Acquired Old, Bad Content Site That Ranks Great. Redirect to Content on My Site?
-
Hello. my company acquired another website. This website is very old, the content within is decent at best, but still manages to rank very well for valuable phrases. Currently, we're leaving the entire site active on its own for its brand, but i'd like to at least redirect some of the content back to our main website. I can't justify spending the time to create improved content on that site and not our main site though.
What would be the best practice here?
1. Cross-domain canonical - and build the new content on our main website?
2. 301 Redirect Old Article to New Location containing better article
3. Leave the content where it is - you won't be able to transfer the ranking across domain.
Thanks for your input.
-
Thanks Andy and Travis -
Yeah, I think the enhancement and/or citation route is probably the safest for us. Thanks for your help!
-
It would be best to lightly revamp the poor content on site that is ranking for the important key terms you are targeting. In doing so why not just write a lead in or make reference to something on your main website to encourage click through traffic. By doing this, you will likely help to maintain the good rankings for the new 'junk' site while generating referral traffic to your main site. Additionally, a site ranking well for your target terms linking to your main site could be beneficial to your rankings.
-
Hi Blenny,
What you have to think abut is that Google say never lead someone to a page, only for them to be redirected to somewhere they don't expect. Never try to bypass that.
However, there is no reason not to add some annotation to the post and link this to your current site, or even to a better blog post. Perhaps move away from links and just use co-citations and mentions.
-Andy
-
Thanks Bill -
You're exactly right - I'm definitely not considering redirecting the entire site for the reasons you point out - there ARE some shady practices to the product pages in particular.
What I'm wondering though is if I can at least gleam some content authority from individual articles and such?
-
Blenny, I would be extremely cautious about redirecting another site to your site, even if it's ranking well now. There are a lot of issues that you need to consider, especially given the fact that all of the factors (links, history, content issues, etc.) are going to be passed on to the new site.
You'll need to look at the site's link profile in depth to make sure that the site isn't ranking well for a particular reason. The site could be ranking well right now because of certain links to the site: but Google, for example, has not penalized those links yet. I've seen sites that have a lot of low quality links that help a site rank: but when Google gets around to re-analyzing the site (i.e., Google Penguin), the site then literally falls out of the rankings and becomes penalized.
If it's a new site that you recently bought, are you sure the former site owner didn't just pump up the site's rankings in order to sell it? Perhaps they used techniques that would eventually get the site penalized?
I don't like to sound pessimistic here, but you have to look in depth into the site before you redirect it to your current site. Your current site could end up banned or could end up with a penalty, especially given the fact that you say that the content isn't that great.
-
Just to clarify the whole 'bad' content thing. The content is outdated but was good in its day..and did acquire links. It needs updated and improved..which I am prepared to do.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Duplicate content in sidebar
Hi guys. So I have a few sentences (about 50 words) of duplicate content across all pages of my website (this is a repeatable text in sidebar). Each page of my website contains about 1300 words (unique content) in total, and 50 words of duplicate content in sidebar. Does having a duplicate content of this length in sidebar affect the rankings of my website in any way? Thank you so much for your replies.
On-Page Optimization | | AslanBarselinov1 -
Horrible ranking for hundreds of content pages
We have hundreds of pages of restaurant reviews (each is 100% original content) on our site (for example, here is a list of many of the content pages: https://www.rewards21.com/articles). The PA of almost every page is 1 (ouch). Doing even the most long-tail Google search doesn't bring up one of those pages (even if I include our company name in the search string). I'm certain we have lots of room to improve SEO, but not even seeing the pages come up for even the most long-tail search has me concerned... Our site used to be on Wordpress many months ago and many of these pages ranked fine..ever since switching away from Wordpress, we've not made any SEO progress. Am wondering if something major is "broken" with our site SEO...
On-Page Optimization | | r210 -
Is it better to create more pages of content or expand on current pages of content?
I am assuming that one way of improving the rankings of current pages will be to create more content on the keywords used... should this be an expansion of the content on current pages I am optimising for a keyword or is it better to keep creating new pages and if we are creating new pages is it best to use an extension of the keyword on the new page – for example if we are optimising one page for ‘does voltage optimisation work’ would it then be worth creating a page optimised for ‘does voltage optimisation work in hotels’ for example and so on? I am guessing maybe both might help, this is just a question I have had from one of my clients.
On-Page Optimization | | TWSI1 -
Page rank check
Hello everyone, How long should I wait to see if page rank for optimized pages have improved? cheers
On-Page Optimization | | PremioOscar0 -
Static content VS Dynamic changing content what is best
We have collected a lot of reviews and we want to use them on our Categories pages. We are going to be updating the top 6 reviews per categories every 4 days. There will be another page to see all of the reviews. Is there any advantage to have the reviews static for 1 or 2 weeks vs. having unique new ones pulled from the data base every time the page is refreshed? We know there is an advantage if we keep them on the page forever with long tail; however, we have created a new page with all of the reviews they can go to.
On-Page Optimization | | DoRM0 -
Has a product portfolio bad (direct) influence on rankings because of less relevant content?
Hey SEO's, I'm wondering if a bad product portfolio of a e-commerce website has an influence (direct) on the rankings because of less relevant content. To show you what I'm thinking about, look at these two situations: 1. E-Commerce website with 3.000 products from different brands (all top brands) but the products itself are not quite up to date 2. E-Comerce website with 3.000 products from differend brands (all top brands) but these products contain allways the top seller items. Is it possible, that Google has an index for "fresh content" or "highly demanded content" or something like this which has direct influence on the ranking? I ask this question besides the fact, that its of course allways better to have the top sellers in a portfolio than not have. But the big thing is: What to do if you don't know which products are best, or you just don't get them from your retailers or some other reason... For Google & Co. its harmfull (I guess) to put a e-commerce website without top-seller products into the top-rankings with high competition!? Any ideas on that?
On-Page Optimization | | videriconcept0 -
Updating Old Posts
I have ~ 45 posts that I wrote 2-3 years ago that need to be updated with current information and I'm wondering if I should: Just update them Update them and change the date published to present day Publish the updated info. as a completely new post other? ... and why. I've read so many conflicting thoughts on this, really curious to hear what other Pro members think (or would do if it were them). To give a little more background, the topics of the posts are various retirement communities. Things that may have changed could be they added new amenities, new home types, prices, number of homes still available, etc. I have one page of my site that acts as sort of a directory linking to an article(post) for each community, but worried if I add all the updates as new posts I'll have to link to separate articles about each community which doesn't really make things too friendly for the reader. They want to know about what's going on with each community now...not back 3 years ago. Thoughts? Suggestions? Many thanks! Ryan
On-Page Optimization | | ryanerisman0 -
Duplicate content on area specific sites
I have created some websites for my company Dor-2-Dor and there is a main website where all of the information across the board is on (www.dor2dor.com) but I also have area specific sites which are for our franchisees who run certain areas around the country (www.swansea.dor2dor.com or www.oxford.dor2dor.com) The problem is that the content that is on a lot of the pages is the same on all of them for instance our faq's page, special offers etc. What is the best way to get these pages to rank well and not have the duplicate content issues and be ranked down by search engines? Any help will be greatly received.
On-Page Optimization | | D2DWeb0