Optimizing a large mess
-
An agency referred me to a client who wants a proposal for SEO. The website has been recently completed, but it a complete train wreck. I just ran a Moz crawl and I'm looking at 303 issues to fix out of a site with 377 pages. I just downloaded an xml sitemap, hoping to prioritize what needs to be done, however I'm not getting a clear sense of the hierarchy.
In your opinion, what is the best way to attack a project of this size? I am clear on the client's business goals, so I can work on the most crucial pages first, but I can't leave the rest of the site a mess. Should I start by gathering for links that have no user value and plan to block them with meta tags? I'm used to optimizing much smaller sites, so any advice on how to approach this proposal would be much appreciated. Thank you!
-
Sounds good! Keep us updated with how it goes.
-Andy
-
Thanks for your responses, everyone. Sorry my post was vague. I should've run that through the meat grinder a few more times before posting. The problems with the site are many and varied. Lots of duplicate content pages, duplicate titles, missing metas -- most of which are pretty minor league. There are tons of pages where the only content is nothing more than a large graphic between the header and footer, with no descriptive alt tag, and this, I believe, is causing the duplicate page issue. The pages have no h1, h2, etc. Just graphics.
There are many superfluous pages, as well. They have a restaurant page, and instead of linking out to those restaurants they link to another internal page that just includes a logo and phone number. Just to make things interesting, the site is also trying to be bilingual. They are using a WPML translation plugin and several of the pages are duplicated in French. I need to dig and see if that is contributing to the crawl errors.
It's amazing to me that this site just launched. It's one of the worst WP hack jobs I've ever seen.
Now that I've gotten in the dash and seen the menus, I have a better sense of what all these pages are and it's not quite so daunting. I just need to dig my way out, one page at a time, like you said. You guys are the best. Thanks for your help!
-
I agree with the other guys you need to give us much more information before we can be of help.
Like Andy said.
Start at the beginning, look what Moz campaign manager has told you it is a remarkable tool that really shows you a lot so dig in. Find out the answers to how to fix whenever the error our issue is.
When you get too technical SEO large sites I am talking 500,000 pages are a lot more complex but if you are able to do this on a 50 page site. Just think of it as that and keep going.
Discover the issues then go through every error in reference http://moz.com/learn/seo
I would recommend checking out distilled.net/U in addition as it can be very helpful if you are trying to troubleshoot but so can Moz
if you have a paying client and you are willing to put the work in why not pass this one off to Yoast he will give you a report telling you what is wrong with your site and how to fix it.
I know that you have enough resources through Moz though to find the information. You need to fix this.
I am interested in seeing the Moz data as well as screaming frog and feed the bot.
To help shed some light on this in addition to what you should already have.
if you want to send a private message with the current crawl data I would be very interested.
To be honest a 377 page website with 300 and some odd issues not "errors" hopefully is not the end of the world.
All the best,
Tom
-
I would start by looking at fixing glaring errors and then making sure all best practice is in place, and one of the best places to find this, is in the Google Webmaster Guidelines.
Should I start by gathering for links that have no user value and plan to block them with meta tags?
Can you explain this a little more please? Do you mean internal or external links? Or do you mean pages?
When it comes down to it, there isn't really a huge difference between smaller and larger sites, but you do have to be mindful of making sure you don't inadvertently block a path or group of pages by noindexing / nofollowing.
You will also find that different SEO's will have different ways they would approach SEO on any site. For example, I like to start any new project with an audit to see what state everything is in.
-Andy
-
I don't think anyone can answer this question unless you explain what issues are present on the site, If you can provide that information, then I or someone else may be able to assist you - or at least give you a direction.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Do i have to optimize all pages on ecommerce site which is currently 4028 give or take
Hello, do i have to optimize all pages on ecommerce site, as its a lot of pages to developed unique content for my plan at the moment is to start from top down, I have completed top home, featured products etc i have also started on individual team shops my content inst unique to each page more the same and just changing the team name and keyword i was planning on doing that in the blog area of the site and just making the top categories and sub categories. and maybe in time start on the products. I can do all categories in about two months but to complete products would take like 2 years I don't feel that is productive and most would be changed or out of stock by then please take a look at my site and tell me what you think ? sportingdesires.com Kindest Regards, Stephen Kewn
On-Page Optimization | | sportingdesires0 -
What is the most common problem to be solved when optimizing web sites?
ON page - What is the most common problem to be solved when optimizing web sites?
On-Page Optimization | | JordanBrown0 -
Impact of number of outgoing links on Page Rank of an optimized page?
What is the current best practice on preferred number of outbound links on a page you are trying to rank with: According to online resources form a pure page rank perspective a high number of outbound follow links can have a negative impact not only on child pages but also the page itself
On-Page Optimization | | thomaspro
http://pr.efactory.de/e-outbound-links.shtml Other resources suggest that particularly placing high quality outbound links on a page (nofollow) increases the trust and authority of a page Are there any other elements to keep in mind? Is the best practice to avoid any follow links on a page you want to rank well in Google for? Thanks /T0 -
What makes a "perfectly optimized page" in 2013?
Hi all, I was re-reading this blog http://moz.com/blog/perfecting-keyword-targeting-on-page-optimization and wondered how relevant you guys thought this post still was? Moz link directly to it from their 'learn' page http://moz.com/learn/seo so I'm interpreting that to mean it is still accurate and as current as it can be? What else would you add to it? Thanks,
On-Page Optimization | | James-Distinction
James0 -
Optimize URL
Hello, My website have been running over five years. I have just reviewed and seen some URLs had not good. It is http://www.vietnamvisacorp.com/faqs/who-need-visa-to-vietnam---1.html, containing characters "---1". Should I remove unnecessary characters "---"?. Thanks for any advice!
On-Page Optimization | | JohnHuynh0 -
Site Architecture: How do I best Optimize for Similar Keywords?
Hello Moz Community! I'm really struggling trying to decide on an improved site architecture. I run an online proofreading & editing website. This leaves us targeting many different niche keywords. For example: blog editing/proofreading, essay editing/proofreading, book editing/proofreading, resume... you get the point. I feel like editing & proofreading are similar enough to target on the same page(s). However, the issue is that I'm also having to deal with what I'm calling derivative keywords. For example, when I try to optimize for 'essay editing/proofreading', I also have to think about: paper editing, paper editor, paper correction, edit my paper, etc. I would have no problem optimizing the page for 'essay editing' in the title, H1, etc. and then targeting these words as secondary keywords within the body text, etc., however, I keep thinking 'a large slice of a small pie is better than a small slice of a big one.' You see, the keyword 'essay correction' has only about one-third the monthly searches as 'essay editing', but it is 50% less competitive. The same is loosely true for the rest of the 'derivative' keywords. I'd have no problem building specific pages for these derivative keyword groups, however, I'm very concerned how this would effect my site from a user experience perspective. I don't want to have a master "services" page with links to book editing, resume editing, essay editing, etc. and then also show paper editing, essay correction, etc. To me, this would be confusing... "What's the difference between essay editing and paper editing?". Any guidance is much appreciated. This has got my head spinning! Thanks!
On-Page Optimization | | TBiz0 -
Optimizing your photo gallery for Pinterest
We are in the middle of a redesign and the VP wants to get more aggressive with Pinterest. We currently use Slideshow Pro for our photo albums. I have a feeling that we are going to have trouble pulling the images from this self-hosted script. Before we get further in our design process, I was wondering what photo services/scripts others use that seem to pull into Pinterest without problems or are you doing a custom album generator? Thanks!
On-Page Optimization | | Touchmark0 -
Optimization of home page
Hi there I have an issue which, despite searching hard, I simply cannot find the right solution for. We have an index page that used to rank pretty well for a main industry keyword. However following a revamp of the site last year the kw slipped and no longer brings in decent traffic levels. The problem seems to be that the old static site had a sprinkling of variable anchor text links that brought value to the home page. Instead of the main anchor being "home" we would revert to "main keyword" and variations across the site sometimes in t he content but mainly on the nav bars. However the new CMS design structure restricts us considerably with anchor distribution and so instead we opted for the site logo on the masthead to have an ALT tag for "main keyword" but so as not to game google too much we added .."home" to the tag. Probably pointless but we figured it could do no harm. This ALT text is site wide Problem now is that we have lost the spread of internal nav bar anchors and variety etc. We have slipped in the serps for "main keyword" and I cant help thinking we are not maximising the anchors as we should. So what Im coming to is this.... How can we tell if Google is picking up the ALT tage anchor as the main anchor to rank the site at the expense of all internal text anchors. Despite retaining lots of embedded anchors - according to the Moz metrics these are not being picked up because OSE suggests the ALT tag anchor is taking precedence. The serps probably support this view as well. Should we: a) Vary the masthead ALT if there is no way of avoiding this being the most important link / anchor on the page b) Remove the ALT anchor and instead opt for content links high on the page (we do have nav bar links saying "Home" site wide as well which may overrid the embedded links?) c) Leave the ALT alone and still push for content anchors as described in b) What is the best way to handle this..? Best wishes and thanks Morch
On-Page Optimization | | Morch0