Moz Q&A is closed.
After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.
Lots of Listing Pages with Thin Content on Real Estate Web Site-Best to Set them to No-Index?
-
Greetings Moz Community:
As a commercial real estate broker in Manhattan I run a web site with over 600 pages. Basically the pages are organized in the following categories:
1. Neighborhoods (Example:http://www.nyc-officespace-leader.com/neighborhoods/midtown-manhattan) 25 PAGES Low bounce rate
2. Types of Space (Example:http://www.nyc-officespace-leader.com/commercial-space/loft-space)
15 PAGES Low bounce rate.3. Blog (Example:http://www.nyc-officespace-leader.com/blog/how-long-does-leasing-process-take
30 PAGES Medium/high bounce rate4. Services (Example:http://www.nyc-officespace-leader.com/brokerage-services/relocate-to-new-office-space) High bounce rate
3 PAGES5. About Us (Example:http://www.nyc-officespace-leader.com/about-us/what-we-do
4 PAGES High bounce rate6. Listings (Example:http://www.nyc-officespace-leader.com/listings/305-fifth-avenue-office-suite-1340sf)
300 PAGES High bounce rate (65%), thin content7. Buildings (Example:http://www.nyc-officespace-leader.com/928-broadway
300 PAGES Very high bounce rate (exceeding 75%)Most of the listing pages do not have more than 100 words. My SEO firm is advising me to set them "No-Index, Follow". They believe the thin content could be hurting me.
Is this an acceptable strategy? I am concerned that when Google detects 300 pages set to "No-Follow" they could interpret this as the site seeking to hide something and penalize us.
Also, the building pages have a low click thru rate. Would it make sense to set them to "No-Follow" as well?
Basically, would it increase authority in Google's eyes if we set pages that have thin content and/or low click thru rates to "No-Follow"?
Any harm in doing this for about half the pages on the site?
I might add that while I don't suffer from any manual penalty volume has gone down substantially in the last month. We upgraded the site in early June and somehow 175 pages were submitted to Google that should not have been indexed. A removal request has been made for those pages. Prior to that we were hit by Panda in April 2012 with search volume dropping from about 7,000 per month to 3,000 per month. Volume had increased back to 4,500 by April this year only to start tanking again. It was down to 3,600 in June. About 30 toxic links were removed in late April and a disavow file was submitted with Google in late April for removal of links from 80 toxic domains.
Thanks in advance for your responses!! Alan
-
Is there a risk to no-indexing the listing pages? Thanks, Alan
-
Hi Benjamin:
I think your suggestions are excellent. However from a practical point of view there are 350 listings so it is a lot of work to beef them all up.
Once visitors are on the site and they run listing searches, the click thru rate is pretty good, but the problem is more with Google, that many listing are not indexed and they don't generate many clicks.
My SEO company suggests deindexing them because they don't generate much click thru and the high bounce rate may be harming our overall indexing. They are of the opinion that it is best to focus on improving content on categories of pages that have a high click thru rate like neighborhoods and types of space, deindexing listings (I don't know how 350 no indexes would look to Google) and displaying the listings in more appealing manner like in lists and maps.
As for video, do you think that would attract more interest than photos?
Thanks,Alan
-
Hi Prestashop:
I am a commercial real estate broker, so no Zillow or anything comparable in my industry.
If I were to beef up the listing content, would 200-300 words be enough? Should I add some H2 tags and headings?
There are 350 listings, so it is a lot of work if it going to be professionally written.
Thanks,
Alan -
Adding the Zillow api would be a once only thing that would add a lot of value and original content to the pages. I personally would look into that.
-
Also, try adding something unique to your listing. Take 5 minutes and write about the building, area, things to do in that neighborhood - stuff off the top of your head that would be useful to a searcher. That makes you the authority, will make your content more apt to be socially bookmarked and gives you some unique elements to the page. Also try loading a video of the listing if it is yours.
-
I wouldn't build out elaborate content for the property listing pages. I would however build out elaborate content in my website blog about Manhattan real estate, where I discuss the market, types of housing, moving tips, renters insurance, etc - things helpful to the person looking to buy, rent or sell - and that you can keep on your site as evergreen content. Do that first before you start no indexing listing pages. Keep the meta data on the listing pages unique to your site. google knows catalog sites will have the same short description, etc. Your real traffic will come from the content you create in your blog that relate to the listings in your catalog. Then do internal linking from the blog posts to the listing pages. If you have an admin section or other part of the site you do not want people to find in organic search, then no index those....but I wouldnt tell google not to index my product inventory.
-
Thanks Prestashop, Benjamin, Devanur!In principal I understand it is better to beef up content, however the listings get rented quickly. They take 30-60 minutes each to create these pages between the content, tags and photos.
They all get rented within a few weeks to a few months, there is major turn over. So it would be extremely labor intensive to write elaborate content for each.
Furthermore it means that it makes it very difficult to add a lot of listings because of the amount of content if I have to take ranking and amount of content into account each time I write a listing.
Is there any risk that Google would penalize the site by setting these listings to "No-Index"? It would make thing easier.
It may make more sense to add content to the building pages as they are permanent and there are only 150 of them.
Thoughts??
Thanks,
Alan -
I agree. Do you have a blog on your site? If not, I would create one and load content there over the category listing pages. There are tons of real estate sites (catalog sites) that share the same listing content.
Just make sure you have unique page meta data and h1's. Then beef up your site with high quality content about your area, 800+ words each.
But I would not no index / no follow the listings pages.
-
Lesley is absolutely correct. I would never want to remove my pages from Google there by reducing the number of indexed pages (as the website has only about 600 pages), but would beef them up with unique and sizeable content of at least around 500 words each.
-
Do I think that Google will see anything wrong with the no-index'd pages? No, that is pretty much what they are asking for. Would I handle it that way? No, not really.
Listings and buildings seem to be the areas that need to be worked on from what you listed above. This is what I would do. I would have someone write text for each listing. It might seem like a big cost up front, but in the end it evens out. Depending on the current on page non duplicate content (by duplicate content I mean items that are global on the site such as navigation, footer text, links in the footer, side bar, and other things that are on every page) I would put at least 500 words of original content on every page.
This will serve two purposes in my mind, real estate is high in NY, I am not really going to check out a site that does not have enough information on it. The second is to help in the search engines. I do a lot of ecommerce work and one thing I tell my clients is that their current revenues can be increased without doing any SEO at all. Turn the bounces into buyers. Traffic does nothing for a site, conversions mean everything.
I am just shooting off the hip and I could be totally wrong, but I am guessing you are using Wordpress since it is so common. I would get someone to make a plugin so that you can "emulate" content. Sounds pretty shady, but at the same time it adds value.
Think of it this way, you can have a plugin developed where (if you are using Wordpress, or whatever CMS) that on the listing you enter the address. Once that is entered, you load content from Zillow. Content like sale dates on the location, school information, neighborhood info, ect. (you can see a complete list here http://www.zillow.com/howto/api/APIBenefits.htm ) That content will help thicken up your content and enrich the site to your viewers. At the same time I would also have someone rewrite and wordify the 100 word descriptions on the pages too.
The same thing basically for the buildings pages. If the buildings pages are like a landing page and on the page you have linked all of the different suites or condos in the building, I would handle it differently. I would have building descriptions written and if needed spin them, not using a program, but spin them by hand. Hire someone that writes to do it. You could even do it as broad as per borough. Like write one description per borough then hire someone (US native english speaker, college students work for cheap) to rewrite the same couple paragraphs with different wording, adding and taking away from it several dozen times.
That is what I would recommend. The loading cost at this point might be high, but the maintenance cost in the end will be low, you might only be sending out 10 listings a month for like $50 to be rewritten.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
What type of website is best for seo.
I need a new website for my health insurance business. What type is best for SEO? Many thanks
Web Design | | laurentjb0 -
Why are there lots of 404s after setting up CDN?
I just setup Cloudfront CDN through W3 Total Cache. Everything looks good but there is one problem that I have encountered: After activating the CDN none of the images are available at the older image URLs and they are throwing a 404 error. Let me give you an example for this: 1. Before I setup the CDN, let's say an image was available at http://example.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/leap-of-faith.jpg 2. After I setup the CDN, the image is available at http://cdn.example.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/leap-of-faith.jpg and the good part is the URLs in the blog posts where this image was attached is updated to reflect the above mentioned URL. But the problem is that when visit the older URL of the image (which is what Google has crawled earlier, I get a 404 error). Can you help me how to avoid this problem? Ravi C
Web Design | | stj0 -
Anyone using CloudFlare on multiple sites?
We are considering using CloudFlare as a CDN for a large group of sites. The fees are $5 to $200 depending on many factors. We tried the free trial on one site and were impressed with the results. I am wondering if any of you have any longer term experience with this and performance metrics, etc.
Web Design | | RobertFisher1 -
Multi-page articles, pagination, best practice...
A couple months ago we mitigated a 12-year-old site -- about 2,000 pages -- to WordPress.
Web Design | | jmueller0823
The transition was smooth (301 redirects), we haven't lost much search juice. We have about 75 multi-page articles (posts); we're using a plugin (Organize Series) to manage the pagination. On the old site, all of the pages in the series had the same title. I've since heard this is not a good SEO practice (duplicate titles). The url's were the same too, with a 'number' (designating the page number) appended to the title text. Here's my question: 1. Is there a best practice for titles & url's of multi-page articles? Let's say we have an article named: 'This is an Article' ... What if I name the pages like this:
-- This is an Article, Page 1
-- This is an Article, Page 2
-- This is an Article, Page 3 Is that a good idea? Or, should each page have a completely different title? Does it matter?
** I think for usability, the examples above are best; they give the reader context. What about url's ? Are these a good idea? /this-is-an-article-01, /this-is-an-article-02, and so on...
Does it matter? 2. I've read that maybe multi-page articles are not such a good idea -- from usability and SEO standpoints. We tend to limit our articles to about 800 words per page. So, is it better to publish 'long' articles instead of multi-page? Does it matter? I think I'm seeing a trend on content sites toward long, one-page articles. 3. Any other gotchas we should be aware of, related to SEO/ multi-page? Long post... we've gone back-and-forth on this a couple times and need to get this settled.
Thanks much! Jim0 -
What is the best tool to view your page as Googlebot?
Our site was done with asp.net and a lot of scripting. I want to see what Google can see and what it can't. What is the best tool that duplicates Googlebot? I have found several but they seem old or inaccurate.
Web Design | | EcommerceSite0 -
Landing pages vs internal pages.
Hey everyone I have run into a problem and would greatly appreciate anyone that could weigh in on it. I have a web client that went to an outside vendor for marketing. The client asked me to help them target some keywords and since I am new to the SEO world I have proceeded by researching the best keywords for the client. I found 6 that see excellent monthly searches. I then registered the .com and or .net domain names that match these words. I then started building landing pages that make reference to the keyword and then have links to his site to get more info. My customer sent the first of these sites to the marketer and he says I am doing things all wrong. He says rather then having landing pages like this I should just point the domain names at internal pages to the website. He also says that I should not have different looks for the landing pages from the main site and that I should have the full site menu on each landing page. I wanted to here what everyone here has to say about the pros and cons of the way to do this cause the guy giving the advice to me has a lower ranking site then I do and I have only started working on getting my site ranked this year. He has atleast according to him been doing this forever. Thanks, Ron
Web Design | | bsofttech0 -
Two home pages?
One of my campaigns shows duplicate page content for domain xxx and xxx/index. There is only one index (home) page, so why does it report on two?
Web Design | | Beemer0 -
Combining web pages and it's affects on SEO?
We are looking into amending a website we are working on to try and combine 2 or 3 current pages onto one page. This site is similar to an estate agents site and currently has images, map, floor plan sub pages etc. Can anyone tell me, if we were to combine these pages and include the above details on one page, how that would affect the current search engine rankings?
Web Design | | SoundinTheory0