. Eric's suggestion for a title tag is a good one, and you could really do anything along that line. It looks like the phrase you're targeting most with that page is "Barcelo Hotel Reviews" so I'd begin the title tag with that phrase. Other words like Resorts will still get some association with the word Barcelo, so there's no need to repeat it.
Your title tag is also currently targeting way too many phrases. It's best to target only one or two key phrases on any given page - it's difficult for a page to rank for more than that. Are there other pages on your site that you could use to target some of these phrases?
It sounds like your boss has some ego built in to those title tags, so maybe start out by saying that 2010 was a long time ago (4 years is like a million years in Internet time) and SEO best practices have updated since then. The best practice now would be to use your keyword at the beginning of the title tag, MAYBE use a secondary keyword if you can work it in in natural-sounding language, and keep it to under about 70 characters.
As for the meta description, ABSOLUTELY add one of those - like Eric points out, your SERP result is a little advertisement for your page and the description tag is another way to target your keywords and convince users to click. Having a description tag also means you have more control over what displays when people share your page in social media. As for the meta keywords tag, I'd dispense with those altogether - they're completely worthless at best and may be a weak spam signal at worst.
-
This title tag violates many of SEO best practices.
1- There are 5 dashes separating the keywords.
I was taught that using the same word, symbol, or phrase more than 3 times is a no no.2- It is too long: Keep it under 70 characters so the entire title tag displays on SERPs. The way you have it now, the title tag will get the ellipse treatment and will be cut off.
3- You use the word Barcelo 7 times in the title tag.
Red flag! Warning! Be careful. This is definitely keyword stuffing and not necessary to get Google's attention. Unless of course your going for negative attention.4- You do not have a meta description at all:
Write a brief sentence that explains the page. This will show directly under your title tag and is also incredibly important for rank factors as well as conveying the message of the page. Your description should include the keywords in your title tag.Think of your title tag as an advertisement. Sure, it is used by Google to determine the focus of the page, but it is also the first thing a potential customer will see when your result comes up.
Here is how I would change this title tag and the meta description i would used for this page.
Title Tag: Barcelo Hotel Reviews | Barcelo Resorts | Mexico, Dominican Republic
Meta Description: Read our reviews or get more information on Barcelo Hotels and Resorts in Mexico, the Dominican Republic and Costa Rica.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Have you ever changed the logo anchor text from "logo" to "keyword"? How Google considers?
Hi all, We know that generally logo with the website homepage link is the first link crawled by Google and other search engines. Can we change the anchor text from "logo" to "keyword"? Have any one tried or seen others doing? How Google considers it? Thanks
Algorithm Updates | | vtmoz1 -
Help - Losing Ranking on Plural Keywords in Google
Help! I'm losing keyword rankings for certain keywords - but still ranking well on others. The trend I can see is that we're losing rankings on plurals, so this page https://www.key.co.uk/en/key/platform-trolleys-trucks Used to rank well for: platform trolleys
Algorithm Updates | | BeckyKey
platform trucks
flat bed trolleys But now only ranks well for platform trolley flat bed trolleys platform truck I have seen a large number of keywords drop out - they're not hitting traffic massively yet, but conversions are dropping - help! I;m struggling to find the cause!0 -
Keyword optimisation: Google's eyes before users' eyes?
Hi all, So the default and ultimate suggestion about how to rank a page high is to get favoured by users, so by the Google. But if write content in favour of users, it may miss out the keywords or will not have much keyword density and variety of keywords to get in to Google's eyes. Then we may appear around 3rd page; then how do we get into top slots? I can see some top results without even a single mention of the keyword they are ranking for. How that would be possible? Thanks
Algorithm Updates | | vtmoz0 -
Should plural keyword variations get their own targeted pages?
I am in the middle of changing a website from targeting just a single keyword on all pages to instead having each page target its own keyword/phrase. However, I'm a little conflicted on whether or not plural forms and other suffix (-ing) variations are different enough to get their own pages. SERP show different results for each keyword searched. Also, relevancy reports for the keywords score some differently and some the same. Is it best to instead use these as secondary and third level keywords on the same page as the main keyword for a page? See example below: OPTION A (Use each for different pages): Page 1 - Construction Fence Page 2 - Construction Fences Page 3 - Construction Fencing Page 4 - Construction Site Fence Page 5 - Construction Site Fences Page 6 - Construction Site Fencing ... OPTION B (Use as variations on same page): Page 1 - Construction Fence, Construction Fences, Construction Fencing Page 2 - Construction Site Fence, Construction Site Fences, Site Construction Fencing ... Any help is greatly appreciated. Thanks!
Algorithm Updates | | pac-cooper0 -
Will we no longer need Location + Keyword? Do we even need it at all?
Prepare yourselves. This is a long question. With the rise of schema and Google Local+, do you think Google will now have enough data about where a business is located, so that when someone searches for, a keyword such as "Atlanta Hyundai dealers" a business in Atlanta that's website: has been properly marked up with schema (or microdata for business location) has claimed its Google Local+ has done enough downstream work in Local Search listings for its NAP (name, address, phone number) will no longer have to incorporate variations of "Atlanta Hyundai dealers" in the text on the website? Could they just write enough great content about how they're a Hyundai dealership without the abuse of the Atlanta portion? Or if they're in Boston and they're a dentist or lawyer, could the content be just about the services they provided without so much emphasis tied to location? I'm talking about removing the location of the business from the text in all places other than the schema markup or the contact page on the website. Maybe still keep a main location in the title tags or meta description if it would benefit the customer. I work in an industry where location + keywords has reached such a point of saturation, that it makes the text on the website read very poorly, and I'd like to learn more about alternate methods to keep the text more pure, read better and still achieve the same success when it comes to local search. Also, I haven't seen other sites penalized for all the location stuffing on their websites, which is bizarre because it reads so spammy you can't recognize where the geotargeted keywords end and where the regular text begins. I've been working gradually in this general direction (more emphasis on NAP, researching schema, and vastly improving the content on clients' websites so it's not so heavy with geo-targeted keywords). I also ask because though the niche I work in is still pretty hell-bent on using geo-targeted keywords, whenever I check Analytics, the majority of traffic is branded and geo-targeted keywords make up only a small fraction of traffic. Any thoughts? What are other people doing in this regard?
Algorithm Updates | | EEE30 -
Queries vs Keywords
Can anyone clarify why my list of queries from google webmaster tools varies so much from the keywords that have resulted in clicks? I have a site that, according to Google analytics, has had clicks from 125 key phrases where as in webmaster tools (via analytics) allegedly only 17 queries have resulted in clicks. Is it becuase GA can't handle less than 5 clicks from the webmaster data or is it something else I am missing? The site I am researching for has very little traffic from other search engines.
Algorithm Updates | | SoundinTheory0 -
How to find which keywords bring traffic to a particular page on my website ?
I have been using Google Analytics and SEOMoz tools for a while now. I know which are my top landing pages and some of the keywords which bring me traffic. But I don't know which are the top searched keywords for my website as these are "not provided" by Google Analytics. More importantly, I want to know which keywords are directing traffic to a particular page on my website. Can anyone help ?
Algorithm Updates | | EricMoore0 -
With Google's Location Based Searches, Should I Include a City Name with My Keywords?
What I mean is when you search on Google it seems to pull information by your location so would it be helpful including the city name + keyword still for SEO or would it be just as helpful using just the keyword? For example, a client is in Alexandria, VA and has a computer repair shop so would "Alexandria computer repair" be as good or better than "computer repair"? Just a little curious. Thanks!
Algorithm Updates | | CodyOelker-AMICreativeStudio2