Combining Law websites to boost local results?
-
So we currently have 2 separate websites for the 2 areas of law we practice, Criminal Defense and Family. Currently our Criminal Defense website is the one affiliated with our google+ page and so it ranks well in local results, where as our Family website does not rank at all locally.
Would it be best for our Family practice if we merged it with our Criminal site? We all work out of the same office and share address and phone number, so I don't believe we can associate the Family website with a google+ page, but I am wondering if each site would show up in Local results for their individual keywords if the criminal site and law site were both subdomains of a main Firm website.
-
You have answered many questions I wasn't even sure I was asking! Thank you for being clear and detailed, so many great people at Moz!
-
Hey There,
I agree with Hutch and Linda regarding the single site approach typically being more powerful than a multi-site approach. What shows up in the local search results is completely dependent on your Google+ Local page, and as your practice is only allowed 1 Google+ Local page (you can't have multiple listings covering multiple specialties) whatever is on that page is what will appear in the local results.
Now, that being said, something for you to consider is the multi-practitioner listing scenario. If there is more than one lawyer at the firm, you are allowed to have a Google+ Local page for each practitioner as well as the one for the practice. Google's most recent guideline update specifies that you must split up the categories between practitioners/practice. This has long been considered a best practice, but now it is a guideline. Without knowing the details of your specific scenario, I can only estimate how you would re-fashion the business to fit this marketing approach, but it would probably look something like this:
-
You consolidate your sites into a single site, with your brand being the unifying factor rather than your specialties being a cause for division.
-
You create a unique page on the website for each partner in the practice, including a unique phone number for each of the lawyers at which he/she is directly contactable.
-
You research Google's categories (the Moz Local category tool is great for this: https://moz.com/local/categories) and discover if there is an authentic way to divvy up categories like Family Law Attorney, Criminal Justice Attorney, etc between the partners and the practice. Remember - they cannot share categories.
-
You link the practice listing to the homepage and link the partners to their own landing pages on the site
In this way, you might be able to represent your practice, your partners and some of the specialties each of the lawyers has with Google+ Local pages and increase your chances of this business appearing in the local results for more than one category of terms.
*Now, all this being said, before you take such a step, you should spend some time researching two things:
-
Historic problems that have occurred over the years surrounding multi-practitioner listings. Linda Buquet's Local Search Forum would be a good place to look this up, as she has covered this topic many times and with great insight. Search other sites as well to get a sense of the potential issues with the multi-practitioner listing scenario.
-
Study Google's most recent guideline iteration in minute detail (https://support.google.com/business/answer/3038177?hl=en). I recommend checking out Mike Blumenthal's 2-part post comparing the older iteration to the latest one: http://blumenthals.com/blog/2014/12/05/google-my-business-guidelines-a-detailed-comparison-new-old/
This will be a big decision to make, involving a change in direction for how you think about marketing your business, and should only be undertaken if it truly feels like the right fit for your practice. It may or may not be. But I hope these ideas are helpful to consider in weighing your options!
-
-
Follow up question, is there a way to have the subsite show up in the local result? Or will I only be able to have a single url associated with the local result? for example could www.wearelawyers.com/family show up in the local result for family law web searches and www.wearelawyers.com/defense show up for criminal defense searches?
-
Yes I agree with Hutch.
Many companies feel like "divide and conquer" is the name of the game - but with Google Local "united we stand" typically works better. Then you are driving all your energy into one strong site instead of fracturing it. Many attorneys have a single site with multiple practice areas.
You are right, you can't have a separate G+ L page for the other practice area, but as long as the home page is optimized for both practice areas and you have the right categories you should be good.
-
Combining them will help your Family Law side. You can then create distinct landing pages for each type of law the firm practices instead of just having a generic home page for both, that way you can give a better user experience and better target specific keywords which I will assume are pretty different from the two law types.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
GMB page for law not ranking but individual attorneys' names are
I'm kind of a newbie to everything marketing. I run the marketing for a small law firm. When I google certain keywords, the law firm's GMB page doesn't show up in the local pack or rankings. What shows up instead are the individual GMB pages under the lawyers' names even though we don't do anything to maintain those pages. Their individual pages don't have content or nearly as many reviews. I maintain the firm's GMB page by posting content and that's also where the bulk of our reviews go. Why would pages that aren't maintained show up in the local pack while the page that I keep a close eye on doesn't show up?
Local Listings | | elisa175910 -
Local SEO for E-commerce
Hi there I am running an ECommerce site that supplies products globally! We have 2 administrative offices - the UK and Ireland. When setting Google my business, do you suggest setting 2 listings - one for the UK and one for Ireland? Both listings will link to the same E-Commerce homepage but with different phone numbers. Please give me advice=)
Local Listings | | Insightful_Media0 -
How to fix my local buisness listing
Ive checked with the Moz Local and put my company name in. theres two listings showing up Ones verified but is in a slightly wrong format - it says Street Name, Unit Number, Town, Post Code The other ones not verified but correct - its unit number, street name town, post code Will I need to edit the verified one to make it the correct format like it is on companies house and with Royal Mail? Or can I use the none verified version?
Local Listings | | paulfoz16091 -
Moz Local and NAP
Hi, I go to moz local and i get 4 listings and is shows 2 as verified: Verified
Local Listings | | dansum
Northumberland Ave, Bury Saint Edmunds, Verified
Northumberland Avenue, Bury St Edmunds, Both of them tell me I have 13% inconsistency and the two words that are underlined in red as inconsistent are:
Ave, Saint My google places has it listed as:
Northumberland Ave
Bury St Edmunds My website and 4 of the 11 listings have it as:
Northumberland Avenue, Bury St. Edmunds The other 7 listings have it as:
Northumberland Avenue, Bury St. Edmunds Is this a problem do you think these very slight inconsistencies matter? If so should they all match what google places says the address is (I did try changing this from Ave to Avenue on google places but it wouldn't change)?1 -
Menu Headings Local Search
Will my pages rank better in local city search if i have menus like "seo tips city" , "city google maps", "city electricians best online directories", . So a Google searcher in x city looking for seo services for his electrician business types in G box "city electricians best online directories" would having this term in the menu help or is it waste of time to have it in menu? thanks
Local Listings | | nickowain0 -
Local Rankings for Second Business Location in the SAME City
I have an issue regarding local rankings for multiple locations within the SAME city, and I'm hoping to start a productive discussion about the various options for helping a second location gain visibility in the local pack. Here's the context…My business is an electronic cigarette shop in New Orleans, called Crescent City Vape. Our first location (Uptown) opened up a year ago and ranks very well in the local-pack as well as organic results for target keywords, as well as brand terms. Our second location opened up 2 months ago, also in New Orleans (Lower Garden District), about 3 miles away from the first shop. This shop, however, is not visible locally or organically, unless we get extremely specific with a branded search query like "Crescent City Vape Lower Garden District" or "Crescent City Vape St. Charles Ave." It does not rank locally for "Crescent City Vape" or "Crescent City Vape New Orleans" We have one website: crescentcityvape.com -- and both shops have a location landing page on the main site: crescentcityvape.com/uptown
Local Listings | | djreich
crescentcityvape.com/lower-garden However, when we launched our local SEO work for the first shop, we used the homepage as the URL in Google+ Local, as well as all of our citations. When we launched the second shop, we used the location landing page as the URL for G+ and all of our citations. We also added a location modifier to the business name on G+ Local: Crescent City Vape - Lower Garden District Both shops have 5+ reviews on Google+ Local, and both shops have citation profiles that are better than any other competitor. I'm confident that the local SEO basics are covered…and this is evident from the solid local and organic rankings for the original shop. My concern isn't that the second shop is ranking worse than the first. I expected this. But I am very concerned that the second shop doesn't even rank for a branded search like "Crescent City Vape." You have to get unrealistically specific with local descriptors to see the G+ local result for the second shop. e.g. "Crescent City Vape Lower Garden District". Here are some of the options and questions I've been pondering. Would love anyone's thoughts on what's worth trying and what might be too risky…since obviously I do not want to sacrifice rankings for the original shop. Changing the G+ URL of the second shop to the homepage (rather than that local landing page). In this case, G+ pages for both locations would link to the homepage. Then updating Moz Local and other citations accordingly with the URL as the homepage. My concern is that this will end up hurting rankings for the original shop more than helping rankings for the second shop. Removing the location modifier from the second shop's Google+ Local business name. When you google "Starbucks" or "McDonalds" you get a local-pack that usually includes 3 of their locations in the pack, and none have location modifiers. I'm wondering if the modifier is sending the wrong signal, because right now, when you Google "Crescent City Vape" only the original location shows up with a local result. Changing the modifier for the second shop's Google+ Local business name to something like "Crescent City Vape: New Orleans E-Cigs". Some of our competitors have added keywords to their G+ names and it's been effective for them. I know this is not aligned with Google guidelines, and may be a risky play. We don't have anything to lose with the second location if we try this…However, is there any chance this would negatively affect our original shop's rankings (since it's the same domain)? If we went in this direction, should I update our citations accordingly? And build new ones with this new "name"? Does page authority of the business URL have an impact on G+ Local rankings? i.e. would building quality links to the local landing page have much of an impact? i.e. is that a productive use of time and resources, as opposed to promoting the homepage and other more important landing pages? Appreciate your thoughts and feedback! Hopefully this discussion will be helpful for other businesses trying to rank for more than one location in the same city. Thanks!0 -
Google Local: When moving locations, is a new website/content needed?
I've effectively moved companies before, but I've heard that ranking locally in a competitive market after an address move it is necessary to redesign the entire website/content/domain as Google associates the old website/content/domain with the old location. Is this true? Does anyone have any direct experience with this? NOTE- I have updated citations across the internet and have regular social signals going to the new location, and this has been the case for almost 6 months now.
Local Listings | | mgordon0 -
Moz Local for the UK?
Hell Moz family, My business recently bought 10 locations from a competitor, but I am having real issues claiming these new business listings from Google. I have tried claiming existing listings and starting new ones, but it seems Google have the old business as the registered owner and therefore display their icons in Google Maps and local SERPS??!!! Will Moz Local we rolling out in the UK as well as the US? It would be a great help to manage in one place. Regards Ben
Local Listings | | Bendall0